- Ancient Jat Kingdoms
The
Jat people of theIndian subcontinent had many kingdoms in ancient times.Jat rulers in Kaikan
Kaikan was a province inSind . Kikania is the name of a mountain. When the Arab invaders first time came to Kaikan mountains, the Jats repelled them. K.R.Kanungo [K.R.Qanungo, History of the Jats, Ed. dr Vir Singh, 2003, p.17] writes that whenMuhammad bin Qasim invadedSind , Kaikan country was in independent possession of Jats. The country of Kaikan was supposed to be in south-easternAfghanistan [Elliot, I, 383] , which was conquered from Jats by the Arab general Amran Bin Musa in the reign of the Khalifa Al-Mutasim-bi-llah, (833 -881 AD) [Elliot, I, 448] . During the same reign another expedition was sent against the Jats who had seized upon the roads ofHajar (?)...and spread terror over the roads and planted posts in all directions towards the desert. They were overcome after a bloody conflict of twenty five days. 27000 of them were led in captivity to grace the triumph of victor. It was a custom among these people to blow their horns when Marshalled for battle. [Elliot, II, 247] , Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas (Hindi), Maharaja Suraj Mal Smarak Shiksha Sansthan, Delhi, 1934, 2nd edition 1992 page 702. ] , [Sindh Ka itihas, p.30] H.C.Verma wrote [ H.C.Verma : Mediewal History [Part-1] [Delhi University Publication] that the Jats of Kikkan fought very bravely and defeated the Arabs very badly again & again.So Arab could not attack on India by Kikkan route.Panwar rulers in Omarkot
Umerkot or Omarkot (Urdu: عمرکوٹ) is town in the province ofSindh , Pakistan. It is also referred to as Amar Kot as per old histories, "Amar Kot Itehas" by Tej Singh Solanki. Once, it has been Capital of Greater Sindh Province, including some parts of presentRajasthan state of India. According toThakur Deshraj ,Panwar clan Jats were rulers here prior to Mughal rulerHumayun . Jame Todd tells it to be a Rajput state confusing Panwar with Rajputs, but it was denied byCunningham , who wrote it to be aPanwar Jat state referring to the author of 'Humayun Nama '. [Memoirs of Humayun, p. 45] , [Tahkur Deshraj , Jat Itihas, p.705]Other Jat rulers in Sind
Thakur Deshraj mentions about rule of other Jat named Chandra Ram ofHala clan. He was ruler ofSusthan but he lost it toMuslim s. He wandered for some time but later he attacked the fort and occupied it. WhenMuhammad bin Qasim learnt it he sent 1000 sawar and 2000 footsoldiers to suppress Chandra Ram. He fought bravely but killed. His state was known as Halakhandi. Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas (Hindi), Maharaja Suraj Mal Smarak Shiksha Sansthan, Delhi, 1934, 2nd edition 1992 page 702. ] , [Sindh Ka itihas, p.30]Maharaja Shalinder
After the fall of
Kushan Empire country was divided in to small states. There is no information of any important Jat state in a period of two centuries followingKushan rule. In the beginning offifth century we find Jat ruler Maharaja Shalinder with his rule extending from Punjab toMalwa andRajasthan . This is proved from the Pali inscription obtained from villageKanswa inKota state in year1820 AD. We get following information from this inscription: [Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas, p.208-211]Shalinder was the ruler
Shalpur , known in the present by the nameSialkot . He established this state on his own power, which indicates that he was a monarch emerged from chieftain ship of arepublic state. He had a powerful army full of strong warriors amongst whom he felt proud of glory of his caste. He had many small states under him and a rich treasury. He was aKashyap vanshi (Suryavanshi )Taxak clan Jat. He had leftBuddhism and adopted puranic religion and started vedic culture like performing yagyas etc. [Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas, p.208-211]He married with a lady of other caste as he has been mentioned as having a "dogla" issue from him. His descendant Degali had married with daughters of
Yaduvanshi . One of these queens gave birth to Veer Narendra. The chronology derived from this inscription is as under: 1. Maharaja Shalinder, 2. Dogla, 3. Sambuk, 4. Degali, 5. Veer Narendra 6. Veerchandra 7. ShalichandraIn samvat 597 (
