Infobox World Heritage Site
Name = Site of Carthage
State Party = TUN
Type = Cultural
Criteria = ii, iii, vi
ID = 37
Year = 1979
Session = 3rd
Carthage ( _gr. Καρχηδών "Karkhēdōn", _la. Carthago, from the Phoenician קרת חדשת " _ph. Qart-ḥadašt" meaning "new town") refers both to an ancient city in
Tunisiaand to the civilization that developed within the city's sphere of influence. The city of Carthage is located on the eastern side of Lake Tunisacross from the center of Tunis.According to legend it was founded by Phoenician colonists under the leadership of Elissa (Queen Dido). It became a large and rich city and thus a major power of the Mediterranean until its destruction in the Third Punic Warin 146 BC. Although the center of the Punic culture was destroyed, it continued into Roman times. Rome also refounded Carthage, which became one of the three most important cities of the Empire, a position that would last until the Muslim conquest when it was destroyed a second time in 698 AD.
Carthage was built on a promontory with inlets to the sea to the north and south. The city's location made it master of the Mediterranean's maritime trade. All ships crossing the sea had to pass between
Sicilyand the coast of Tunisia, where Carthage was built, affording it great power and influence.
Two large, artificial harbors were built within the city, one for harboring the city's massive navy of 220 warships and the other for mercantile trade. A walled tower overlooked both harbors.
The city had massive walls, 23 miles (37 kilometers) in length, longer than the walls of comparable cities. Most of the walls were located on the shore, and thus could be less impressive as Carthaginian control of the sea made attack from that direction difficult. The 2½–3 miles (4–4.8 kilometers) of wall on the
isthmusto the west were truly large and in fact were never penetrated.
The city had a huge
necropolisor burial ground, religious area, market places, council house, towers, and a theatre, and was divided into four equally-sized residential areas with the same layout. Roughly in the middle of the city stood a high citadel called the Byrsa. It was one of the largest cities in Hellenistic times (by some estimates only Alexandriawas larger) and was among the largest cities in pre-industrial history.
The historical study of Carthage is problematic. Because its culture and records were destroyed by the Romans at the end of the
Third Punic War, very few Carthaginian primary historical sources survive. While there are a few ancient translations of Punictexts into Greek and Latin, as well as inscriptions on monuments and buildings discovered in North Africa, [cite web
last = Jongeling
first = K.
year = 2005
url = http://website.leidenuniv.nl/~jongelingk/projects/neopunic-inscr/puninscr.html
title = The Neo-Punic Inscriptions and Coin Legends
format = HTML
publisher = University of Leiden
accessmonthday = April 14
accessyear = 2006] the main sources are Greek and Roman historians, including
Livy, Polybius, Appian, Cornelius Nepos, Silius Italicus, Plutarch, Dio Cassius, and Herodotus. These writers belonged to peoples in competition, and often in conflict, with Carthage. [ [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&docId=9384201 Carthage by B. H. Warmington p11] ] Greek cities contested with Carthage for Sicily, [Herodotus, V2. 165–7] and the Romans fought three wars against Carthage. [Polybius, World History: 1.7–1.60] Not surprisingly, their accounts of Carthage are extremely hostile; while there are a few Greek authors who took a favorable view, these works have been lost. [Warmington, B. H. "Carthage", p.11.]
Recent excavation has brought much more primary material to light. Some of these finds contradict aspects of the traditional picture of Carthage, and much of the material is still ambiguous.
Legends of the foundation
Queen Elissa (also known as "Alissar", and by the Arabic namecite web | url=http://www.alwatan.com.sa/daily/2004-03-21/socity/socity13.htm | title=Al-Watan Daily | accessdate=2007-07-25 | publisher=http://www.alwatan.com.sa | language=Arabic] _ar. اليسار also _ar. اليسا and _ar. عليسا), who in later accounts became known as "Queen Dido", was a princess of Tyre who founded Carthage. At its peak, her metropolis came to be called the "shining city," ruling 300 other cities around the western Mediterranean and leading the Phoenician (or Punic) world.
