- Phenomenology (philosophy)
Phenomenology is the study of
phenomena(from Greek, meaning "that which appears") and how they appear to us from a first-person perspective. In modern times, it usually refers to the philosophy developed by Edmund Husserl, which is primarily concerned with consciousnessand its structures (the ways in which phenomena appear to us). Because consciousness is supposed to be that to which everything shows itself, and phenomenology is the study of consciousness, Husserl considered it to be a proper first philosophy. Husserl also sought to develop a "philosophy as rigorous science".
Husserl's original account of phenomenology has through the years been criticised and developed, partly by Husserl himself, but also by
Martin Heidegger, who was his student and assistant, and many of the later existentialist thinkers such as Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Simone de Beauvoir.
What is Phenomenology?
In its most basic form, phenomenology is the study of the consciousness from a first-person perspective, as opposed to, but not exclusive of, a third-person perspective like the neurological perspective. It is the attempt to reflect on pre-reflexive experience to determine certain properties of, or structures in, consciousness.
Husserl derived many important concepts central to phenomenology from the works and lectures of his teachers, the philosophers and psychologists
Franz Brentanoand Carl Stumpf. [citation
title=Husserl's Position in the School of Brentano
place= Dordrecht / Boston / London
year=1999] An important element of phenomenology that Husserl borrowed from Brentano was
intentionality(often described as "aboutness"), the notion that consciousness always is consciousness "of" something. The object of consciousness is called the "intentional object", and this object is constituted for consciousness in many different ways, through for instance perception, memory, protention, retention, signification, etc. Throughout these different intentionalities, though they have different structures and different ways of being "about" the object, an object is still constituted as the same identical object; consciousness is directed at the same intentional object in direct perception as it is in the immediately following retention of this object and the eventual remembering of it.
Though many of the phenomenological methods involve various reductions, phenomenology is essentially anti-reductionistic; the reductions are mere tools to better understand and describe the workings of consciousness, not to reduce any phenomenon to these descriptions. In other words, when a reference is made to a thing's "essence" or "idea", or when one details the constitution of an identical coherent thing by describing what one "really" sees as being only these sides and aspects, these surfaces, it does not mean that the thing is only and exclusively what is described here: The ultimate goal of these reductions is to understand "how" these different aspects are constituted into the actual thing as experienced by the person experiencing it. Phenomenology is a direct reaction to the
psychologismand physicalismof Husserl's time.
Intuition in phenomenology refers to those cases where the intentional object is present in direct perception, where the intention is "filled," so to speak. For instance, having a cup of coffee in front of you, seeing it, feeling it - these are all filled intentions, and the object is then "intuited". If you do not have the object in direct perception, as when you remember it or if you fantasize about it, the object is not intuited, but still intended. This also goes for "theoretical" objects like mathematical objects. Filled intentions about these kinds of objects can be such things as thought and imagination.
The lived-body is your own body as experienced by yourself, "as" yourself. Your own body manifests itself to you mainly as your possibilities of acting in the world. It is what lets you reach out and grab something, for instance, but it also, and more importantly, allows for the possibility of changing your point of view. This helps you differentiate one thing from another by the experience of moving around it, seeing new aspects of it (often referred to as making the absent present and the present absent), and still retaining the notion that this is the same thing that you saw other aspects of just a moment ago (it is identical).
empathyrefers to the experience of another human body as another subjectivity: You see another body, but you immediately perceive another subject. In Husserl's original account, this was done by apperceptionbuilt on the experiences of your own lived-body which you experience in a dual way, both as object (you can touch your own hand) and as your own subjectivity (you are being touched). This experience of your own body as your own subjectivity is then applied to the experience of another's body, which, through apperception, is constituted as another subjectivity. This experience of empathy is important in the phenomenological account of intersubjectivity.
Husserl's "Logische Untersuchungen" (1900/1901)
In the first edition of the "Logical Investigations", still under the influence of Brentano, Husserl describes his position as "descriptive psychology." Husserl analyzes the intentional structures of mental acts and how they are directed at both real and ideal objects. The first volume of the "Logical Investigations", the "Prolegomena to Pure Logic", begins with a devastating critique of
psychologism, i.e., the attempt to subsume the "a priori" validity of the laws of logic under psychology. Husserl establishes a separate field for research in logic, philosophy, and phenomenology, independently from the empirical sciences. [On the "Logical Investigations", seeCitation
title= One Hundred Years of Phenomenology (Husserl's Logical Investigations Revisited)
place= Dordrecht / Boston / London
editor-first= Jitendra Nath
title= Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations
place= Den Haag
Transcendental phenomenology after the "Ideen" (1913)
Some years after the publication of the "Logical Investigations", Husserl made some key elaborations which led him to the distinction between the act of consciousness ("noesis") and the phenomena at which it is directed (the "noemata").
