- Peter Lombard (Archbishop of Armagh)
Peter Lombard (b. at
Waterford ,Ireland about 1555; d. atRome 1625) was a Roman Catholic archbishop of Armagh during theCounter Reformation .Early life
Lombard belonged to a respectable and wealthy family. More than one of his relatives filled the position of mayor of Waterford, and others gained eminence in
literature , among the latter being the famousFranciscan ,Luke Wadding . After receiving his early education at Waterford, young Lombard was sent toWestminster School , whence, after some years, he went toOxford . At Westminster School one of his professors was the historianWilliam Camden , and pupil and master seem to have got on well together.Camden's learning was great and Lombard was studious and clever and earned the praises of his master for his gentleness and docility. Camden also takes credit for having made his pupil a good Anglican. But the change, if it occurred at all, did not last, and Lombard, after leaving Oxford, went to Louvain, passed through his philosophic and theological classes with great distinction, graduated as
Doctor of Divinity , and was ordainedpriest . Appointed professor of theology at Leuven University he soon attracted notice by the extent of his learning.Archbishop of Armagh
In 1594 he was made provost of the
cathedral atCambrai . When he went to Rome, a few years later,Clement VIII thought so highly of his learning andpiety that he appointed him, in 1601,Archbishop ofArmagh . He also appointed him his domesticprelate , and thus secured him an income, which in the condition of Ireland at the time, there was no hope of getting from Armagh. Henceforth till his death Lombard lived at Rome.He was for a time president of the
Congregatio de Auxiliis charged with the duty of pronouncing on Molina's work and settling the controversy onpredestination and grace which followed its publication. [Schuceman, "Controversiarum de divinae gratiae liberique arbitrii concordia initia et progressos", Freiburg, 1881] Lombard was active and zealous in providing for the wants of the exiledEarl of Tyrone andEarl of Tyrconnel , and was among those who publicly welcomed them to Rome.He was not however able to go to Ireland, for the
penal laws were in force, and to set foot in Ireland would be to invite the fate ofConor O'Devanny and others.James I of England personally disliked him, and publicly attacked him in the English Parliament. Armagh was thus left without a Roman Catholic archbishop for nearly a quarter of a century.There was however an administrator,
David Rothe . He had for a time acted at Borne as Lombard's secretary and the primate appointed him Vicar-General of Armagh. Nor did Rothe cease to act in this capacity even after 1618, when he was madeBishop of Ossory .Roman Catholics in the North complained of being left so long without an archbishop. In any case they disliked being ruled by a Munsterman, still more being ruled by one unwilling to face the dangers of his position. At Rome Lombard wrote "De Regno Hiberniae sanctorum insula commentarius". [Louvain 1632: re-edited, Dublin, 1868 with prefatory memoir, by
Cardinal Moran ] This work gave such offence toCharles I of England that he gave special directions to his Irish viceroy, Strafford, to have it suppressed.Lombard also wrote a little work on the administration of the
Sacrament of Penance , and in 1604 a yet unedited work, addressed to James I, in favour of religious liberty for the Irish. [Bellesheim, "Gesch de Kath. Kirche in Irland", II (Mainz, 1890), 323-25, and passim]References
Further reading
*Stuart, Historical Memoirs of Armagh, ed. by Coleman (Dublin, 1900)
*Meehan, Earls of Tyrone and Tyrconnell (Dublin. 1886)
*Moran, Spicilegium Ossoriense (Dublin, 1874-84)
*Renehan, Irish Archbishops Dublin, 1861)External links
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09336a.htm Source]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.