Elissa was a princess of Tyre. Her brother, King
Pygmalion of Tyre, had murdered her husband, the high priest. Elissa escaped the tyranny of her own country and founded the "new city" of Carthage and subsequently its later dominions. Details of her life are sketchy and confusing, but the following can be deduced from various sources. According to Justin, Princess Elissa was the daughter of King Matten of Tyre (also known as Muttoial or Belus II). When he died, the throne was jointly bequeathed to her and her brother, Pygmalion. She married her uncle Acherbas (also known as Sychaeus) the High Priest of Melqart, a man with both authority and wealth comparable to the king. Pygmalion was a tyrant, lover of both gold and intrigue, who desired the authority and fortune enjoyed by Acherbas. Pygmalion assassinated Acherbas in the temple and kept the misdeed concealed from his sister for a long time, deceiving her with lies about her husband's death. At the same time, the people of Tyre called for a single sovereign, causing dissent within the royal family.
In the Roman epic of
Virgil, the Aeneid, Queen Dido, the Greek name for Queen Elissa, is first introduced as an extremely respected character in his legend. In just seven years, since their exodus from Tyre, the Carthaginians have rebuilt a successful kingdom under her rule. Her subjects adore her and present her with a festival of praise. Her character is perceived by Virgil as even more noble when she offers asylum to Aeneasand his men, who have recently escaped from Troy. The messenger god, Mercury, sent by Jupiter, reminds Aeneas that his mission is not to stay in Carthage with his new-found love, Dido, but to sail to Italy to found Rome. Virgil ends his legend of Dido with the story that, when Aeneas tells Dido, her heart broken, she orders a pyreto be built where she falls upon Aeneas' sword. As she lay dying, she predicted eternal strife between Aeneas' people and her own: "rise up from my bones, avenging spirit" (4.625, trans. Fitzgerald) she says, an obvious invocation of Hannibal.
The Carthaginian Empire was one of the longest-living and largest empires in the ancient Mediterranean. Reports state several wars with Syracuse and Rome, leading finally to the destruction of Punic Carthage during her third war with Rome.
According to Polybius, Carthage relied heavily, though not exclusively, on foreign mercenaries, [Polybius, Book 6, 52. [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0234&query=head%3D%23524 On the "Perseus" project]
The former (the Romans - editor's note) bestow their whole attention upon this department (upon military service on land - editor's note): whereas the Carthaginians wholly neglect their infantry, though they do take some slight interest in the cavalry. The reason of this is that they employ foreign mercenaries, the Romans native and citizen levies. It is in this point that the latter polity is preferable to the former. They have their hopes of freedom ever resting on the courage of mercenary troops: the Romans on the valour of their own citizens and the aid of their allies.] especially in overseas warfare. The core of its army was from its own territory in Africa (ethnic Libyans and Numidians, as well as "Liby-Phoenicians" — i.e. Punics proper). These troops were supported by mercenaries from different ethnic groups and geographic locations across the Mediterranean who fought in their own national units;
Celtic, Balearic, and Iberiantroops were especially common. Later, after the Barcid conquest of Iberia, Iberians came to form an even greater part of the Carthaginian forces. Carthage seems to have fielded a formidable cavalry force, especially in its African homeland; a significant part of it was composed of Numidian contingents of light cavalry. Other mounted troops were the now extinct North African Elephants, trained for war, which were used for frontal assaults or as anti-cavalry protection and were used for many other uses. An army could field up to several hundreds of these animals, but on most reported occasions fewer than a hundred were deployed. The riders of these elephants were armed with a spike and hammer to kill the elephants in case they charged toward their own army
The navy of Carthage was one of the largest in the
Mediterranean, using serial productionto maintain high numbers at moderate cost. The reputation of her skilled sailors implies that there was in peacetime a training of oarsmen and coxswains, giving their navy a cutting edge in naval matters.The trade of Carthaginian merchantmen was by land across the Sahara and especially by sea throughout the Mediterranean and far into the Atlantic to the tin-rich islands of Britain and to West Africa.There is evidence that at least one Punic expedition under Hanno sailed along the West African coast to regions south of the Equator, describing how the sun was in the north at noon. Polybiuswrote in the sixth book of his History that the Carthaginians were "more exercised in maritime affairs than any other people." [Polybius, History Book 6] Their navy included some 300 to 350 warships. The Romans, who had little experience in naval warfare prior to the First Punic War, managed to finally defeat Carthage with a combination of reverse engineering captured Carthaginian ships, recruitment of experienced Greek sailors from the ranks of its conquered cities, the unorthodox corvus device, and their superior numbers in marines and rowers. In the Third Punic WarPolybius describes a tactical innovation of the Carthaginians, augmenting their few triremes with small vessels that carried hooks (to attack the oars) and fire (to attack the hulls). With this new combination, they were able to stand their ground against the superior Roman numbers for a whole day.
