- Elizabethan Religious Settlement
The Elizabethan Religious Settlement was Elizabeth I’s response to the religious divisions created over the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI and Mary I. This response, described as "The Revolution of 1559", [cite book|first=A.G.|last=Dickens|title=The English Reformation|publisher=Fontana|year=1967|pages=401] was set out in two Acts of the
Parliament of England. The Act of Supremacy of 1559 re-established the Church of England’s independence from Rome, with Parliament conferring on Elizabeth the title Supreme Governor of the Church of England, while the Act of Uniformity of 1559 set out the form the English church would now take, including establishing the Book of Common Prayer.
Elizabeth's religious reign
When Mary died in 1558, Elizabeth inherited the throne. One of the most important concerns during Elizabeth’s early reign was religion. Communion with the
Roman Catholic Churchhad been reinstated under Mary using the instrument of Royal Supremacy, but was again severed by Elizabeth. She relied primarily on her chief advisors, Sir William Cecil, as her Secretary of State, and Sir Nicholas Bacon, as the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, for direction on the matter.
Parliament was summoned in 1559 to consider the Reformation Bill and to again create an independent Church of England. The Reformation Bill defined the Communion as a
consubstantialcelebration as opposed to a transubstantial celebration, included abuse of the popein the litany, and ordered that ministers should not wear the surpliceor other Catholic vestments. It allowed ministers to marry, banned images from churches, and confirmed Elizabeth as Supreme Head of the Church of England. The Bill met heavy resistance in the House of Lords, as Roman Catholic bishops as well as the lay peers voted against it. They reworked much of the Bill, changed the liturgy to allow for belief in transubstantiation in the Communion and refused to grant Elizabeth the title of Supreme Head of the Church. Parliament was proroguedover Easter, and when it resumed, the government entered two new bills into the Houses — the Act of Supremacy and the Act of Uniformity.
Act of Supremacy
The Act of Supremacy validated ten Acts of Henry VIII that Mary had repealed and confirmed Elizabeth as Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Use of the term Supreme Governor as opposed to Supreme Head pacified many who were concerned about a female leader of the Church of England. Elizabeth's changes were more wholesale than those of her half-brother,
Edward VI. All but one of the bishops lost their posts, a hundred fellows of Oxford colleges were deprived; many dignitaries resigned rather than take the oath. The bishops who were removed from the ecclesiastical bench were replaced by appointees who would agree to the reforms.
On the question of images, her initial reaction was to allow crucifixes and candlesticks and the restoration of roods, but some of the new bishops whom she had elevated protested. In 1560
Edmund Grindal, one of the Marian exiles now made Bishop of London, was allowed to enforce the demolition of rood lofts in London and in 1561 the Queen herself ordered the demolition of all lofts. [She herself retained a cross and candlesticks in her own chapel. See: Haigh,Cristopher, "English Reformations: Religion, Politics and Society under the Tudors". Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. p.244] Thereafter, the determination to prevent any further restoration was evidenced by the more thoroughgoing destruction of roods, vestments, stone altars, dooms, statues and other ornaments. The queen also appointed a new Privy Council, removing many Roman Catholic counsellors by doing so. Under Elizabeth, factionalism in the Council and conflicts at court greatly diminished. The Act of Supremacy had passed without difficulty.
Act of Uniformity
Act of Uniformity 1559, which forced people to attend Sunday service in an Anglican church, at which a new version of the Book of Common Prayerwas to be used, passed by only three votes. [Haigh (ibid.) p.237-241. No bishops voted in favour, two were prevented from voting at all, and two other ecclesiastics were absent. The majority were all laymen : J Guy"Tudor England"(OUP1988) p. 262 ] The Bill of Uniformity was more cautious than the initial Reformation Bill. It revoked the harsh laws proposed against Roman Catholics, it removed the abuse of the pope from the litany and kept the wording that allowed for both a subjective and objective belief in the Real Presence in the Communion.
