- Tumor marker
A tumor marker is a substance found in the
blood ,urine , or body tissues that can be elevated incancer , among other tissue types. There are many different tumor markers, each indicative of a particular disease process, and they are used inoncology to help detect the presence of cancer. An elevated level of a tumor marker can indicate cancer; however, there can also be other causes of the elevation.Description
Tumor markers can be produced directly by the tumor or by non-tumor cells as a response to the presence of a tumor.
Koepke outlines a hierarchy of clinical laboratory tests, from least to most informative. As used in
oncology , they are as follows:*"Screening" for common
cancer s on a population basisExample: elevatedprostate specific antigen suggestsprostate cancer .
*"Monitoring" ofcancer survivors after treatmentExample: elevated AFP in a child previously treated forteratoma suggestsrelapse withendodermal sinus tumor .
*"Diagnosis" of specific tumor types, particularly in certainbrain tumor s and other instances wherebiopsy is not feasible.The term
tumor antigen is sometimes interchangeably used for tumor marker.Classification
Tumor markers can be classified in two groups: Cancer-specific markers and tissue-specific markers.
Cancer-specific markers
Cancer-specific markers are related to the presence of certain cancerous tissue. Because there is a large overlap between the many different tumor tissue types and the markers produced these markers might not be specific in making a diagnosis. They can, however, be useful in the follow-up of treated patients to describe progress of the disease or response to treatment. A few examples of these markers are CEA,
CA19-9 ,CA125 .An example of a cancer-specific marker, CEA, or
carcinoembryonic antigen , is a blood-borneprotein , first noted to be produced by tumors of thegastrointestinal system . Further investigation showed that it was produced by the occasional lung and breast cancer case, meaning that an elevated level does not necessarily mean a bowel cancer. However, in a patient with a history of a treated bowel cancer, a rising CEA level can be an early sign of recurring bowel cancer. This usually occurs before the site of return can be identified on imaging or examination and so many oncologists question the wisdom of doing a blood test for CEA when the end result is bad news that alarms the patient. Nevertheless, a sequence of steady low CEA readings can provide much needed reassurance to the post-operative patient. Also, a rising sequence of CEA readings should alert the physician to the need for diagnostic tests such as PET scans.Tissue-specific markers
Tissue-specific markers are related to specific tissues which have developed cancer. Generally speaking, these substances are not specifically related to the tumor, and may be present at elevated levels when no cancer is present. But unlike the previous group, elevated levels point to a specific tissue being at fault. Examples include PSA,
beta-HCG - (Human chorionic gonadotropin ), AFP - (Alpha-fetoprotein ),AFP-L3 - (a lectin-reactive AFP) andThyroglobulin . For example, if man has an elevated PSA, a search for prostate cancer will be undertaken. If an individual has an elevated level of beta-HCG, AFP orAFP-L3% , a search for a testicular or liver cancer, respectively, will be made.PSA (
Prostate specific antigen ) is produced by the normalprostate . It is a protein enzyme called a serine protease that usually acts as an anticoagulant to keep semen liquid. Only small amounts leak into the circulation in normal circumstances. Enlarged prostates leak more substantial amounts, and cancerous prostates also leak substantial amounts. An accurate way to tell if an elevated PSA level results from cancer is tobiopsy the prostate.β-hCG: Elevated levels cannot prove the presence of a tumor, and low levels do not rule it out (an exception is in males who do not naturally produce β-hCG). Nevertheless, elevated βhCG levels fall after successful treatment (e.g. surgical intervention or
chemotherapy ), and a recurrence can often be detected by the finding of rising levels.Application and Interpretation
The
hook effect (also known ashigh dose hook effect ) is an artifact of tumor marker immunoassay kits, that causes the reported quantity of tumor marker to be incorrectly low when the quantity is high. An undetected hook effect may cause delayed recognition of a tumor.cite journal
author = Leboeuf R, Langlois MF, Martin M, Ahnadi CE, Fink GD
title = "Hook effect" in calcitonin immunoradiometric assay in patients with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: case report and review of the literature
journal = J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
volume = 91
issue = 2
pages = 361–4
year = 2006
pmid = 16278263
doi = 10.1210/jc.2005-1429 ] The hook effect can be detected by analyzing serial dilutions. Absent hook effect, reported quantities of tumor marker in a serial dilution should be proportional to the dilution.If repeated measurements of tumor marker are needed, some clinical testing laboratories provide a special reporting mechanism, a serial monitor, that links test results and other data pertaining to the person being tested. This requires a unique identifier for the person. In the
United States commonly aSocial Security number is used for this. One important function of this mechanism is to ensure that each test is performed using the same assay kit. For example, for AFP many different commercial assay kits, based on different technologies, are available. AFP measurements obtained using different assay kits are not comparable unless special calculations are performed.Interlaboratory
proficiency testing for tumor marker tests, and for clinical tests more generally, is an emerging field.PMID|1540898 [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112675420/ABSTRACT free full text] ] In the United States, New York state is prominent in advocating such research. [Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States [http://www.genome.gov/10002403 genome.gov] ]See also
*
Tumor antigen References
External links
*
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.