- Battle of Maaten al-Sarra
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Maaten al-Sarra
partof=theToyota War
caption=
date=September 5 ,1987
place=Maaten al-Sarra Air Base ,Libya
result=Decisive Chadian victory
combatant1=
combatant2=
commander1=Uknown
commander2=Hassan Djamous K. Pollack, "Arabs at War", 396]
strength1=2,500
strength2=2,000Citation| author =Greenwald, John| title =Disputes Raiders of the Armed Toyotas| newspaper =Time| date =1987-09-21 | url =http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,965563,00.html]
casualties1=1,000M. Azevedo, "Roots of Violence", 125] T. Collelo, "Chad"] –1,713 [Citation| title =N'Djamena sends troops into Libya| newspaper =The New York Times | date =1987-09-13 | url =http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DEED81131F930A2575AC0A961948260] killed
300 PoW
70tank s
30 APCs
26K. Pollack, 396–397] –32aircraft
casualties2=65 killed
112 woundedK. Pollack, 397]
notes=The battle of Maaten al-Sarra was a battle fought between
Chad andLibya onSeptember 5 1987 during theToyota War . The battle took the form of a surprise Chadian raid against the LibyanMaaten al-Sarra Air Base , meant to remove the threat of Libyan airpower, that had already thwarted the Chadian attack on theAouzou Strip in August. The first clash ever held in Libyan territory since the beginning of theChadian-Libyan conflict , the attack was fully successful, causing a high number of Libyan casualties and contributing to the definitiveceasefire signed onSeptember 11 among the warring countries.Background
Since
1983 Libyan troops had invaded Chad in support of the rebelTransitional Government of National Unity (GUNT) fighting against the Chadian government led byHissène Habré . French military interventions had limited the Libyan-GUNT advance to the 16th parallel (the so-called Red Line), freezing the situation on the ground till1986 , when the bulk of the GUNT forces turned against their Libyan patrons, an opportunity that was immediately taken by Habré, that in December gave orders to his troops to attack Libyan positions in Northern Chad. [K. Pollack, 382–390] Starting with Fada and continuing with B'ir Kora and Ouadi Doum, theChadian National Armed Forces ' (FANT) commander-in-chief Hassan Djamous reported a series of victories that forced Libyan forces to fall back on the Aouzou Strip. [K. Pollack, 390–394]Ignoring French pleas for restraint, Habré assumed a militant attitude towards the Libyan occupation of the Aouzou Strip; his troops successfully took Aouzou on
August 8 , but were repulsed onAugust 28 , partly due to French refusal to provide air cover for Habré's attempt to regain Aouzou.S. Popper, "The Economic Cost of Soviet Military Manpower Requirements", 147] S. Nolutshungu, "Limits of Anarchy", 222]Attack
Before the final Libyan assault, Habré had withdrawn
Hassan Djamous and most of his veteran troops, planning to let them rest for a new offensive that would finally secure the Strip. Habré, judging by the decisive role played by close-range Libyan air strikes in the setback at Aouzou, concluded that Libya's greatest advantage was its ability to conduct endless air strikes. To remove this threat, Habré ordered Djamous to take 2,000 troops and destroy the main Libyan airbase in southern Libya, Maaten al-Sarra, 60 miles north of the Chadian-Libyan border.D. Vanderwalle, "A History of Modern Libya", 148] Habré may also have been encouraged in this raid byFrench President François Mitterrand 's public declaration onSeptember 3 that the Red Line was obsolete and thus French troops in Chad would no longer be bound by it. [S. Nolutshungu, 224–225]Chad made military preparations for what seemed to be an attempt to retake Aouzou. Instead, encouraged by the
United States , which supplied satellite intelligence, the FANT attacked Maaten al-Sarra on onSeptember 5 , taking the Libyans by surprise, and apparently the French as well, who reacted by refusing to provide intelligence or logistic support. Djamous's troops were careful to follow thewadi s, thus not exposing themselves, and they also took advantage of careless Libyan patrolling and security, intending to take the airbase's garrison and its defenders by surprise. To confuse the Libyans, the FANT forces first proceeded north and northwest in Libyan territory, then turned east and descended upon Maaten al-Sarra; as a result, the Libyan officers took them for reinforcements and attempted to join them.Nowithstanding the defenders' 2,500-strong garrison, tank brigade, artillery and extensive fortifications, the Chadian troops rapidly overcame the Libyan forces and assumed control of the base, starkly revealing the professional incompetence of the Libyan military. While the FANT's losses were minor, Libya suffered staggering casulties, with 1,713 Libyans killed, 300 taken prisoner and hundreds of others forced to flee into the surrounding desert. The Chadians then proceeded to demolish all the equipment they could not carry back, including 70 tanks, 30 APCs, 8
radar stations, a radar scrambling device, numerous SAMs, and 26 aircraft—including 3 Mig-23, 1 Mi-24, and 4 Mirages; they also tore up the base's tworunway s. Then, traveling without lights beneath the moon and stars, the FANT column withdrew to Chadian soil onSeptember 6 , and the Chadian government declared that the battle "must be written in gold letters in the great book of victories."Reactions
Gaddafi's first reaction was to place the blame for the defeat on the French, challenging their position in Chad. A couple of days after Djamous' raid on Maaten two
Tu-22 were dispatched againstN'Djamena , the Chadian capital, and other two towardsAbéché ; the air raid was unsuccessful, as the Tupolev attacking the capital was shot down by aFrench Army Hawk SAM battery, while the second plane was forced to return to Libya without dropping its bombs. Libya's reaction to the downing was to publicly accuse the Maaten raid of being a "combined Franco-American military action", and added that France and the United States were "behind the aggression against Libya."While the United States did not conceal its satisfaction for the Libyan defeat, a US official adding that "We basically jump for joy every time the Chadians ding the Libyans", France reacted differently, with the
Defence Minister Andre Giraud expressing "deepest regrets" over the escalation. The French appeared to have judged the battle of Maaten al-Sarra even too successful for Habré, giving way to concerns that the battle was only the first stage of a general invasion of Libya, a thing that France wanted to avoid at all costs; therefore, onSeptember 11 Mitterrand pressed Habré in agreeing to aceasefire with Gaddafi, the Libyan leader accepting due to internal demoralization and foreign hostility. While the ceasefire was subject to many minor violations, it substantially resisted, thus putting an end to the Chadian-Libyan conflict. [S. Nolutshungu, 222–223]References
*cite book|author=Azevedo, Mario J.|title=Roots of Violence: A History of War in Chad|publisher=
Routledge |year=1998|id=ISBN 90-5699-582-0
*cite book|author=Collelo, Thomas|title=Chad|publisher=US GPO|year=1990|url= http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/tdtoc.html|id=ISBN 0-1602-4770-5
*cite book|author=Nolutshungu, Sam C.|title=Limits of Anarchy: Intervention and State Formation in Chad|publisher=University of Virginia Press|year=1995|id=ISBN 0-8139-1628-3
*cite book|author=Pollack, Kenneth M.|title=Arabs at War: Military Effectiveness, 1948–1991|publisher=University of Nebraska Press |year=2002|id=ISBN 0-8032-3733-2
*cite book|author=Popper, Steven W.|title=The Economic Cost of Soviet Military Manpower Requirements|publisher=RAND |year=1989|id=ISBN 0-8330-0934-6
*cite book|author=Vanderwalle, Dirk J.|title=A History of Modern Libya|publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2006|id=ISBN 0-5218-5048-7Notes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.