United States Special Operations Command

United States Special Operations Command

Infobox Military Unit
unit_name= United States Special Operations Command


caption= United States Special Operations Command emblem
dates= April 16, 1987
country= United States
allegiance=
branch=
type= Special Operations
role= Provide fully capable Special Operations Forces to defend the United States and its interests and plan and synchronize operations against terrorist networks
size=48,000
command_structure= Department of Defense
current_commander= Admiral Eric T. Olson
garrison= MacDill Air Force Base
ceremonial_chief=
colonel_of_the_regiment=
nickname= USSOCOM or SOCOM
patron=
motto=
colors=
march=
mascot=
battles=Operation Earnest Will
Operation Just Cause
Operation Desert Storm
Operation Restore Hope
Operation Gothic Serpent
Battle of Mogadishu
Operation Enduring Freedom
Operation Iraqi Freedom
The United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM or SOCOM) is the Unified Combatant Command charged with overseeing the various Special Operations Commands (SOC or SOCOM) of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps of the United States Armed Forces. The command is part of the Department of Defense. USSOCOM is headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida.

The idea of a unified special operations command had its origins in the aftermath of Operation Eagle Claw, the disastrous attempted rescue of hostages at the American embassy in Iran in 1980. The ensuing investigation, chaired by Admiral James L. Holloway III, the retired Chief of Naval Operations, cited lack of command and control and inter-service coordination as significant factors in the failure of the mission. [cite web
last =
first = Naval Historical Foundation
authorlink =
coauthors = Admiral James L. Holloway III
title = Biography of Admiral James L. Holloway III, US Navy (Ret.)
work =
publisher =
month = June | year = 2006
url = http://www.history.navy.mil/bios/holloway_j.htm
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-03-21
] Since its activation on April 16, 1987, U.S. Special Operations Command has participated in many operations, from the 1989 invasion of Panama to the ongoing Iraq War. [cite news
first = Larry
last = Rother
title = With a Bang, Panama Is Erasing House of Horrors
work = The New York Times |date= December 6, 1996
accessdate = 2008-03-10
] [cite news
first = Thom
last = Shanker
title = Regime Thought War Unlikely, Iraqis Tell U.S.
work = The New York Times |date= February 12, 2004
accessdate = 2008-03-10
]

USSOCOM conducts several overt and clandestine missions, such as unconventional warfare, foreign internal defense, special reconnaissance, psychological operations, Civil Affairs, direct action, counter-terrorism and War on Drugs operations. USSOCOM's global performance in combat and noncombat areas has proven the value of a mature, culturally attuned, properly equipped, and adaptive Special Operations Force (SOF). [cite book
last = Robinson
first = Linda
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Masters of Chaos: The Secret History of the Special Forces
publisher = PublicAffairs
month = October | year = 2004
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 1586482491
] Each branch has a Special Operations Command that is unique and capable of running their own operations, but when the different Special Operations Forces need to work together for an operation, USSOCOM becomes the joint component command of the operation, instead of a SOC of a specific branch. [cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = USSOCOM Posture Statement
work =
publisher = USSOCOM
year = 2007
url = http://www.socom.mil/Docs/USSOCOM_Posture_Statement_2007.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-12
]

History

Establishment of USSOCOM

Desert One did serve to strengthen the resolve of some within the Department of Defense to reform SOF. The Army Chief of Staff, General Edward C. “Shy” Meyer, called for a further restructuring of special operations capabilities. Although unsuccessful at the joint level, Meyer nevertheless went on to consolidate Army SOF units under the new 1st Special Operations Command in 1982, a significant step to improve Army SOF.

