- Nova rocket
Nova was a series of proposed
rocket designs, originally asNASA 's first large launchers for missions similar to theSaturn V that entered production, and later as larger follow-ons to the Saturn V intended for missions to Mars. The two series of designs were essentially separate, but shared their name. Thus, "Nova" does not refer to a specific rocket design, just a rocket larger than theSaturn V in most cases. To add more confusion, the final Saturn V design was larger than some of the early Nova proposals. The "Nova" depicted in the illustration is the "Nova C8" design (superficially akin to the "Nova 8L" proposal which, instead, had giant twin Aerojet M-1 engines in stage 2). It is also unclear in the historic record, but it appears the Nova C8 concept was nearly identical to the proposed "Saturn C8"; there were differences in staging engines and in the stage-1 fin/flaring arrangement.Lunar rockets
The first Nova series was designed in-house at NASA in 1959. This project examined a number of designs, the smallest having four F-1s in the lower stage and J-2s in the uppers. This design placed 24 tons in a lunar injection trajectory. These designs were presented to President
Dwight D. Eisenhower onJanuary 27 ,1959 .The Nova designs were not the only lunar rockets being considered at the time. The
US Air Force was in the process of defining itsLunex Project , including a massive booster design using a cluster of solid fuel rockets in the lower stage withliquid hydrogen -powered uppers mounting the J-2 or M-1. Meanwhile, at theUS Army 'sRedstone Arsenal ,Wernher von Braun was developing his "Juno V" design, using a cluster of Jupiter and Redstone related engines and tanks for a lower stage, aTitan I missile as the second stage.In 1959 the Army decided it was no longer interested in developing large boosters, for which it had no immediate need, and passed von Braun's team over to NASA. This left NASA with two large booster designs, their own Nova, and von Braun's recently renamed Saturn ("the one after Jupiter"). Over the next two years the competing NASA and Air Force studies continued, but immediately following President
John F. Kennedy 's call to reach the moon before the end of the decade, NASA was given the mission and work on Lunex ended.Originally, NASA had designed Nova for the "
direct ascent " mission profile, in which a single large spacecraft would be placed in earth orbit. Dr. von Braun favoured a profile that built up the spaceship in Earth orbit, which reduced the launch mass needed for any one launch. However, as studies into the spacecraft needed for the mission started, it became clear that the systems would be much heavier than initially suspected; the existing Nova designs were too small, and the original Saturn design would need up to fifteen launches to put all the parts and fuel into orbit. A redesign of both plans followed.Nova was still targeting the direct ascent approach, which required the most lift capacity. The most powerful of the resulting "normal" designs, the 8L, included eight F-1's in the lower stage and placed 68 tons in a translunar trajectory. Other designs in the series replaced the F-1s with large solids, while others studied nuclear rocket engines for the upper stages. Lunar payload for the various models varied between 48 and 75 tons.
A number of upgraded Saturns were also studied. Dr. von Braun's original Saturn design became the A-1 model, while the A-2 replaced the Titan missile with a Jupiter. The more powerful B-1 model used a cluster of Titans for its second stage, but was otherwise similar to the A-1. More "radical" proposals, those requiring new engines, were lumped together in the "C series". C-1 was similar to the A-1, but used new upper stages derived from Titan engines, while the similar C-2 used new J-2 powered upper stages. C-3 through C-5 used the same J-2 powered uppers, but added a new first stage powered by three, four, or five F-1 engines (hence the names). Dr. von Braun's favoured approach remained
Earth Orbit Rendezvous (EOR), but this time based on two Saturn C-3's.The debate between the various approaches came to a head in 1961, and the outcome was unexpected by both teams. Instead of either the direct ascent or earth orbit rendezvous, the working group instead selected a third option,
Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (LOR). LOR had a mass requirement about mid-way between the Saturn C-3 and Nova 8L. After studying what would be required to modify either booster to the new requirement of about 200,000 lb inlow earth orbit (LEO), it seemed that the Saturn C-5 would be the best solution. The C-2 model would also be built as a testbed system, launching subassemblies into orbit for flight testing before the C-5 would be ready. The main determinant in selecting the Saturn over the Nova was that the Saturn C-5 could be built in an existing factory outsideNew Orleans , later known as theMichoud Assembly Facility , while the larger diameter Nova would need new factories to be built.Studies on the Nova series continued into 1962 as a backup for Saturn, but were eventually ended as the Saturn-based LOR profile became engrained.
Mars rockets
As the Apollo program continued, NASA designers started looking at their needs for the post-Apollo era, and it appeared that a manned mission to Mars would be the next "obvious" step. For this role even the Saturn V was far too small, and a second series of Nova design studies started for launchers of up to 1 million pounds delivered to LEO. Unlike the original Nova series which was designed in-house at NASA, the new designs were studied under contract by the major aerospace companies that did "not" receive major Apollo-related contracts, namely
General Dynamics andMartin Marietta .Philip Bono atDouglas Aircraft decided to send in his own unsolicited proposals as well.All of the companies submitted a wide variety of designs. Many of these were based on existing technology, suitably enlarged. For instance, Martin's smallest design, the 1B, used fourteen F-1s in the first stage and had a LEO payload of 662,000 lb, over three times that of the Saturn V. However they also suggested a number of "advanced" designs using the latest (undeveloped) technology, notably
aerospike engine s.It wasn't long after the proposals were submitted that it started becoming clear that post-Apollo funding would be considerably tighter. NASA abandoned their Nova plans in
1964 .The name "Nova" was used in over thirty large rocket proposals/studies from the late 1950s through the 1980s. Some other specific names given to the proposals were:
"Douglas"
* Nova DAC ISI
* Nova-1 DAC
* Nova-2 DAC"General Dynamics"
* Nova C
* Nova D
* Nova GD-B
* Nova GD-E
* Nova GD-F
* Nova GD-H
* Nova GD-J"Martin Marietta"
* Nova MM 14A
* Nova MM 14B
* Nova MM 1B
* Nova MM 1C
* Nova MM 24G
* Nova MM 33
* Nova MM 34
* Nova MM R10E-2
* Nova MM R10R-2
* Nova MM S10E-1
* Nova MM S10E-2
* Nova MM S10R-1
* Nova MM S10R-2
* Nova MM T10EE-1
* Nova MM T10RE-1
* Nova MM T10RR-2
* Nova MM T10RR-3"NASA"
* Nova 4L
* Nova NASA
* Nova 4S
* Nova 5S
* Nova 7S
* Nova 8L
* Nova 8L Mod
* Nova 9L"Convair"
* Nova A
* Nova Bpecifications for Nova C8
External links
* [http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/nova.htm "Encyclopedia Astronautica" entry]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.