Technological singularity

The technological singularity is a theoretical future point of unprecedented technological progress, caused in part by the ability of machines to improve themselves using artificial intelligence. [Harvtxt|Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence|2007 states: "The Singularity is the technological creation of smarter-than-human intelligence." However, Harvtxt|Kurzweil|2001 writes: cquote|The Singularity is technological change so rapid and so profound that it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history. Some would say that we cannot comprehend the Singularity, at least with our current level of understanding, and that it is impossible, therefore, to look past its "event horizon" and make sense of what lies beyond.]

Statistician I. J. Good first wrote of an "intelligence explosion", suggesting that if machines could even slightly surpass human intellect, they could improve their own designs in ways unforeseen by their designers, and thus recursively augment themselves into far greater intelligences. The first such improvements might be small, but as the machine became more intelligent it would become better at becoming more intelligent, which could lead to an exponential and quite sudden growth in intelligence.

Vernor Vinge later called this event "the Singularity" as an analogy between the breakdown of modern physics near a gravitational singularity and the drastic change in society he argues would occur following an intelligence explosion. In the 1980s, Vinge popularized the singularity in lectures, essays, and science fiction. More recently, some prominent technologists such as Bill Joy, founder of Sun Microsystems, voiced concern over the potential dangers of Vinge's singularity Harv|Joy|2000. Following its introduction in Vinge's stories, particularly "Marooned in Realtime" and "A Fire Upon the Deep", the singularity has also become a common plot element throughout science fiction.

Others, most prominently Ray Kurzweil, define the singularity as a period of extremely rapid technological progress. Kurzweil argues such an event is implied by a long-term pattern of accelerating change that generalizes Moore's Law to technologies predating the integrated circuit and which he argues will continue to other technologies not yet invented. Critics of Kurzweil's interpretation consider it an example of static analysis, citing particular failures of the predictions of Moore's Law.

Robin Hanson proposes that multiple "singularities" have occurred throughout history, dramatically affecting the growth rate of the economy. Like the agricultural and industrial revolutions of the past, the technological singularity would increase economic growth between 60 and 250 times. An innovation that allowed for replacement of virtually all human labor could trigger this singularity.

Critics note that proponents of the "singularity" tend to ignore all of the negative impacts of technology, only focusing on the positive effects. The singularity also draws criticism from anarcho-primitivism and environmentalism advocates.

Intelligence explosion

Harvtxt|Good|1965 speculated on the consequences of machines smarter than humans:

Mathematician and author Vernor Vinge greatly popularized Good’s notion of an intelligence explosion in the 1980s, calling the creation of the first ultraintelligent machine "the Singularity". Vinge first addressed the topic in print in the January 1983 issue of "Omni" magazine. Harvtxt|Vinge|1993 contains the oft-quoted statement, "Within thirty years, we will have the technological means to create superhuman intelligence. Shortly thereafter, the human era will be ended." Vinge refines his estimate of the time scales involved, adding, "I'll be surprised if this event occurs before 2005 or after 2030."

Vinge continues by predicting that superhuman intelligences, however created, will be able to enhance their own minds faster than the humans that created them. "When greater-than-human intelligence drives progress," Vinge writes, "that progress will be much more rapid." This feedback loop of self-improving intelligence, he predicts, will cause large amounts of technological progress within a short period of time.

Most proposed methods for creating smarter-than-human or transhuman minds fall into one of two categories: intelligence amplification of human brains and artificial intelligence. The means speculated to produce intelligence augmentation are numerous, and include bio- and genetic engineering, nootropic drugs, AI assistants, direct brain-computer interfaces, and mind transfer.

Despite the numerous speculated means for amplifying human intelligence, non-human artificial intelligence (specifically seed AI) is the most popular option for organizations trying to advance the singularity, a choice addressed by Harvtxt|Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence|2002. Harvtxt|Hanson|1998 is also skeptical of human intelligence augmentation, writing that once one has exhausted the "low-hanging fruit" of easy methods for increasing human intelligence, further improvements will become increasingly difficult to find.