By 1983, there was a small but growing sense in the Congress for the need for military reforms. In June, the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), under the chairmanship of Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ), began a two-year long study of the Defense Department which included an examination of SOF.With concern mounting on Capitol Hill, the Department of Defense created the Joint Special Operations Agency on January 1, 1984; this agency, however, had neither operational nor command authority over any SOF.cite book
last = Sloan
first = Stephen
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Beating International Terrorism: An Action Strategy for Preemption and Punishment
publisher = Diane Pub Co
month = October | year = 1992
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 1568061048
] The Joint Special Operations Agency thus did little to improve SOF readiness, capabilities, or policies hardly what Congress had in mind as a systemic fix for SOF’s problems. Within the Defense Department, there were a few staunch SOF supporters. Noel Koch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, and his deputy, Lynn Rylander, both advocated SOF reforms.

At the same time, a few visionaries on Capitol Hill were determined to overhaul SOF. They included Senators Sam Nunn (D-GA) and William Cohen (R-ME), both members of the Armed Services Committee, and Representative Dan Daniel (D-VA), the chairman of the United States House Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness. Congressman Daniel had become convinced that the U.S. military establishment was not interested in special operations, that the country’s capability in this area was second rate, and that SOF operational command and control was an endemic problem. Senators Nunn and Cohen also felt strongly that the Department of Defense was not preparing adequately for future threats. Senator Cohen agreed that the U.S. needed a clearer organizational focus and chain of command for special operations to deal with low-intensity conflicts.

In October 1985, the Senate Armed Services Committee published the results of its two-year review of the U.S. military structure, entitled “Defense Organization: The Need For Change.” [cite conference
first = Barry
last = Goldwater
authorlink =
coauthors = Sam Nunn
title = S.CON.RES.80
booktitle = A concurrent resolution to authorize the printing of 2,000 additional copies of the Committee Print of the Committee on Armed Services (99th Congress, 1st Session) entitled "Defense Organization: The Need for Change".
pages =
publisher =
date =
location =
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate = 2008-03-22
] Mr. James R. Locher III, the principal author of this study, also examined past special operations and speculated on the most likely future threats. This influential document led to the Goldwater-Nichols Defense Reorganization Act of 1986. [cite conference
first = Bill
last = Nichols
authorlink =
coauthors = Barry Goldwater
title = H.R.3622
booktitle = A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to strengthen the position of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to provide for more efficient and effective operation of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.
pages =
publisher =
year = 1986
location =
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate = 2008-03-22
] [cite book
last = Lederman
first = Gordon Nathaniel
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Reorganizing the Joint Chiefs of Staff: The Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986
publisher = Greenwood Press
month = November | year = 1999
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0313310858
] By spring 1986, SOF advocates had introduced reform bills in both houses of Congress. On 15 May, Senator Cohen introduced the Senate bill, co-sponsored by Senator Nunn and others, which called for a joint military organization for SOF and the establishment of an office in the Defense Department to ensure adequate funding and policy emphasis for low-intensity conflict and special operations.cite conference
first = William
last = Cohen
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = S.2453
booktitle = A bill to enhance the capabilities of the United States to combat terrorism and other forms of unconventional warfare.
pages =
publisher =
month = May | year = 1986
location =
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate = 2008-03-22
] Representative Daniel’s proposal went even further—he wanted a national special operations agency headed by a civilian who would bypass the Joint Chiefs and report directly to the Secretary of Defense; this would keep Joint Chiefs and the Services out of the SOF budget process.cite conference
first = W.C.
last = Daniel
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = H.R.5109
booktitle = A bill to establish a National Special Operations Agency within the Department of Defense to have unified responsibility for all special operations forces and activities within the Department.
pages =
publisher =
month = September | year = 1986
location =
url =
doi =
id =
accessdate = 2008-03-22
]

Congress held hearings on the two bills in the summer of 1986. Admiral William J. Crowe Jr., Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, led the Pentagon’s opposition to the bills. He proposed, as an alternative, a new Special Operations Forces command led by a three-star general. This proposal was not well received on Capitol Hill—Congress wanted a four-star general in charge to give SOF more clout. A number of retired military officers and others testified in favor of the need for reform. By most accounts, retired Army Major General Richard Scholtes gave the most compelling reasons for change. Scholtes, who commanded the joint special operations task force in Grenada, explained how conventional force leaders misused SOF during the operation, not allowing them to use their unique capabilities, which resulted in high SOF casualties. After his formal testimony, Scholtes met privately with a small number of Senators to elaborate on the problems that he had encountered in Grenada. [cite news
last = Taubman
first = Philip
coauthors =
title = U.S. Military tries to catch up in fighting terror
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = December 5, 1984
url =
accessdate = 2008-04-10
]

