- Lord Howe's action, or the Glorious First of June
Infobox Painting
painting_alignment =
image_size = 300px
title = Lord Howe's action, or the Glorious First of June
other_language_1 =
other_title_1 =
other_language_2 =
other_title_2 =
artist = Philippe-Jacques de Loutherbourg
year = 1795
type = Oil on canvas
height = 266.5
width = 373.5
height_inch =
width_inch =
diameter_cm =
diameter_inch =
city =London
museum =Queen's House (NMM)"Lord Howe's action, or the Glorious First of June" is a
1795 painting byPhilippe-Jacques de Loutherbourg of the victory of British naval forces under Lord Howe over a French force led byLouis Thomas Villaret de Joyeuse on the Glorious First of June1794 . After time in theRoyal Collection of George IV, it is currently in the collection of theNational Maritime Museum and on display in the ground floor of itsQueen's House , in place of Turner's "The Battle of Trafalgar" (whilst the latter is on long-term foreign loan).History
The painting was commissioned by V. and R. Green and Christian von Mechel,
engraver s andpublisher s, for £500. They had in 1793 commissioned the equally large "The Siege of Valenciennes" from him, and this painting of the naval battle was intended to accompany it. Both paintings were intended for engraving (prints of them were produced byJames Fittler , with 'Glorious First' coming out in January 1799 [ [http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectId=1399136&partId=1 A copy of the print of 'Glorious First' at the British Museum] ] and 'Valenciennes' in 1801) and public exhibition (from 2 March 1795 at the Historic Gallery,Pall Mall , thus garnering interest for the images' publication, and on tour after their sale to Mr T. Vernon ofLiverpool in 1799).James Gillray , as with Louthebourg's 'Valenciennes', gave Louthebourg help with painting the figures (Gillray had accompanied the army carrying out the siege).Shown at Edinburgh in 1800, Vernon later sold them separately, with the 'Valenciennes' eventually finishing up in
Lord Hesketh 's collection atEaston Neston . The 'Glorious First' was purchased early in the 1800s for theRoyal Collection by the Prince of Wales, who displayed it atSt James's Palace and - after his accession to the throne in 1820 - commissionedJMW Turner 's "The Battle of Trafalgar" as a pendant for it. However, Turner's piece was criticised for perceived factual innaccuracies, and so George gave both the 'Trafalgar' and 'Glorious First' to the Naval Gallery at Greenwich Hospital in 1829 as one of his last gifts to them.Description
In the centre are the two flagships are depicted fighting each other, HMS "Queen Charlotte" is to the left and "Montagne" to the right, with bodies falling from the gunports of the latter. The pair did engage during the battle, but never in the broadside position shown in the painting, and "Queen Charlotte" only lost her fore-topmast whilst already well astern of the "Montagne", rather than during a broadside engagement shown here. This wrongly makes it appear that "Queen Charlotte" dropped behind "Montagne" due to the loss of this mast and thus failed to capture her, and led to criticism of the painting by Lord Howe and by
James Bowen (Howe'sMaster of the Fleet , and a hero of the battle) - Bowen commented that "Queen Charlotte" would have captured "Montagne" if such a broadside engagement as shown had occurred in reality and that the painting was thus a slur on the "Queen Charlotte"'s honour.In the extreme right is the port bow of an English ship (probably HMS|Brunswick|1790|6), behind which is another French ship (flying, like the "Montagne", the
signal flag S from one of her masts), whilst in the left foreground is shown the port side of the 74 gun "Vengeur du Peuple ", sinking after a long and fatal duel with the "Brunswick", and beyond "Vengeur" are other ships' topsails, just showing above the smoke of battle.The French ships are shown flying the early Revolutionary naval ensign (with the French tricolour added to the upper quadrant of the Bourbon white naval ensign), the only major action the French fleet fought under it. It had officially been replaced by the new (and current) tricolour in May 1794, but the new pattern had not arrived when Villaret-Joyeuse's ships sailed.
Analysis
Though the accuracy as regards the French ensign and Loutherbourg's detailed preparatory sketches [Detailed studies of the 'Queen Charlotte' ( [http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectId=726814&partId=1 here] , [http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectId=726816&partId=1 here] , [http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectId=726808&partId=1 here] , [http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectId=726811&partId=1 here] , and [http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectId=726834&partId=1 here] ), along with an overall compositional sketch, are now in the
British Museum .] show the artist's great care over the detail, the matter of the central duel and its departure from literal historical truth shows how the painting is more a Romantic treatment of the battle than a literally documentary one, though such departures did not attract such widespread criticism as Turner's did in "Trafalgar". Attempts are being made by four English boats to rescue the "Vengeur"'s crew, who are shown clinging to their ship's spars and to other wreckage blasted off other ships right across the foreground. Both sides are shown heroically fighting the sea itself as well as each other, intensifying both and giving the event drama as well as human scale, as well as showing the British sailor as compassionate to his defeated enemy. Compared to Turner's later pendant, the painting is an unequivocally heroic image and its overall style is conventionally patriotic.References
External links
* [http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/nelson/viewObject.cfm?ID=BHC0470 National Maritime Museum catalogue]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.