It is difficult to directly compare silicon-based hardware with neurons. But Harvtxt|Berglas|2008 notes that computer speech recognition is approaching human capabilities, and that this capability seems to require 0.01% of the volume of the brain. This analogy suggests that modern computer hardware is within a few orders of magnitude as powerful as the human brain. It is also noted that the entire human genome is only about 750 megabytes of data, of which only 1.5% codes genes, most of which have nothing to do with intelligence. There is also only about 1% difference in the genes of a human and chimpanzee. This suggests that the "software" in the brain we are born with is relatively small — there is simply no storage space for a huge, arbitrary program.

One other factor potentially hastening the singularity is the ongoing expansion of the community working on it, resulting from the increase in scientific research within developing countries.

Economic aspects

Dramatic changes in the rate of economic growth have occurred in the past because of some technological advancement. Based on population growth, the economy doubled every 250,000 years from the Paleolithic era until the Neolithic Revolution. This new agricultural economy began to double every 900 years, a remarkable increase. In the current era, beginning with the Industrial Revolution, the world’s economic output doubles every fifteen years, sixty times faster than in the agricultural era. If the rise of superhuman intelligences causes a similar revolution, one would expect the economy to double at least quarterly and possibly on a weekly basis. cite web |url=http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/jun08/6274 |title= Economics Of The Singularity |accessdate=2008-09-11 |author= Robin Hanson |work=IEEE Spectrum Special Report: The Singularity ]

Machines capable of performing most mental and physical tasks as well as humans would cause a rise in wages for the jobs at which humans still outperform. However, a sudden proliferation of humanlike machines would likely cause a net drop in wages, as humans compete with robots for jobs. Also, the wealth of the technological singularity may be concentrated in the hands of only a few. These wealthy few would be those who own the means of mass producing the intelligent robot workforce. On the other hand, everyone would benefit from radical price drops of most goods and services.

Potential dangers

Superhuman intelligences may have goals inconsistent with human survival and prosperity. AI researcher Hugo de Garis suggests AIs may simply eliminate the human race, and humans would be powerless to stop them.

Harvtxt|Berglas|2008 argues that unlike man, a computer based intelligence is not tied to any particular body, which would give it a radically different world view. In particular, a software intelligence would essentially be immortal and so have no need to produce independent children that live on after it dies. It would thus have no evolutionary need for love. But it would have an evolutionary need for power because the first AI that wants to and can dominate the earth will dominate the earth.

Other oft-cited dangers include those commonly associated with molecular nanotechnology and genetic engineering. These threats are major issues for both singularity advocates and critics, and were the subject of Bill Joy's "Wired" magazine article "Why the future doesn't need us" Harv|Joy|2000.

Harvtxt|Bostrom|2002 discusses human extinction scenarios, and lists superintelligence as a possible cause:

Moravec (1992) argues that although superintelligence in the form of machines may make humans in some sense obsolete as the top intelligence, there will still be room in the ecology for humans.

Eliezer Yudkowsky proposed that research be undertaken to produce friendly artificial intelligence in order to address the dangers. He noted that if the first real AI was friendly it would have a head start on self-improvement and thus might prevent other unfriendly AIs from developing. The Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence is dedicated to this cause. Bill Hibbard also addresses issues of AI safety and morality in his book "Super-Intelligent Machines". However, Harvtxt|Berglas|2008 notes that there is no direct evolutionary motivation for an AI to be friendly to man.

Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics are one of the earliest examples of proposed safety measures for AI. The laws are intended to prevent artificially intelligent robots from harming humans. In Asimov’s stories, any perceived problems with the laws tend to arise as a result of a misunderstanding on the part of some human operator; the robots themselves shut down in the case of a real conflict. On the other hand, in works such as the 2004 film "I, Robot", which was based very loosely on Asimov's stories, a possibility is explored in which AI take complete control over humanity for the purpose of protecting humanity from itself. In 2004, the Singularity Institute launched an Internet campaign called "3 Laws Unsafe" to raise awareness of AI safety issues and the inadequacy of Asimov’s laws in particular Harv|Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence|2004.