After Parliament was dismissed, Elizabeth, along with Cecil, drafted what are known as the Royal Injunctions. These were additions to the settlement and largely stressed some continuity with the Catholic past — ministers were ordered to wear the surplice. Wafers, as opposed to ordinary baker's bread, were to be used as the bread at Communion. There had been opposition to the settlement in the shires, which for the most part were largely Roman Catholic, so the changes are often said to have been made in order to allow for acceptance of the Settlement, although MacCulloch sees it as "absurd to see these concessions as intended to mollify Catholic- minded clergy and laity" and only of help in conciliating possible
Lutherans. Catholics had lost so much that these minor changes meant nothing to them. [D. MacCulloch, "Reformation-Europe's House Divided" Penguin, 2004) p. 289] What succeeded more than anything else was the sheer length of Elizabeth's reign; while Mary had been able to impose her programme for a mere five years, Elizabeth had more than forty. Those who delayed, 'looking for a new day' when restoration would again be commanded, were defeated by the passing of years. [Haigh (ibid) p.245]
The settlement is often seen as a terminal point for the
English Reformationand in the long run the foundation of a "via media" and the concept of Anglicanism. At the time it was believed to have established a Protestant Church. [cite journal|first=Diarmaid|last=MacCulloch|title=Putting the English Reformation on the Map|journal=Trans. RHistS|publisher=CUP|year=2005|volume=XV|pages=75–95] Although Elizabeth "cannot be credited with a prophetic latitudinarian policy which foresaw the rich diversity of Anglicanism", her preferences made it possible. [cite book|last=Dickens|first=A.G.|title=The English Reformation|publisher=Fontana|year=1967|pages=403] To some it can be said to represent a compromise in wording and practice between the first Prayer Book of Edward VI (1549) and the Second Prayer Book (1552). For example, when Thomas Cranmerfirst wrote the Book of Common Prayer, which came into operation in 1549, it contained the words "The Body of our Lord Jesus Christ which was given for thee, preserve thy body and soul unto everlasting life." The 1552 edition, which was never in force, replaces these words with "Take and eat this in remembrance that Christ died for thee, and feed on him in thy heart by faith, with thanksgiving." However, some liturgical scholars such as Gregory Dix, Ratcliff, and Couratin would say that both prayer books taught the same eucharistic doctrine, albeit more cautiously in the first book. [For an extended treatment, see cite book|first=EC|last=Ratcliff|title=Reflections on Liturgical Revision|publisher=Grove Books|year=1980|pages=12–17 discussing "The Communion Service of the Prayer Book: Its intention, Interpretation and Revision", and also cite book|first=Gregory|last=Dix|title=Dixit Cranmer Et Non Timuit|publisher=Dacre|year=1948] The Act which authorised the second book spoke of it as explaining and making 'fully perfect' the first book. [cite book|first=JR|last=Tanner|title=Tudor Constitutional Documents|publisher=CUP|year=1948|pages=19] Finally, the 1559 book, published under Matthew Parkerduring the reign of Elizabeth, includes "both" phrases. [cite book|last=Chadwick|first=Owen|title=The Reformation|location=Harmondsworth|publisher=Penguin|year=1964|pages=121]
By the time of Elizabeth's death, there had emerged a new party, "perfectly hostile" to Puritans, but not adherent to Rome. The Anglicans, as they came to be called later in the century, [Maltby (ibid)p.235] preferred the revised
Book of Common Prayerof 1559, from which had been removed some of the matters offensive to Catholics. [Proctor F. and Frere W.H., "A New History of the Book of Common Prayer" (Macmillan 1965) p.91ff.] A new dispute was between the Puritans, who wished to see an end of the prayer book and episcopacy and the Anglicans, the considerable body of people who looked kindly on the Elizabethan Settlement, who rejected 'prophesyings', whose spirituality had been nourished by the Prayer Book and who preferred the governance of bishops. [Judith Maltby, "Prayer book and People in Elizabethan and Early Stuart England" (Cambridge 1998)] It was between these two groups that, after Elizabeth's death in 1603, a new, more savage episode of the English Reformation was in the process of gestation.
Road to the Civil War
During the reigns of the Stuart kings, James I and Charles I, the battle lines were to become more defined, leading ultimately to the
English Civil War, the first on English soil to engulf parts of the civilian population. The war was only partly about religion, but the abolition of prayer book and episcopacy by a Puritan Parliament was an element in the causes of the conflict. As Diarmaid MacCullochhas noted, the legacy of these tumultuous events can be recognised, throughout the Commonwealth (1649-1660) and the Restorationwhich followed it and beyond. Anglicans were to become the core of the restored Church of England, but at the price of further division. At the Restoration in 1660 Anglicans were to be but part of the religious scene.
Oath of Supremacy
Regnans in Excelsis"
Religion in the United Kingdom
*Peace of Augsburg 1555
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/tudors/reformation_debate_02.shtml The Legacy of the Reformation: A New Approach]
* [http://www.elizabethi.org/uk/elizabethanchurch/settlement.html Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603), Elizabethan Religious Settlement]
* [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/ENGref/er80.html Elizabeth's Act of Uniformity (1559)]
* [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/ENGref/links.html Documents Illustrative of English Church History]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.