The fall of Carthage was at the end of the
Third Punic Warin 146 BC. ["Wine: The 8,000-Year-Old Story of the Wine Trade", Thomas Pellechia (2006)] In spite of the initial devastating Roman naval losses at the beginning of the series of conflicts and Rome's recovery from the brink of defeat after the terror of a 15-year occupation of much of Italy by Hannibal, the end of the series of wars resulted in the end of Carthaginian power and the complete destruction of the city by Scipio Aemilianus. The Romans pulled the Phoenician warships out into the harbor and burned them before the city, and went from house to house, capturing and enslaving the people. Fifty thousand Carthaginians were sold into slavery. [ [http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001198.html Ancient History] ] The city was set ablaze, and in this way was razed with only ruins and rubble to field the aftermath. After the fall of Carthage, Rome annexed the majority of the Carthaginian colonies, including other North African locations such as Volubilis, Lixus, Chellahand Mogador. [ [http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=14906 C. Michael Hogan (2007) "Volubilis", The Megalithic Portal, ed. by A. Burnham] ] Through a series of misunderstandings, a belief that the Carthaginian farmland was salted to ensure that no crops could be grown there developed in the modern period. [Ridley, R.T., "To Be Taken with a Pinch of Salt: The Destruction of Carthage," Classical Philology vol. 81, no. 2 (1986).]
When Carthage fell, its nearby rival Utica, a Roman ally, was made capital of the region and replaced Carthage as the leading center of Punic trade and leadership. It had the advantageous position of being situated on the Lake of Tunis and the outlet of the
Majardah River, Tunisia's only river that flowed all year long. However, grain cultivation in the Tunisian mountains caused large amounts of siltto erode into the river. This silt was accumulated in the harbor until it was made useless, and Rome was forced to rebuild Carthage.
By 122 BC,
Gaius Gracchusfounded a short-lived "colonia", called "Colonia Iunonia", after the Latin name for the punic goddess Tanit, "Iuno caelestis". The purpose was to obtain arable lands for impoverished farmers. The Senate abolished the colony some time later, in order to undermine Gracchus power.After this ill-fated attempt, a new city of Carthage was built on the same land, and by the 1st century it had grown to the second largest city in the western half of the Roman empire, with a peak population of 500,000Fact|date=July 2008. It was the center of the Roman province of Africa, which was a major breadbasket of the empire.
Carthage also became a center of early
Christianity. In the first of a string of rather poorly reported Councils at Carthage a few years later, no fewer than seventy bishops attended. Tertullian later broke with the mainstream that was represented more and more by the bishop of Rome, but a more serious rift among Christians was the Donatistcontroversy, which Augustine of Hippospent much time and parchment arguing against. In 397 at the Council at Carthage, the biblical canonfor the western Church was confirmed.
The political fallout from the deep disaffection of African Christians is supposedly a crucial factor in the ease with which Carthage and the other centres were captured in the 5th century by
Gaiseric, king of the Vandals, who defeated the Roman general Bonifaciusand made the city his capital. Gaiseric was considered a heretic too, an Arian, and though Arians commonly despised Catholic Christians, a mere promise of toleration might have caused the city's population to accept him. After a failed attempt to recapture the city in the 5th century, the Byzantines finally subdued the Vandals in the 6th century.
