- Rocky Flats Plant
The Rocky Flats Plant was a
United States nuclear weapon s production facility nearDenver, Colorado that operated from 1952 to 1992. It was under the control of theUnited States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) until 1977, when it was replaced by the Department of Energy (DOE).History
1950s
Following
World War II , the United States began production of the hydrogen bomb. The AEC chose theDow Chemical Company to manage the bomb production facility. A site about convert|15|mi|km northwest ofDenver, Colorado on a windy plateau called Rocky Flats was chosen for the facility. OnJuly 10 ,1951 , ground was broken on the first building in the facility.In 1953, the plant began production of bomb components, manufacturing
plutonium triggers, or "pits", which were used at thePantex plant inAmarillo, Texas to assemble nuclear weapons.By 1957, the plant had expanded in size to 27 buildings. In this year, a fire occurred in one of the
stainless steel glovebox es used to handleradioactive materials. The accident resulted in the contamination of Building 71 and the release of radioactive material into the atmosphere, and caused US $818,600 in damage. Anincinerator for plutonium-contaminated waste was installed in Building 71 in 1958.Barrels of
radioactive waste were found to be leaking into an open field in 1959. This was not made publicly known until 1970 when wind-borne particles were detected in Denver.1960s
Throughout the 1960s, the plant continued to enlarge and add buildings. The Sixties also brought more contamination to the site. In 1967, 3,500
barrel s ofplutonium -contaminatedlubricant s andsolvent s were stored on Pad 903. A large number of them were found to be leaking, and low-level contaminated soil was becoming wind-borne from this area. This pad was covered withgravel and paved over withasphalt in 1969.1969 saw a major fire in a glovebox in Building 776/777. This was the costliest
industrial accident to ever occur in the United States up to that time. Cleanup from the accident took two years and led to safety upgrades on the site, includingsprinkler system s and firewalls.1970s
In order to reduce the danger of public contamination and to create a security area around the plant following protests, the
United States Congress authorized the purchase of a 4,600 acre (18 km²) buffer zone around the plant in 1972. In 1973, nearby Walnut Creek and theGreat Western Reservoir were found to have elevatedtritium levels. The tritium was determined to have been released from contaminated materials shipped to Rocky Flats from theLawrence Livermore Laboratory . Discovery of the contamination by the Colorado Department of Health led to investigations by the AEC andUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a result of the investigation, several mitigation efforts were put in place to prevent further contamination. Some of the elements included channeling ofwastewater runoff to threedam s for testing before release into the water system and construction of areverse osmosis facility to clean up wastewater.The next year, elevated
plutonium levels were found in thetopsoil near the now covered Pad 903. An additional 4,500 acres (18 km²) of buffer zone were purchased.1975 saw
Rockwell International replacingDow Chemical as the contractor for the site. This year also saw local landowners suing for property contamination caused by the plant.In 1978, 60 protesters belonging to the
Rocky Flats Truth Force [http://danielpubgroup.com/disobey/disobey.html] , or Satyagraha Affinity Group, based inBoulder, Colorado , were arrested fortrespassing at Rocky Flats, and were brought to trial before Judge Kim Goldberger. Dr. John Candler Cobb, Professor of Preventive Medicine at the University of Colorado Medical Center, testified that the most significant danger of radioactive contamination came from the 1967 incident in whichoil barrel s containing plutonium leaked 5,000 gallons of oil intosand under the barrels, which was then blown by strong winds as far away as Denver. Radioactivity of the sand was measured at 30 million disintegrations per minute, 15 million times higher than the state standard of two disintegrations per minute. [Bob Reuteman, "Vindication at last for all who feared Rocky Flats", "TheRocky Mountain News ", 18 February 2006.]A report released by Jefferson County Health Department director, Dr. Carl Johnson, indicated that incidents of
cancer were higher near Rocky Flats. This report was refuted by a Department of Energy (DOE) report indicating lower cancer rates in males employed at Rocky Flats than in the national population.On April 28th, 1979, a few weeks after the
Three Mile Island accident , a crowd of close to 15,000 protesters assembled at a nearby site. [ [http://books.google.com.au/books?id=rlIH-NQbFQgC&pg=PA295&lpg=PA295&dq=atomic+protests+arrests+power&source=web&ots=7R0_4BSy1F&sig=1VLLONdkehSNSOlupuHOhDTFMJY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result Nonviolent Social Movements] p. 295.] SingersJackson Browne andBonnie Raitt took the stage along with various speakers. The following day, 286 protesters includingDaniel Ellsberg were arrested forcivil disobedience /trespassing on the Rocky Flats facility.1980s
Rocky Flats became a focus of protest by peace activists throughout the 1980s. In 1983, a massive demonstration was organized that brought together 17,000 people who joined hands in an encirclement around the 17-mile perimeter of the plant.
