Aquatic ape hypothesis

The aquatic ape hypothesis (AAH), sometimes referred to as the aquatic ape theory, asserts that wading, swimming and diving for food exerted a strong evolutionary effect on the ancestors of the genus "Homo" and is in part responsible for the split between the common ancestors of humans and other great apes. The AAH attempts to explain the large number of physical differences between humans and other apes, such as lack of body hair, larger brains and upright posture, in terms of the methods of feeding and types of food of early hominids living in coastal and river regions.

Hypotheses

As compared to their nearest living relatives, the great apes, humans exhibit many significant differences in anatomy, including bipedalism,cite journal |author=Niemitz, C |title=A Theory on the Evolution of the Habitual Orthograde Human Bipedalism - The "Amphibisce Generalistheorie" |journal=Anthropologischer Anzeiger |volume=60 |issue= |pages=3–66 |year=2002 |pmid= |doi=] hairless skin,cite book | last = Morgan | first = Elaine | authorlink = Elaine Morgan (writer) | title = The Aquatic Ape | year = 1982 | publisher = Stein & Day Pub | id = ISBN 0-285-62509-8] increased subcutaneous fat,cite journal | author = Hardy, A. | year = 1960 | title = Was man more aquatic in the past | journal = New Scientist | volume = 7 | pages = 642–645] greatly expanded brain size,cite journal |author=Crawford, M et al |title=Evidence for the unique function of docosahexanoic acid (DHA) during the evolution of the modern hominid brain |journal=Lipids |volume=34 |issue= |pages=S39–S47 |year=2000 |pmid= |doi=] a hooded nose which prevents water from entering the nostrils, and greasy skin with an abundance of sebaceous glands, which can be interpreted as a waterproofing device. [Kingdon, Jonathan. (2003) "Lowly Origin" Princeton University Press, 242] There are several variants on the broad theme that early or proto-humans lived in close proximity to water, gathering much of their food in or near shallow bodies of water and developing and adapting new modes of locomotion in order to move and gather food (possibly including wading,cite journal |author=Niemitz, C |title=A Theory on the Evolution of the Habitual Orthograde Human Bipedalism - The "Amphibisce Generalistheorie" |journal=Anthropologischer Anzeiger |volume=60 |issue= |pages=3–66 |year=2002 |pmid= |doi=] swimming,cite book | last = Patrick | first = John | title = Human Respiratory Adaptations for Swimming and Diving | year = 1991 | month = | publisher = Souvenir Press | id = 0-285-63033 4 ] and divingcite journal | author = Hardy, A. | year = 1960 | title = Was man more aquatic in the past | journal = New Scientist | volume = 7 | pages = 642–645] ). Proponents have disagreed on the relative importance of fresh watercite journal |author=Ellis DV |title=Wetlands or aquatic ape? Availability of food resources |journal=Nutrition and health |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=205–17 |year=1993 |pmid=8183488 |doi=] versus coastal salt- or brackish-watercite journal |author=Cunnane SC, Plourde M, Stewart K, Crawford MA |title=Docosahexaenoic acid and shore-based diets in hominin encephalization: a rebuttal |journal=Am. J. Hum. Biol. |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=578–81 |year=2007 |pmid=17546620 |doi=10.1002/ajhb.20673] habitats. Although the earliest proponents argued for an early (Miocene, "ca" 6 Ma) timescale,cite journal | author = Hardy, A. | year = 1960 | title = Was man more aquatic in the past | journal = New Scientist | volume = 7 | pages = 642–645] most now favour the view that the critical period of close association with waterside habitats was much later, with or just before the advent of genus "Homo" "ca" 2.5 Ma.cite journal | author = Verhaegen, M. | coauthors = Puech, P.F.; Munro, S. | year = 2002 | title = Aquarboreal ancestors? | journal = Trends in Ecology & Evolution | volume = 17 | issue = 5 | pages = 212–217 | url = http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/OP%20Verhaegen%20final%20styled.doc.pdf | format = pdf | accessdate = 2007-10-29 | doi = 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02490-4]

History

Sometime prior to 546 BC, the Milesian philosopher Anaximander proposed that mankind had sprung from an aquatic species of animal. He thought that the extended infancy of humans could not have originally permitted survival as a land-based species. This idea was based on elemental forces of mutation rather than natural selection.

The German biologist Max Westenhöfer was perhaps the first to publish the idea in an evolutionary context, writing that "The postulation of an aquatic mode of life during an early stage of human evolution is a tenable hypothesis, for which further inquiry may produce additional supporting evidence",cite book | author = Westenhöfer, M. | year = 1942 | title = Der Eigenweg des Menschen | publisher = Mannstaedt & Co] but it was the marine biologist Sir Alister Hardy, who announced similar thoughts in a speech to the British sub-aqua club in Brighton on 5 March 1960, that is more commonly credited with the origins of the idea.

News of Hardy's speech generated immediate controversy in the field of paleoanthropology, and Hardy followed up by publishing two articles in the scientific magazine "New Scientist"cite journal | author = Hardy, A. | year = 1960 | title = Was man more aquatic in the past | journal = New Scientist | volume = 7 | pages = 642–645] . In the article of 17 March 1960 [ [http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/Hardy/Hardy1960.pdf Scanned image of New Scientist article of 17 March 1960] ] Hardy defined his idea: "My thesis is that a branch of this primitive ape-stock was forced by competition from life in the trees to feed on the sea-shores and to hunt for food, shell fish, sea-urchins etc., in the shallow waters off the coast. I suppose that they were forced into the water just as we have seen happen in so many other groups of terrestrial animals. I am imagining this happening in the warmer parts of the world, in the tropical seas where Man could stand being in the water for relatively long periods, that is, several hours at a stretch." (Hardy 1960:642) Despite receiving some positive feedback in the Letters pages of "New Scientist" in the weeks that followed, and strong backing from a professor of geography,cite journal | author = Sauer, C O. | year = 1960 | title = Seashore - Primitive home of man? | journal = Proceedings of the American Philosopical Society | volume = 106 | issue =1 | pages = 41–47] the idea was largely ignored by the scientific community.

