- Proto-Indo-European society
The society of the
Proto-Indo-Europeans (PIE) existed during theBronze Age (roughly fifth to fourth millennium BC), and has been reconstructed through analyses of modern Indo-European societies as well as archaeological evidence. PIE society was most likelypatrilineal , and probably semi-nomadic , relying onanimal husbandry .ocietal structure
The native name with which these people referred to themselves as a linguistic community, or as an
ethnic unity of related tribes cannot be reconstructed with certainty.There is evidence for sacral kingship, suggesting the
tribal chief at the same time assumed the role of high priest. Many Indo-European societies still show signs of an earlier threefold division of aclerical class, awarrior class and a class offarmer s or husbandmen. Such a division was suggested for the Proto-Indo-European society byGeorges Dumézil .If there was a separate class of
warrior s, it probably consisted of single young men. They would have followed a separate warrior code unacceptable in the society outside their peer-group. Traces of initiation rites in several Indo-European societies suggest that this group identified itself with wolves or dogs (seeBerserker ,Werewolf ,Wild Hunt ).The people were organized in settlements ("*weiunicode|ḱs"; English "-wick" "village"), probably each with its chief ("*unicode|H₃rēunicode|ǵs"). These settlements or villages were further divided in households ("*domos"), each headed by a patriarch ("*dems-potis"; Greek "despotes", Sanskrit "dampati").
Technology
Technologically, reconstruction suggests a culture of the
Bronze Age : Words forBronze can be reconstructed ("*unicode|H₂éyos") from Germanic, Italic and Indo-Iranian, while no word forIron can be dated to the proto-language.Gold andSilver were known.An "*unicode|n̥sis" was a bladed weapon, originally a
dagger of Bronze or in earliest times of bone. An "*ik'mos" was aspear or similar pointed weapon. Words foraxe are "*unicode|H₂éunicode|gʷsiunicode|H₂" (Germanic, Greek, Italic) and "*péleunicode|ḱus" (Greek, Indo-Iranian); these could have been either of stone or of bronze.The
wheel ("*unicode|kʷéunicode|kʷlos" or "*rótunicode|H₂eunicode|H₂") was known, certainly for ox-drawn carts. Horse-drawnchariot s developed after the breakup of the proto-language, originating with theProto-Indo-Iranian s around2000 BC .Judging by the vocabulary, techniques of
weaving , plaiting, tyingknot s etc. were important and well-developed and used for textile production as well as for baskets, fences, walls etc. Weaving and binding also had a strong magical connotation, and magic is often expressed by such metaphors.Fact|date=July 2008 The bodies of the deceased seem to have been literally tied to their graves to prevent their return.Fact|date=July 2008ubsistence
Proto-Indo-European society depended on
animal husbandry .Cattle ("*unicode|gʷōus") were the most important animals to them, and a man's wealth would be measured by the number of cows he owned.Sheep ("*unicode|H₃ówis") andgoat s ("*unicode|gʰáidos") were also kept, presumably by the less wealthy. Agriculture and catching fish ("*písunicode|ḱos") were also practiced.The
domestication of the horse (seeTarpan ) may have been an innovation of this people and is sometimes invoked as a factor contributing to their rapid expansion.Ritual and sacrifice
They practiced a polytheistic religion centered on sacrificial rites, probably administered by a class of
priest s orshaman s.Animals were slaughtered ("*unicode|gʰʷunicode|n̥tós") and dedicated to the gods ("*déiwos") in the hope of winning their favour. The king as the high priest would have been the central figure in establishing favourable relations with the other world.
The
Kurgan hypothesis suggests burials in barrows or tomb chambers. Important leaders would have been buried with their belongings, and possibly also with members of their household or wives (sati). The practice ofhuman sacrifice is inferred from theLuhansk sacrificial site .Names
The use of two-word
compound word s for personalname s, typically but not always ascribing some noble or heroic feat to their bearer, is so common in Indo-European languages that it seems certainly inherited. These names are often of the class of compound words that inSanskrit are called "bahuvrihi " compounds.They are found in the Celtic region ("
Dumnorix ": "king of the world"; " Kennedy": "ugly head"), inIndo-Aryan languages ("Asvaghosa ": "tamer of horses"); in Greek ("Socrates ": "good ruler", "Hipparchus " : "horse master"; "Cleopatra ": "from famous lineage") inSlavic languages ("Vladimir": "great ruler"); in theGermanic language s ("Alfred": "elf-counsel"; "Godiva ": "gift of God").Patronymic s such as "Gustafson" ("son of Gustav"), "MacDonald" ("son of Donald") are also frequently encountered in Indo-European languages.Poetry
Only small fragments of Proto-Indo-European poetry may be recovered. What survives of their poetry are stock phrases of two or three words, like "undying fame" ("*ḱléwos n̥dʰgʷʰitom") and "immortal gods", that are found in diverse ancient sources. These seem to have been standard building blocks for song lyrics.
Inferring chiefly from the
Vedas , there would have been sacrificial hymns, creation myths (such as myths of aworld tree ), and hero tales (the slaying of a serpent or adragon , "*unicode|kʷunicode|r̥mis" by a heroic man or god).Probably of the greatest importance to the Indo-Europeans themselves were songs extolling great deeds by heroic warriors. In addition to perpetuating their glory ("*unicode|ḱléwos"), such songs would also temper the warriors' behavior, since each needed to consider whether his "undying fame" would be honorable or shameful. See also "
bard ", "fili ", "skald ", "rhapsode ".Philosophy
Some words connected with PIE world-view:
*"*PIE|gʰosti-" concerned mutual obligations between people and between worshipers and gods, and from which "guest" and "host" are derived.
*"*PIE|h₁r̥-tu-", "PIE|h₁r̥-to-", "fitting, right, ordered", also "right time, ritually correct", related to the order of the world (Avestan "asha ", Vedic "rta -", "rtu -")References
*Stüber, Karin, 'Die Stellung der Frau: Spuren indogermanischer Gesellschaftsordnung in der Sprache' in: Schärer, K. (ed.) "Spuren lesen", Chronos (2007), ISBN 978-3-0340-0879-2, pp. 97–115.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.