540 AD) a temple was built on the bank of riverTaveli inKota state and a close relative of Jit Shalinder had written the inscription. Probably the writer of the inscription wasShalichandra (son ofVeerchandra and grandson ofVeer Narendra ), who left Shalivahanpur in samvat 597 (540 AD) due to attack ofHun s and came toMalwa . Maharaja Shalinder had probably sought the help of his own clan ruler MaharajaYasodharman ofMalwa . In the first attempt of combined Jat power, they defeated Huns and repulsed them from Punjab which is clear from the Chandra’s grammar ‘Ajaya jarto Hunan’. [Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas, p.208-211]Kartik Jat ruler of Bundi
James Todd obtained aPali inscription about Jit or Jat tribe at village Ramchandrapura 3 "kos" (6 miles) east ofBundi state, which he sent toAsiatic Society London . The inscription reveals that there was a kingThot born inUti vansha . His son was Raja Chandrasain, a powerful and beloved of his subject. The son of Chandrasain was Kartik, renowned for his prowess. His wife was Gunaniwas, who gave birth to two sons Mukund and Daruk. Daruk produced son named Kuhal. Kuhal produced son named Dhunak, who achieved great works. He had war with HillMeena s and defeated them Fact|date=May 2008. He along with his brother Dok worshipped gods and brahmanas. They founded a temple. Kuhal had founded this temple and a Maheshwar temple in east. The popularity of this was spread byAchal son of MahabaliMaharaja Yashovarma . [James Todd, Appedix 1] , [Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas, p.588-589]The period of war of this dynasty with
Parihar Meenas or Pratihar Meenas is difficult to asses. If we assume that Jat ruler Kartik had war with Menander then the period of this comes about150 BC . Menander had attacked areas up toChittor . It is very likely that Kartik had a war with Menander. This way the period of his descendant becomes thefirst century . If we look into the period of Achal who made this temple popular it comes around third orfourth century or beyond it, as rulerYashovarman was inMaukhari vansha ineighth century inKannauj . He had sent a delegation toChina in731 AD. [Bharat Ke Prachin Rajvansh, II] Lack of records and history prior tosixth century prevents prom determining the exact period of the rule of Kartik and his descendants. According toThakur Deshraj , We can presume their rule from fourth tosixth century . [Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas, p.589-590]Jat republics in Rajasthan
Jat republics in
Jangladesh Jangladesh was the name of a region of northernRajasthan state in India. It included the present-day districts ofBikaner ,Churu ,Ganganagar , andHanumangarh . These districts are predominant districts of theJats . It corresponds to the former princely state ofBikaner , which was founded in the 15th century and persisted until shortly after India's Independence in 1947. The principal towns of Jangladesh at present areBikaner ,Churu ,Rajgarh ,Ratangarh andReni .According to
James Todd as mentioned in his book "Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan (1829)" the Jangladesh region was inhabited byJats , who had for ages been established in these arid abodes, ["Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan". (1829-1832)James Tod and William Crooke, Reprint: Low Price Publications, Delhi (1990), Vol.II, Appendix. p. 1126.] prior to Bika Rathor annexed these small republics. At every stage of invasion to India the foreign invaders had to encounter with the Jats of this region. At what period the Jats established themselves in the Indian desert is not known. By the 4th century they had spread up to Punjab in India.The north-eastern and north-western
Rajasthan , known by the nameJangladesh in ancient times, was inhabited by Jat clans ruled by their own chiefs and largely governed by their own customary law. [Dashrath Sharma, Rajasthan through the ages, Jodhpur, 1966, Vol.I, p. 287-288] Whole of the region was possessed by six or seven cantons namelyPunia ,Godara , Saran,Sihag ,Beniwal ,Johiya [James Todd, Annals and Antiquities, Vol.II, p. 1126=27] andKaswan [Ibid., Seventh clan of Jats] . Besides these cantons there were several sub-castes of Jats, simultaneously wrested from Rajput proprietors for instance Bagor, Kharipatta, Mohila or Mehila, [James Todd, Annals and Antiquities, Vol.II, p. 1126=27]Bhukar ,Bhadu , Chahar. [Thakur Deshraj, Jat Itihas, Delhi, 2002, p. 269-285] According to History of Bikaner State and by the scholars, the region was occupied by Jats with their seven territories. It is said about Jat territories that "Saat Patti Sattavan Majh" (means seven long and fifty-seven small territories). [G.S.L.Devra, op. cit., Cf. Dayaldas ri Khyat, Part II, p. 7-10] Following are the main clans and their heads with capital and number of villages in each territory. [Jibraeil: "Position of Jats in Churu Region", The Jats - Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 222] , [Dr Brahma Ram Chaudhary: The Jats - Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 250]Table of Jat republics in Jangladesh:
