- Thebes tablets
The Thebes tablets are clay tablets discovered at the city of
Thebes, Greece , with inscriptions in theMycenaean language in theLinear B script. They belong to the Late Helladic IIIB context, contemporary with the finds atPylos . A first group of 21 fragments were found in the 1963-4 campaign; [They were published byJohn Chadwick in "Minos" 10 1970:115-37] a further nineteen tablets were found in 1970 and 1972. [Theodoros G. Spyropoulos and John Chadwick, "The Thebes Tablets II" (Salamanca: Universitad de Salamanca) 1975.] Using Near Eastern cylinder seals associated with the finds, the editors of the published corpus of the whole archive now date the destruction of the "Kadmeion", the Mycenaean palace complex at Thebes, and therefore the writing of the tablets, some of which were still damp when they were unintentionally fired, to a time not long after 1225 BC. Chadwick identified three recognizable Hellenic divinities,Hera ,Hermes andPotnia "the mistress", among the recipients of wool. He made out a case for "ko-ma-we-te-ja", also attested atPylos , as the name of a goddess.Quite early, before the more recent discoveries, F.M. Ahl made the astute observation of the "phoinikeia grammata", the "Phoenician" or the "palm-leaf" ("phoinix") letters: "
Cadmus did bring writing to Thebes, but this writing was not the Phoenician alphabet, but Linear B". [Ahl, "Cadmus and the Palm-Leaf Tablets" "The American Journal of Philology" 88.2 (April 1967, pp. 188-194) p. 188.]Discovery
A substantial additional portion, some 250 tablets, amounting roughly to 5% of the entire Mycenaean corpus from all sites, was discovered in Pelopidou Street and the "Arsenal" by Vassilis L. Aravantinos, the current archaeological superintendent of Thebes, from 1993 to 1995, in a rescue excavation. In 1996 a few more tablets were identified in a museum among finds from the 1963-64 dig in Thebes.
The number of tablets given by the editors is actually misleading. For example, as Tom Palaima and Sarah James have independently demonstrated, the '123 tablets' of the Fq series) actually are many fragments of texts that originally made up between fifteen and eighteen tablets at the most.
Publication
The French and Italian linguists Louis Godart and Anna Sacconi were charged with the publication of these tablets. During the following years, their tantalizing glimpses of the contents resulted in impatient accusations; when the tablets were finally published in 2001, [V. Aravantinos,L. Godart and A. Sacconi, "Thèbes: Fouilles de la Cadmée I" (Pisa/Rome) 2001.] the impact of their overall content was perceived by most reviewers to be rather less than expected.
Findings
Many of the Thebes tablets can be read as containing information on divinities and religious rites; others mention quantities of various commodities. By the sites mentioned, the boundaries of the region controlled by the Theban palace can be estimated: the Theban palace controlled the island of
Euboia and had a harbour inAulis . The tablets contain a number of important terms previously unattested in Linear B, such as "ra-ke-da-mi-ni-jo /Lakedaimnijos/" "a man fromLacedaemonia (Sparta )", or "ma-ka /Mā Gā/" "Mother Gaia" (a goddess still revered in Thebes in the5th century BC , as reported e.g. inAeschylus ' "Seven Against Thebes "). Interesting is also "ku-na-ki-si /gunaiksi/" "for women", exhibiting the peculiar oblique stem of Greek Polytonic|γυνή "woman".Godart and Sacconi read the tablets to indicate cult activity dedicated to
Demeter ,Zeus protector of crops, and to Kore, and they speculate that the roots of theEleusinian Mysteries can be traced back to Mycenaean Thebes. Palaima, however, has lambasted their suggestions as "subject to very dubious interpretations" and "highly suspect on linguistic and exegetical grounds". [Palaima, "Sacrifical Feasting" p. 218, citing his own reviews "Rev. of Aravantinos, Godart, and Sacconi 2001", in "Minos" 35–36, pp. 475–486; review of Aravantinos, Godart, and Sacconi 2001, in "AJA" 107, pp. 113–115.] Other arguments against the identification of cult activity in the texts have been advanced by Sarah James and Yves Duhoux.citationPalaima does attach importance to one tablet (Uo 121) as evidence of linking sacrificial animals with foodstuffs at the end of LHIIIB. The same phenomenon, part of ritual Mycenaean feasting, occurs in the contemporary
Pylos tablets.The Vienna symposium, 2002
The results of a specialist symposium held in Vienna December 5-6, 2002 have now been published. [S. Deger-Jalkotzy and O. Panagl, "Die Neuen Linear B-Texte aus Theben" (Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2006); [http://www.austriaca.at/?arp=0x00118cf7 On-line abstract] .] These papers further dismantle the "house of cards" constructed by the editors of the tablets concerning religious references in the Thebes tablets.