Many Singularitarians consider nanotechnology to be one of the greatest dangers facing humanity. For this reason, they often believe seed AI (an AI capable of making itself smarter) should precede nanotechnology. Others, such as the Foresight Institute, advocate efforts to create molecular nanotechnology, claiming nanotechnology can be made safe for pre-singularity use or can expedite the arrival of a beneficial singularity.

Accelerating change

Some singularity proponents argue its inevitability through extrapolation of past trends, especially those pertaining to shortening gaps between improvements to technology. In one of the first uses of the term "singularity" in the context of technological progress, Harvtxt|Ulam|1958 tells of a conversation with John von Neumann about accelerating change:

Harvtxt|Hawkins|1983 writes that "mindsteps", dramatic and irreversible changes to paradigms or world views, are accelerating in frequency as quantified in his mindstep equation. He cites the inventions of writing, mathematics, and the computer as examples of such changes.

Ray Kurzweil's analysis of history concludes that technological progress follows a pattern of exponential growth, following what he calls "The Law of Accelerating Returns". He generalizes Moore's Law, which describes geometric growth in integrated semiconductor complexity, to include technologies from far before the integrated circuit.

Whenever technology approaches a barrier, Kurzweil writes, new technologies will cross it. He predicts paradigm shifts will become increasingly common, leading to "technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history" Harv|Kurzweil|2001. Kurzweil believes that the singularity will occur before the end of the 21st century, setting the date at 2045 Harv|Kurzweil|2005. His predictions differ from Vinge’s in that he predicts a gradual ascent to the singularity, rather than Vinge’s rapidly self-improving superhuman intelligence.

This leads to the conclusion that an artificial intelligence that is capable of improving on its own design is also faced with a singularity. This idea is explored by Dan Simmons in his novel "Hyperion", where a collection of artificial intelligences debate whether or not to make themselves obsolete by creating a new generation of "ultimate" intelligence.

The Acceleration Studies Foundation, an educational non-profit foundation founded by John Smart, engages in outreach, education, research and advocacy concerning accelerating change Harv|Acceleration Studies Foundation|2007. It produces the Accelerating Change conference at Stanford University, and maintains the educational site [http://www.accelerationwatch.com/ Acceleration Watch] .

Presumably, a technological singularity would lead to a rapid development of a Kardashev Type I civilisation where a Kardashev Type I civilization has achieved mastery of the resources of its home planet, Type II of its planetary system, and Type III of its galaxy. [Zubrin, Robert, 1999, "Entering Space - Creating a Spacefaring Civilization"] Given the fact that the Kardashev scale will reach 0.7 by 2040, a technological singularity between now and then would push us rapidly over that limit.

Criticism

Some critics assert that no computer or machine will ever achieve human intelligence while others do not rule out the possibility. [Harvnb|Dreyfus|Dreyfus|2000|p=xiv:cquote|The truth is that human intelligence can never be replaced with machine intelligence simply because we are not ourselves "thinking machines" in the sense in which that term is commonly understood.Harvtxt|Hawking|1998:cquote|Some people say that computers can never show true intelligence whatever that may be. But it seems to me that if very complicated chemical molecules can operate in humans to make them intelligent then equally complicated electronic circuits can also make computers act in an intelligent way. And if they are intelligent they can presumably design computers that have even greater complexity and intelligence.] Theodore Modis and Jonathan Huebner argue that the rate of technological innovation has not only ceased to rise, but is actually now declining. Harvtxt|Smart|2005 criticizes Huebner's analysis. Some evidence for this decline is that the rise in computer clock speeds is slowing, even while Moore's prediction of exponentially increasing circuit density continues to hold.

Others propose that other "singularities" can be found through analysis of trends in world population, world GDP, and other indices. Andrey Korotayev and others argue that historical hyperbolic growth curves can be attributed to feedback loops that ceased to affect global trends in the 1970s, and thus hyperbolic growth should not be expected in the future.

In "The Progress of Computing", William Nordhaus argued that, prior to 1940, computers followed the much slower growth of a traditional industrial economy, thus rejecting extrapolations of Moore's Law to 19th-century computers. Harvtxt|Schmidhuber|2006 suggests differences in memory of recent and distant events create an illusion of accelerating change, and that such phenomena may be responsible for past apocalyptic predictions.

