- Ryukyuan missions to Edo
Over the course of Japan's
Edo period , theOkinawa n Kingdom of Ryūkyū sent eighteen [Nineteen, if the 1609-1611 journey of King Shō Nei and his advisors to Sunpu as prisoners of war following the 1609 invasion of Ryukyu is counted.] nihongo|missions to Edo|琉球江戸上り|ryūkyū edo nobori|extra="lit. 'the going up of Ryūkyū to Edo', the capital of Tokugawa Japan. The Kingdom became a vassal to the Japanese feudal domain ("han") of Satsuma following Satsuma's1609 invasion of Ryūkyū , and as such were expected to paytribute to the shogunate; the missions also served as a great source of prestige for Satsuma, the only "han" to claim any foreign polity, let alone a kingdom, as its vassal.Walker, Brett L. [https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/1811/609/1/V10N2Walker.pdf "Foreign Affairs and Frontiers in Early Modern Japan: A Historiographical Essay,"] "Early Modern Japan." Fall, 2002, pp. 50-51.]Evolving relationships
Royal princes or top-ranking officials in the royal government served as chief envoys, and were accompanied by merchants, craftsmen, scholars, and other government officials as they journeyed first by sea to the "
Ryūkyū-kan " (琉球館) in Kagoshima, an institution which served a role similar to a consulate for the Ryūkyū Kingdom, and then on by land to Edo. [Kerr, George H. (2000). [http://books.google.com/books?id=vaAKJQyzpLkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA168,M1 "Okinawa: The History of an Island People," p, 168.] ] Missions traveled as a part of Satsuma's regular missions to Edo under the "sankin kōtai " system, the Ryūkyūan envoys and their entourage considerably outnumbered by the Japanese envoys and entourage from Satsuma, and were housed in the Shimazu clan residences during their time in Edo [Toby, Ronald. "State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan". Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1984. p188.] . Even so, they were still regarded as diplomatic missions from a foreign country. This was reflected in the envoys' reception in Edo, in the associated rituals and meetings [Toby. p46.] . Ryūkyū was, however, regarded as being quite low in the hierarchy of foreign countries in the shogunate's world view. While the Ryūkyūn embassies paralleled in many ways those sent by Joseon Dynasty Korea in the same period, various aspects of the Ryūkyūan envoys' reception reflected their lower status in the shogunate's view. Since envoys from both Korea and Ryūkyū were not equals with the shogun, intermediaries represented the shogunate in meetings with the envoys; while Korean envoys met with members of various high-ranking families (the "kōke "), envoys from Ryūkyū were met by a lower-ranking master of ceremonies, the "sōshaban"Toby. p186.] .The nature and composition of these Ryūkyūan missions to Edo evolved over the course of time, but their essential character mirrored the Ryūkyūan embassies to the Qing court in Beijing. The best extant description of these embassies is found in "Tsūkō ichiran", compiled by
Hayashi Akira in 1853. [Smits, [http://books.google.com/books?id=37LxVhgIbJkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&sig=ACfU3U3F53IvQ-bK0-0-tFMd8yEEomE9EQ&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=4_1#PPA37,M1 p. 37.] ] Japanese modifications to the well-established concepts and patterns of foreign relations of Imperial China developed as conditions changed.Every mission was conducted either to congratulate a new shogun on his succession or in connection with the accession of a new king of Ryūkyū. [Smits, Gregory. (1999). [http://books.google.com/books?id=37LxVhgIbJkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&sig=ACfU3U3F53IvQ-bK0-0-tFMd8yEEomE9EQ&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=4_1#PPA27,M1 "Visions of Ryūkyū: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics," p. 27.] ] In the latter case, approval and formal recognition of the new king would be formally requested of both the
Shimazu clan lords of Satsuma and of the shogunate, but the request was essentially simply a matter of ritual, and none were ever denied.Extensive efforts were made to stress the foreignness of the costume, language, customs and art of the Ryūkyū Kingdom, emphasizing the glory and power of the Shimazu clan of the Satsuma Domain, the only
daimyo (feudal lords) in Japan to enjoy the fealty of a foreign kingdom. The missions served a similar function for the shogunate at times, helping to create the image that the shogun's power and influence extended overseas. The third Tokugawa shogun,Tokugawa Iemitsu , called for an embassy to be sent from Ryūkyū in 1634, as his predecessorTokugawa Hidetada had done with a Korean embassy in 1617, in order to provide a show for the Imperial court and daimyō of the shogun's power [Toby. p72.] .Cultural impacts
Numerous woodblock prints and paintings of the exotic and brightly colored costumes and banners of the Ryūkyū delegation were produced, and bought and sold by commoners and samurai alike. [Kerr, p. 247.]
