Court of Arbitration for Sport

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS; French: Tribunal Arbitral du Sport or TAS) is an international arbitration body set up to settle disputes related to sport. Its headquarters are in Lausanne and its courts are located in New York, Sydney and Lausanne, Switzerland. Temporary courts are built in current Olympic Host Cities.

With the intermixing of sports and politics, the body was originally conceived by International Olympic Committee (IOC) President Juan Antonio Samaranch to deal with disputes arising during the Olympics. It was established as part of the IOC in 1984.

Ten years later, a case decided by the CAS was appealed to the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, challenging CAS impartiality. The Swiss court ruled that the CAS was a true court of arbitration, but drew attention to the numerous links which existed between the CAS and the IOC. In response, the CAS underwent reforms to make itself more independent of the IOC, organizationally and financially. The biggest change resulting from this reform was the creation of an "International Council of Arbitration for Sport" (ICAS) to look after the running and financing of the CAS, thereby taking the place of the IOC.

Generally speaking, a dispute may be submitted to the CAS only if there is an arbitration agreement between the parties which specifies recourse to the CAS. Currently, all Olympic International Federations but one,^{[citation needed]} and many National Olympic Committees, have recognised the jurisdiction of the CAS and included in their statutes an arbitration clause referring disputes to it. Through compliance with the 2009 World Anti-Doping Code all Olympic International Federations have recognised the jurisdiction of CAS for anti-doping rule violations.

Its arbitrators are all high level jurists and it is generally held in high regard in the international sports community.^{[citation needed]}

As of 2004^[update], the majority of recent cases considered by the CAS dealt with transfer disputes within professional football (soccer) or with doping.

It ruled in 2006 that Gibraltar had valid grounds for its application to join UEFA, forcing the organisation to hand it provisional membership. At the next UEFA Congress, however, Gibraltar was overwhelmingly rejected in a vote, due to lobbying from Spain, in defiance of the CAS ruling.^[1]

In 2010 the Irish Football Association took its case to CAS after FIFA failed to prevent the Football Association of Ireland from selecting Northern-Irish-born players who had no blood link to the Republic.^[2] The CAS ruled in favour of the FAI and FIFA by confirming that they were correctly applying the regulations. ^[3]

External links

• Official website
• "Where do Athletes Go to Court?" Slate 1 July 2004

References

1. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/internationals/6302889.stm
2. ^ IFA take case to CAS
3. ^ http://www.tas-cas.org/d2wfiles/document/4385/5048/0/Award%202071.pdf