Some anarcho-primitivism and eco-anarchism advocates, such as John Zerzan and Derrick Jensen, see the singularity as an orgy of machine control, and a loss of free existence outside of civilization. Harvs|txt=yes|last=Bell|year=2002|year2=2003 expresses a cautionary environmentalist perspective on the singularity.

A recent study of patents per thousand persons shows that human creativity does not show accelerating returns, but in fact – as suggested by Joseph Tainter in his seminal "The Collapse of Complex Societies" [Tainter, Joseph (1988) "The Collapse of Complex Societies" (Cambridge University Press)] – a law of diminishing returns.Fact|date=May 2008 The number of patents per thousand peaked in the period from 1850–1900, and has been declining since.Fact|date=May 2008 The growth of complexity eventually becomes self-limiting, and leads to a wide spread "general systems collapse". Thomas Homer Dixon in "" shows that the declining energy returns on investment has led to the collapse of civilizations.
Jared Diamond in "" also shows that cultures self-limit when they exceed the sustainable carrying capacity of their environment, and the consumption of strategic resources (frequently timber, soils or water) creates a deleterious positive feedback loop that leads eventually to social collapse and technological retrogression.

Popular culture

While discussing the singularity's growing recognition, Harvtxt|Vinge|1993 writes that "it was the science-fiction writers who felt the first concrete impact." In addition to his own short story "Bookworm, Run!", whose protagonist is a chimpanzee with intelligence augmented by a government experiment, he cites Greg Bear's novel "Blood Music" (1983) as an example of the singularity in fiction. In William Gibson's 1984 novel "Neuromancer", AIs capable of improving their own programs are strictly regulated by special "Turing police" to ensure they never exceed human intelligence, and the plot centers on the efforts of one such AI to circumvent their control. The 1994 novel "The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect" features an AI that augments itself so quickly as to gain low-level control of all matter in the Universe in a matter of hours. A more malevolent AI achieves similar levels of omnipotence in Harlan Ellison's short story "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream" (1967). William Thomas Quick's novels "Dreams of Flesh and Sand" (1988), "Dreams of Gods and Men" (1989), and "Singularities" (1990) present an account of the transition through the singularity; in the latter novel, one of the characters states that it is necessary for Mankind's survival that they achieve an integration with the emerging machine intelligences, or it will be crushed under the dominance of the machines – the greatest risk to the survival of a species reaching this point (and alluding to large numbers of other species that either survived or failed this test, although no actual contact with alien species occurs in the novels).

The singularity is sometimes addressed in fictional works to explain the event's absence. Neal Asher's "Gridlinked" series features a future where humans living in the Polity are governed by AIs and while some are resentful, most believe that they are far better governors than any human. In the fourth novel, "Polity Agent", it is mentioned that the singularity is far overdue yet most AIs have decided not to partake in it for reasons that only they know. A flashback character in Ken MacLeod's 1998 novel "The Cassini Division" dismissively refers to the singularity as "the Rapture for nerds", though the singularity goes on to happen anyway.

Popular movies in which computers become intelligent and overpower the human race include "", the "Terminator" series, "I, Robot", and "The Matrix" series. The television series "Battlestar Galactica" also explores these themes. See also|List of fictional computers

Isaac Asimov expressed ideas similar to a post-Kurzweilian singularity in his short story "The Last Question". Asimov's future envisions a reality where a combination of strong artificial intelligence and post-humans consume the cosmos, during a time Kurzweil describes as when "the universe wakes up", the last of his six stages of cosmic evolution as described in "The Singularity is Near". Post-human entities throughout various time periods of the story inquire of the artificial intelligence within the story as to how entropy death will be avoided. The AI responds that it lacks sufficient information to come to a conclusion, until the end of the story when the AI does indeed arrive at a solution, and demonstrates it by re-creating the universe, in godlike speech and fashion, from scratch. Notably, it does so in order to fulfill its duty to answer the humans' question.