* "noetic" refers to the intentional act of consciousness (believing, willing, etc.)
* "noematic" refers to the object or content (noema) which appears in the noetic acts (the believed, wanted, hated, and loved ...).
What we observe is not the object as it is in itself, but how and inasmuch it is given in the intentional acts. Knowledge of
essences would only be possible by "bracketing" all assumptions about the existence of an external world and the inessential (subjective) aspects of how the object is concretely given to us. This procedure Husserl called "epoché".
Husserl in a later period concentrated more on the ideal, essential structures of consciousness. As he wanted to exclude any hypothesis on the existence of external objects, he introduced the method of phenomenological reduction to eliminate them. What was left over was the pure transcendental ego, as opposed to the concrete empirical ego. Now (transcendental) phenomenology is the study of the essential structures that are left in pure consciousness: this amounts in practice to the study of the noemata and the relations among them. The philosopher
Theodor Adornocriticised Husserl's concept of phenomenological epistemology in his metacritique "Against Epistemology", which is anti-foundationalist in its stance.
Transcendental phenomenologists include
Oskar Becker, Aron Gurwitsch, and Alfred Schutz.
After Husserl's publication of the "Ideen" in 1913, many phenomenologists took a critical stance towards his new theories. Especially the members of the Munich group distanced themselves from his new transcendental phenomenology and preferred the earlier realist phenomenology of the first edition of the "Logical Investigations".
Realist phenomenologists include
Adolf Reinach, Alexander Pfänder, Johannes Daubert, Max Scheler, Roman Ingarden, Nicolai Hartmann, Dietrich Von Hildebrandand Hans Köchler.
Existential phenomenologydiffers from transcendental phenomenology by its rejection of the transcendental ego. Merleau-Ponty objects to the ego's transcendence of the world, which for Husserl leaves the world spread out and completely transparent before the conscious. Heidegger thinks of a conscious being as always already in the world. Transcendence is maintained in existential phenomenology to the extent that the method of phenomenology must take a presuppositionless starting point - transcending claims about the world arising from, for example, natural or scientific attitudes or theories of the ontological nature of the world.
Husserlthought of philosophy as a scientific discipline that had to be founded on a phenomenology understood as epistemology, Heideggerheld a radically different view. Heidegger himself states their differences this way::"For Husserl, the phenomenological reduction is the method of leading phenomenological vision from the natural attitude of the human being whose life is involved in the world of things and persons back to the transcendentallife of consciousness and its noetic-noematic experiences, in which objects are constituted as correlates of consciousness. For us, phenomenological reduction means leading phenomenological vision back from the apprehension of a being, whatever may be the character of that apprehension, to the understanding of the Being of this being (projecting upon the way it is unconcealed)."citation
author-link = Martin Heidegger
title=The Basic Problems of Phenomenology
publisher=Indiana University Press
According to Heidegger, philosophy was not at all a scientific discipline, but more fundamental than science itself. According to him science is only one way of knowing the world with no special access to truth. Furthermore, the scientific mindset itself is built on a much more "primordial" foundation of practical, everyday knowledge. Husserl was skeptical of this approach, which he regarded as quasi-mystical, and it contributed to the divergence in their thinking.
Instead of taking phenomenology as "prima philosophia" or a foundational discipline, Heidegger took it as a metaphysical ontology: "being is the proper and sole theme of philosophy"... this means that philosophy is not a science of beings but of being.". Yet to confuse phenomenology and ontology is an obvious error. Phenomena are not the foundation or Ground of Being. Neither are they appearances, for as Heidegger argues in "
Being and Time", an appearance is "that which shows itself in something else," while a phenomenon is "that which shows itself in itself."
While for Husserl, in the epochè, being appeared only as a correlate of consciousness, for Heidegger being is the starting point. While for Husserl we would have to abstract from all concrete determinations of our empirical ego, to be able to turn to the field of pure consciousness, Heidegger claims that "the possibilities and destinies of philosophy are bound up with man's existence, and thus with temporality and with historicality."
