Scandinavian Airlines Flight 751

Scandinavian Airlines Flight 751
Gottröra Crash
Accident summary
Date 27 December 1991
Type Propulsion loss
Site Gottröra, Sweden
Passengers 122
Crew 7
Injuries 92
Fatalities 0
Survivors 129 (all)
Aircraft type McDonnell-Douglas MD-81
Aircraft name Dana Viking
Operator SAS
Tail number OY-KHO
Flight origin Stockholm-Arlanda Airport
Stopover Copenhagen Airport
Destination Warsaw-Frederic Chopin Airport

Scandinavian Airlines Flight 751 was a regularly scheduled Scandinavian Airlines flight from Stockholm, Sweden to Copenhagen, Denmark and Warsaw, Poland that crashed on 27 December 1991. The McDonnell Douglas MD-81 was piloted by Danish captain Stefan G. Rasmussen and Swedish first officer Ulf Cedermark. Ice had collected on the wings prior to take off, which broke off and was sucked into the engines when the aircraft became airborne. After losing both engines, the pilots were forced to make an emergency landing in a field near Gottröra, Sweden. Coordinates: 59°46′6.12″N 18°7′54.6″E / 59.7683667°N 18.131833°E / 59.7683667; 18.131833

The incident is known as Gottrörakraschen (English: Gottröra crash) in Sweden.

Contents

Accident

The aircraft had arrived from Zürich on the previous evening and was parked overnight at temperatures of around 0 to 1 °C. About 2550 kg of flight-chilled very cold fuel remained in the wing tanks. Because of this, clear ice had formed on the upper side of the wings, but was not detected. The aircraft was de-iced with 850 liters of de-icing fluid, but not checked afterwards for remaining ice by either the de-icing personnel or the captain.[1]

At lift-off and rapidly after it, pieces of ice slammed onto the fans of both engines, deforming the fan blades sufficiently to disturb the airflow to the compressors. The disturbed airflow caused the compressors to stall and this in turn caused engine surge. Because the engines were not throttled down sufficiently, the surges continued. The high loads from repeated engine surges quickly led to the breakup of both engines.

The airliner was piloted by Danish captain Stefan G. Rasmussen and Swedish first officer Ulf Cedermark. It was headed to Warsaw, Poland through Copenhagen, Denmark.

From the pilot's point of view, after 25 seconds of flight, noise, bangs and vibrations caused by no. 2 engine being in surge were first noticed. The flight crew responded by throttling down a little, but an automatic system (ATR, Automatic Thrust Restoration) that had not been described to the flight crew by SAS, simultaneously increased throttle as a response to increasing altitude. As a consequence, the engine surges continued. An SAS flight captain, Per Holmberg, who was on board as a passenger, noticed the problems early and hurried to the cockpit to assist the crew. Engine no. 1 surged 39 seconds later, and both engines failed at 76 and 78 seconds into flight, at an altitude of 980 meters.

The pilot responded to the loss of both engines by pitching the aircraft down in a dive before leveling it, to try and have the aircraft glide the longest possible distance without stalling. The pilots requested a return to Arlanda and attempted the restart procedure,[2] but with the plane breaking through the cloud cover at 270 meters the pilot chose a field in the forest, near Vängsjöbergs säteri in Gottröra, Uppland, for an immediate emergency landing.

During the final descent the plane hit some trees, losing a large part of the right wing. It impacted the ground tail-first, sliding along the field for 110 m, breaking into three parts before coming to a stop. Twenty-five people were injured, two of them seriously, but there were no fatalities. One of the reasons for the lack of fatalities was said to be the brace position that had been instructed by the flight stewardesses.[3]

The flight crew, and especially Captain Rasmussen, were lauded for the skilled emergency landing in a fast-developing, potentially fatal situation. Rasmussen commented that "few civilian air pilots are ever put to a test of the skills they have acquired during training to this degree"[citation needed] and said he was proud of his crew and very relieved everyone had survived.