Günter Neumann (pp. 125-138) demonstrates clearly that the animals in the Thebes tablets are not in any way sacred or 'divine', but are animals that would naturally be part of everyday life for Mycenaean and later Greeks. He gathers the explicit historical evidence for this, including references to these animals being fed grains.
Michael Meier-Brügger (pp. 111-118) clearly demonstrates that "de-qo-no" as "master of banqueting" is linguistically impossible. It must be "deipnon" "main dinner' as in Homer; that "di-wi-ja-me-ro" cannot equal 'the part for the goddess Diwia' but has to be 'two-day period' (as also argued earlier by Melena and in this volume by Killen); that "si-to" is not an otherwise unattested god Sito (Grain) but plain "siton" "grain".
José Luis Garcia Ramón (pp. 37-69) demonstrates that linguistically "a-ko-ro-da-mo" cannot signify "agorodamos" 'mystic assembler of the people'. He proposes the simple Greek man's name Akrodamos. He also sees that "o-po-re-i" is a personal name parallel to another in these Thebes texts "me-to-re-i". They mean respectively "On the mountain" and "Beyond the mountain." So "o-po-re-i" does not mean "Zeus of the Fall Harvest", which is impossible according to Mycenaean usage for god's names and epithets.
John T. Killen (pp. 79-110) specifically concludes (p.103): "...the fact that ma-ka, o-po-re-i, and ko-wa never all occur together, and that it requires a special hypothesis to explain this fact, combined with what I believe are the continuing difficulties with explaining o-po-re-i as a theonym /Opo:rehi/, make me reluctant for the present to accept the ma-ka = Ma:i Ga:i [i.e., Mother Earth] equation."
Notes
Further reading
*V. L. Aravantinos, L. Godart, A. Sacconi, "Thèbes: Fouilles de la Cadmée I: Les tablettes en Linéaire B de la Odos Pelopidou: Édition et commentaire." Pisa and Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 2001. ISBN 88-8147-228-7
*V. L. Aravantinos, L. Godart, A. Sacconi, A. Sacconi, "Thèbes: Fouilles de la Cadmée III: Corpus des documents d'archives en linéaire B de Thèbes (1-433). "Pisa and Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 2002. ISBN 88-8147-354-2 ISBN 88-8147-301-1
*V. L. Aravantinos, M. del Freo, L. Godart, "Thèbes: Fouilles de la Cadmée IV: Les textes de Thèbes (1-433): Translitération et tableaux des scribes. "Pisa and Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, 2005. ISBN 88-8147-421-2 ISBN 88-8147-434-4
* [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2005/2005-09-80.html Bryn Mawr Classics Review 20] : review of all three volumes, 2005.
*Duhoux, Yves, "Dieux ou humains? Qui sont "ma-ka", "o-po-re-i" et "ko-wa" dans les tablettes linéaire B de Thèbes," "Minos" p. 37-38 (2002-2003 [2006] ), p. 173-254.
*S.A. James, "The Thebes Tablets and the Fq series: A Contextual Analysis," "Minos" 37-38 (2002-2003 [2006] ), p. 397-418.
*S. Deger-Jalkotzy and O. Panagl, Die Neuen Linear B-Texte aus Theben (Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2006). ISBN 978-3-7001-3640-8
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.