However, ontological being and existential being are different categories, so Heidegger's conflation of these categories is, according to Husserl's view, the root of Heidegger's error. Husserl charged Heidegger with raising the question of ontology but failing to answer it, instead switching the topic to the Dasein, the only being for whom Being is an issue. That is neither ontology nor phenomenology, according to Husserl, but merely abstract anthropology. To clarify, perhaps, by abstract anthropology, as a non-existentialist searching for essences, Husserl rejected the existentialism implicit in Heidegger's distinction between being (sein) as things in reality and Being (Da-sein) as the encounter with being, as when being becomes present to us, that is, is unconcealed. [ I have attempted to respond to the request for clarification of Heidegger's distinction between being and Being. My info source was http://www.uni.edu/boedeker/NNhHeidegger2.doc. It was not copied and pasted but rephrased for copyright reasons. ]
Existential phenomenologists include:
Martin Heidegger(1889 – 1976), Hannah Arendt(1906 – 1975), Emmanuel Levinas(1906 – 1995), Gabriel Marcel(1889 – 1973), Jean-Paul Sartre(1905 – 1980), Paul Ricoeur(1913 - 2005) and Maurice Merleau-Ponty(1908 – 1961).
Phenomenology and Eastern thought
Some researchers in phenomenology (particularly in reference to
Heidegger's legacy) see possibilities of establishing dialogues with traditions of thought outside of the so-called Western philosophy, particularly with respect to East-Asian thinking, and despite perceived differences between "Eastern" and "Western". [ See for instance references to Heidegger's "A Dialogue on Language between a Japanese and an Inquirer," in "On the Way to Language" (New York: Harper & Row, 1971). Heidegger himself had contacts with some leading Japanese intellectuals, including members of the Kyoto School, notably Hajime Tanabe, Kuki Shūzōand Kiyoshi Miki.] Furthermore, it has been claimed that a number of elements within phenomenology (mainly Heidegger's thought) have some resonance with Eastern philosophical ideas, particularly with Zen Buddhismand Taoism. [ An account given by Paul Hsao (in "Heidegger and Asian Thought") records a remark by Chang Chung-Yuan claiming that "Heidegger is the only Western Philosopher who not only intellectually understands but has intuitively grasped Taoist thought"] According to Tomonubu Imamichi, the concept of "Dasein" was inspired — although Heidegger remains silent on this — by Okakura Kakuzo's concept of "das-in-dem-Welt-sein" (being in the world) expressed in " The Book of Tea" to describe Zhuangzi's philosophy, which Imamichi's teacher had offered to Heidegger in 1919, after having studied with him the year before. Tomonubu Imamichi, "In Search of Wisdom. One Philosopher's Journey", Tokyo, International House of Japan, 2004 (quoted by Anne Fagot-Largeau during her [http://www.college-de-france.fr/default/EN/all/phi_sci/p1184676830986.htm lesson] at the Collège de Franceon December 7, 2006).]
There are also recent signs of the reception of phenomenology (and Heidegger's thought in particular) within scholarly circles focused on studying the impetus of
metaphysicsin the history of ideas in Islamand Early Islamic philosophy; [ See for instance: Nader El-Bizri, "The Phenomenological Quest between Avicennaand Heidegger" (Binghamton, N.Y.: Global Publications SUNY, 2000) ISBN 1586840053] perhaps under the indirect influence of the tradition of the French Orientalist and philosopher Henri Corbin. [A book-series under the title: "Islamic Philosophy and Occidental Phenomenology in Dialogue" [http://www.springer.com/series/6137] has been recently established by Springer (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht) in association with the World Phenomenology Institute [http://www.phenomenology.org/] . This initiative has been initiated by the Polish phenomenologist Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, editor of "Analecta Husserliana".]
