Talley v. California

Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=Talley v. California
ArgueDateA=January 13
ArgueDateB=14
ArgueYear=1960
DecideDate=March 7
DecideYear=1960
FullName=Talley v. California
USVol=362
USPage=60
Citation=80 S. Ct. 536; 4 L. Ed. 2d 559; 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1948
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=
SCOTUS=1958-1962
Majority=Black
JoinMajority=
Concurrence=Harlan
JoinConcurrence=
Concurrence2=
JoinConcurrence2=
Concurrence/Dissent=
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
Dissent=Clark
JoinDissent=Frankfurter, Whittaker
Dissent2=
JoinDissent2=
LawsApplied=

"Talley v. California", 362 U.S. 60 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Los Angeles city ordinance which forbade the distribution of any handbills in any place under any circumstances if the handbills did not contain the name and address of the person who prepared, distributed, or sponsored it was void.

"Talley" is often cited for the proposition that identification requirements burden speech.

External links

* [http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./362/60/ Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960)] (opinion full text).