A perimeter security zone was installed around the facility in 1983 and was upgraded with remote detection abilities in 1985. Also in 1983, the first
radioactive waste was processed through the aqueous recovery system, creating aplutonium button.A celebration of 25,000,000 continuous safe hours by the employees at Rocky Flats happened in 1985. The same year, Rockwell received Industrial Research Magazine's IR-100 award for a process to remove
actinide contamination from wastewater at the plant. The next year, the site received aNational Safety Council Award of Honor for outstanding safety performance.In 1988, several events occurred that put the plant's past and future into a dim light. A DOE safety evaluation resulted in a report that was critical of safety measures at the plant. The EPA fined the plant for
polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) leaks from atransformer . A solid waste form, calledpondcrete , was found to have not cured properly and was leaking from containers. Aboxcar of transuranic waste from the site was refused entry into the state ofIdaho and returned to the plant. Plans to potentially close the plant were released.1989 was more devastating to Rocky Flats than 1988. An employee left a faucet running, resulting in
chromic acid being released into the sanitary water system. The Colorado Department of Health and the EPA both posted full-time personnel at the plant to monitor safety. Plutonium production was suspended due to safety violations.FBI Investigation
Insiders at the plant started "tipping" the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about the unsafe conditions sometime in 1988. Late that year the FBI started clandestinely flying light aircraft over the area and noticed that theincinerator was apparently being used late into the night. After several months of collecting evidence both from workers and by direct measurement, they informed the DOE onJune 6 ,1989 that they wanted to meet about a potential terrorist threat. When the DOE officers arrived, they were served with papers. Simultaneously, the FBI raided the facilities and ordered everyone out. They found numerous violations of federal anti-pollution laws including massive contamination of water and soil, though none of the original charges that led to the raid were substantiated. In 1992, Rockwell was charged with minor environmental crimes and paid an $18.5 million fine.1990s
Rockwell International was replaced byEG&G as primary contractor for the Rocky Flats plant. EG&G began an aggressive work safety and cleanup plan for the site that included construction of a system to remove contamination from thegroundwater of the site. The "Sierra Club vs. Rockwell" case was decided in favor of theSierra Club . The ruling directed Rocky Flats to manageplutonium residues as hazardous waste.In 1991, an interagency agreement between DOE, the Colorado Department of Health and the EPA outlined multi-year schedules for environmental restoration studies and remediation activities. The DOE released a report that advocated downsizing the plant's production into a more streamlined facility. Due to the fall of the
Soviet Union , production of most of the systems at Rocky Flats was no longer needed, leaving only theW88 warhead triggers.In 1992, production was discontinued of
submarine -basedmissile s using the W88 trigger, leading to the layoff of 4,500 employees at the plant. 4,000 others were retained for long-term cleanup of the facility. The Rocky Flats Plant Transition Plan outlined the environmental restoration process. The DOE announced that 61 pounds (28 kg) of plutonium lined the exhaust ductwork in six buildings on the site.Starting in 1993,
weapons-grade plutonium began to be shipped to theOak Ridge National Laboratory ,Los Alamos National Laboratory and theSavannah River Site .1994 saw a new name for the site, the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, reflecting the changed nature of the site from weapon production to environmental cleanup and restoration. The cleanup effort was contracted to the Kaiser-Hill Company which proposed release of 4,100 acres (16 km²) of the buffer zone for public access.
