- Historical roots of Catholic Eucharistic theology
The historical roots of Roman Catholic Eucharistic theology are the basis upon which a number of ecclesial communities, or churches, express their
faith in the "bread of life" as given byJesus , and are to be found in theChurch Fathers , Scripture, the writings ofThomas Aquinas , and other early church writings and traditions.Historical roots of Early Church and catholic Eucharistic theology
Institution
The three
synoptic Gospels and Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians contain versions of theWords of Institution : "Take, eat, this is my body.... Take, drink, this is my blood.... Do this in remembrance of me." All subsequent celebration of theEucharist is based on this injunction.The primary theological paradigm is rooted inNew Testament passage John [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=50&ch=006&l=47-67 6:47-67] , key to grasping how the disciples of Jesus and the first Christians understood the Eucharist. In a central portion of this passage ( [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=50&ch=006&l=51-54 6:51-54] ), Jesus states: :I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever; and the bread that I will give, is my flesh, for the life of the world. The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say unto you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.In the Aramaic Peshitta text the phrase "not have life in you" is "you have no life in your inner substance."Early Christian documents
From the earliest Christian documents, such as the
Didache , the understanding follows this pattern: that the bread and wine that is blessed and consumed at the end of the (transformed) Passover meal literally "is" the body and blood of Jesus, and was treated accordingly: "Let no one eat or drink of the Eucharist with you except those who have been baptized in the name of the Lord; for it was in reference to this that the Lord said: 'Do not give that which is holy to dogs'" (Jurgens §6). The Didache also enjoins "confessing your transgressions so that your sacrifice may be pure" (Jurgens §8). Others state explicitly that the consecrated bread and wine is indeed the body and blood of Christ. St. Ignatius of Antioch, who was martyred in ca.107 , wrote: "I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the Bread of God, which is the Flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire His Blood, which is love incorruptible" (Jurgens §54a). He recommended Christians to stay aloof from heretics who "confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again" ("Letter to the Smyrnaeans ", 8). (Note the use of "which", referring to "the flesh", not "who", which would refer to "our Saviour Jesus Christ".) St. Justin Martyr, ca.150 : "We call this food "Eucharist"; and no one else is permitted to partake of it, except one who believes our teaching to be true.... For not as common bread nor common drink do we receive these; but since Jesus Christ our Savior was made incarnate by the word of God and had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so too, as we have been taught, the food which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer set down by Him, and by the change of which our blood and flesh is nourished, is both the flesh and the blood of that incarnated Jesus" (Jurgens §128). From St. Clement of Alexandria, ca.202 : "'Eat My Flesh.' He says, 'and drink My Blood.' The Lord supplies us with these intimate nutriments. He delivers over His Flesh, and pours out His Blood; and nothing is lacking for the growth of His children. O incredible mystery!" (Jurgens §408).Documents selected as Scripture
The Scriptures, too, are testimony by the early Christians. In 1 Cor [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=53&ch=010&l=16 10:16] , St. Paul states: "The chalice of benediction, which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? And the bread, which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord?" In the next chapter, he draws the same association we find in the Didache and elsewhere, "i.e." the need for purity in receiving the Eucharist. First, Paul narrates the meal with Jesus: ( [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=53&ch=011&l=24 11:24] ) "And giving thanks, broke, and said: Take ye, and eat: this is my body, which shall be delivered for you: this do for the commemoration of me." Likewise with the chalice; then Paul states ( [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=53&ch=011&l=27 11:27] ) "Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord." So we find that the early letters and documents, as well as the letters that became Holy Scripture among Christians, appear strongly to affirm a belief in what is today called by many the "
Real Presence ", a summary term that refers to the notion that Jesus Christ is "really, truly, and substantially present" in the Eucharist.Over the centuries
Christian documents show that this dogma was maintained with the passage of time. From
