Naomi Oreskes

Naomi Oreskes
Naomi Oreskes

Fields Science History, Economic geology
Institutions Stanford University
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Dartmouth College
Harvard University
New York University
University of California San Diego
Alma mater Imperial College, University of London
Stanford University

Naomi Oreskes is an American science historian, and Professor of History and Science Studies at the University of California San Diego. She has worked on studies of geophysics, environmental issues such as global warming, and the history of science. In 2010, Oreskes co-authored Merchants of Doubt which identified some parallels between the climate change debate and earlier public controversies.[1]

Contents

Background

Oreskes graduated from Stuyvesant High School in 1976. She received her BSc degree in Mining Geology from the Royal School of Mines of Imperial College, University of London in 1981, and worked as a Research Assistant in the Geology Department and as a Teaching Assistant in the departments of Geology, Philosophy and Applied Earth Sciences at Stanford University starting in 1984. She received her PhD degree in the Graduate Special Program in Geological Research and History of Science at Stanford in 1990. She received a National Science Foundation's Young Investigator Award in 1994.

She has worked as a consultant for the United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S National Academy of Sciences, and has also taught at Dartmouth, Harvard and New York University (NYU). She is also a member of the History of Science Society. She is the author or has contributed to a number of essays and technical reports in economic geology and science history[2] in addition to several books:

  • The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science, Oxford University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-19-511733-6
  • Plate Tectonics: An Insider’s History of the Modern Theory of the Earth, Edited with Homer Le Grand, Westview Press, 2003, ISBN 0-8133-4132-9
  • Perspectives on Geophysics, Special Issue of Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31B, Oreskes, Naomi and James R. Fleming, eds., 2000.
  • Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway, Bloomsbury Press, 2010

Oreskes is currently the Provost of the Sixth College at the University of California, San Diego.

Science and society essay

Oreskes wrote an essay on science and society Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change in the journal Science in December 2004.[3][4][5]

In the essay she reported an analysis of “928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and published in the ISI database with the keywords ‘global climate change’”.[3] The essay stated the analysis was to test the hypothesis that the drafting of reports and statements by societies such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, American Association for the Advancement of Science and National Academy of Sciences might downplay legitimate dissenting opinions on anthropogenic climate change. After the analysis, she concluded that 75 percent of the examined abstracts either explicitly or implicitly backed the consensus view, while none directly dissented from it. The essay received a great deal of media attention from around the world and has been cited by many prominent persons such as Al Gore in the movie An Inconvenient Truth.

In 2007, Oreskes expanded her analysis, stating that approximately 20 percent of abstracts explicitly endorsed the consensus on climate change that: "Earth's climate is being affected by human activities". In addition, 55 percent of abstracts "implicitly" endorsed the consensus by engaging in research to characterize the ongoing and/or future impact of climate change (50 percent of abstracts) or to mitigate predicted changes (5 percent). The remaining 25 percent focused on either paleoclimate (10%) or developing measurement techniques (15%); Oreskes did not classify these as taking a position on contemporary global climate change.[6]

Merchants of Doubt

Merchants of Doubt is a 2010 book by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. Oreskes and Conway, both American science historians, identify some remarkable parallels between the climate change debate and earlier controversies over tobacco smoking, acid rain and the hole in the ozone layer. They argue that spreading doubt and confusion was the basic strategy of those opposing action in each case.[1] In particular, Fred Seitz, Fred Singer, and a few other contrarian scientists joined forces with conservative think tanks and private corporations to challenge the scientific consensus on many contemporary issues.[7]

The Marshall Institute has been critical of the book, but most other reviewers received it favorably. One reviewer said that Merchants of Doubt is exhaustively researched and documented, and may be one of the most important books of 2010. Another reviewer saw the book as his choice for best science book of the year.[8]

Selected awards, honors, and fellowships

  • George Sarton Award Lecture, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2004
  • American Philosophical Society Sabbatical Fellowship, 2001-2002.
  • National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, 1994-1999.
  • National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship for University Teachers, 1993-94.
  • Society of Economic Geologists Lindgren Prize for outstanding work by a young scientist, 1993.
  • Ritter Memorial Fellowship in History of Marine Sciences, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 1994.
  • Listed, Who’s Who in American Science and Engineering, Who’s Who in the West.

References

  1. ^ a b Mike Steketee. Some sceptics make it a habit to be wrong The Australian, November 20, 2010.
  2. ^ Oreskes publication record at UCSD
  3. ^ a b Naomi Oreskes (2004-12-03). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Science 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686. 
  4. ^ Oreskes, Naomi (2005-01-21). "Beyond the Ivory Tower, The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change (including corrections)". sciencemag.org. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/306/5702/1686.pdf. Retrieved 2008-04-24. 
  5. ^ "Exchange of letters to Science". sciencepolicy.colorado.edu. Archived from the original on 2010-04-12. http://www.webcitation.org/5owRfHITk. Retrieved 2008-04-24. 
  6. ^ Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we’re not wrong?". In Joseph F. DiMento, Pamela Doughman. Climate Change. MIT Press. ISBN 026204241X. http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/documents/Chapter4.pdf. 
  7. ^ Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Press, p. 6.
  8. ^ McKie, Robin. "Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M Conway". The Guardian, August 8, 2010

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Naomi Oreskes — (2008). Naomi Oreskes (* 1958 in New York)[1] ist Professorin für Geschichte und Wissenschaftsforschung (History and Science Studies) an der University of California, San Diego …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Oreskes — Naomi Oreskes ist Professorin für Geschichte und Wissenschaftsforschung (History and Science Studies) an der University of California, San Diego. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Leben und Wirken 1.1 Essay über Konsens zum Klimawandel 2 Auszeichnungen und… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Naomi (given name) — Naomi (pronounced nay oh mee) is a female given name from Hebrew נָעֳמִי, with an original meaning of enjoyment, pleasure, or gratification . Alternate spellings may include Noémie (a version used in French speaking countries), Noemi , or Naomie …   Wikipedia

  • Merchants of Doubt — Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming   …   Wikipedia

  • Climate change denial — This article is about campaigns to undermine public confidence in scientific opinion on climate change. For challenges to the scientific consensus, see global warming controversy. Climate change denial is a term used to describe organized… …   Wikipedia

  • Scientific opinion on climate change — This article is about scientific opinion on climate change. For public perception and controversy about the scientific consensus, see Public opinion on climate change and Global warming controversy. For opinions of individual dissenting… …   Wikipedia

  • Global warming controversy — refers to a variety of disputes, significantly more pronounced in the popular media than in the scientific literature,[1][2] regarding the nature, causes, and consequences of global warming. The disputed issues involve the causes of increased… …   Wikipedia

  • George C. Marshall Institute — Not to be confused with the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies or The George C. Marshall Foundation Logo of the George C. Marshall Institute. The George C. Marshall Institute (GMI) is a politically conservative think tank… …   Wikipedia

  • Climatic Research Unit email controversy — Date 17 November 2009 Location Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia Also known as Climategate Inquiries House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK)[1] Independent Climate Change Review (UK) International Science Assessment …   Wikipedia

  • Scientific consensus — is the collective judgement, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of science at a particular time. Scientific consensus is not, by itself, a scientific argument, and is not part of the scientific method;… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”