- Hannibal (film)
Infobox Film
name = Hannibal
caption = Theatrical release poster
director =Ridley Scott
producer =Ridley Scott Dino De Laurentiis
writer = Screenplay:David Mamet Steven Zaillian
Novel:Thomas Harris
starring =Anthony Hopkins Julianne Moore Gary Oldman Ray Liotta Giancarlo Giannini
music =Hans Zimmer
cinematography =John Mathieson
editing =Pietro Scalia
distributor =Universal Pictures Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
released = February 9, 2001
runtime = 131 min.
country = UK
USA
language = English
Italian
Japanese
budget = $87 million
gross = $351,692,268
preceded_by = "The Silence of the Lambs"
followed_by = "Red Dragon"
website = http://www.hannibalmovie.com/
amg_id = 1:233530
imdb_id = 0212985"Hannibal" is a 2001
thriller film directed byRidley Scott , adapted from theThomas Harris novel of the same name. Set ten years after "The Silence of the Lambs", the premise is that one ofHannibal Lecter 's surviving victims, the extremely wealthyMason Verger , is determined to capture, torture, and kill him. The film's locations alternate between Italy and the United States.According to Steffen Hantke, author of "Horror Film: Creating and Marketing Fear", "Hannibal" the film was an "eagerly anticipated
auteur and star-driven event movie, with emphasis on a distinctive visual appearance and deliberate flamboyant performances." [cite book | last = Hantke | first = Steffen | authorlink = | title = Horror Film: creating and marketing fear | publisher = University Press of Mississippi | year = 2004 | isbn = 978-1-57806-692-6 ]"Hannibal" was the anticipated sequel to 1991's Oscar-winning "The Silence of the Lambs" which introduced Hannibal Lecter to mainstream moviegoing audiences (though the character was first portrayed by
Brian Cox in the 1986 film, "Manhunter", based on Harris' novel, "Red Dragon ").cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Killer Instinct | date=2000-03-17 | publisher= | url =http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,275700,00.html | work =Entertainment Weekly | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-12 | language = ] "The Silence of the Lambs" became only the third film in history to receive Academy Awards for Best Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, and screenplay adaptation. [cite news | first=Daniel | last=Fierman | coauthors= | title=The Gory Details | year=2001 | publisher= | url =http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,279665,00.html | work =Entertainment Weekly | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-20 | language = ] The character ofHannibal Lecter became a "household name",cite news | first=David | last=Thompson | coauthors= | title=The doctor will eat you now... | date= | publisher= | url =http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/features/article251822 | work =The Independent | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] and part of popular culture.cite book | last = Clarke | first = James | authorlink = | title = Virgin Film: Ridley Scott | publisher = Virgin Books | year = 2002 | isbn = 0753507315 ] The "bumpy" development of "Hannibal" drew a large amount of attention, with "Silence of the Lambs" directorJonathan Demme ,screenwriter Ted Tally and actorJodie Foster all eventually declining involvement.cite news | first=Dan | last=Jolin | coauthors= | title=Hannibal film review | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.totalfilm.com/cinema_reviews/hannibal | work =Total Film | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] Upon release, "Hannibal" brokebox-office records in the United States, Australia, Canada and the UK in February 2001.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Taste of success | date= | publisher= | url =http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article253462.ece | work =The Independent | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ]Plot
The film takes place ten years after the events depicted in "The Silence of the Lambs".
Dr. Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins ) has taken up residence inFlorence , Italy under the pseudonym 'Dr. Fell'. Meanwhile,FBI AgentClarice Starling (Julianne Moore ) is disgraced after a botched stakeout/drug raid that resulted in the deaths of five people, including drug dealer Evelda Drumgo (Hazelle Goodman), who was shot by Starling while holding a baby — and amachine pistol . Even though she tried to call the raid off, her co-worker went ahead and resulted in the massacre, and Starling is unjustly given the blame for the mess by Justice Department officialPaul Krendler (Ray Liotta ), whose advances Starling has rejected.As a result of the failed drug raid, Starling is temporarily taken out of the field and assigned to office work on Lecter's case. Starling is sent to the
mansion ofbillionaire meatpacking -heirMason Verger (Gary Oldman ), who was horrificallymutilated and paralyzed after an encounter with Lecter years earlier. Verger, who specifically asked for Starling, claims he has new information (which turns out to be anX-ray ) which he is willing to disclose only to her. Upon her arrival, Verger tells Starling about his history with Lecter. He first met Dr. Lecter due to a court order to undergo heavy therapy after being convicted on multiple counts of child sex abuse. Lecter, fascinated and disgusted by his evil new patient, chose him as his next victim. Verger, uniquely, survives his encounter with Lecter, although in a reduced condition: he is paralyzed and bedridden in the hospital wing of his mansion; he's fed intravenously; his remaining eye is irrigated by a saline drip, in lieu of natural tears. He can move around in a motorized wheelchair after muscular attendants and his verbally-abused physician Cordell lift him into it. He is surrounded by experts and minions to help him in various ways, and uses them to track down his old enemy. He has created a Website offering a $3 million reward for the whereabouts of Lecter, mediated by a Swiss bank.Starling later receives a letter from Lecter expressing sympathy for the drug raid fiasco, but also taunting her into tracking him down. Lecter was very careful not to leave anything on the letter that could provide a clue to his whereabouts, but it is also covered with some particular type of perfume which is sold in only a handful of shops throughout the world.