St. Edward's University chemist Eamonn Healy discusses accelerating change in the film "Waking Life". He divides history into increasingly shorter periods, estimating "two billion years for life, six million years for the hominid, a hundred-thousand years for mankind as we know it". He proceeds to human cultural evolution, giving time scales of ten thousand years for agriculture, four hundred years for the scientific revolution, and one hundred fifty years for the industrial revolution. Information is emphasized as providing the basis for the new evolutionary paradigm, with artificial intelligence its culmination. He concludes we will eventually create "neohumans" which will usurp humanity’s present role in scientific and technological progress and allow the exponential trend of accelerating change to continue past the limits of human ability.

Accelerating progress features in some science fiction works, and is a central theme in Charles Stross's "Accelerando". Other notable authors that address singularity-related issues include Karl Schroeder, Greg Egan, Ken MacLeod, David Brin, Iain M. Banks, Neal Stephenson, Tony Ballantyne, Bruce Sterling, Dan Simmons, Damien Broderick, Fredric Brown, Jacek Dukaj, Nagaru Tanigawa and Cory Doctorow. Another relevant work is Warren Ellis’ ongoing comic book series "newuniversal".

In the episode "" of "", John Connor mentions the singularity. The Terminator franchise is predicated on the concept of a human-designed computer system becoming self-aware and deciding to destroy humankind. It eventually achieves superintelligence.

In the film "Screamers" – based on Philip K. Dick's short story "Second Variety" – mankind's own weapons begin to design and assemble themselves. Self replicating machines (here, the screamers) are often considered to be a significant prerequisite "final phase" – almost like a catalyst to the accelerating progress leading to a singularity. Interestingly, screamers develop to a level where they will kill each other and one even professes her love for the human. This idea is common in Dick's stories, that explore beyond the simplistic "man vs machine" scenario in which our creations consider us a threat.

The feature-length documentary film "Transcendent Man" is based on Ray Kurzweil and his book "The Singularity Is Near". The film documents Kurzweil's quest to reveal mankind's destiny.

