- Ishta-deva
Within
Hinduism , an Ishta-deva or Ishta devata (Sanskrit "IAST|iṣṭa-deva(tā)", literally "cherished divinity" from "iṣṭa" "desired, liked, cheriched" and "devatā " "godhead, divinity,tutelary deity " or "deva" "deity") is a term denoting a worshipper's favourite deity. [V. S. Apte, "A Practical Sanskrit Dictionary", p. 250.]It is especially significant to both the
Smarta andBhakti schools wherein practitioners choose to worship the form of God which inspires them the most. WithinSmartism , one of five chief deities are selected. Even in denominations that focus on a singular concept of God, such asVaishnavism , the istha deva concept exists. For example, in Vaishnavism special focus is given to a particular form ofVishnu or one of hisavatar s (i.eKrishna orRama ), and similarly withinShaktism , focus is given to a particular form of the Goddess such asParvati orLakshmi . TheSwaminarayan sect of Vaishnavism has a similar concept, but in consideration of Vishnu and Shiva being worshipped as different aspects of the same God. [ [http://www.swaminarayansatsang.com/library/scriptures/index.asp?idCategory=2&curPage=2&MediaType= Swaminarayan Satsang - Scriptures ] ]Variations in practices
There is no universally accepted perspective of God throughout the branches of Hinduism, and thus the specific nature of belief and worship regarding a practitioner's Ishta-deva depends largely on which tradition they are following. Adherents of the monistic schools (such as
Advaita Vedanta ) worship multiple forms of God as emanations from the ultimately formlessBrahman , whereas followers of thebhakti traditions may worship a particular form oravatar ofVishnu ,Shiva orGanesha as the Supreme God (Ishvara ) in the dualistic sense.A famous example to quote from the
Indian epics would be that ofHanuman whose Ishta-deva was LordRamachandra . Other notable examples would be that ofTulsidas who was another devotee ofRama andMirabai a devotee ofKrishna .Formal Smarta worship
The "worship of the five forms" (IAST|
pañcāyatana pūjā ) system, which was popularized by the ninth-century philosopher IAST|Śaṅkarācārya among orthodox Brahmins of the Smārta tradition, invokes the five deities Ganesha, Vishnu, Shiva, Devī, and Sūrya. [Grimes, John A. Ganapati: Song of the Self. (State University of New York Press: Albany, 1995) p. 162.] [Dating for the pañcāyatana pūjā and its connection with Smārta Brahmins is from p. 163, Courtright, Paul B. IAST|Gaṇeśa: Lord of Obstacles, Lord of Beginnings. (Oxford University Press: New York, 1985). ISBN 0-19-505742-2] This system was instituted by IAST|Śaṅkarācārya primarily to unite the principal deities of the five major sects (IAST|Gāṇapatya, Śaiva, Vaiṣṇava, Shakta and Sūrya) on an equal status. The monistic philosophy preached by IAST|Śaṅkarācārya made it possible to choose one of these as a preferred principal deity and at the same time worship the other four deities as different forms of the same all-pervadingBrahman .Forms of worship
Typically a practitioner worships their Ishta-deva through the form of a
murti . This worship may involve offering items to their chosen divinity, such asincense or flowers, or recitingmantra s, singing their names and offeringprayer s.Remembering the deity and internally building a relationship with (or through) them is considered essential to the practice. Within the
Advaita schools it is believed that thehuman mind needs a concrete form to understand the divine that ultimately can never be defined. Just as one can understand the abstract concept of acolor only after one has seen a concrete form, one can only realize the deity through a form of murti. In contrast, theDvaita associated schools believe the Supreme Being to possess a divine form, and offer worship to their Ishta-deva as either a representation or direct expansion of the Supreme Person. For example Vaishnava schools offer worship exclusively to murthis of Vishnu, or his associated avatars such asKrishna orRama .Shaivites worship Shiva, either figuratively, or through his
Lingam murthi. As Shaivism contains both monistic and dualistic traditions either (or both) of the above approaches may be applicable.Human Ishta-devas?
Within a number of Hindu traditions, both presently and in the past, living people have claimed (or are claimed by followers) to be
avatar s of a divine or Supreme being. In these cases followers have then in some instances worshipped these individuals as Ishta-devas. Although these tend to be minority groups within Hindism, it has been a growing tendency in modern times (the followers ofSai Baba being one such example). This often attracts criticism from other Hindu traditions who do not share the same belief.Swami Tapasyananda ofRamakrishna Mission , in his book, "Bhakti Schools of Vedanta," pg. 50, on commentating about this phenomenon, said::"The avatar doctrine has been excessively abused by many Hindus today and we have the strange phenomenon of every disciple of a sectarian Guru claiming him to be an avatar. Christianity has therefore limited the Divine Incarnation as a one-time phenomenon. The theory has strong points and equally strong defects but it surmounts the gross abuse of the doctrine indulged in by many Hindus."
Thus, if followers respect and revere the guru, it is only proper if they are using him as a conduit to God, and respect him as a teacher.
However,
Swami Sivananda has said that a guru can be likened to God if he himself has attained realization and is a link between the individual and the Absolute. Such a guru, according to his definition and interpretation, should have actually attained union with God, inspire devotion in others, and have a presence that purifies all. Such a case is limited in contemporary times.As early as the seventeenth century, a
Vaishnavite saint,Raghavendra Swami , in his last speech before departing from the mortal world, warned about the dangers of fraudulent gurus by saying::"The search for knowledge is never easy. As the
Upanishads say it is like walking on the razor's edge. But for those who have strong faith and put in sustained effort and have the blessings of ShiHari and guru this is not difficult. Always keep away from people who merely perform miracles without following theshastras and yet call themselves God or guru. I have performed miracles, and so have great persons likeShrimadacharya . These are based on yoga siddhi and the shastras. There is no fraud or trickery at all. These miracles were performed only to show the greatness of God and the wonderful powers that one can attain with His grace. Right knowledge (jnana) is greater than any miracle. Without this no real miracle can take place. Any miracle performed without this right knowledge is only "witchcraft". No good will come to those who perform such miracles and also those who believe in them."References
Further reading
ee also
*
Kuldevta
*Vedanta
*Smartism
*Bhakti
*Bhakti Yoga External links
* [http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/interreligious/cd37-08.html The Significance of the Hindu Doctrine of Ishtadeva] by Anantand Rambachan
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.