According to
James Todd , during the period of Rathor domination ("intermediate between Timur's and Babur's invasion of India", i.e. sometime between 1398 and 1526) out of total 2670 villages in the Jangladesh, 2200 villages were under the rule ofJats . ["Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan". (1829-1832)James Tod and William Crooke, Reprint: Low Price Publications, Delhi (1990), Vol.II, Appendix. pp. 1126-1127.] Each canton bore the name of the community, and was subdivided into districts. AfterChauhan s, Jats completely established their supremacy and hold over administration in their own traditional fashion, which continued till the conquest of the region by Rathores. [Ibid., p.103] The Jats claimed their right over the land which was under their possession, before the Rathores occupied it and this claim was inherited by their descendants, who used to divide the land among themselves for cultivation. It appears probable that in the early period of their conquest the Rathores could not exercise any definite claim on the land as landlords. However, it was possible only in the 17th century, [Ibid, p.203] due to internal rivalries among Jats, primarilyGodara s surrendered, later on all Jat clans accepted Rathor's suzerainty. [G.S.L. Devra, op. cit., 7-8, Cf. Dayaldas ri Khyat, part 2, p. 4-5] , [Jibraeil: "Position of Jats in Churu Region", The Jats - Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 223]Other republics in Jangladesh
*Bhadu - Bhadus were rulers inJangladesh where they established an important cityBhadra . Samantraj was a popular ruler of Bhadus. Bhadus had a war with 'Bhagore ' people and after capturing it they moved toMarwar area. Bhadus also occupied many villages inAjmer-Merwara . [Thakur Deshraj : Jat Itihas (Hindi), Delhi, 1934, p. 597]*
Bhati - Jat Bhatis ruledBhatner , presentlyHanumangarh , andBhatinda . Bhatner was historically important because it was situated on route of invaders from Central Asia to India. [Thakur Deshraj : Jat Itihas (Hindi), Delhi, 1934, p. 601]*
Bhukar - Bhukars were initially settled atSambhar inRajasthan . They were the rulers in this area and their ruling method was that of 'Bhomia-chor'.Gothra Bhukaran was their capital.
*Chahar - In thethirteenth century , a Chahar Jat,Raja Maldeo ruled atSidhmukh inJangladesh .*
Jakhar - The king of the Jakhar clan, Jakhbhadra, settled inJangladesh and made his capital at Reni (modern-dayTaranagar ).Thakur Deshraj , Jat Itihas (Hindi), Maharaja Suraj Mal Smarak Shiksha Sansthan, Delhi, 1934, 2nd edition 1992 page 594-95. ] At a later date, the Jakhars established a kingdom, the ruins of which are found atMadhauli , which was in the princely state ofJaipur .Thakur Deshraj , Jat Itihas (Hindi), Maharaja Suraj Mal Smarak Shiksha Sansthan, Delhi, 1934, 2nd edition 1992 page 594-95. ]*
Sangwan - The Sangwan jats ruled at Sarsu in Jangladesh region of Rajasthan in 8th to 10th century.*Sahu - They have been the rulers of a small republic in
Jangladesh . Their capital was at village Dhansia, situated at a distance of 65 km in northwest ofChuru town. [Dr Mahendra Singh Arya,Dharmpal Singh Dudee , Kishan Singh Faujdar & Vijendra Singh Narwar: Ādhunik Jat Itihasa (The modern history of Jats), Agra 1998, p.282 ] There were 84 villages in their territory. [GSL Devra, op. cit., Cf. Dayaldas ri Khyat, Part II, pp. 7-10] , [Jibraeil: "Position of Jats in Churu Region", The Jats - Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 222]Jat republics in Marwar
*
Dhaulya
*Dudi
*Gaina
*Jewlia
*Karwasra
*Kulhari
*Moond Jat republics in Matsya region
*
Katewa *
Vijayrania - Mentioned asVaretatae people ofGreek language byMegasthenes were rulers inKhandela wati. Vijayranias founded a village called 'Vijarna' in1078 and constructed a fort at 'Ladhana ' in1178 . One chieftain Jagsingh of this clan founded his rule inPalsana ofShekhawati region in year1255 .Jat republics in southern Rajasthan
*
Jatrana - This is an ancient gotra. According toKautilya they fought againstAlexander the Great . According toAlberuni this hilly place calledChittor ( Jattaur) was the capital of the Jatrana clan. They call themselves descendants ofTur .