In addition, the work of Jim Ruddy in the field of comparative philosophy, combined the concept of Transcendental Ego in Husserl's phenomenology with the concept of the primacy of self-consciousness in the work of Sankaracharya. In the course of this work, Ruddy uncovered a wholly new eidetic pheomenological science which he called "convergent phenomenology." This new phenomenology takes over where Husserl left off, and deals with the constitution of relation-like, rather than merely thing-like, or "intentional" objectivity. [ See the thesis, "Convergent Phenomenology," presented to the University of Madras, June, 1979. ]
Criticisms of phenomenology
Daniel Dennetthas criticized phenomenology on the basis that its explicitly first-person approach is incompatible with the "scientific" third-person approach, going so far as to coin the term "autophenomenology" to emphasize this aspect and to contrast it with his own alternative, which he calls heterophenomenology. Dennett's criticism reflects a more general attitude among analytic philosophers of mind. Phenomenologists, however, are often quick to point out that the relationship between phenomenological and natural scientific methods has been a major theme in phenomenology since at least Husserl see The Crisis of the European Sciences, though Dennett makes no real attempt to engage with the work of phenomenologists on this issue. Many proponents of phenomenology argue that natural science can make sense only as a human activity, i.e., an activity which presupposes the fundamental structures of the 'first-person perspective.' While not hostile to the natural sciences per se, many thinkers in the Heideggerian tradition would regard criticisms such as Dennett's metaphysical rather than purely scientific claims, and thus susceptible to the usual criticisms directed at metaphysical theories of all kinds. Powerful defenses of the phenomenological approach against science-inspired reductive naturalism have been made by Hubert Dreyfusand Charles Tayloramong others.
As part of an ongoing debate with
Hubert Dreyfus, John Searlehas argued that much of the work done by phenomenologists on the philosophy of mind suffers from what he terms the 'Phenomenological Illusion'. [cite web|url=http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~jsearle/PhenomenologicalIllusion.pdf|title=Searle.indd |format=PDF] Searle defines the Phenomenological Illusion as the mistake of assuming that what is not phenomenologically present is not real, and that what is phenomenologically present is an adequate description of how things really are. According to Searle, this leads some phenomenologists to make mistaken claims about subjects such as meaning, social reality, functions, and causal self referentiality. Searle himself makes explicit that, defined as the examination of consciousness, he has no problem with phenomenology itself.
Historical overview of the use of the term
Phenomenology has at least three main meanings in
philosophicalhistory: one in the writings of G.W.F. Hegel, another in the writings of Edmund Husserlin 1920, and a third, deriving from Husserl's work, in the writings of his former research assistant Martin Heideggerin 1927.
G.W.F. Hegel, phenomenology is an approach to philosophythat begins with an exploration of phenomena(what presents itself to us in conscious experience) as a means to finally grasp the absolute, logical, ontological and metaphysical Spirit that is behind phenomena. This has been called a "dialectical phenomenology".
Edmund Husserl, phenomenology is "the reflective study of the essenceof consciousness as experienced from the first-person point of view." [citation
place= London-New York
year=2007] Phenomenology takes the intuitive experience of
phenomena(what presents itself to us in phenomenological reflexion) as its starting point and tries to extract from it the essential features of experiences and the essenceof what we experience. When generalized to the essential features of any possible experience, this has been called "transcendental phenomenology". Husserl's view was based on aspects of the work of Franz Brentanoand was developed further by philosophers such as Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Max Scheler, Edith Stein, Dietrich von Hildebrandand Emmanuel Levinas.
Martin Heideggerbelieved that Husserl's approach overlooked basic structural features of both the subject and object of experience (what he called their "being"), and expanded phenomenological enquiry to encompass our understanding and experience of Being itself, thus making phenomenology the method (in the first phase of his career at least) of the study of being, ontology.
The difference in approach between Husserl and Heidegger influenced the development of
existential phenomenologyand existentialismin France, as is seen in the work of Jean-Paul Sartreand Simone de Beauvoir. Munich phenomenologists (Johannes Daubert, Adolf Reinach, Alexander Pfänderin Germanyand Alfred Schützin Austria), and Paul Ricoeurhave all been influenced. Readings of Husserl and Heidegger have also been crucial elements of the philosophies of Jacques Derridaand Bernard Stiegler.
Although the term "phenomenology" was used occasionally in the
history of philosophybefore Husserl, modern use ties it more explicitly to his particular method. Following is a list of thinkers in rough chronological order who used the term "phenomenology" in a variety of ways, with brief comments on their contributions: [Partially based onCitation
chapter="Phänomenologie": Eine Begriffsgeschichtilche Reflexion
title= Karl Schuhmann. Selected Papers on Phenomenology
place= Dordrecht / Boston / London
Friedrich Christoph Oetinger(1702 - 1782) German pietist, for the study of the "divine system of relations" [Ernst Benz, Christian Kabbalah: Neglected Child of Theology]
David Hume(1711 – 1776) Scottish philosopher, called variably a skepticor a common sense advocate. While this connection is somewhat tenuous, Hume, in A Treatise of Human Nature, does seem to take a phenomenological or psychological approach by describing the process of reasoning causality in psychological terms. This is also the inspiration for the Kantian distinction between phenomenal and noumenal reality. [Ernest Campbell Mossner. The Life of David Hume. Oxford University Press, 1980.]