During the emperor Maurice's reign, Carthage was made into an
Exarchate, as was Ravennain Italy. These two exarchates were the western bulwarks of Byzantium, all that remained of its power in the west. In the early 7th century, it was the Exarch of Carthage, Heraclius(of Armenian origin), who overthrew Emperor Phocas.
The Byzantine Exarchate was not, however, able to withstand the Muslim conquerors of the 7th century.
UmayyadCaliph Abd al-Malikin 686 AD sent a force led by Zuhayr ibn Qais who won a battle over Byzantinesand Berbersled by Kusaila, on the Qairawanplain, but could not follow that up. In 695 AD Hasan ibn al-Nu'mancaptured Carthage and advanced into the Atlas Mountains. A Byzantinefleet arrived, retook Carthage but in 698 AD Hasan ibn al-Nu'manreturned and defeated Tiberios IIIat the Battle of Carthage. The Byzantines withdrew from all of Africa except Ceuta. The Roman Carthage was destroyed, just as the Romans had done in 146 BC. Carthage was replaced by Tunisas the major regional center. The destruction of the Exarchate of Africa marked a permanent end to Roman or Byzantine influence there, as the rising tide of Islam shattered the empire.
Carthaginian commerce was by sea throughout the Mediterranean and far into the Atlantic and by land across the Sahara desert. According the Aristotles the Carthaginians and others had treaties of commerce to regulate their exports and imports. [Aristotle, Politics Book 3,IX]
The empire of Carthage depended heavily on its trade with
Tartessosand other cities of the Iberian peninsula, from which it obtained vast quantities of silver, lead, and, even more importantly, tinore, which was essential to the manufacture of bronzeobjects by the civilizations of antiquity. Its trade relations with the Iberians and the naval might that enforced Carthage's monopoly on trade with tin-rich Britain and the Canary Islands allowed it to be the sole significant broker of tin and maker of bronze. Maintaining this monopoly was one of the major sources of power and prosperity for Carthage, and a Carthaginian merchant would rather crash his ship upon the rocky shores of Britain than reveal to any rival how it could be safely approached. In addition to being the sole significant distributor of tin, its central location in the Mediterranean and control of the waters between Sicily and Tunisia allowed it to control the eastern nations' supply of tin. Carthage was also the Mediterranean's largest producer of silver, mined in Iberia and the North African coast, and, after the tin monopoly, this was one of its most profitable trades. One mine in Iberia provided Hannibal with 300 Roman pounds(3,75 talents) of silver a day. [Pliny, "Nat His" 33,96]
Carthage's economy began as an extension of that of its parent city, Tyre. Its massive merchant fleet traversed the trade routes mapped out by Tyre, and Carthage inherited from Tyre the art of making the extremely valuable dye
Tyrian Purple. It was one of the most highly-valued commodities in the ancient Mediterranean, being worth fifteen to twenty times its weight in gold. High Roman officials could only afford togas with a small stripe of it. Carthage also produced a less-valuable crimson pigment from the cochineal.
Carthage produced finely embroidered and dyed
textilesof cotton, linen, wool, and silk, artistic and functional pottery, faience, incense, and perfumes. It worked with glass, wood, alabaster, ivory, bronze, brass, lead, gold, silver, and precious stones to create a wide array of goods, including mirrors, highly-admired furniture and cabinetry, beds, bedding, and pillows, jewelry, arms, implements, and household items. It traded in salted Atlantic fish and fish sauce, and brokered the manufactured, agricultural, and natural products of almost every Mediterranean people.
In addition to manufacturing, Carthage practiced highly advanced and productive agriculture, using iron plows, irrigation, and crop rotation. Mago wrote a famous treatise on agriculture which the Romans ordered translated after Carthage was captured. After the Second Punic War, Hannibal promoted agriculture to help restore Carthage's economy and pay the war indemnity to Rome (10000 talents or 800,000 Roman pounds of silver [Pliny 33,51] ), and he was largely successful.