*Gora - In ancient times ruled inAjmer-Merwara ,Mewar , andBundi -Sirohi areas inRajasthan . They are descendants ofPingala Nagavanshi . [Dr Mahendra Singh Arya, Dharmpal Singh Dudi, Kishan Singh Faujdar & Vijendra Singh Narwar: Ādhunik Jat Itihasa (The modern history of Jats), Agra 1998, Page 237 ]*
Ranthambore - It was founded by Ran Mal Jat, by putting a stambh (pillar) at the location of present Ranthambore. He challenged the neighbouring rulers for battle. The area around Ranthambore was ruled byGora andNagil jats till two centuries prior to the rule ofPrithvi Raj Chauhan . [Thakur Deshraj : Jat - Itihas, 1934, p. 593]*
Sheoran - A branch ofShivi Jats ruled inMalwa andRajasthan .*
Chandlai - A small republic founded by Jat chieftain 'Chandla'. He got constructed a pucca pond near the village in the name of her daughter ‘Bhala’ and put an inscription on it on baisakh sudi 15 samvat 1027 (970 AD). Chandla was ruler ofTonk at that time. [Thakur Deshraj : Jat Itihas (Hindi), Maharaja Suraj Mal Smarak Shiksha Sansthan, Delhi, 1934, p.603-604] , [Rajasthan Sandesh, Year 1, Vol 2]Jat republics in United province
*Garhwal - the rulers of
Garhmukteshwar *
Kaliramna - A king of this gotra was the ruler nearMathura , on the banks ofYamuna River . The ancient fort of Kaliramna is in ruins near Mathura. His fort was known as fort of Kalidheh.*
Khirwar - "Raja Khir" was the son of "Aniruddha", the grandson ofSri Krishna . Khirwars are the descendants of Raja Khir. Khirwar Jats were the rulers of theBrij area of Uttar Pradesh. From here they moved toMadhya Pradesh , where they occupied good land for cultivation on the banks of the Narmada and founded the city ofNarsinghpur in Madhya Pradesh where they ruled for a long period.*
Nauhwar - Rulers in ancient times at Noh lake area nearMathura .*
Koīl - In the ancient times the people ofKampilya were later known as Koil. The Koīl people came from Kampilya and founded the city known as Kampilgarh, situated south east ofGanges . The town of Kampilgarh later became popular as Koil which is nowAligarh .*Hala
*
Kuntal *
Pachar *
Thenua *
Thakurele - [Aligarh,In 18th century they defeat the Hada Rajputs & have a strong hold on Khair,Inglash tahsil]Jat republics in
Malwa *
Malwa
**Harshavardhana
**Shiladitya
**Singhavarma
**Vishnuvardhan
**Yasodharman Jats in the pre-Aurangzeb period
We do not have the means to form an accurate and comprehensive view of their past, from the early medieval times to commencement of the reign of
Aurangzeb when their brethren ofMathura and Bharatpur step by step rose to political prominence. Our sources contain incidental and meager information about the Jats. [G.C.Dwivedi, The Jats, Their role in the Mughal Empire, Ed. Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2003, p. 7]The lack of any systematic and complete history from the Jat side causes difficulties. The non-Jat sources do provide facts about the Jat activities. The sources consulted include such as Majmal-ut-Tawarikh, Tabkai-i-Akbari, Kamil-ut-Tawarikh, Tarikh-us-Subuktigin, Malfuzat-i-Timuri, "
Tarikh-i-Sher Shahi " etc.The history of pre-Aurangzeb period reveals that they (the Jats) have shown in all times – whether against Sultan
Mahmud of Ghazni , or againstNadir Shah andAhmad Shah Abdali – the same propensity to fall upon the rear of a retreating army undeterred by the heaviest odds, or the terror-inspiring fame of great conquerors. When encountered they showed the same obstinate and steady courage unmindful of the carnage on the field or of the miseries that were in store for them after defeat". [Qanungo, Jats,30] , [G.C.Dwivedi, The Jats, Their role in the Mughal Empire, Ed. Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2003, p.11-12]References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.