In Florence, Inspector Rinaldo Pazzi (
Giancarlo Giannini ) is investigating the disappearance of alibrary curator, and meets with his replacement: Dr Fell. At the same time, Pazzi's department is contacted by Starling, who wants to have thesurveillance videos of allperfume stores that sell the particular perfume, including one in Florence. After spotting Fell in the requested surveillance tape, Pazzi finds out Fell's trueidentity and, hoping to get the $3 million reward, contacts Mason Verger via the bank. Pazzi decides to apprehend Lecter, with the help of Verger's men, ignoring Starling's urgent advice to be careful and leave Lecter alone. Lecter, however, has guessed Pazzi's intentions, and kills him by disemboweling andhanging him from thePalazzo Vecchio , a fate shared by his ancestor Francesco Pazzi. Lecter then heads to the United States to find Starling.In order to exact his revenge on Lecter and draw him out of hiding, Verger recruits a corrupt Department of Justice employee, who happens to be the very Paul Krendler who disgraced Starling. Krendler, tempted by Verger's money, delivers falsified love letters from Lecter to the head of the
FBI , claiming he found them in Starling's office. As a result, Starling is temporarily put on administrative leave, and she is thus unable to stop Verger's men from capturing Lecter and bringing him to his estate, where he is to be eaten by a herd of specially trainedgiant forest hog s. Nonetheless, Starling heads to Verger'smansion , where she manages to kill Verger's men and free Lecter just before the herd of hogs is unleashed. Lecter subsequently saves the wounded Starling from the animals and, while doing so, also persuades Verger's assistant Cordell (Zeljko Ivanek ) to let Verger roll into the pit with the hogs, thus giving him the satisfaction of watching Verger die. He promises to take the blame for Verger's death and leaves with Starling.Lecter takes Starling to Krendler's lake-front house and performs
surgery on her to remove the bullet. After awakening, she discovers her whereabouts and calls the police before heading downstairs, where Lecter has performed acraniotomy on Krendler. Starling watches in horror as Lecter feeds the severely drugged Krendler a small part of his own brain, sautéed in butter and herbs. Starling tries to attack Lecter, and in the ensuing struggle, he traps her by her hair in the fridge. While trapped there, Lecter asks Starling if she would beg for him to stop, asking, "Would you ever say to me, stop? If you loved me, you'd stop?" Starling, expressionless and staring him directly in the eye, responds with, "Not in a thousand years." Impressed by her reply, having expected nothing less from her, he says, "That's my girl," and kisses her. As he tries to withdraw he finds that Starling has handcuffed herself to him and the police are closing in. Lecter threatens to chop off Starling's hand to make his escape, but it is later shown he chose to remove his own hand instead.Lecter manages to escape, leaving Starling behind alive. He is later shown on a plane eating the meal he packed, Krendler's brain among it. A very young boy asks him what it is, and says it 'looks good.' Lecter responds, 'Oh, it "is" good.' The boy says that he would like to try it, to which Lecter responds: "As your mother tells you, and my mother certainly told me, it is important, she always used to say, always to try new things." Lecter is then shown feeding the boy something, presumably, Krendler's brain.
Cast
*
Anthony Hopkins as Dr. Hannibal Lecter
*Julianne Moore asClarice Starling
*Gary Oldman asMason Verger
*Ray Liotta asPaul Krendler
*Giancarlo Giannini as Insp. Renaldo Pazzi
*Frankie R. Faison as Nurse Barney
*Francesca Neri as Allegra Pazzi
*Zeljko Ivanek as Dr. Cordell DoemlingDevelopment
Background
"The Silence of the Lambs" director,
Jonathan Demme was asked in 1994 about a possiblesequel in "Rolling Stone " magazine. Demme said thatThomas Harris , author of "The Silence of the Lambs" had been working on the follow-up for "seven or eight years." Demme had an idea even at that time that it would not be a straight follow up. Harris told Demme: "I imagine Doctor Lecter going somewhere in Europe…strolling round the streets ofFlorence orMunich , gazing in the windows of watchmakers…" [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Rolling Stone | date= | publisher= | url =http://storefrontdemme.com/rollingstone.html | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-06 | language = ] Demme would state his intention to be involved in the cinematic adaptation of "Hannibal" in 1998, less than a year before thenovel was published. Hannibal DVD "Making of feature"]Dino De Laurentiis produced the film "Manhunter" in 1986, featuring the first appearance ofHannibal Lecter , played byBrian Cox . The film was directed by Michael Mann. It was based on the Thomas Harris novel "Red Dragon". De Laurentiis did not like Mann’s version of "Manhunter": "Manhunter was no good…it was not Red Dragon," he said. De Laurentiis and his wife Martha (also his co-producer) would have no direct involvement in the film "The Silence of the Lambs", a decision De Laurentiis came to regret. They did, however, own the rights to the "Lecter character" and reportedly allowed Orion Pictures, which produced "Silence of the Lambs" to use the character of Lecter for free, not wishing to be "greedy." When "Silence of the Lambs" became a commercial andcritical success in 1991, winning fiveAcademy Awards , both Dino and Martha De Laurentiis would find themselves sitting on a valuableasset and eager for a follow-up novel they could adapt. After a lengthy wait, De Laurentiis finally received a call from Thomas Harris telling him he had finished the sequel to "Silence of the Lambs" and De Laurentiis would purchase the rights for a record $10 million.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=How Hannibal came to be made | date= | publisher= | url =http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,435456,00.html | work =The Guardian | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-06 | language = ]The "
Los Angeles Times " reported in April 1999, that thebudget for an adaptation of "Hannibal" could cost as much as $100 million. It speculated that bothJodie Foster andAnthony Hopkins would receive $15 million each to reprise their roles and “$5 million to $19 million for directorJonathan Demme ." Thenewspaper further reported that although "Silence of the Lambs" cost only $22 million - this would not deter thestudio from going ahead with "Hannibal". Mort Janklow, Thomas Harris’s agent at the time, told the "Los Angeles Times" thatJodie Foster ,Anthony Hopkins andJonathan Demme would soon receivemanuscript s of the novel, claiming it would make an unbelievable movie.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=News atricles | date= | publisher= | url =http://imdb.com/title/tt0212985/news | work =IMDB | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-06 | language = ]The