Missions chronology
1609-1611
The Kingdom of Ryūkyū was invaded by forces from the Satsuma Domain in the 12th year of "Keichō" (1609). [Titsingh, Issac. (1834).
Nihon Ōdai Ichiran [http://books.google.com/books?id=18oNAAAAIAAJ&pg=PP9&dq=nipon+o+dai+itsi+ran#PRA1-PA409,M1 ("Annales des empereurs du japon"), p. 409.] ] KingShō Nei and a number of royal advisors and government officials were taken back to Kagoshima and then toSunpu , where they met with retiredshogun Tokugawa Ieyasu . The delegation continued north toEdo for a formal audience in the shogunal court ofTokugawa Hidetada . Upon returning to Kagoshima, the king and officials were required to sign oaths of loyalty to Satsuma. [Smits, [http://books.google.com/books?id=37LxVhgIbJkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&sig=ACfU3U3F53IvQ-bK0-0-tFMd8yEEomE9EQ&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=4_1#PPA16,M1 p. 16.] ] Secondary sources, i.e. history books, often count this as the first tribute mission.1629
No formal tribute/diplomatic mission was sent in this year, but three high-ranking officials from the Ryūkyū government journeyed to Edo to perform before Shogun
Tokugawa Iemitsu [Kerr, p. 224.] .1649
The 1649 mission was headed by Prince Gushikawa Chōei. [Kerr, [http://books.google.com/books?id=vaAKJQyzpLkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA191,M1 p. 191.] ] . Chōei was the seventh son of
Shō Kyū , son of KingShō Gen (r. 1556-1572).1682
Prince Nago led a mission in 1682 to congratulate Shogun
Tokugawa Tsunayoshi on his succession. He alone of the members of the mission was granted an audience with the shogun; by contrast, the Korean representatives received several months later included three ambassadors and seven or so aides and pages. This is but one of many differences seen in the reception of Korean and Ryūkyūan embassies, reflections of the different levels of status the two countries held in the Japanese view. The reception for Prince Nago was attended by all daimyo below the fourth court rank; a great number of samurai lords, but of relatively low rank. In presenting formal greetings on behalf of KingShō Tei , he bowed nine times "on the fourth mat below the Lower State[and] withdrew" and then presented obeisances on his own behalf from the veranda. This, too, reflects a lower status than the Korean ambassadors, who made only four and a half bows from the second mat below the Middle Stage [Toby. p185.] . HistorianRonald Toby , by way of contrasting the treatment of the two embassies, also adds that the Ryūkyūans were offered no grand banquet as the Koreans did, nor were they bade farewell by the "rōjū " (Council of Elders; chief shogunal advisors) when they left Edo for home, as the Korean envoys did [Toby. p188-9.] .1710
Mission to Edo included 168 from Ryūkyū, far exceeding the size of any previous mission. [National Archives of Japan: [http://jpimg.digital.archives.go.jp/kouseisai/category/emaki/ryukyutyuzan_e.html "Ryūkyū Chuzano ryoshisha tojogyoretsu," Ryūkyū emissary, 1710.] ] This is a reflection in large part of the relative prosperity of the kingdom under the guidance of royal advisor
Sai On .1714
The largest mission in the history of the practice journeys to Edo, led by Princes Yonagusuku and Kin.