Throughout the remainder of the 1990s and into the 2000s, cleanup of contaminated sites and dismantling of contaminated buildings continued with the waste materials being shipped to the
Nevada Test Site , theWaste Isolation Pilot Plant inNew Mexico , and the Envirocare company inUtah , which is nowEnergySolutions after merging with three other waste disposal companies.In 1999, 800 acres (3 km²) were turned over to the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service creating theRock Creek Reserve .2000s
In 2000, Congress proposed transforming Rocky Flats to a
wildlife refuge , setting aside 6,400 acres (25 km²) after cleanup and closure. TheRocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge Act passed in 2001. [cite web |title=Final Rocky Flats Sign Text |url=http://www.fws.gov/rockyflats/Signage/Final%20Rocky%20Flats%20Sign%20Text%202.23.07.pdf |format=PDF |author=U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |date=2007-01-31 |accessdate=2007-04-19]The last contaminated building was removed and the last
weapons-grade plutonium was shipped out in 2003, ending the cleanup based on a modified cleanup agreement. The modified agreement required a higher level of cleanup in the first 3 feet (1 m) ofsoil in exchange for not having to remove any contamination below that point unless it posed a chance of migrating to the surface or contaminating thegroundwater . ["Glovebox removal heralds new Flats era", "The Denver Post ",9 December 2004 .] About half of the 800 buildings previously existing on the site had been dismantled by early December 2004.Due to fires, principally the fire in 1957, and other inadvertent releases, principally due to wind at a waste storage area, the site is contaminated with plutonium. The other major contaminant is
carbon tetrachloride (CCl4. Both of these substances affected areas adjacent to the site. In addition, there were small releases ofberyllium andtritium , as well asdioxin fromincineration .Clean-up was declared complete on
October 13 ,2005 . About convert|1000|acre|km2 of the new wildlife refuge, the former industrial area, will remain under DOE control to protect the ongoing environmental monitoring and remediation.In February 2006, after a 16-year legal battle, a federal jury ruled against
Dow Chemical andRockwell International in aclass-action lawsuit brought by 12,000 property owners living downwind from Rocky Flats. The jury awarded $110 million inpunitive damages against Dow Chemical, $89 million against Rockwell International, and $177 million against each company incompensatory damages . Lawyers for the two companies said they would appeal. [Katie Kelley, "Jury Urges Millions in Penalties for Contamination Near Former Nuclear Site", "The New York Times ",16 February 2006 .]On
June 13 ,2007 , the EPA announced it had certified the cleanup of the former Rocky Flatsnuclear weapon s plant, another step toward the planned conversion of the site to awildlife refuge . [Daily Camera, "EPA certifies cleanup at Rocky Flats", "Daily Camera ",13 June 2007 .]References
* - PDF
External links
*
* - Includes a brief history of the cleanup at the site as well as links to detailed reports on contamination and accidents
* - Extensive photographs and descriptions of the buildings at the Rocky Flats site
* – by Harvey Wasserman and Norman Solomon, 1982.
* [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/hhh.co0471 Survey number HAER CO-83] - Rocky Flats Plant
* [http://www.csirc.net/docs/reports/LA-UR-05-3247.pdf A Technically Useful History of the Critical Mass Laboratory at Rocky Flats] by Dr. Robert E. Rothe, May 2005
* [http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=6291683&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1 Rocky Flats Protesters Reunite]
*cite web | title=Photography: a year of disobedience | work=Daniel Publishing Group, Inc | url=http://danielpubgroup.com/disobey/disobey.html | accessmonthday=21 April | accessyear=2008 - Photographs and narrative of initial protests against the Rocky Flats Plant, 1978-79
* [http://www.rockyflatscoldwarmuseum.org/beforeafter.htm Rocky Flats before (1995) and after (2005) cleanup.]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.