Johann Heinrich Lambert(1728–1777) (mathematician, physician and philosopher) known for the theory of appearances underlying empirical knowledge. [Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1772). Anmerkungen und Zusätze zur Entwerfung der Land- und Himmelscharten. Von J. H. Lambert (1772.) Hrsg. von A. Wangerin. Mit 21 Textfiguren. (xml). W. Engelmann, reprint 1894.]
Immanuel Kant(1724–1804), in the Critique of Pure Reason, distinguished between objects as phenomena, which are objects as shaped and grasped by human sensibility and understanding, and objects as "things-in-themselves" or noumena, which do not appear to us in space and time and about which we can make no legitimate judgments.
G.W.F. Hegel(1770–1831) challenged Kant's doctrine of the unknowable thing-in-itself, and declared that by knowing phenomena more fully we can gradually arrive at a consciousness of the absolute and spiritual truth of Divinity. Hegel's " Phenomenology of Spirit", published in 1807, prompted many opposing views, including the existential work of Søren Kierkegaard, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre, as well as the materialist work of Marx and his many followers.
Franz Brentano(1838-1917) seems to have used the term in some of his lectures at Vienna, where Edmund Husserlstudied with him and came under his influence.
Carl Stumpf(1848-1936), student of Brentano and mentor to Husserl, used "phenomenology" to refer to an ontology of sensory contents.
Edmund Husserl(1859–1938) established phenomenology at first as a kind of "descriptive psychology" and later as a transcendental and eideticscience of consciousness. He is considered to be the founder of contemporary phenomenology.
Max Scheler(1874-1928) developed further the phenomenological method of Edmund Husserl and extended it to include also a reduction of the scientific method. He influenced the thinking of Pope John Paul IIand Edith Stein.
Martin Heidegger(1889–1976) criticized Husserl's theory of phenomenology and attempted to develop a theory of ontologythat led him to his original theory of Dasein, the non-dualistic human being.
Alfred Schütz(1899-1959) developed a phenomenology of the social world on the basis of everyday experience which has influenced major sociologists such as Harold Garfinkel, Peter Berger, and Thomas Luckmann.
Graham Harman(1968 - ) Although working from within phenomenology, Harman finds the broad history of phenomenology to be deficient in that it constantly subordinates the independent life of objects to our (human) access to them. His radical break with the traditional use of terms such as intentionalityas well as a fresh approach to metaphysics, stems from his greatest influences by such as the great phenomenologists Alphonso Lingis, Husserl, Ortega y Gasset, Zubiri, and Heidegger. Harman's thought is perhaps the first to combine phenomenology with speculative philosophers such as Whitehead, Leibniz, and the sort of radical thinking typified by Speculative Realism.
Later usage is mostly based on or (critically) related to Husserl's introduction and use of the term. This branch of philosophy differs from others in that it tends to be more "descriptive" than "prescriptive".
List of phenomenologists and phenomenology-derived theorists
James M. Edie
Michael Jackson (anthropology)
Mark Johnson (professor)
Jose Ortega y Gasset
Herman Van Breda
* Karol Wojtyła
Phenomenology of religion
Philosophy of technology
* Important publications in phenomenological psychology
*The [http://iap.li/default.php IAP LIBRARY] offers very fine sources for Phenomenology.
*The [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/ London Philosophy Study Guide] offers many suggestions on what to read, depending on the student's familiarity with the subject: [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/Phenomenology.htm Phenomenology]
* Dermot Moran, "Introduction to Phenomenology" (Oxford: Routledge, 2000) - Charting phenomenology from Brentano, through Husserl and Heidegger, to Gadamer, Arendt, Levinas, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and Derrida.
* Robert Sokolowski, "Introduction to Phenomenology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000) - An excellent non-historical introduction to phenomenology.
Herbert Spiegelberg, "The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction," 3rd ed. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983). The most comprehensive source on the development of the phenomenological movement.