Both the House and Senate passed SOF reform bills, and these went to a conference committee for reconciliation. Senate and House conferees forged a compromise. The bill called for a unified combatant command headed by a four star general for all SOF, an Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, a coordinating board for low-intensity conflict within the National Security Council, and a new Major Force Program (MFP-11) for SOF (the so-called “SOF checkbook”).cite web
last =
first = DoD
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Special Operations/Low Intensity Conflict & Interdependent Capabilities (ASD SO/LIC & IC)
work = DoD
publisher =
date =
url = http://www.defenselink.mil/policy/sections/policy_offices/solic/
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-03-19
] [cite web
last = Giles
first = James E.
authorlink =
coauthors = Altizer, Harrell B. ; Glass, David V. Parker, Robert W.
title = Providing Resources for Special Operations Forces: Completing the Transition
work =
publisher =
month = March | year = 1989
url = http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA210951
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-03-19
] The final bill, attached as a rider to the 1987 Defense Authorization Act, amended the Goldwater-Nichols Act and was signed into law in October 1986.Congress clearly intended to force DOD and the Administration to face up to the realities of past failures and emerging threats. DOD and the Administration were responsible for implementing the law, and Congress subsequently had to pass two additional bills to ensure proper implementation. The legislation promised to improve SOF in several respects. Once implemented, MFP-11 provided SOF with control over its own resources, better enabling it to modernize the force. Additionally, the law fostered interservice cooperation: a single commander for all SOF promoted interoperability among the forces assigned to the same command. The establishment of a four-star Commander in Chief and an Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict eventually gave SOF a voice in the highest councils of the Defense Department.Implementing the provisions and mandates of the Nunn-Cohen Act, however, was neither rapid nor smooth. One of the first issues to surface was appointing an ASD (SO/LIC), whose principal duties included monitorship of special operations activities and low-intensity conflict activities of the Department of Defense. The Congress even increased the number of assistant secretaries of defense from 11 to 12, but the Department of Defense still did not fill this new billet. In December 1987, the Congress directed Secretary of the Army John O. Marsh to carry out the ASD (SO/LIC) duties until a suitable replacement was approved by the Senate. Not until 18 months after the legislation passed did Ambassador Charles Whitehouse assume the duties of ASD (SO/LIC). [cite news
last = Lewis
first = Paul
coauthors =
title = Charles S. Whitehouse, 79, Diplomat and C.I.A. Official
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = July 1, 2001
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-22
]

Meanwhile, the establishment of USSOCOM provided its own measure of excitement. A quick solution to manning and basing a brand new unified command was to abolish an existing command. U.S. Readiness Command (USREDCOM),with an often misunderstood mission, did not appear to have a viable mission in the post Goldwater-Nichols era. and its Commander in Chief, General James Lindsay, had had some special operations experience. On January 23, 1987, the Joint Chiefs of Staff recommended to the Secretary of Defense that USREDCOM be disestablished to provide billets and facilities for USSOCOM. President Ronald Reagan approved the establishment of the new command on April 13, 1987. The Department of Defense activated USSOCOM on April 16, 1987 and nominated General Lindsay to be the first Commander in Chief Special Operations Command (USCINCSOC). The Senate accepted him without debate.cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = USSOCOM Command History
work =
publisher =
date =
url = http://www.socom.mil/Docs/Command_History_26Feb07webversion.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-08
]