book sold out of its initial 1.6 millionprint run in the summer of 1999.cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Interview with Ridley scott |url= |work= |publisher=Total Film |date= March 2001|accessdate=2007-03-06 ] "Hannibal", would go on to sell millions of copies following its release in mid-1999.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Bloody 'Hannibal' lacks bite of 'Lambs' | date= | publisher= | url =http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/08/hannibal.review/index.html | work =CNN | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-06 | language = ]Jonathan Demme would inform (via fax) the producers of "Hannibal" that he would pass on directing "Hannibal". It has been claimed Demme turned down the project because he found the material "lurid"cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Pleased to eat you | date=
2001-02-04 | publisher=The Guardian | url =http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,433350,00.html | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ] and was averse to the book's "gore". [cite news | first=Gillian | last=Flynn | coauthors= | title=Rebirth of Cruel | date=2002-10-11 | publisher= | url =http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,357302,00.html | work =Entertainment Weekly | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-12 | language = ] Dino De Laurentiis said on Demme’s decision to decline: “When the pope die, we create a new pope. Good luck to Jonathan Demme. Good-bye.” He has since added that Demme felt he could not make a sequel as good as "The Silence of the Lambs".cite book | last=Prigge | first=Steven | year=2004 | title= Movie Moguls Speak: Interview with top film producers | isbn = 978-0-7864-1929-6 | publisher=McFarland ]David Fincher was originally considered to direct the film due his successful movie "Fight Club" but dropped out for unknown reasons [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000399/bio] .Ridley Scott
Producer
Dino De Laurentiis visited DirectorRidley Scott on theset of "Gladiator" and suggested to Ridley he read the novel he had bought the rights to. Scott was in the third week beforeprincipal photography was due to finish on "Gladiator". "Gladiator" would become a commercial and critical success — gaining 12Academy Award nominations. De Laurentiis asked Scott if he would like to direct the film version of "Hannibal". Scott misunderstood which Hannibal he meant, thinking De Laurentiis was speaking of the brilliant general and historical figure from Carthage who nearly brought down the empire of Rome back around 200 B.C., so he replied: "Basically Dino, I’m doing a Roman epic right now. I don’t wanna doelephant s coming over theAlps next, old boy." Scott would read themanuscript in four sittings within a week, believing it to be a "symphony" and expressed his desire to do it. Scott further explains how he got involved: “I was shooting "Gladiator" inMalta and one day, for the hell of it, I went for a walk for half a mile down the road to the Malta Film Studio to see my old buddy Dino. I had not seen him since I’d worked on a version of "Dune" – this was pre "Blade Runner ". Dino had pursued me to direct "Dune" and another film. He’s always enthusiastic and aggressive and came after me when I did both "Blade Runner" and "Alien", but I couldn’t do the films. Anyway, we had an espresso together and a few days later, he called me to ask if he could visit the "Gladiator" set. He arrived with a manuscript of "Hannibal", about a month before it was published in book form. He said: ‘Lets make this one.’ I haven’t read anything so fast since "The Godfather ". It was so rich in all kind of ways.”Although Scott had accepted the job
Jonathan Demme had rejected, he said: "My first question was: ‘What about Jonathan?’ and they said: ‘The original team said it’s too violent.’ I said, 'Okay. I’ll do it.'" Scott did, himself, have some uncertainty with the source material. He had difficulties with the ending of the novel in particular — "I couldn’t take that quantum leap emotionally on behalf of Starling. Certainly, on behalf of Hannibal – I’m sure that’s been in the back of his mind for a number of years. But for Starling, no. I think one of the attractions about Starling to Hannibal is what a straight arrow she is." (In the novel Lecter and Starling end up an actual couple on the run together.) He also, "didn’t buy the book from theopera scene onwards, which became like avampire movie." He asked authorThomas Harris if he was "married to his ending". Harris said no, so he changed it.cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=Interview with Ridley scott |url= |work= |publisher=Total Film |date= March 2001|accessdate=2007-03-06 ]cript development
Ted Tally , thescreenwriter for "The Silence of the Lambs", was another key member of the original team to decline involvement in "Hannibal" (he won an Oscar for his "Silence" adaptation). Tally, like Demme, had problems with the novel's "excesses".Steve Zaillian (writer of ("Schindler's List ") was offered the chance to write the adaptation after Tally passed - he too would also decline. He explains why: “I was busy. And I wasn’t sure I was interested. You can almost never win when you do asequel .”David Mamet would be the firstscreenwriter to produce a draft, which, according toRidley Scott and the producers, needed major revisions. Stacey Snider, co-chairman ofUniversal Pictures (a co-production deal was struck between Universal andMGM ) said on the rejection of Mamet’s screenplay: "There’s no way David was going to read 15 pages of our notes and then be available to work on the script day-to-day." Mamet was preparing to direct his own film. A script review at ScreenwritersUtopia.com describes the Mamet draft as "stunningly bad" but found Zaillian's rewrite to be "gripping entertainment".cite news | first="Stax"| last= | coauthors= | title=Script Review: Hannibal | date= | publisher= | url =http://screenwritersutopia.com/modules.php?name=Content&file=print&pid=116 | work =ScreenwriterUtopia | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] Zaillian, who had already passed, would reconsider and become involved in the project, saying: "It’s hard to say no to Dino once and it’s almost impossible to say no to him twice."This question (regarding the script development) was put to Ridley Scott by "