ee also

Notes

References

* Citation
last = Acceleration Studies Foundation
year = 2007
url = http://www.accelerating.org/about.html
title = ASF: About the Foundation
accessdate = 2007-11-13
* Citation
url = http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/eij/article/technotopia_the_death_of_nature/
title = Technotopia and the Death of Nature: Clones, Supercomputers, and Robots
first = James John
last = Bell
year = 2002
season = Summer
publisher = Earth Island Journal
accessdate = 2007-08-07
* Citation
url = http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/2003/Singularity-Bell1may03.htm
title = Exploring The "Singularity"
last = Bell
first = James John
year = 2003
date = 1 May 2003
work = The Futurist
publisher = World Future Society (mindfully.org)
accessdate = 2007-08-07
* Citation
first=Anthony
last=Berglas
title=Artificial Intelligence will Kill our Grandchildren
year=2008
url=http://berglas.org/Articles/AIKillGrandchildren/AIKillGrandchildren.html
accessdate=2008-06-13
* Citation
first = Damien
last = Broderick
authorlink = Damien Broderick
title = The Spike: How Our Lives Are Being Transformed by Rapidly Advancing Technologies
location= New York
publisher=Forge
year = 2001
id = ISBN 0-312-87781-1
* Citation
first = Nick
last = Bostrom
authorlink=Nick Bostrom
title=Existential Risks
journal=Journal of Evolution and Technology
year=2002
volume=9
url=http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
first = Nick
last = Bostrom
authorlink = Nick Bostrom
title = Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence
journal = Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence
year = 2003
volume = 2
pages = 12-17
url = http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
last = Dreyfus
first = Hubert L.
author-link = Hubert Dreyfus
last2 = Dreyfus
first2 = Stuart E.
author2-link = Stuart Dreyfus
year = 2000
date = 1 March 2000
title = Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
edition = 1
place = New York
publisher = Free Press
isbn = 0743205510
* Citation
first = I. J.
last = Good
authorlink = I. J. Good
title = Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine
journal = Advances in Computers
year = 1965
volume=6
pages=31-88
publisher = Academic Press
editors = Franz L. Alt and Morris Rubinoff
url = http://web.archive.org/web/20010527181244/http://www.aeiveos.com/~bradbury/Authors/Computing/Good-IJ/SCtFUM.html
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
url = http://hanson.gmu.edu/vc.html#hanson
title = Some Skepticism
first = Robin
last = Hanson
author-link = Robin Hanson
year = 1998
publisher = Robin Hanson
accessdate = 2007-08-07
* Citation
last= Hanson
first= Robin
author-link= Robin Hanson
title= Economics of the Singularity
periodical=IEEE Spectrum
date= June 2008
* Citation
last= Hawking
first= Stephen
author-link= Stephen Hawking
year= 1998
title= Science in the Next Millennium: Remarks by Stephen Hawking
url= http://clinton2.nara.gov/Initiatives/Millennium/shawking.html
accessdate= 2007-11-13
* Citation
first = Gerald S.
last = Hawkins
authorlink = Gerald Hawkins
title = Mindsteps to the Cosmos
year = 1983
month = August
publisher = HarperCollins
* Citation
last= Heylighen
first= Francis
author-link= Francis Heylighen
year= 2007
contribution= Accelerating Socio-Technological Evolution: from ephemeralization and stigmergy to the global brain
contribution-url= http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/AcceleratingEvolution.pdf
editor-last= Modelski
editor-first= G.
editor2-last= Devezas
editor2-first= T.
editor3-last= Thompson
editor3-first= W.
title= Globalization as an Evolutionary Process: Modeling Global Change
place=London
publisher=Routledge
id=ISBN 9780415773614
* Citation
last= Johansen
first= Anders
last2= Sornette
first2= Didier
date= 25 January 2001
year= 2001
title= Finite-time singularity in the dynamics of the world population, economic and financial indices
periodical= Physica A
volume= 294
pages= 465-502
url=http://hjem.get2net.dk/kgs/growthphysA.pdf
issn=0378-4371
accessdate=2007-10-30
* Citation
first=Bill
last=Joy
authorlink=Bill Joy
title=Why the future doesn’t need us
journal=Wired Magazine
year=2000
date= April 2000
issue=8.04
url=http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
first=Raymond
last=Kurzweil
authorlink=Raymond Kurzweil
title=The Law of Accelerating Returns
year=2001
publisher=Lifeboat Foundation
url=http://lifeboat.com/ex/law.of.accelerating.returns
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
first=Raymond
last=Kurzweil
authorlink=Raymond Kurzweil
title=The Singularity Is Near
location=New York
publisher=Viking
year=2005
isbn=0-670-03384-7
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
first=Hans
last=Moravec
authorlink=Hans Moravec
title=Pigs in Cyberspace
journal = On the Cosmology and Ecology of Cyberspace
url=http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/project.archive/general.articles/1992/CyberPigs.html
date=January 1992
accessdate=2007-11-21
* Citation
first = Jürgen
last = Schmidhuber
authorlink = Jürgen Schmidhuber
title = New Millennium AI and the Convergence of History
year = 2006
date = 29 June 2006
url=http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0606081v3
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
last = Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
authorlink= Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
title = Why Artificial Intelligence?
year = 2002
accessmonthday = August 7
accessyear = 2007 wayback|url=www.singinst.org/intro/whyAI-print.html|date=20061004201151
* Citation
url = http://www.asimovlaws.com/
title = 3 Laws Unsafe
last = Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
authorlink = Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
year = 2004
accessdate = 2007-08-07
* Citation
last = Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
authorlink= Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
title = What is the Singularity?
year = 2007
url = http://www.singinst.org/overview/whatisthesingularity
accessdate = 2008-01-04
* Citation
url = http://accelerating.org/articles/huebnerinnovation.html
title = On Huebner Innovation
first = John
last = Smart
authorlink = John Smart (futurist)
year = 2005
date = September 2005
publisher = Acceleration Studies Foundation
accessdate = 2007-08-07
* Citation
first = Stanislaw
last = Ulam
authorlink = Stanislaw Ulam
year = 1958
date = May 1958
title = Tribute to John von Neumann
journal = Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society
volume = 64
issue = nr 3, part 2
pages = 1-49
* Citation
first=Vernor
last=Vinge
authorlink=Vernor Vinge
year=1993
title=The Coming Technological Singularity
journal = Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering in the Era of CyberSpace, proceedings of a Symposium held at NASA Lewis Research Center
publisher = NASA Conference Publication CP-10129
url=http://rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.html
date=30-31 March 1993
accessdate=2007-08-07
* Citation
first=Kevin
last=Warwick
authorlink=Kevin Warwick
year=2004
title=March of The Machines
publisher = University of Illinois Press
isbn=978-0252072239
* Citation
first = Russian
last = Researches
authorlink = Russian Institute for Advanced Researches
year = 1998
date = May 1998
title = Russian Institute for Advanced Researches
journal = Bulletin of the Russian Institute for Advanced Researches
volume = 2
issue = nr 3, part 2
pages = 200-280

