Colossal magnetoresistance

Colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) is a property of some materials, mostly manganese-based perovskite oxides, that enables them to dramatically change their electrical resistance in the presence of a magnetic field. The magnetoresistance of conventional materials enables changes in resistance of up to 5%, but materials featuring CMR may demonstrate resistance changes by orders of magnitude.

Initially discovered in mixed-valence perovskite manganites in the 1950s by G. H. Jonker and J. H. van Santen.,^[1] a first theoretical description in terms of the double-exchange mechanism was given early on. In this model, the spin orientation of adjacent Mn-moments is associated with kinetic exchange of e_g-electrons. Consequently, alignment of the Mn-spins by an external magnetic field causes higher conductivity. Relevant experimental work was done by Volger,^[2] Wollan and Koehler,^[3] and later on by Jirak et al.^[4] and Pollert et al.^[5]

However the double exchange model did not adequately explain the high insulating-like resistivity above the transition temperature.^[6] In the 1990s, work by R. von Helmholt et al.^[7] and Jin et al.^[8] initiated a large number of further studies. Although there is still no complete understanding of the phenomenon, there is a variety of theroetical and experimental work providing a deeper understanding of the relevant effects.

One prominent model is the so-called half-metallic ferromagnetic model, which is based on spin-polarized (SP) band structure calculations using the local spin-density approximation (LSDA) of the density functional theory (DFT) where separate calculations are carried out for spin-up and spin-down electrons. The half-metallic state is concurrent with the existence of a metallic majority spin band and a nonmetallic minority spin band in the ferromagnetic phase.

This model is not the same as the Stoner Model of itinerant ferromagnetism. In the Stoner model, a high density of states at the Fermi level makes the nonmagnetic state unstable. With SP calculations on covalent ferromagnets, the exchange-correlation integral in the LSDA-DFT takes the place of the Stoner parameter. The density of states at the Fermi level does not play a special role.^[9] A significant advantage of the half-metallic model is that it does not rely on the presence of mixed-valency as does the double exchange mechanism and it can therefore explain the observation of CMR in stoichiometric phases like the pyrochlore Tl₂Mn₂O₇. Microstructural effects have also been investigated for polycrystalline samples and it has been found that the magnetoresistance is often dominated by the tunneling of spin polarized electrons between grains, giving rise to an intrinsic grain-size dependence to the magnetoresistance.^[10][11]

Hitherto, however, a fully quantitative understanding of the CMR effect has been elusive and it is still the subject of current research activities. Early prospects of great opportunities for the development of new technologies have not yet come to fruition.

See also

• Giant magnetoresistance

References

1. ^ G. H. Jonker and J. H. Van Santen,Physica 16 (1950), p. 377
2. ^ J. Volger. Physica 20 (1954), p. 49
3. ^ E.O. Wollan and W.C. Koehler. Phys. Rev. 100 (1955), p. 545
4. ^ Z.B. Z. Jirak et al., JMMM 53 (1985), p. 153
5. ^ E. Pollert et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43 (1982), p. 1137
6. ^ J. N. Lalena and D. A. Cleary "Principles of Inorganic Materials Design," 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 361 (2010).
7. ^ R. von Helmolt, J. Wecker, B. Holzapfel, L. Schultz K. and Samwer, Giant negative magnetoresistance in perovskitelike La_2/3Ba_1/3MnO_x ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993), p. 2331, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2331
8. ^ S. Jin et al., Science 264 (1994), p. 413
9. ^ R. Zeller Computational Nanoscience: Do It Yourself, J. Grotendorst, S. Blũgel, D. Marx (Eds.), John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jũlich, NIC Series, Vol. 31, ISBN 3-00-017350-1, pp. 419-445, 2006.
10. ^ J. N. Lalena and D. A. Cleary "Principles of Inorganic Materials Design," 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 361-362 (2010).
11. ^ For a review see: E. Dagotto. Nanoscale Phase Separation and Colossal Magnetoresistance. Springer 2003.

• Colossal magnetoresistance, A. P. Ramirez, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 8171-8199 (1997) doi:10.1088/0953-8984/9/39/005

External links

• New Clues to Mechanism for Colossal Magnetoresistance
• Theory group at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
• Physicsweb article February 1999