Carthage produced wine, which was highly prized in Rome, Euturia (Etruscans), and Greece. Rome was a major consumer of raisin wine, a Carthaginian specialty. Fruits, nuts, grain, grapes, dates, and olives were grown, and olive oil was exported in competition with Greece. Carthage also raised fine horses, similar to today's
Arabian horses, which were greatly prized and exported.
Carthage's merchant ships, which surpassed even those of the cities of the
Levant, visited every major port of the Mediterranean, Britain, the coast of Africa, and the Canary Islands. These ships were able to carry over 100 tons of goods. The commercial fleet of Carthage was comparable in size and tonnage to the fleets of major European powers in the 18th century.
Merchants at first favored the ports of the east: Egypt, the Levant, Greece, Cyprus, and Asia Minor. But after Carthage's control of Sicily brought it into conflict with Greek colonists, it established commercial relations in the western Mediterranean, including trade with the
Carthage also sent caravans into the interior of Africa and
Persia. It traded its manufactured and agricultural goods to the coastal and interior peoples of Africa for salt, gold, timber, ivory, ebony, apes, peacocks, skins, and hides. Its merchants invented the practice of sale by auction and used it to trade with the African tribes. In other ports, they tried to establish permanent warehouses or sell their goods in open-air markets. They obtained amber from Scandinavia and tin from the Canary Islands. From the Celtiberians, Gauls, and Celts, they obtained amber, tin, silver, and furs. Sardinia and Corsica produced gold and silver for Carthage, and Phoenician settlements on islands such as Maltaand the Balearic Islandsproduced commodities that would be sent back to Carthage for large-scale distribution. Carthage supplied poorer civilizations with simple things, such as pottery, metallic products, and ornamentations, often displacing the local manufacturing, but brought its best works to wealthier ones such as the Greeks and Etruscans. Carthage traded in almost every commodity wanted by the ancient world, including spices from Arabia, Africa, and India and slaves.
These trade ships went all the way down the Atlantic coast of Africa to
Senegaland Nigeria. One account has a Carthaginian trading vessel exploring Nigeria, including identification of distinguishing geographic features such as a coastal volcano and an encounter with gorillas (See Hanno the Navigator). Irregular trade exchanges occurred as far west as Madeira and the Canary Islands, and as far south as southern Africa. Carthage also traded with India by traveling through the Red Seaand the perhaps-mythical lands of Ophir(India/Arabia?) and Punt, which may be present-day Somalia.
Archaeological finds show evidence of all kinds of exchanges, from the vast quantities of tin needed for a bronze-based metals civilization to all manner of textiles, ceramics and fine metalwork. Before and in between the wars, Carthaginian merchants were in every port in the Mediterranean, buying and selling, establishing warehouses where they could, or just bargaining in open-air markets after getting off their ship.
The Etruscan language has not yet been deciphered, but archaeological excavations of Etruscan cities show that the Etruscan civilization was for several centuries a customer and a vendor to Carthage, long before the rise of Rome. The Etruscan city-states were, at times, both commercial partners of Carthage and military allies.