Operation Earnest Will

USSOCOM's first tactical operation involved SEALs, Special Boat Teams (SBT), and 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne)("Nightstalkers") aviators working together during Operation Earnest Will in September 1987. During Operation Earnest Will, the United States ensured that neutral oil tankers and other merchant ships could safely transit the Persian Gulf during the Iran–Iraq War. Iranian attacks on tankers prompted Kuwait to ask the United States in December 1986 to register 11 Kuwaiti tankers as American ships so that they could be escorted by the U.S. Navy. President Reagan agreed to the Kuwaiti request on March 10, 1987, hoping it would deter Iranian attacks. The protection offered by U.S. naval vessels, however, did not stop Iran, which used mines and small boats to harass the convoys steaming to and from Kuwait. In late July 1987, Rear Admiral Harold J. Bernsen, commander of the Middle East Force, requested NSW assets. Special Boat Teams deployed with six Mark III Patrol Boats and two SEAL platoons in August. The Middle East Force decided to convert two oil servicing barges, Hercules and Wimbrown VII, into mobile sea bases. The mobile sea bases allowed SOF in the northern Persian Gulf to thwart clandestine Iranian mining and small boat attacks.

On September 21, Nightstalkers flying MH-6 and AH-6 Little Birds took off from the frigate Jarrett to track an Iranian ship, the Iran Ajr. The Nightstalkers observed the Iran Ajr turn off its lights and begin laying mines. After receiving permission to attack, the helicopters fired guns and rockets, stopping the ship. As the Iran Ajr’s crew began to push mines over the side, the helicopters resumed firing until the crew abandoned ship. Special Boat Teams provided security while a SEAL team boarded the vessel at first light and discovered nine mines on the vessel’s deck, as well as a logbook revealing areas where previous mines had been laid. The logbook implicated Iran in mining international waters. Within a few days, the Special Operations forces had determined the Iranian pattern of activity the Iranians hid during the day near oil and gas platforms in Iranian waters and at night they headed toward the Middle Shoals Buoy, a navigation aid for tankers. With this knowledge, SOF launched three Little Bird helicopters and two patrol craft to the buoy. The Little Bird helicopters arrived first and were fired upon by three Iranian boats anchored near the buoy. After a short but intense firefight, the helicopters sank all three boats. In mid-October, three days after an Iranian Silkworm missile hit the tanker "Sea Isle City" near the oil terminal outside Kuwait City. Seventeen crewmen and the American captain were injured in the missile attack.cite web
last = Andrew Kelley
first = Stephen
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Better Lucky Than Good: Operation Earnest Will as Gunboat Diplomacy
work =
publisher = Naval Postgraduate School
month = June | year = 2007
url = http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/kelley07.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-05-12
] During Operation Nimble Archer, four destroyers shelled two oil platforms in the Rostam oil field. After the shelling, a SEAL platoon and a demolition unit planted explosives on one of the platforms to destroy it. The SEALs next boarded and searched a third platform two miles away. Documents and radios were taken for intelligence purposes. Iran AJR, caught laying mines, was disabled by Night Stalker helicopters and boarded by SEALs.

On April 14, 1988, 65 miles east of Bahrain, the U.S. frigate Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58) hit a mine, blowing an immense hole in its hull. Ten sailors were injured. During Operation Praying Mantis the U.S. retaliated fiercely, attacking the Iranian frigate Sabalan and oil platforms in the Sirri and Sassan oil fields.cite book
last = Peniston
first = Bradley
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = No Higher Honor: Saving the USS Samuel B. Roberts in the Persian Gulf
publisher = United States Naval Institute Press
month = July | year = 2006
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 1591146615
] After U.S. warships bombarded the Sirri platform and set it ablaze, a UH-60 with a SEAL platoon flew toward the platform but was unable to get close enough because of the roaring fire. Secondary explosions soon wrecked the platform. Thereafter, Iranian attacks on neutral ships dropped drastically. On July 18, Iran accepted the United Nations cease fire; on August 20, 1988, the Iran–Iraq War ended. The remaining SEALs, patrol boats, and helicopters then returned to the United States.Despite American overconfidence in the ability to deter Iran, Operation Earnest Will could be declared a success. Special Operations Forces provided critical skills necessary to help CENTCOM gain control of the northern Persian Gulf and balk Iran’s small boats and minelayers. The ability to work at night proved vital, because Iranian units used darkness to conceal their actions. Additionally, because of Earnest Will operational requirements, USSOCOM would acquire new weapons systems—the patrol coastal ships and the Mark V Special Operations Craft.