In 1967, the hypothesis was positively reviewed in "The Naked Ape," a book by Desmond Morris in which can be found the first use of the term "aquatic ape" (Morris 1967:29).cite book | last = Morris | first = Desmond | title = The Naked Ape | year = 1967 | month = | publisher = McGraw-Hill | id = ISBN 0 09 948201 0 ] The early television playwright and later feminist writer Elaine Morgan read about the idea in Morris' book and was struck by its potential explanatory power. She developed and promoted it over the next thirty years, publishing six books on the subject.] ] [] [] [] [cite book | last = Morgan | first = Elaine | authorlink = Elaine Morgan (writer) | title = The Naked Darwinist| year = 2008 | month = | publisher = Eildon Press | id = ISBN 0-9525620-30 ] Several other proponents have published work in favour of the aquatic ape hypothesis during this time including the physician Marc Verhaegen,cite journal | author = Verhaegen, M. | coauthors = Puech, P.F.; Munro, S. | year = 2002 | title = Aquarboreal ancestors? | journal = Trends in Ecology & Evolution | volume = 17 | issue = 5 | pages = 212–217 | url = http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/OP%20Verhaegen%20final%20styled.doc.pdf | accessdate = 2007-10-29 | doi = 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02490-4] neurochemists Michael Crawfordcite journal |author=Crawford, M et al |title=Evidence for the unique function of docosahexanoic acid (DHA) during the evolution of the modern hominid brain |journal=Lipids |volume=34 |issue= |pages=S39–S47 |year=2000 |pmid= |doi=] and Stephen Cunnane,cite journal |author=Cunnane, S., Plourde, M., Stewart, K., Crawford, M |title=Docosahexaenoic Acid and Shore-Based Diets in Hominin Encephalization: A Rebuttal |journal=American Journal of Human Biology |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=578–591 |year=2007 |pmid= |doi=10.1002/ajhb.20673] and ecologist Derek Ellis.cite journal |author=Ellis DV |title=Wetlands or aquatic ape? Availability of food resources |journal=Nutrition and health (Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire) |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=205–17 |year=1993 |pmid=8183488 |doi=]

Reception by Academia

The hypothesis and its variations have been largely ignored by mainstream paleoanthropology, although occasional papers have criticised certain aspects of it.] ] ] ] cite book | title = Skin: a natural history | last = Jablonski | first = N| publisher = University of California Press | year = 2006 | isbn = 0520242815 ] It has been suggested, for example, that a broad terrestrial diet would ensure sufficient access to docosahexaenoic acid that there was no requirement for high consumption of seafood and accordingly no reason to posit an aquatic phase in human evolution. [cite journal |author=Carlson BA, Kingston JD |title=Docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis and dietary contingency: Encephalization without aquatic constraint |journal=Am. J. Hum. Biol. |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=585–8 |year=2007 |pmid=17546613 |doi=10.1002/ajhb.20683]

In 1991 a symposium was held in Valkenburg, Holland, titled "Aquatic Ape: Fact or fiction?", which published its proceedings.cite book | last = Roede| first = Matilde | title = Aquatic Ape: Fact of Fiction: Proceedings from the Valkenburg Conference | year = 1991 | publisher = Souvenir Press | id = ISBN 0 285 63033 4] The chief editor, Vernon Reynolds, rejected the strong version of the hypothesis, but accepted a weaker form, summarizing that "overall, it will be clear that I do not think it would be correct to designate our early hominid ancestors as ‘aquatic’. But at the same time there does seem to be evidence that not only did they take to the water from time to time but that the water (and by this I mean inland lakes and rivers) was a habitat that provided enough extra food to count as an agency for selection. As a result, we humans today have the ability to learn to swim without too much difficulty, to dive, and to enjoy occasional recourse to the water."cite book | last = Reynolds| first = Vernon | title = Cold and Watery? Hot and Dusty? Our Ancestral Environment and Our Ancestors Themselves: an Overview (in Roede et al 1991) | year = 1991 | pages = 340 | publisher = Souvenir Press | id = ISBN 0 285 63033 4]

Despite the conciliatory wording of the summary, and the fact that half of the submitted papers were in favour of the hypothesis, it was reported in the anthropological press that the hypothesis had been rejected.

However there has since been some acceptance. In 2004 Colin Groves, Professor of Biological Anthropology at the Australian National University in Canberra, Australia with co-author David W. Cameron stated that

"..nor can we exclude the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis (AAH). Elaine Morgan has long argued that many aspects of human anatomy are best explained as a legacy of a semiaquatic phase in the proto-human trajectory, and this includes upright posture to cope with increased water depth as our ancestors foraged farther and further from the lake or seashore. At first, this idea was simply ignored as grotesque, and perhaps as unworthy of discussion because proposed by an amateur. But Morgan's latest arguments have reached a sophistication that simply demands to be taken seriously (Morgan 1990, 1997). And although the authors shy away from more speculative reconstructions in favour of phylogenetic scenarios, we insist that the AAH take its place in the battery of possible functional scenarios for hominin divergence." [cite book | last = Groves| first = Colin (with David W.Cameron) | title = Bones, Stones and Molecules | year = 2004 | pages = 400 | publisher = Elsevier Academic Press | id = ISBN 0 121 56933 0]

See also

* Aquatic adaptation
* Human evolution

References

External links

*