Total Film " magazine: “There were lots of rewrites on 'Hannibal' – what was the main problem with the original material?” Scott replied: “That’s inaccurate, because there were very few rewrites once I brought in Steve Zaillian. If you were to ask who were the best three screenwriters in the business, Steve Zaillian would be one of them. We discussed "Hannibal" endlessly.” Asked if he read Mamet’s draft, he said: "Yes. He is very fast, very efficient, but he was off doing a film. 'Hannibal' was green lit and his first draft only took about a month. But I was scared that he would not be able to give me enough attention, because that draft needed a lot of work. So I moved on basically.” Scott has said there were writing and "structural problems" as to what they would do with parts of the movie. A key objective of Zaillian, an Academy Award winner, was to revise the script by David Mamet until it pleased all parties - meaning the "love" story would need to be done by suggestion instead of by "assault".cite news | first=Peter | last=Travers | coauthors= | title=Hannibal - Rolling Stone Review | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948327/review/5948328/hannibal | work =Rolling Stone | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] Scott would work through the script with Zaillian for 28 days making Scott “sweat through it with him and discuss every inch of the way with him." After 25 days Scott suddenly realized that Zaillian was "exorcising the 600 pages of the book. He was distilling through discussion what he was gonna finally do...Frankly I could have just made it."Casting
It was unclear if
Jodie Foster (Clarice Starling ) andAnthony Hopkins (Dr. Hannibal Lecter ) wouldreprise their respective roles in which they also wonAcademy Awards for in "The Silence of the Lambs" (best actress/actor) It would become apparent that the producers andstudio could do without one of the original "stars" (and "would" go on to find a replacement). The withdrawal of both - Foster and Hopkins, could possibly have been terminal for the project, however. Producer De Laurentiis confirmed this after the films release: "First and foremost, I knew we had no movie without Anthony Hopkins."Involvement of Jodie Foster
Jodie Foster confirmed toLarry King (on her potential involvement in "Hannibal"), in 1997, that she “would definitely be part of it”. She told "Entertainment Weekly " in 1997 that "Anthony Hopkins always talks about it. I mean, everybody wants to do it. Every time I see him, it's like: 'When is it going to happen? When is it going to happen?'" ProducerDino De Laurentiis thought Foster would decline once she read the book ("Hannibal"), even believing the final movie was better for it.Anthony Hopkins also had doubts Foster would be involved, saying he had a "hunch" she would not be. Foster did turn it down, confirming this in late December 1999.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Lambs 'in doubt' without Foster | date= | publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/592904.stm | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ] This would cause problems for the studio, Universal and partnerMGM . “The studio is just back from the holiday and is regrouping based on the news, and has no cohesive game plan at the moment.” Said Kevin Misher, Universal’s president of production. Misher added that, “It was one of those moments when you sit down and think, ‘Can Clarice be looked upon asJames Bond for instance? A character who is replaceable?' Or was Jodie Foster Clarice Starling, and the audience will not accept anyone else?" Foster said in December 1999 that the part ofClarice Starling in "Hannibal" had "negative attributes" and "betrayed" the original character.Yet there is still uncertainty as to why Foster declined. Some say she had "sequelitis." Others contended that she didn’t want to do it without Demme or was slated herself to direct another film. Her spokeswoman said the reason was becauseClaire Danes had become available in Foster's own project "Flora Plum". [cite web| title=Foster passes on Lambs sequel | date= | publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/581813.stm | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ]Salary demands may also have played a part in Foster’s non-participation. Dino De Laurentiis said: “I call the agent of Judy Foster. He say to me ‘I have instruction. She no want to read the script if you no give her an offer of $20m and 15% of the gross.’ And I say, ‘Give my love to Judy Foster, goodbye.’” (The article makes clear that “Dino comically mispronounces the actress’s name”) "Entertainment Weekly" described the project as becoming "a bloody mess, hemorrhaging talent and money" even despite Hopkins being on-board.Jodie Foster talked about "Hannibal" in aninterview with "Total Film " magazine in late 2005. She said: "The official reason I didn’t do "Hannibal" is I was doing another movie, "Flora Plum". So I get to say, in a nice dignified way, that I wasn’t available when that movie was being shot...Clarice meant so much to Jonathan and I, she really did, and I know it sounds kind of strange to say but there was no way that either of us could really trample on her." [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=The Total Film Interview: Jodie Foster | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.totalfilm.com/features/the_total_film_interview__jodie_foster | work =Total Film | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ]Julianne Moore as "Clarice Starling"
When it became clear that Jodie Foster would skip "Hannibal", the
production team would consider several differentactresses . These included:Cate Blanchett ,Angelina Jolie ,Gillian Anderson ,Hilary Swank ,Ashley Judd ,Helen Hunt andJulianne Moore .Anthony Hopkins asked his agent if he had any "power" over casting. He informed De Laurentiis that he knew Julianne Moore, with whom he had worked on "Surviving Picasso ". Hopkins thought her a "terrific actress". Although Hopkins' agent told him he had no contractual influence oncasting ,Ridley Scott thought it correct to discuss who would be Hopkins' "leading lady". Scott said he was “really surprised to find that I had five of the top actresses inHollywood wanting it.”Julianne Moore would eventually secure the sought after part ofClarice Starling . Scott said his decision was swayed in favor of Moore because: “She is a true chameleon. She can be a lunatic in "Magnolia", a vamp in "An Ideal Husband", a porn star in "Boogie Nights " and a romantic in "The End of the Affair " ” “Julianne Moore, once Jodie decided to pass was always top of my list.” said Scott on his female lead. Hannibal DVD "Ridley Scott commentary"] Moore talked about stepping into a role made famous by another actress: "The new Clarice would be very different. Of course people are going to compare my interpretation with that of Jodie Foster's...but this film is going to be very different."Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter
Anthony Hopkins was generally expected to reprise hisAcademy Award winning role. Hopkins did say in June 1999 that he would only be interested if the script was "really good". Hopkins says on the making-of feature onDVD that he couldn’t make up his mind to commit. "I was kind of surprised by this book, "Hannibal". I thought it was really overreaching and so bizarre. So I couldn’t make up my mind about it all. Some of it I found intriguing, some I was a little doubtful about." The producers confirmed that they were going to film Harris' novel. Hopkins told them yes, but added: “It needs condensing.” The "Hollywood Reporter " would confirm thatAnthony Hopkins had agreed to reprise his role in late December 1999, saying he had approved the latest of thescript bySteven Zaillian . [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Sir Anthony set for Lambs sequel | date= | publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/573715.stm | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ] Hopkins said he had no difficulty moving back into "Lecter’s mind". "I just learned the lines and showed up and walked around as Hannibal Lecter. I thought, 'Do I repeat that same performance, or do I vary it?' Ten years had passed so I changed a bit." In the book,Hannibal Lecter has hadplastic surgery in an attempt todisguise himself. This was left out of the film because Scott and Hopkins agreed to leave the face alone.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Movie Interview: Anthony Hopkins | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/anthony_hopkins_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] Hopkins explains why: "It's as if he's making a statement - catch me if you can." With his big hat, he's so obvious that nobody thinks he's Hannibal Lecter. I've always thought he's a very elegant man, a renaissance man." In the film Hannibal Lecter is first seen inFlorence "as the classical Lecter, lecturing and being smooth." according to Hopkins.cite news | first=Charlie | last=Rose | coauthors= | title=60 Minutes: Actors' Take On Ridley Scott | date=2001-01-30 | publisher= | url =http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/28/60II/main267669.shtml?source=search_story | work =CBS News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-08 | language = ] When the film moves to the US Hopkins changed his appearance by building upmuscle and cropping his hair short "to make him like amercenary , that he would be so fit and so strong that he could just snap somebody in two if they got... in his way."Further casting
Other stars subsequently cast included
Ray Liotta as corrupt Justice Department official Paul Krendler (a character that appeared in "Silence of the Lambs," though original actorRon Vawter died before the production of "Hannibal") and Italian screen legendGiancarlo Giannini as the opportunistic Detective Pazzi.Francesca Neri won the role of Pazzi’s wife, Allegra. AndFrankie R. Faison signed on to reprise his role as former hospital orderly Barney. (The actor had appeared in "Silence of the Lambs" as Barney. He also appeared in the film, "Manhunter" as another character, Lt. Fisk).Mason Verger - one of the only two living victims ofHannibal Lecter (The other beingWill Graham from Manhunter) is a bizarrely disfigured character.Gary Oldman was cast. Co-producer Martha De Laurentiis said they had a "funny situation" with Oldman wanting a prominent "credit". She said: "Now how can you have a prominent credit with "Hannibal"? The characters are Hannibal and Clarice Starling. So we really couldn’t work something out (at first)." Oldman was apparently "out" of the movie for while, but then came back in, asking to go "unbilled". Oldman would become transformed and "unrecognizable as himself" to play the part of Verger. He would have no lips, cheeks or eyelids. Make-up artist Greg Cannom said: “It's really disgusting…I’ve been showing people pictures [of Oldman as Verger] , and they all just say ‘Oh my God,’ and walk away, which makes me very happy.”Key production crew
Scott recruited key production crew whom he had worked with previously. Production designer Norris Spencer had worked on "
Thelma & Louise ", "Black Rain " and "1492 Conquest of Paradise ".Cinematographer John Mathieson , editorPietro Scalia and composerHans Zimmer had all worked on Scott’s previous film "Gladiator". Official Hannibal production notes]Production and post production
Background
"Hannibal" was filmed in 83 working days over 16 weeks.Official Hannibal Journal] The film began production on May 8, 2000 in
Florence . Apress conference was also held before shooting began in Florence to promote the movie. The film visited key locations in Florence, (Italy) and various locations around the US in Washington D.C., Richmond, Virginia and North Carolina. Martha De Laurentiis said the movie has almost a hundred locations and that is was a: “constant pain of moving and dressing sets. But the locations were beautiful. Who could complain about being allowed to shoot in Palazzo Vecchio in Florence? Or President James Madison’s farm in Montpelier or the amazing Biltmore Estate in Asheville?” Eighty million dollars and a year and a half in production were spent before director Ridley Scott got his first look at "Hannibal" in the editing room. [cite news | first=Charlie | last=Rose | coauthors= | title=60 Minutes: Ridley Scott | year=2001 | publisher= | url =http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/27/60II/main267597.shtml | work =CBS | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-07 | language = ]Filming locations
*
Florence The whole second act of "Hannibal" takes place in Florence. Ridley Scott had never filmed there before, but described it as “quite an experience…It was kind of organised chaos…We were there at the height of tourist season.” Within Florence the production would visit various locations such as the Palazzo Capponi (as Dr.Fell/Hannibal Lecter’s apartment), ThePonte Vecchio , ThePalazzo Vecchio , The Pharmacy of Santa Maria Novella and II Duomo.
*Washington, D.C. After leavingFlorence and Italy on June 5 2000, the production moved to Washington, D.C. Filming took place over six days atUnion Station for a scene which would appear later in the movie.The unusual sight of acarousel would appear in the transportation hub and shopping plaza at the request of directorRidley Scott .
*Richmond, Virginia Filming would last for seven weeks in Richmond, Virginia. A key scene from the movie would be shot here: a "shootout" in a crowded fish market, which would feature early in the finished film.Julianne Moore underwentFederal Bureau of Investigation training at the Bureau’s headquarters before filming. This was the first movie Moore was actually required to fire agun .
*Montpelier, Virginia The production visited a barn, which was situated on the estate of PresidentJames Madison . It was used to house 15 "performing hogs”.The 15 hogs (Russian boars) used in the shoot, were from a selection of around 6,000 of which the animal wranglers looked at.