Origen , c244 : " [W] hen you have received the Body of the Lord, you reverently exercise every care lest a particle of it fall..." (Jurgens §490). From St. Ephraim, ante373 : "Do not now regard as bread that which I have given you; but take, eat this Bread, and do not scatter the crumbs; for what I have called My Body, that it is indeed" (Jurgens §707). From St. Augustine, c412 : "He walked here in the same flesh, and gave us the same flesh to be eaten unto salvation. But no one eats that flesh unless first he adores it; and thus it is discovered how such a footstool of the Lord's feet is adored; and not only do we not sin by adoring, we do sin by not adoring" (Jurgens §1479a). At theRoman Council VI ,1079 , Berengarius affirmed: "I, Berengarius, in my heart believe and with my lips confess that through the mystery of the sacred prayer and the words of our Redeemer the bread and wine which are placed on the altar are substantially changed into the true and proper and living flesh and blood of Jesus Christ, our Lord..." (Denziger [Dz] §355). In a discussion of the form of consecration (the word now used to refer to the blessing given by Jesus),Pope Innocent III states (1202 ) "For the species of bread and wine is perceived there, and the truth of the body and blood of Christ is believed and the power of unity and of love.... The form is of the bread and wine; the truth, of the flesh and blood..." (Dz §414-4). The dogma was affirmed repeatedly by the Roman Catholic Church and within Roman Catholic theology, "e.g." at theCouncil of Lyon , A.D.1274 (Dz §465); byPope Benedict XII ,1341 (Dz §544); byPope Clement VI ,1351 (Dz §574a); at theCouncil of Constance ,1418 (Dz §583); at theCouncil of Florence ,1439 (Dz §698); byPope Julius III at theCouncil of Trent ,1551 (Dz §874); byPope Benedict XIV ,1743 (Dz §1469); byPope Pius VI ,1794 (Dz §1529); and byPope Leo XIII ,1887 (Dz §1919), inter alia. Other examples can be found to flesh out any interim.The "Summa Theologiae" by Thomas Aquinas
The
Summa Theologiae , c1270 , is considered within the Roman Catholic Church to be the paramount expression of its theology, and as such offers a clear discussion of the Eucharist. " [F] or Christ is Himself contained in the Eucharist sacramentally. Consequently, when Christ was going to leave His disciples in His proper species, He left Himself with them under the sacramental species..." ( [http://newadvent.org/summa/407505.htm III 73 5] ). "The presence of Christ's true body and blood in this sacrament cannot be detected by sense, nor understanding, but by faith alone, which rests upon Divine authority. Hence, on ). Jesus extols faith in verses , ), written little more than thirty years after the death of Jesus, and theActs of the Apostles (bibleref|Acts|2:42, bibleref|Acts|2:46) present the rite of "the Lord's supper" or "the breaking of bread" as dating from the very beginning of Christianity, when Christianity was still an entirely Jewish phenomenon, even before Gentiles, initially from among the "the God-fearing" (a term used forGentile s who attended Jewish synagogue services but held back from becoming full-scaleproselyte s), [See, for example, bibleref|Acts|13:16, bibleref|Acts|13:26.] were accepted as members of the Christian community. These writings, which are the earliest evidence about the rite of the Eucharist, thus indicate that these Christians believed they were continuing an already traditional reenactment of something that Jesus did and said at his last supper, and not performing a rite newly adapted from paganism, to which the same writings show they were strongly opposed. In fact, in bibleverse|1|Corinthians|10:14-22, Paul cites precisely the Eucharistic rite as a reason for refusing to have anything to do with the idolatry and sacrifices of the pagans.Spiritual meaning of the Eucharist
Union with God
Ignatius of Antioch (c110 ) called the Eucharist "the medicine of immortality, the antidote we take in order not to die but to live for ever in Jesus Christ" (Letter to the Ephesians, 20:2b). There are many related conclusions that flow naturally within Roman Catholic theology from the historical understanding of the Eucharist, which have deeply influenced the spirituality exhibited by many centuries of Christians. The following are all "spiritual points of view" that stem from the belief that Jesus is "truly, really, and substantially present" in the Eucharist:
*that he will feed man with his own flesh and blood
*that he, as food, is left so we will not fall through weariness (recall that Jesus stumbles on the way to Calvary)
*that Jesus is the perfection of the type of the seder supper, the true Passover lamb, true flesh and blood
*by washing the disciples' feet shortly before instituting the Eucharist he showed us perfect charity that should be the fruit of the Sacrament
*as Mary prayed to perpetually adore the Word made Flesh within her, so we will adore the Flesh within us at Holy Communion
*Mary teaches us to unite ourselves to Our Lord
*with Christ we are blessed to enjoy true interpenetration: "He Himself is in us by his flesh and we are in him" (St Hilary in Gabriel)
*we are made part of the living vine (Jn [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=50&ch=015&l=1-4 15:1-4] )
*in Holy Communion we have physical union with Christ
*nourished by the Eucharist we live by Christ as Christ lives by the Father alone
*as Jesus lives for the glory of the Father so should the communicant live only for the glory of Jesus