Investigation and recommendations

According to the official accident report, the problem of clear ice formation in the wings in this type of aircraft was a well known phenomenon at the time of the accident. From 1985 on McDonnell Douglas gave extensive information, including several "All Operators Letters" that dealt with the clear ice problem. In the "All Operators Letter" of 14 Oct 1986 operators were informed of how Finnair had solved the problem of discovering clear ice. In 1988 and 1989 McDonnell Douglas arranged "Theme Conferences" dealing with clear ice formation. SAS took part in these conferences.[1]

On 26 October 1991 SAS distributed a "Flight Deck Bulletin/Winterization" to all pilots. It said: "It is the Pilot-in-Charge's responsibility to check the aircraft for any ice or snow that may affect performance" and on the section "Clear Ice" it noted, "Although the awareness within Line Maintenance is mostly good, the responsibility again rests with the Pilot-in-Charge that the aircraft is physically checked by means of a hands-on check on the upper side of the wing. A visual check from a ladder or when standing on the ground is not enough"[1]

Another contribution to the accident was insufficient training of the crew: they were not trained in restoring engine operation after they repeatedly surged.[4] There was no simulator or other training on the engine surging problem. Secondly, they were not informed about a pre-installed automatic thrust system (ATR for Automatic Thrust Restoration). The reason for this lapse of information was that there was no knowledge of ATR within SAS. However, ATR was described in manuals by the aircraft builders which every operator is obliged to know. Even though the system was developed for use in procedures not applied by SAS, a sufficiently careful study of the manuals should have led to SAS noting the system and training its pilots in its function.[1]

The conclusion of the official accident report states:

The accident was caused by SAS' instructions and routines being inadequate to ensure that clear ice was removed from the wings of the aircraft prior to takeoff. Hence the aircraft took off with clear ice on the wings. In connection to lift-off, the clear ice disengaged and was sucked in by the engines. The ice caused damage to the engine fan stages, which led to engine surges, and these triggered irreparable engine failure. The pilots were not trained to identify and eliminate engine surging; furthermore, the Automatic Thrust Restoration system was not known by the pilots, nor noticed by the airline.

In the section "Compressor failures" the report states:

With sufficiently reduced thrust in the right engine and maintained thrust (not increased) in the left engine, the engines would probably not have failed. The aircraft would then have been able to return for landing.

Dramatization

The accident was featured in Air Crash Investigation's episode "Pilot Betrayed", along with interviews of the some of the crew, and the poignant resignation of Pilot Rasmussen.

External links and references

Coordinates: 59°46′6.12″N 18°7′54.6″E / 59.7683667°N 18.131833°E / 59.7683667; 18.131833


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • United Airlines Flight 585 — Occurrence summary Date 3 March 1991 Type Rudder Malfunction Site …   Wikipedia

  • China Airlines Flight 358 — B 198 at changi Airport in 1985 Accident summary Date Decembe …   Wikipedia

  • Scandinavian Airlines System — Infobox Airline airline = Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS) logo size = 250 IATA = SK BU ICAO = SAS CNO callsign = SCANDINAVIAN SCANOR parent = SAS AB founded = 1946 headquarters = Stockholm, Sweden *SAS Group, SAS AB *Scandinavian Airlines… …   Wikipedia

  • Flight attendant — Flight attendants or cabin crew (historically known as stewards, air hosts/hostesses, or stewardesses) are members of an aircrew employed by airlines to ensure the safety and comfort of the passengers aboard commercial flights as well as on… …   Wikipedia

  • Continental Express Flight 2574 — Accident summary Date September 11, 1991 Type Maintenance error Site …   Wikipedia

  • Lauda Air Flight 004 — Accident summary Date 26 May 1991 Type In flight uncommanded deployment of thrust reverser Site …   Wikipedia

  • Nigeria Airways Flight 2120 — C GMXQ, the aircraft involved in the accident, is seen here at Faro Airport. (1989) Accident summary …   Wikipedia

  • Non-stop flight — A non stop flight, especially in the aviation industry, refers to any flight by an aircraft which does not involve any intermediate stops. A direct flight is not the same as a non stop flight . For purposes of this article, an ultra long haul non …   Wikipedia

  • Stockholm-Arlanda Airport — Infobox Airport name = Stockholm Arlanda Airport nativename = Stockholm Arlanda flygplats IATA = ARN ICAO = ESSA type = Public owner = operator = Luftfartsverket city served = Stockholm, Sweden location = Sigtuna Municipality elevation f = 137… …   Wikipedia

  • List of Mayday episodes — Mayday, also known as Air Crash Investigation(s) in the United Kingdom, Australia and Asia and Air Emergency and Air Disasters in the United States, is a Canadian documentary television program produced by Cineflix investigating air crashes, near …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”