*Asheville, North Carolina Asheville, in North Carolina is home to the biggest privately owneddwelling in the U.S., theBiltmore Estate . This location was chosen by Ridley Scott to signify the huge personalwealth of the characterMason Verger .pecial make-up effects
Make-up artist Greg Cannom was pleased to be involved in "Hannibal" as it offered him the chance to produce "incredible and original make-ups". For Mason Verger the make-up team would initially produce 20 different "heads" which looked like "zombie s" and did not reflect the vision directorRidley Scott had of the character - Scott wanted Verger to look real with hideous scarring, and not something from the "House of Wax". Scott himself would actually call up the help of expert doctors in an effort to get the look of the character as realistic as possible. Scott showed the make-up team pictures of "foetal things", which he thought “touching” – he wanted to make Mason Verger more "touching" than "monstrous", as he thought the character of Verger as being "someone who hadn’t lost his sense of humour...almost sympathetic."Gary Oldman would spend six hours a day in make-up to prepare for the role.For one of the final and infamous scenes of the movie an exact "duplicate" was created of the character
Paul Krendler , played byRay Liotta , a scene which blended make-up,puppet work and CGI in a way which director Ridley Scott called "seamless".Title sequence
The main
titles were designed by Nick Livese a graduate of theRoyal College of Art who worked for one of Scott’s production companies inLondon . The sequence, shot inFlorence by Livesey himself was intended as the second promotional trailer for the film. The studio thought it not "quite right" however, but it remained on Scott’s mind and would eventually end up as the maintitle sequence . Livesey would gather footage ofpigeons in an empty square in Florence early one morning which, in the final cut, wouldmorph into the face ofHannibal Lecter . Scott believed it a good idea as it fundamentally asked the question: Where is Hannibal Lecter? Scott explains: “And of course this story tells it, with pigeons in the cobblestones of somewhere, where you wonder where that is...and there he is his face appears.” The titles have said to have been influenced by the film "Se7en ".cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=FILM REVIEW; Whetting That Large Appetite for Second Helpings | date= | publisher= | url =http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B04E2D81431F93AA35751C0A9679C8B63 | work =New York Times | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ]Music
Ridley Scott worked very closely with
composer Hans Zimmer , duringpost-production on "Hannibal". Scott believes themusic to a film is as important asdialogue – “It is the final adjustment to the screenplay, being able to also adjust the performance of the actors in fact.” Zimmer and Scott sat in during the editing process with editorPietro Scalia to discuss scenes in the film and "not music". Zimmer used asymphony orchestra for theopera sequence, but would mostly use what he described as a "very odd orchestra…only cellos and basses all playing at the extreme ends of their range.” This was done to emphasise the character of Hannibal Lecter. He explains: "Anthony’s character is for me somebody at the extreme range of whatever is humanly imaginable somehow." Zimmer also did not want the score to sound like a "modern day orchestra". The character ofMason Verger , had his own "theme", which become more “perverted” as the movie progressed according to Zimmer. Dante's sonnet was put to music by Zimmer andPatrick Cassidy for theopera scene inFlorence . Tracksounds.com wrote positively of Zimmer's score. "Zimmer truly crafts a score worthy of most fans' full attention…the classical elements, and yes, even the monologue combine to make this an intense listening experience.”cite news | first=Christopher | last=Coleman | coauthors= | title=Goodie, Goodie! | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.tracksounds.com/reviews/hannibal.htm | work =TrackSounds | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] In a poll byClassic FM (UK) listeners to find the greatestmovie soundtrack of all-time, "Hannibal" ranked at 59. [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Top 100 movie soundtracks | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.classicfm.com/article.asp?id=223575 | work =Classic FM | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-06 | language = ]Themes
Key
themes in the film include romance, retribution,punishment and corruption.Romance:
"'Allegra DePazi: "Dr. Fell, do you believe that a man can become so obsessed with a woman from a single encounter?"
Hannibal: "Could he daily feel a stab of hunger for her and find nourishment in the very sight of her? I think so. But would she see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?""'
Scott has said he believes the underlying
emotion of the film "Hannibal" is "affection ". "In some instances, you might even wonder or certainly from one direction – is it more than affection?" Said Scott. “It is dark, because the story is of course essentially dark, but it’s kind of romantic at the same time.” He added. Scott openly admits to a “romantic thematic” running though the film. He toldCNN that: "Hannibal" was quite a different target, essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it’s rather romantic and also quite humorous, but also there’s some quite bad behaviour as well." During theopera scene inFlorence , the wife of “Pazzi” asks Hannibal (upon Hannibal giving her “Dante’s first sonnet”): "Do you believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single encounter…" Hannibal replies: “Yes I believe they could…" This scene, in the movie, is one which Scott claims most people "missed” the meaning of. It was in reference to “Clarice” - to their encounter in "The Silence of the Lambs" "The New York Times " in itsreview of the film, said "Hannibal", "toys" with the idea of: "love that dare not speak Its name" Composer,Hans Zimmer believes there to be "many"messages andsubtext in each scene of the film. He says "I can score this movie truly as a Freudian archetypal beauty and the beastfairytale , as ahorror movie , as the most elegant piece, on corruption in the American police force, as the loneliest woman on earth, the beauty in renaissance..." Zimmer ultimately believes it to be a dark love story, centering on two people who should never be together – a modern day "Romeo and Juliet ". Duringpost-production of the film, Scott, Zimmer and the editor passionately argued about what a single shot meant, where a tear slides down the cheek of Clarice during a confrontation with Lecter. They could not agree if it was a tear of "anguish ", "loneliness " or "disgust ". Scott told the "New York Post " that, the affair of the heart between Hannibal and Clarice is "metaphorical". [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Hannibal News | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.countingdown.com/movies/1203/news?item id=5800 | work =Counting Down | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ] "Rolling Stone " even said in theirreview : "Scott offers a sly parody of relationships - think "When Hannibal met Sally."Anthony Hopkins said: "It's not exactly a romance there is that element. There's that erotic element in the story. I'm told. Ridley says it comes across very clearly."Fact|date=March 2008Retribution and