The government of Carthage was an oligarchal
republic, which relied on a system of checks and balancesand ensured a form of public accountability. The Carthaginian heads of state were called Suffets (thus rendered in Latin by Livy30.7.5, attested in Punic inscriptions as SPΘM /ʃuftˤim/, meaning "judges" and obviously related to the Biblical Hebrew ruler title _he. "Shophet" "Judge"). Greek and Roman authors more commonly referred to them as "kings". SPΘ /ʃufitˤ/ might originally have been the title of the city's governor, installed by the mother city of Tyre. In the historically attested period, the two Suffets were elected annually from among the most wealthy and influential families and ruled collegially, similarly to Roman consuls (and equated with these by Livy). This practice might have descended from the plutocratic oligarchies that limited the Suffet's power in the first Phoenician cities.Fact|date=June 2007 The aristocratic families were represented in a supreme council (Roman sources speak of a Carthaginian " Senate", and Greek ones of a "council of Elders" or a gerousia), which had a wide range of powers; however, it is not known whether the Suffets were elected by this council or by an assembly of the people. Suffets appear to have exercised judicial and executive power, but not military Fact|date=June 2007. Although the city's administration was firmly controlled by oligarchs Fact|date=June 2007, democratic elements were to be found as well: Carthage had elected legislators, trade unions and town meetings. Aristotlereported in his "Politics" that unless the Suffets and the Council reached a unanimous decision, the Carthaginian popular assembly had the decisive vote - unlike the situation in Greek states with similar constitutions such as Spartaand Crete. Polybius, in his History book 6, also stated that at the time of the Punic Wars, the Carthaginian public held more sway over the government than the people of Rome held over theirs (a development he regarded as evidence of decline). Finally, there was a body known as the Hundred and Four, which Aristotle compared to the Spartan ephors. These were judges who oversaw the actions of generals Fact|date=June 2007, who could sometimes be sentenced to crucifixion. Eratosthenes, head of the Library of Alexandria, noted that the Greeks had been wrong to describe all non-Greeks as barbarians, since the Carthaginians as well as the Romans had a constitution. Aristotlealso knew and discussed the Carthaginian constitution in his "Politics" (Book II, Chapter 11).
During the period between the end of the First Punic War and the end of the Second Punic War, members of the
Barcidfamily dominated in Carthaginian politics. They were given control of the Carthaginian military and all the Carthaginian territories outside of Africa.
Carthaginian religion was based on Phoenician religion, a form of
polytheism. Many of the gods the Carthaginians worshiped were localized and are now known only under their local names.
The supreme divine couple was that of
Tanitand Ba'al Hammon. The goddess Astarteseems to have been popular in early times. At the height of its cosmopolitan era, Carthage seems to have hosted a large array of divinities from the neighbouring civilizations of Greece, Egypt and the Etruscan city-states. A pantheon was presided over by the father of the gods, but a goddess was the principal figure in the Phoenician pantheon.
Caste of priests and acolytes
Surviving Punic texts are detailed enough to give a portrait of a very well organized caste of temple priests and acolytes performing different types of functions, for a variety of prices. Priests were clean shaven, unlike most of the population. In the first centuries of the city ritual celebrations included rhythmic dancing, derived from Phoenician traditions.
Cippi and stelae of limestone are characteristic monuments of Punic art and religion, and are found throughout the western Phoenician world in unbroken continuity, both historically and geographically. Most of them were set up over urns containing cremated human remains, placed within open-air sanctuaries. Such sanctuaries constitute striking relics of Punic civilization.
Carthage under the Phoenicians was notorious to its neighbors for
child sacrifice. Plutarch("c." 46–120) mentions the practice, as do Tertullian, Orosius, Philoand Diodorus Siculus. [Diodorus Siculus. Trans. C.H. Oldfather. "Diodorus of Sicily 1, VI, VIII, IX". Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954-1963 (The Loeb Classical Library).] Livyand Polybiusdo not. The Hebrew Biblealso mentions child sacrifice practiced by the Canaanites, ancestors of the Carthaginians, and by some Israelites.
archaeologyin formerly Punic areas has discovered a number of large cemeteries for children and infants. But there is some argument that the reports of child sacrifice were based on a misconception, later used as blood libelby the Romans who destroyed the city. These cemeteries may have been used as graves for stillborninfants or children who died very early.Fact|date=February 2007 Modern archeological excavations have been interpreted as confirming Plutarch's reports of Carthaginian child sacrifice. [ [http://www.ualberta.ca/~kmacfarl/CLASS_110/5.HittitesPhoeneciansIsraelites.html Kelly A. MacFarlane, University of Alberta, "Hittites and Phoenician"] ] In a single child cemetery called the Tophetby archaeologists, an estimated 20,000 urns were deposited between 400 BC and 200 BC, with the practice continuing until the early years of the Christian period. The urns contained the charred bones of newborns and in some cases the bones of fetuses and 2-year-olds. These remains have been interpreted to mean that in the cases of stillborn babies, the parents would sacrifice their youngest child. There is a clear correlation between the frequency of cremation and the well-being of the city. In bad times (war, poor harvests) cremations became more frequent, but it is not possible to know why. The correlation could be because bad times inspired the Carthaginians to pray for divine intervention (via child sacrifice), or because bad times increased child mortality, leading to more child burials (via cremation).