* David Stewart and Algis Mickunas, "Exploring Phenomenology: A Guide to the Field and its Literature" (Athens: Ohio University Press 1990)
* Michael Hammond, Jane Howarth, and Russell Kent, "Understanding Phenomenology" (Oxford: Blackwell 1995)
* Christopher Macann, "Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty" (New York: Routledge: 1993)
Jan Patočka, "Qu'est-ce que la phénoménologie?" In: "Qu'est-ce que la phénoménologie?", ed. and trans. E. Abrams (Grenoble: J. Millon 1988), pp. 263–302. An answer to the question, What is phenomenology?, from a student of both Husserl and Heidegger and one of the most important phenomenologists of the latter half of the twentieth century.
* William A. Luijpen and Henry J. Koren, "A First Introduction to Existential Phenomenology" (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press 1969)
* Richard M. Zaner, "The Way of Phenomenology" (Indianapolis: Pegasus 1970)
Hans Köchler, "Die Subjekt-Objekt-Dialektik in der transzendentalen Phänomenologie. Das Seinsproblem zwischen Idealismus und Realismus". (Meisenheim a.G.: Anton Hain, 1974) (German)
Hans Köchler, "Phenomenological Realism: Selected Essays" (Frankfurt a. M./Bern: Peter Lang, 1986)
Mark Jarzombek, "The Psychologizing of Modernity" (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
* Pierre Thévenaz, "What is Phenomenology?" (Chicago: Quadrangle Books 1962)
* ed. James M. Edie, "An Invitation to Phenomenology" (Chicago: Quadrangle Books 1965) - A collection of seminal phenomenological essays.
* ed. R. O. Elveton, "The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings" (Seattle: Noesis Press 2000) - Key essays about Husserl's phenomenology.
* ed. Laura Doyle, "Bodies of Resistance: New Phenomenologies of Politics, Agency, and Culture". Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2001.
* eds. Richard Zaner and Don Ihde, "Phenomenology and Existentialism" (New York: Putnam 1973) - Contains many key essays in existential phenomenology.
Albert Borgmannand his work in philosophy of technology.
* eds. Natalie Depraz,
Francisco Varela, Pierre Vermersch, "On Becoming Aware: A Pragmatics of Experiencing" (Amsterdam: John Benjamins 2003) - searches for the sources and the means for a disciplined practical approach to exploring human experience.
* Don Idhe, "Experimental Phenomenology: An Introduction" (Albany, NY: SUNY Press)
*Sara Ahmed, "Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects Others" (Durham: Duke University Press 2006)
* Michael Jackson, "Existential Anthropology"
*cite book|title=Being and Nothingness |first=Jean-Paul |last=Sartre
Shaun Gallagherand Dan Zahavi,"The Phenomenological Mind". London: Routledge, 2007.
* [http://www.phenomenologycenter.org/phenom.htm What is Phenomenology?]
* [http://www.husserlpage.com/ About Edmund Husserl]
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry]
* [http://www.o-p-o.net/ Organization of Phenomenology Organizations]
* [http://www.phenomenology.ro Romanian Society for Phenomenology]
* [http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/ Phenomenology Online]
* [http://www.thenewdialectics.org Dialectical Phenomenology]
* [http://www.thenewphenomenology.org The New Phenomenology]
* [http://www.springer.com/philosophy/phenomenology Springer's academic Phenomenology program]
* [http://popups.ulg.ac.be/bap.htm Bulletin d'analyse phénoménologique]
* [http://www.janushead.org Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts]
* [http://www.britishphenomenology.com Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology]
* [http://www.brill.nl/m_catalogue_sub6_id9390.htm Research in Phenomenology]
* [http://www.phenomenology.ro/newsletter/newsletter_all.htm Newsletter of Phenomenology] (online-newsletter)
* [http://www.studia-phaenomenologica.com/ Studia Phaenomenologica] ISSN|1582-5647
* [http://www.ipjp.org/ Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology]
* [http://www.roman-ingarden.phils.uj.edu.pl/ang/index.php The Roman Ingarden Philosophical Research Centre]
* [http://www.springer.com/11097 Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences]
* [http://www.springer.com/11007 Continental Philosophy Review]
* [http://www.springer.com/10746 Human Studies]
* [http://www.springer.com/10743 Husserl Studies]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/6062 Edmund Husserl: Gesammelte Werke]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/6059 Edmund Husserl: Collected Works]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/6060 Edmund Husserl: Dokumente]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/6061 Edmund Husserl: Materialien]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/5621 Analecta Husserliana]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/6409 Phaenomenologica]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/5811 Contributions to Phenomenology]
* [http://www.springer.com/series/6545 Studies in German Idealism]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.