Punishment : Ridley Scott believes the character ofHannibal Lecter , in his own way to be "pure" - one of the key motivating factors for the character is the search for "retribution and punishment". "There is something very moral about Lecter in this film." Said Scott in his audio commentary…The behaviour of Hannibal is neverinsane – didn’t want to use that excuse. Is he insane? No, I think he’s as sane as you or I. He just likes it." Scott did say however, "In our normal terms, he’s trulyevil ." Scott also brings up the notion ofabsolution in reference to the Lecter character towards the end of the film. Theantagonist character ofMason Verger has one overriding objective in life: to capture and subjectHannibal Lecter to a slow tortuous death in an attempt to obtainrevenge and punish Lecter.cite news | first=Mark | last=Wilson | coauthors= | title=Lecter's bloody second course has a hollow centre | date= | publisher= | url =http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/reviews/article251440.ece | work =The Independent | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-09 | language = ]Corruption: Part of the story, which involves the character Rinaldo Pazzi (
Giancarlo Giannini ) a Florentine policeman, who becomes corrupted by the prospect of financial gain when he learns the true identity of "Dr. Fell" and the hugereward on his head.His escalating abandonment of morality allows him to countenance and facilitate the death of a gypsy pickpocket, egged on by the desire to have the best for his much younger wife. There is a moment in the film when, for Pazzi – he becomes "corrupted", despite being what Scott describes as "very thoughtful…loves his wife". Paul Krendler also succumbs to greed and corruption.Promotion
Upon the films release, "Hannibal" was met with significant media attention,cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Taking A Bite Out Of Hannibal | date=2001-02-08 | publisher= | url =http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/08/entertainment/main270627.shtml?source=search_story | work =CBS News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-08 | language = ] with the movie's stars and director making serial appearances on television, newspapers and magazines.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Appetites Whet For Hannibal | date=2001-02-02 | publisher= | url =http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/02/entertainment/main269156.shtml | work =CBS News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-08 | language = ]
CBS News claimed in early February 2001 that "the long-awaited sequel to the grisly 1991 thriller "Silence of the Lambs" is cooking up the hottest Internet and media buzz since the 1999 "Star Wars" "prequel"." Stars Anthony Hopkins and Julianne made the covers of a number of magazines including "Vanity Fair ", "Entertainment Weekly ", "Premiere (magazine) " and "Empire magazine ". The character ofAnthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter would be chosen as the 'unique selling point ' of "Hannibal", a choice made by theMarketing Department of the studio as being “extremely exploitable” and a “no-brainer.”The character of Hannibal Lecter was the key pulling factor to make people pay to see the movie. There was no risk in taking this key marketing decision: he had been seen before, millions of copies of a book with his name for a title has been bought and the actor portraying the character on-screen had won anAcademy Award for his first time in the role. "Mr Hopkins is the draw here", said "The New York Times ". “Hannibal” was a household name and a “brand”.The firstteaser trailer was released in cinemas and made available via the official website in early May 2000.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=News | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.darkhorizons.com/2001/Hannibal.htm | work =Dark Horizons | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-07 | language = ] As the first teaser trailer was released over nine months before the film was released, and the film had only just begun production, footage was used from "The Silence of the Lambs". It used thetagline line “Never forget who he is”. The first official art-work was also released at the same time as a "teaser one-sheet". It featured the tagline "Break the silence", a direct reference to "The Silence of the Lambs", and would only feature the character of Hannibal Lecter.A further trailer, which featuredfootage from the new movie, was released in late November 2000.A poster released in the UK to promote "Hannibal" featured Hannibal Lecter with a "skin mask" covering the right side of his face – a reference to the escape scene in "The Silence of the Lambs". The poster was quickly removed from circulation as it was deemed “too shocking and disturbing for the public."While the film was on location inWashington, D.C. ,Anthony Hopkins visited PresidentBill Clinton for dinner at theWhite House .The film was released, by no coincidence, on the 10th anniversary of the release of "The Silence of the Lambs". It was released in February 2001 in the US, UK and Australia.Reception
"Hannibal" grossed $58 million (USA) in its opening weekend (from 3,230 screens). At the time (February 2001) this was the third-biggest debut ever - only 1997's "" and 1999's "
The Phantom Menace " grossed more in an opening weekend.cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Box Office: Hannibal Takes Record-Sized Bite | date=2001-02-11 | publisher= | url =http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=109619&page=1 | work =ABC News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-08 | language = ] It was also, when it was released, the biggest openingbox office for anR-rated movie ever. Final domestic box-office gross (USA) reached $165,091,464 with aworldwide gross of $349,200,000. [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Business data for Hannibal | date= | publisher= | url =http://imdb.com/title/tt0212985/business | work =IMDB | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-10 | language = ] The film spent 3 weeks at number one in the US box office chart, and 4 weeks at number one in the UK. [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Box Office | date= | publisher= | url =http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/boxoffice | work =IMDB Pro | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-10 | language = ] "Hannibal" was the tenth highest grossing movie of the year worldwide. [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Box-Office data for Hannibal | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=2001&p=.htm | work =Boxofficemojo | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-10 | language = ] "Hannibal" also made over $87,000,000 in USvideo rentals following release in August 2001. [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=US Video rentals | date= | publisher=IMDB | url =http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/videorevenue | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-10 | language = ]The reviews for "Hannibal" were mixed.cite news | first=David | last=Thomson | coauthors= | title=The Riddler Has His Day | year=2001 | publisher= | url =http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/84/ | work =Sight & Sound | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-09 | language = ] cite book | last = Rob | first = Brian | authorlink = | title = Ridley Scott: Pocket Essential | publisher = Pocket Essentials | year = 2005 | pages = | doi = | isbn = 978-1-904048-47-3 ] "