External links

Essays

* [http://lifeboat.com/ex/singularities.and.nightmares Singularities and Nightmares: Extremes of Optimism and Pessimism About the Human Future] by David Brin
* [http://hanson.gmu.edu/vi.html A Critical Discussion of Vinge’s Singularity Concept] by Robin Hanson
* [http://hanson.gmu.edu/fastgrow.html Is a singularity just around the corner?] by Robin Hanson
* [http://www.accelerationwatch.com/history_brief.html Brief History of Intellectual Discussion of Accelerating Change] by John Smart
* [http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2004/PositiveTranscension.htm Encouraging a Positive Transcension] by Ben Goertzel
* [http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge74.html One Half of a Manifesto] by Jaron Lanier — a critique of "cybernetic totalism"
* [http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0236.html One Half of an Argument] — Ray Kurzweil's response to Lanier
* [http://berglas.org/Articles/AIKillGrandchildren/AIKillGrandchildren.html Artificial Intelligence will Kill our Grandchildren] Argues that basic evolution makes it unlikely that man would survive, and asks whether that matters. Also provides a succinct rationale for the likely rise of intelligence.
* [http://www.hardcoredynamic.com Hardcore Dynamic: Living on the Brink of Singularity] Blog of writer and researcher Sundar Ganapathy discussing the relationship of technological singularity to transhumanism and technoshamanism

ingularity AI projects

* [http://www.singinst.org/ The Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence]
* [http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/mi.html The SSEC Machine Intelligence Project]
* [http://www.agiri.org/ The Artificial General Intelligence Research Institute]

Portals and wikis

* [http://www.kurzweilai.net/ KurzweilAI.net]
* [http://www.accelerationwatch.com Acceleration Watch]
* [http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael Accelerating Future]
* [http://sl4.org/wiki The SL4 Wiki]
* [http://www.accelerando.org/_static/toughguide.html Singularity! A Tough Guide to the Rapture of the Nerds] by Charles Stross

Fiction

* [http://sifter.org/~simon/AfterLife/ After Life] by Simon Funk uses a complex narrative structure to explore the relationships among uploaded minds in a technological singularity.
* ' [http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/mcnrs.html Message Contains No Recognizable Symbols] ' by Bill Hibbard is a story about a technological singularity subject to the constraint that natural human authors are unable to depict the actions and dialog of super-intelligent minds.
* Much of [http://goertzel.org/fiction.htm Ben Goertzel's fiction] discusses a technological singularity.
* In the episode of called , John tells his Mother about the Singularity, a point in time when machines will be able to build superior versions of themselves without the aid of humans.

Other links

* [http://spectrum.ieee.org/singularity A special report on the Singularity from IEEE Spectrum featuring articles by and interviews with Vernor Vinge, Christof Koch and Guilio Tononi, Rodney Brooks, John Horgan, Robin Hanson, and Richard A.L. Jones]
* [http://sss.stanford.edu/ "The Singularity Summit at Stanford"]
* [http://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/singularity.html Report on "The Stanford Singularity Summit"]
* [http://jwbats.blogspot.com/2005/07/singularity-faq-for-dummies.html "The Singularity FAQ"]
* [http://www.house.gov/jec/publications/110/nanotechnology_03-22-07.pdf March 2007 Congressional Report on the Singularity] by ranking member Jim Saxton on the United States Congress Joint Economic Committee.
* [http://www.singinst.org/summit2007/quotes/ 2007 quotes, Singularity Summit, San Francisco]