*to receive worthily we must not only receive the sacrament of confession but we must also be well disposed to the Eucharist, enlarging our hearts with love for what it is
*the humility he teaches us is exemplified in his own very humble way of coming to us under the forms of bread and wine
*God loves us so much, despite our fallen nature, that he performs this miracle of transubstantiation at every Mass, to give us a chance to return to him and be part of the true vineThese and many more besides are points of spiritual theology that have been spoken by the saints and expounded in books for spiritual guidance. Belief in the "Real Presence" is key to the Roman Catholic conception of progression in prayer life along the purgative way to the illuminative and unitive ways (seeprayer ). The seven Sacraments, as a group, are "seven springs of life", springs in the progression toward union with God. "First of all, the initial sacrament that sows the seeds of eternity, Baptism.... The Eucharist feeds the holy growth with a substance which is none other than the very substance of the Son of God and the Son of man, the sovereign food of the divine life and of the human life in the Christian, since Jesus Christ has the fullness of the divine life and the human life.... The sacraments produce sacramental grace. What is this grace? It is a right, founded on sanctifying grace, and in virtue of which I can demand and receive at the proper time the help of actual grace.... If only I knew how to preserve these rights and to fall back upon them! Assuredly, if God gives them me, it is not for me to neglect them" (Tissot). Thus, through the twentieth century, Roman Catholic theology and spirituality yet teaches us that Jesus Christ in the Eucharist has meaning for us as individuals, a theme elaborated especially well by Dietrich von Hildebrand in Transformation in Christ.Prayers
Many prayers exist within Roman Catholic spiritual life, reflecting on the dogma of the Eucharist. From St. Thomas: "Sit, Jesu dulcissime, sacratissimum Corpus tuum et Sanguis, dulcedo et suavitas animae meae,..." (Sweetest Jesus, Body and Blood most holy, be the delight and pleasure of my soul...). Also: "Not through any merit of my own, but only through the goodness of Your mercy, You have considered me — a sinner, a useless servant — worthy to be nourished with the precious Body and Blood of Your Son, our Lord Jesus Christ." The "Pater Noster" contains the important line, "Give us this day our daily bread." Here the word "daily" is used to translate the Greek word
epiousios . But "daily bread" can also be translated "supersubstantial bread" (as found in some Bible translations and in some prayers such as the "Prayer of St. Bonaventure" which begins: "Pierce, O most sweet Lord Jesus, my inmost soul..."). The Catholic Mass is offered daily, as are Eastern Orthodox communions. The active liturgical life of the Catholic faith is a key element in the theology of the Eucharist. At the Mass, it is prayed, "Perceptio Corporis tui, Domine Jesu Christe, quod ego indignus sumere praesumo, non mihi proveniat in judicium et condemnationem: sed pro tua pietate prosit mihi ad tutamentum mentis ot corporis, et ad medelam percipiendam..." essentially meaning, 'though I am unworthy, I presume to receive Thy Body; may it not turn to my judgment and condemnation'. (The Mass is available in Latin in hundreds of locations worldwide.) The "daily bread" in this prayer given by Jesus is a reference to the Eucharist according to many Church Fathers including St. Augustine, St. John Chrysostom, St. Jerome, and St. Cyprian of Carthage who in A.D.251 wrote: "As the prayer continues, we ask and say, 'Give us this day our daily bread.' ... And we ask that this bread be given us daily, so that we who are in Christ and daily receive the Eucharist as the food of salvation, may not, by falling into some more grievous sin and then in abstaining from communicating, be withheld from the heavenly Bread, and be separated from Christ's Body. ... He Himself warns us... (Jn [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=50&ch=006&l=54 6:54] )" (Jurgens §559). Cyprian again: "We can understand this petition ["give us this day our daily bread"] in a spiritual and in a literal sense. For in the divine plan both senses may help toward our salvation. For Christ is the bread of life; "this bread does not belong to everyone", but is ours alone. When we say, our Father, we understand that "he is the father of those who know him and believe in him". In the same way we speak of our daily bread, because "Christ is the bread of those who touch his body" (Liturgy of the Hours, 1975, Vol. III, Eleventh Week, Thursday, Office of Readings, Second Reading, emphases added). From the very earliest Church, it is clear that the "Pater Noster" refers to the Eucharist in conjunction with traditional Christian belief (faith) that it is the body and blood of Jesus Christ.References
*The Saint Andrew Daily Missal, St. Bonaventure Publications, Inc., 1999 reprint ed.
*Father Gabriel, Divine Intimacy, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1996 reprint ed.
*William A. Jurgens, The Faith of the Early Fathers.
*Alfred McBride, O.Praem., Celebrating the Mass, Our Sunday Visitor, 1999.
*Very Rev. J. Tissot, The Interior Life, 1916, pp. 347-9.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.