- Environmental stress cracking
Environmental Stress Cracking (ESC) is one of the most common causes of unexpected
brittle failure ofthermoplastic (especially amorphous)polymer s known at present. Environmental stress cracking may account for around 15-30% of allplastic component failures in service.H. F. Mark. Encyclopedia of Polymers Science and Technology – 3rd Ed. Vol 12. John Miley & Sons Inc. 2004]ESC and
polymer resistance to ESC (ESCR) have been studied for several decades.Xiangyang Li. Environmental Stress Cracking Resistance of a New Copolymer of Bisphenol-A. Polymer Degradation and Stability. Volume 90, Issue 1, October 2005, Pages 44-52 ] Research shows that the exposure ofpolymer s to liquidchemical s tends to accelerate thecrazing process, initiating crazes at stresses that are much lower than the stress causingcrazing in air.J. C. Arnold. The Effect of Diffusion on Environmental Stress Crack Initiation in PMMA. Journal of Materials Science 33 (1998) p 5193 – 5204] The action of either a tensile stress or acorrosive liquid alone would not be enough to cause failure, but in ESC the initiation and growth of a crack is caused by the combined action of the stress and acorrosive environmental liquid.It is somewhat different from
polymer degradation in that stress cracking does not breakpolymer bonds. Instead, it breaks the secondary linkages betweenpolymer s. These are broken when the mechanical stresses cause minute cracks in thepolymer and they propagate rapidly under the harsh environmental conditions. [Michigan University – College of Engineering, [http://www.engin.umich.edu/labs/EAST/me589/gallery/bioplastics_f01/599Website/plastics_properties.htm Properties of Plastics] . Accessed 22 April 2008.] It has also been seen that catastrophic failure under stress can occur due to the attack of areagent that would not attack thepolymer in an unstressed state.Metallurgists typically use the term
Stress corrosion cracking orEnvironmental stress fracture to describe this type of failure in metals.Predicting ESC
Although the phenomenon of ESC has been known for a number of decades, research has not yet enabled prediction of this type of failure for all environments and for every type of
polymer . Some scenarios are well known, documented or are able to be predicted, but there is no complete reference for all combinations of stress,polymer and environment. The rate of ESC is dependent on many factors including thepolymer ’s chemical makeup, bonding,crystallinity , surface roughness,molecular weight andresidual stress . It also depends on the liquidreagent 's chemical nature and concentration, thetemperature of the system and thestrain rate .Residual stress andresidual strain are especially important because they can drivecrack growth . They frequently arise from poorinjection moulding , especially where cold tools are used in the process.Polycarbonate is a particular problem, and tool temperatures in excess of 80 C must be used to lower residual stresses and strains. Molecular weight influences thetensile strength of the polymer, the lower the molecular weight, the lower the strength. So lower grades of a polymer will be more sensitive to organic fluids tha higher mass grades.Mechanisms of ESC
There are a number of opinions on how certain
reagents act onpolymer s under stress. Because ESC is often seen inamorphous polymer s rather than in semicrystallinepolymer s, theories regarding the mechanism of ESC often revolve around liquid interactions with theamorphous regions ofpolymer s. One such theory is that the liquid can diffuse into thepolymer , causing swelling which increases thepolymer ’s chain mobility. The result is a decrease in the yield stress andglass transition temperature (Tg), as well as a plasticisation of the material which leads tocrazing at lower stresses and strains. A second view is that the liquid can reduce the energy required to create new surfaces in thepolymer bywetting thepolymer ’s surface and hence aid the formation of voids, which is thought to be very important in the early stages of craze formation.There is an array of experimentally derived evidence to support the above theories:
* Once acraze is formed in apolymer this creates an easydiffusion path so that the environmental attack can continue and thecrazing process can accelerate.
*Chemical compatibility between the environment and thepolymer govern the amount in which the environment can swell and plasticise thepolymer .
* The effects of ESC are reduced when crack growth rate is high. This is primarily due to the inability of the liquid to keep up with the growth of the crack.Measuring ESC
A number of different methods are used to evaluate a
polymer ’s resistance to environmental stress cracking. A common method in thepolymer industry is use of theBergen jig , which subjects the sample to variable strain during a single test. The results of this test indicate the critical strain to cracking, using only one sample. Another widely used test is theBell Telephone test where bent strips are exposed to fluids of interest under controlled conditions.Examples
An obvious example of the need to resist ESC in everyday life is the
automotive industry , in which a number of differentpolymer s are subjected to a number of fluids. Some of thechemical s involved in these interactions include petrol, brake fluid and windscreen cleaning solution.Plasticiser s leaching from PVC can also cause ESC over an extended period of time, for example.One of the first examples of the problem concerned ESC ofLDPE . The material was initially used in insulating electric cables, and cracking occurred due to the interaction of the insulation with oils. The solution to the problem lay in increasing themolecular weight of the polymer. A test of exposure to a strongdetergent such asIgepal was developed to give a warning of ESC.AN piano key
A more specific example comes in the form of a piano key made from injection moulded styrene acrylonitrile (SAN). The key has a hook end which connects it to a metal spring, which causes the key to spring back into position after being struck. During assembly of the piano an
adhesive was used, and excessadhesive which had spilled onto areas where it was not required was removed using a ketonesolvent . Some vapour from thissolvent condensed on the internal surface of the piano keys. Some time after this cleaning fracture occurred at the junction where the hook end meets the spring.Ezrin, M & Lavigne, G. Unexpected and Unusual Failures of Polymeric Materials. Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 14, Pages 1153-1165, January 2007]To determine the cause of the fracture, the SAN piano key was heated above its
glass transition temperature for a short time. If there is residual stress within thepolymer , the piece will shrink when held at such a temperature. Results showed that there was significant shrinkage, particularly at the hook end-spring junction. This indicates stress concentration, possibly the combination of residual stress from forming and the action of the spring. It was concluded that although there was residual stress, the fracture was due to a combination of the tensile stress from the spring action and the presence of the ketone solvent.ee also
*
Crazing
*Environmental stress fracture
*Forensic engineering
*Forensic polymer engineering
*Fracture Mechanics
*Polymer degradation
*Stress corrosion cracking
*Structural failure Bibliography
* Ezrin, Meyer, "Plastics Failure Guide: Cause and Prevention", Hanser-SPE (1996).
* Wright, David C., "Environmental Stress Cracking of Plastics" RAPRA (2001).
* Lewis, Peter Rhys, Reynolds, K and Gagg, C, "Forensic Materials Engineering: Case studies", CRC Press (2004)References
External links
* [http://materials.open.ac.uk/mem/index.htm Museum of failed products]
* [http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30190/description#description The journal Engineering Failure Analysis]
* [http://www.forensic-courses.com/wordpress/?p=42; Forensic science and engineering]
* [http://www.open2.net/forensicengineering/modern_methods.html Analytical tools]
* [http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/file.php/2980/formats/print.htm New course]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.