Time Magazine " called it: "A banquet of creepy, gory or grotesque incidents is on display in "Hannibal". But this superiorsequel has romance in its dark heart." While less favourable, the UK's biggest selling film magazine "Empire Magazine " gave it two out of five stars, calling it "...laughable to just plain boring, "Hannibal" is toothless to the end." David Thomson, writing in theBritish Film Institute magazine "Sight & Sound " praised the film. "It works. It's smart, good-looking, sexy, fun...dirty, naughty and knowing." Thomson does make clear however, he is a great fan of director Ridley Scott's work. He adds: "It is, literally, that Hannibal Lecter has become such a household joke that he can't be dreadful again. It seems clear thatAnthony Hopkins and Scott saw that, and planned accordingly. That's how the movie was saved." "Variety" in its review said "Hannibal" is not as good as "Lambs"... ultimately more shallow and crass at its heart than its predecessor, "Hannibal" is nevertheless tantalizing, engrossing and occasionally startling."cite news | first=Todd | last=McCarthy | coauthors= | title=Hannibal Review | date=2001-02-05 | publisher= | url =http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117797220.html?categoryid=31&cs=1 | work =Variety | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-09 | language = ] A negative review in "The Guardian " claimed that what was wrong with "Hannibal" the film was carried over from "Hannibal" the book: "The result is an inflated, good-looking bore of a movie. "The Silence of the Lambs" was a marvellous thing. This, by contrast is barely okey-dokey." [cite news | first=Xan | last=Brooks | coauthors= | title=Hannibal Review | date=2001-02-16 | publisher= | url =http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_review/0,,438460,00.html | work =The Guardian | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-09 | language = ]Roger Ebert gave the film a "Thumbs Down" rating on the television program "Ebert & Roeper" and gave the film a 2 1/2 out of 4 stars rating in his print review in which he open with the following: "Ridley Scott's "Hannibal" is a carnival geek show elevated in the direction of art. It never quite gets there, but it tries with every fiber of its craft to redeem its pulp origins, and we must give it credit for the courage of its depravity; if it proves nothing else, it proves that if a man cutting off his face and feeding it to his dogs doesn't get the NC-17 rating for violence, nothing ever will." [ [http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20010209/REVIEWS/102090301/1023] - Review by Roger Ebert, "Chicago Sun-Times ", February 9, 2001.]"Hannibal" currently has an overall
metacritic rating of 57 out of 100 from 36 reviews and aRotten Tomatoes percentage rating of 38% with an average rating of five out of ten from 160 reviews.Home release
"Hannibal" is available as a one-disc and two-disc
DVD . The two disc DVD contains an array of special features including: Commentary by directorRidley Scott , deleted and alternate scenes, five making-of featurettes and a "marketing gallery" which contains trailers, production stills and unusedposter concepts.A special "steel-book" edition of Hannibal was released in 2007. There are no significant changes made to the DVD itself; only the package artwork was changed.
Differences from the novel
According to "Variety" the script for "Hannibal" was: "...for better or worse, quite faithful to the Harris blueprint; fans of the tome may regret the perhaps necessary excision of some characters, most notably Mason Verger's muscle-bound macho sister Margot, as well as the considerable fascinating academic detail, but will basically feel the book has been respected (yes, even the climactic dinner party is served up intact, with the only surprise twists saved for its wake." "
Time Out " in its review of "Hannibal" noted: "The weight-watchers script sensibly dispenses with several characters to serve a brew that's enjoyably spicy but low on substance. So much story is squeezed into 131 minutes that little time's left for analysis or characterization." [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Hannibal review | date= | publisher=Time Out Film Guide | url =http://www.timeout.com/film/dvd/63664.html | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-04-16 | language = ] ProducerDino De Laurentiis was asked why some characters were left out of the film: "I think if you get a book which is 600 pages, you have to reduce it to ascript of 100 pages. In two hours of film, you cannot possibly include all the characters. We set ourselves a limit, and cut characters which weren't so vital." [cite news | first=James | last=Mattram | coauthors= | title=Interview: Dino De Laurentiis | year=2001 | publisher= | url =http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/dino_de_laurentis_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-07 | language = ]In the book, Mason Verger runs an orphanage, from which he calls children to verbally abuse as a substitute for his no longer being able to abuse them sexually. He also has a sister, Margot, whom he raped when they were children and who happens to be a
lesbian . When she disclosed her sexual orientation to her family, their father disowned her. As she herself is sterile due to steroid abuse, Verger exerts some control over her by promising her asemen sample with which to impregnate her lover, who could then inherit the Verger fortune. Also, in the novel, he literally had no face and had to be kept in a sterile room at all times to keep bacteria from affecting exposed muscle and tissues. At the end of the book, Margot and Starling both help Lecter escape during ashootout between Starling and Verger's guards. Margot, at Lecter's advice, stimulates Mason to ejaculate with acattle prod , and then kills him by ramming his petMoray eel down his throat. Following up on the fate of Krendler in the book, the crookedFBI official experiences a grisly fate when Lecter shoots him with an arrow.The book's controversial ending has Lecter presenting Starling with the exhumed bones of her father, which he "brings to life" by hypnotizing Starling, allowing her to say goodbye. This forges an odd alliance between Starling and Lecter, culminating in their becoming lovers and escaping to
Argentina . At the end of the novel, Barney (the hospital orderly) sighted Clarice and Hannibal at theTeatro Colon ofBuenos Aires .Also gone from the film were the flashbacks to Lecter's
childhood , in which he saw his younger sister eaten by German deserters in 1944. The character of Jack Crawford, while in the book does not feature in the film.Anthony Hopkins was asked in an interview on the subject of whether or not he 'bought' the idea of the two characters (Starling and Lecter) heading off in to the sunset as lovers (as happens in the book). "Yes, I did. Other people found that preposterous. I suppose there's a moral issue there. I think it would have been a very interesting thing though. I think it would have been very interesting had she gone off, because I suspected that there was that romance, attachment there, that obsession with her. I guessed that a long time ago, at the last phone call to Clarice, at the end of SotL, she said, "Dr. Lecter, Dr. Lecter…"." [cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Interview with Anthony Hopkins | date= | publisher= | url = http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035935p1.html | work =IGN | pages = | accessdate = 2007-03-13 | language = ]ee also
*
Vide Cor Meum - the song from the opera in FlorenceReferences
External links
* [http://www.hannibalmovie.com/ Official site]
*
*
*
*
*
*
* [http://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/hannibal_unproduced.html Unproduced script by David Mamet]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.