Stress-energy-momentum pseudotensor

In the theory of general relativity, a stress-energy-momentum pseudotensor, such as the Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor, is an extension of the non-gravitational stress-energy tensor which incorporates the energy-momentum of gravity. It allows the energy-momentum of a system of gravitating matter to be defined. In particular it allows the total of matter plus the gravitating energy-momentum to form a conserved current within the framework of general relativity, so that the "total" energy-momentum crossing the hypersurface (3-dimensional boundary) of "any" compact space-time hypervolume (4-dimensional submanifold) vanishes.

Some people object to this derivation on the grounds that pseudotensors are inappropriate objects in general relativity, but the conservation law only requires the use of the 4-divergence of a pseudotensor which is, in this case, a tensor (which also vanishes). On the other hand, most pseudotensors are sections of jet bundles, which are perfectly valid objects in GR.

Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor

The use of the Landau-Lifshitz combined matter+gravitational stress-energy-momentum pseudotensorLev Davidovich Landau & Evgeny Mikhailovich Lifshitz, "The Classical Theory of Fields", (1951), Pergamon Press, ISBN 7-5062-4256-7 chapter 11, section #96] allows the energy-momentum conservation laws to be extended into general relativity. Subtraction of the matter stress-energy-momentum tensor from the combined pseudotensor results in the gravitational stress-energy-momentum pseudotensor.

Requirements

Landau & Lifshitz were led by four requirements in their search for a gravitational energy momentum pseudotensor, $t\_\{LL\}^\{mu\; u\},$:
# that it be constructed entirely from the metric tensor, so as to be purely geometrical or gravitational in origin.
# that it be index symmetric , i.e. $t\_\{LL\}^\{mu\; u\}\; =\; t\_\{LL\}^\{\; u\; mu\}\; ,$, (to conserve angular momentum)
# that, when added to the stress-energy tensor of matter, $T^\{mu\; u\},$, its total 4-divergence vanishes (this is required of any conserved current) so that we have a conserved expression for the total stress-energy-momentum.
# that it vanish locally in an inertial frame of reference (which requires that it only contains first and not second or higher derivatives of the metric). This is because the equivalence principle requires that the gravitational force field, the Christoffel symbols, vanish locally in some frame. If gravitational energy is a function of its force field, as is usual for other forces, then the associated gravitational pseudotensor should also vanish locally.

Definition

Landau and Lifshitz showed that there is a unique construction that satisfies these requirements, namely

:

where:

$G^\{mu\; u\},$ is the Einstein tensor (which is constructed from the metric)

$g^\{mu\; u\},$ is the metric tensor

$g\; =\; ,\; det\; ,\; (g\_\{mu\; u\}),$ is the determinant of the metric tensor and is < 0. Hence its appearance as $-g$.

are partial derivatives, not covariant derivatives.

$G,$ is Newton's gravitational constant.

Verification

Examining the 4 conditions we can see that the first 3 are relatively easy to demonstrate:
#Since the Einstein tensor, $G^\{mu\; u\},$, is itself constructed from the metric, so therefore is $t\_\{LL\}^\{mu\; u\}$
#Since the Einstein tensor, $G^\{mu\; u\},$, is symmetric so is $t\_\{LL\}^\{mu\; u\}$ since the additional terms are symmetric by inspection.
#The Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor is constructed so that when added to the stress-energy tensor of matter, $T^\{mu\; u\},$, its total 4-divergence vanishes: $((-g)(T^\{mu\; u\}\; +\; t\_\{LL\}^\{mu\; u\}))\_\{,mu\}\; =\; 0$. This follows from the cancellation of the Einstein tensor, $G^\{mu\; u\},$, with the stress-energy tensor, $T^\{mu\; u\},$ by the Einstein field equations; the remaining term vanishes algebraically due the commutativity of partial derivatives applied across antisymmetric indices.
#The Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor appears to include second derivative terms in the metric, but in fact the explicit second derivative terms in the pseudotensor cancel with the implicit second derivative terms contained within the Einstein tensor, $G^\{mu\; u\},$. This is more evident when the pseudotensor is directly expressed in terms of the metric tensor or the Levi-Civita connection; only the first derivative terms in the metric survive and these vanish where the frame is locally inertial around any chosen point. As a result the entire pseudotensor vanishes locally (again, around any chosen point) $t\_\{LL\}^\{mu\; u\}\; =\; 0$, which demonstrates the delocalisation of gravitational energy-momentum.

Metric and Levi-Civita connection versions

Landau & Lifshitz also provide two equivalent but longer expressions for the Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor:

*Metric tensor version:::::::::: [Landau-Lifshitz equation 96.9 ]
*Levi-Civita connection version:::::::: [Landau-Lifshitz equation 96.8 ]

Einstein pseudotensor

This pseudotensor was originally developed by Albert Einstein. [Albert Einstein "Das hamiltonisches Prinzip und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie (The Hamiltonian principle and general relativity)." Sitzungsber. preuss. Acad. Wiss. 1916, 2, 1111-1116.] [Albert Einstein "Der Energiesatz in der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. (An energy conservation law in general relativity)." Sitzungsber. preuss. Acad. Wiss. 1918, 1, 448-459]

Paul Dirac showed [P.A.M.Dirac, "General Theory of Relativity" (1975), Princeton University Press, quick presentation of the bare essentials of GTR. ISBN 0-691-01146-X pages 61&mdash;63] that the mixed Einstein pseudotensor :

satisfies a conservation law:$((\{T\_\{mu^\{\; u\}\; +\; \{t\_\{mu^\{\; u\})sqrt\{-g\})\_\{,\; u\}\; =\; 0\; .$

Clearly this pseudotensor for gravitational stress-energy is constructed exclusively from the metric tensor and its first derivatives. Consequently it vanishes at any event when the coordinate system is chosen to make the first derivatives of the metric vanish because each term in the pseudotensor is quadratic in the first derivatives of the metric. However it is not symmetric, and is therefore not suitable for basing a definition of angular momentum on.

Notes

References

* [http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.0019v1 Perturbations and conservations laws in GR]