Tei Junsoku , Confucian scholar and influential educational reformer, accompanied the mission as the Chief of Correspondence. [Smits, [http://books.google.com/books?id=37LxVhgIbJkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&sig=ACfU3U3F53IvQ-bK0-0-tFMd8yEEomE9EQ&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=4_1#PPA46,M1 p. 47.] ] Tei met with Japanese Confucian scholarsArai Hakuseki ,Ogyū Sorai , andDazai Shundai . Hakuseki would later write a history of the Ryūkyū Islands, entitled nihongo|"History of the Southern Islands"|南島史|Nantō-shi |, based on discussions with Tei Junsoku and others during this envoy mission; Shundai likewise included passages about the Ryūkyūs in his nihongo|"Economic Record"|経済録|Keizai roku |.Kerr, [http://books.google.com/books?id=vaAKJQyzpLkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA201,M1 pp. 201] -202.]Discussions between the Ryūkyūan emissaries and their Japanese counterparts concerned in part problems faced by the Ryūkyū Kingdom. Economic policies put into place in the ensuing years were patterned after recent Japanese policies under Shogun
Tokugawa Tsunayoshi . The influence of this 1714 mission was particularly strong in drawing the attention of the shogunate to the affairs of the Ryūkyū Kingdom.1748-1752
An embassy from the Ryūkyū Islands arrived in Japan in the 1st year of "Kan'en" (1648), and another embassy arrived in the 2nd year of "Hōreki" (1752). [Titsingh, [http://books.google.com/books?id=18oNAAAAIAAJ&pg=PP9&dq=nipon+o+dai+itsi+ran#PRA1-PA418,M1 p. 418.] ]
1764
The king of the Ryūkyū Islands sent an ambassador to the court of
Empress Go-Sakuramachi in the 1st year of "Meiwa" (1764). [Titsingh, [http://books.google.com/books?id=18oNAAAAIAAJ&pg=PP9&dq=nipon+o+dai+itsi+ran#PRA1-PA419,M1 p. 419.] ]Missions Table
Notes
References
* Kerr, George H. and Mitsugu Sakihara. (2000). [http://books.google.com/books?id=vaAKJQyzpLkC&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 "Okinawa, the History of an Island People."] Tokyo:
Tuttle Publishing . 10-ISBN 0-804-82087-2; 13-ISBN 978-0-804-82087-5
* Smits, Gregory. (1999). [http://books.google.com/books?id=37LxVhgIbJkC&dq=Okinawa:+The+History+of+an+Island+People&client=firefox-a&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 "Visions of Ryukyu: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics,"] Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press . 10-ISBN 0-824-82037-1; 13-ISBN 978-0-824-82037-4
* Titsingh, Isaac, ed. (1834). [Siyun-sai Rin-siyo/Hayashi Gahō , 1652] , "Nipon o daï itsi ran "; ou, [http://books.google.com/books?id=18oNAAAAIAAJ&dq=nipon+o+dai+itsi+ran "Annales des empereurs du japon."] Paris: Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland.
* Toby, Ronald P. (1991). [http://books.google.com/books?id=2hK7tczn2QoC&pg=PP1&dq=State+and+Diplomacy+in+Early+Modern+Japan&client=firefox-a&sig=ACfU3U2LUEdVPEFLwBwAI5-9f4HrhECGFg "State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu."] Stanford:Stanford University Press . 10-ISBN 0-804-71951-9; 13-ISBN 978-0-804-71951-3
* Walker, Brett L. [https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/1811/609/1/V10N2Walker.pdf "Foreign Affairs and Frontiers in Early Modern Japan: A Historiographical Essay,"] "Early Modern Japan." Fall, 2002, pp. 44-62, 124-128.ee also
*
Korean missions to Edo External links
* National Archives of Japan: [http://jpimg.digital.archives.go.jp/kouseisai/category/emaki/ryukyutyuzan_e.html "Ryūkyū Chuzano ryoshisha tojogyoretsu," scroll illustrating procession of Ryūkyū emissary to Edo, 1710 ("
Hōei 7")]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.