The Strange Death of Tory England

Infobox Book |
name = The Strange Death of Tory England
title_orig =
translator =


image caption =
author = Geoffrey Wheatcroft
illustrator =
cover_artist =
country = United Kingdom
language = English
series =
genre = Political commentary
publisher = Allen Lane, London
release_date = 31 Mar 2005
media_type = Print (Hardback & Paperback)
pages = 336
isbn = 978-0713998016
preceded_by = The Controversy of Zion (1996)
followed_by =

"The Strange Death of Tory England" is a book of political commentary by the journalist Geoffrey Wheatcroft, published in 2005.

Outline

In the run-up to the United Kingdom general election of 2005, Wheatcroft looks at the journey of the British Conservative Party from being the country's most successful political party of the 20th century into the wilderness of a long period in opposition, by way of Margaret Thatcher's heyday and fall from power and the quite different style of John Major. [http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,1455059,00.html A nation of Sun readers : Geoffrey Wheatcroft traces the fall of the Conservative party in The Strange Death of Tory England] , book review from "The Guardian" online at books.guardian.co.uk (accessed 6 March 2008)]

ummary

The book begins with the Conservative leadership contest of 1963, following the resignation of Harold Macmillan, which turned into a fight between Iain Macleod, the modernizing chairman of the party, and the Earl of Home, the aristocratic dark horse. Home won, disclaimed his peerage, became Sir Alec Douglas-Home, and was elected to the House of Commons at a hastily-arranged by-election. Wheatcroft depicts this contest as a clash between supporters of "the virtues of an hereditary governing class" and those of "worth proved by ability".Charlish, Nicky, [http://www.culturewars.org.uk/2005-01/wheatcroft.htm The Strange Death of Tory England] online at culturewars.org.uk (accessed 6 March 2008)]

Next comes a history of the Tory party from its 17th-century beginnings at the time of the Restoration, followed by an account of the Douglas-Home, Harold Wilson and Edward Heath years and Britain's trials and tribulations of the 1970s, culminating in the election of Margaret Thatcher's first government in 1979.

Within a few years, while holding onto power, the Conservative Party began to split and to fall apart. Wheatcroft seeks to explain this decline, offering factors long discussed by commentators: internal splits over Britain's place in Europe, political sleaze and a fundamental lack of ideology, and a growing desire in the country for change after eighteen years of Conservative rule, coinciding with Tony Blair's "brilliant cynical sincerity".

The future

Wheatcroft finally proposes some cures for the party's ills. He considers that the UK lacks a mainstream party of the right which puts the country's own national interest first. He questions the absence of the mavericks the Tory party used to have, giving it more life and soul, noting the example of Enoch Powell's opposition to capital punishment. And he examines the rise of the American Neocons, suggesting that the British Conservatives could learn both from them and from the "Lion and Unicorn" conservatism of the socialist George Orwell.

He concludes: [ [http://tobedwithatrollope.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-strange-death-of-tory-england-by-geoffrey-wheatcroft/ The Strange Death of Tory England] online at wordpress.com (accessed 9 March 2008)] cquote|Conservatives have sat around for some years saying to themselves that they will get back one day, but there is no necessary reason why this should be so. No law of history says that any political party has to survive. In 1906, the Liberals won the greatest of landslide electionsAt the UK general election of 1906, of 670 seats in the House of Commons, the Liberals won 399, the Conservatives 134 and their Liberal Unionist allies 23, the Irish Parliamentary Party 82, the Labour Representation Committee 29, and others 4.] and within ten years they had lost office as a party, never to hold power again. Whether the Tories are destined to follow them may depend on humility and capacity to learn from error.

Title

The book appears to draw its title from George Dangerfield's "The Strange Death of Liberal England" (1935) which sought to explain the decline of the British Liberal Party after 1910. It should also be noted that "The Strange Death of Tory England" had previously been used as a title by Anne Applebaum for an article published in June 2001. [ [http://www.slate.com/id/109898 The Strange Death of Tory England] by Anne Applebaum dated June 8, 2001, online at slate.com (accessed 6 March 2008)]

Cover

The pictorial dust cover of the book's first edition shows the last Conservative prime minister, John Major, dressed as a batsman playing cricket, at the moment of being "clean bowled" (his wicket demolished). This alludes to Major's well-known love of cricket and to the result of the United Kingdom general election of 1997, which was won in a landslide by the Labour Party with 418 seats in the House of Commons, its highest ever total, while the Conservatives took only 165, their worst performance since the General Election of 1906. In 1997, the Conservatives did not win a single seat in Scotland or in Wales. Little changed at the 2001 General Election, with Labour taking 413 seats, the Conservatives 166, the Liberal Democrats 52, and others 28.

Reviews

The historian Sir Raymond Carr, writing in "The Spectator", said: [ [http://www.lrbshop.co.uk/strange-death-of-tory-england_1023.html The Strange Death of Tory England] online at lrbshop.co.uk (accessed 6 March 2008)] cquote|Journalists of Wheatcroft’s talents make excellent contemporary historians... He has that rarest of gifts, that of compressing complex issues into a few sharp sentences... stunning.

Notes