Accounts of child sacrifice in Carthage report that beginning at the founding of Carthage in about 814 BC, mothers and fathers buried their children who had been sacrificed to Ba`al Hammon and Tanit there.Fact|date=February 2007 The practice was apparently distasteful even to Carthaginians, and they began to buy children for the purpose of sacrifice or even to raise servant children instead of offering up their own. However, in times of crisis or calamity, like war, drought or famine, their priests demanded the flower of their youth. Special ceremonies during extreme crisis saw up to 200 children of the most affluent and powerful families slain and tossed into the burning pyre.
It has been argued by some modern scholars that evidence of Carthaginian child sacrifice is incomplete, and that it is far more likely to have been Roman
blood libelagainst the Carthaginians to justify their conquest and destructionFact|date=March 2007. Skeptics suggest that the bodies of children found in Carthaginian and Phoenician cemeteries were merely the cremated remains of children that died naturally. Sergio Ribichini has argued that the Tophet was "a child necropolis designed to receive the remains of infants who had died prematurely of sickness or other natural causes, and who for this reason were "offered" to specific deities and buried in a place different from the one reserved for the ordinary dead". [Sergio Ribichini, "Beliefs and Religious Life" in Moscati, Sabatino (ed), "The Phoenicians", 1988, p.141] The few Carthaginian texts which have survived make absolutely no mention of child sacrifice, though most of them pertain to matters entirely unrelated to religion, such as the practice of agriculture.
Carthage remains a popular
touristattraction and residential suburb.
In February 1985, Ugo Vetere, the mayor of
Rome, and Chedly Klibi, the mayor of Carthage, signed a symbolic treaty "officially" ending the conflict between their cities, which had been supposedly extended by the lack of a peace treaty for more than 2100 years.Fact|date=September 2008
Polybius[ [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/home.html LacusCurtius • Polybius' Histories ] ]
Hannibal's Campaigns". Tony Bath. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble Books, 1981.
* "La vie quotidienne à Carthage au temps d'Hannibal." Gilbert et Colette Charles-Picard. Paris: Hachette, 1958.
* "La légende de Carthage". Azedine Beschaouch. Paris: Gallimard, 1993.
* "Carthage: Uncovering the Mysteries and Splendors of Ancient Tunisia". David Soren, Aicha Ben Abed Ben Kader, Heidi Slim. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990.
* "The Phoenicians and the West: Politics, colonies and trade". Maria Eugenia Aubet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
* "Itineraria Phoenicia".Edward Lipinski. Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters en Department Oosterse Studies, 2004. "Aeneid" Virgil
* "Polybius. Ancient History Sourcebook": Polybius (c 200–118 BC): [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/polybius6.html#Rome%20and%20Carthage%20Compared Rome at the End of the Punic Wars History] , Book 6.
List of Kings of Carthage
History of Tunisia
Umayyad conquest of North Africa
* [http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/dacapo/book_detail.jsp?isbn=0306813629 Hannibal] : Published by Decapo Books, an excellent source of military history about ancient Carthage and the tactics of Hannibal and the Roman Republic
* [http://www.stanford.edu/dept/archaeology/journal/newdraft/garnand/paper.pdf Brian K. Garnand: "From infant sacrifice to the ABC'S: ancient Phoenicians and modern identities"] - (University of Chicago). Earlier version presented in Standford Colloquium "Past Narratives / Narratives Pasts"
* [http://www.livius.org/cao-caz/carthage/carthage.html Livius.org: Carthage]
* [http://www.fordham.edu/Halsall/ancient/aristotle-carthage.html "Ancient History Sourcebook: Aristotle: On the Constitution of Carthage, c. 340 BC"]
* [http://www.ancientplaces.tv/archives/36 Ancient Places TV: HD video of Carthage]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.