Somalia

Special Operations Command first became involved in Somalia as part of Operation Provide Relief. C-130s circled over Somali airstrips during delivery of relief supplies. Special Forces medics accompanied many relief flights into the airstrips throughout southern Somalia to assess the area. They were the first U.S. soldiers in Somalia, arriving before U.S. forces who supported the expanded relief operations of Restore Hope. [cite news
last =
first =
coauthors =
title = A Big Second Step in Somalia
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = May 4, 1993
url =
accessdate = 2008-05-19
]

The earliest missions during Operation Restore Hope were conducted by Navy SEALs. The SEALs performed several hydro-graphic reconnaissance missions to find suitable landing sites for Marines. On December 7, the SEALs swam into Mogadishu Harbor, where they found suitable landing sites, assessed the area for threats, and concluded that the port could support offloading ships. This was a tough mission because the SEALs had swum against a strong current which left many of them overheated and exhausted. Furthermore, they had to swim through raw sewage in the harbor, which made them sick. When the first SEALs hit the shore the following night, they were surprised to meet members of the news media. The first Marines came ashore soon thereafter, and the press redirected their attention to them. Later, the SEALs provided personal security for President George Bush during a visit to Somalia.cite news
last =
first =
coauthors =
title = Two Tough Tracks in Somalia
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = December 10, 1992
url =
accessdate = 2008-05-19
] In December 1992, Special Forces assets in Kenya moved to Somalia and joined Operation Restore Hope. January 1993, a Special Forces command element deployed to Mogadishu as the Joint Special Operations Forces-Somalia (JSOFOR) that would command and control all special operations for Restore Hope. JSOFOR’s mission was to make initial contact with indigenous factions and leaders; provide information for force protection; and provide reports on the area for future relief and security operations. Before redeploying in April, JSOFOR elements drove over 26,000 miles, captured 277 weapons, and destroyed over 45,320 pounds of explosives.

In August 1993, Secretary of Defense Les Aspin directed the deployment of a Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF) to Somalia in response to attacks made by General Mohamed Farrah Aidid's supporters upon U.S. and UN forces . The JSOTF, named Task Force (TF)Ranger, its mission named Operation Gothic Serpent was to capture Aidid. This was an especially arduous mission, for Aidid had gone underground, after several AC-130 air raids and UN assaults on his strongholds.cite book
last = Bowden
first = Mark
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Black Hawk Down: A Story of Modern War
publisher = Signet
date = 2001
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0451203933
] cite book
last = Eversmann
first = Matt
authorlink =
coauthors = Dan Schilling
title = The Battle of Mogadishu: Firsthand Accounts from the Men of Task Force Ranger
publisher = Presidio Press
date = July 2006
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0345466683
] The task force arrived in the country, and began training exercises. TF Ranger was made up of special operators from Delta Force, 75th Ranger Regiment, 160th SOAR, Air Force special tactics units, and SEALs from the Naval Special Warfare Development Group. During August and September 1993, the task force conducted six missions into Mogadishu, all of which were successes. Although Aidid remained free, the effect of these missions seriously limited his movements.

On October 3, TF Ranger launched its seventh mission, this time into Aidid’s stronghold the Bakara Market to capture two of his key lieutenants. The mission was expected to take only one or two hours. Helicopters carried an assault and a ground convoy of security teams launched in the late afternoon from the TF Ranger compound at Mogadishu airport. The TF came under increasingly heavy fire from, more intense than during previous missions. The assault team captured 24 Somalis including Aidid's lieutenants and were loading them onto the convoy trucks when a MH-60 Blackhawk was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG). A small element from the security force, as well as an MH-6 assault helicopter and an MH-60 carrying a fifteen man combat search and rescue (CSAR) team, rushed to the crash site. The battle became increasingly worse. An RPG struck another MH-60, crashing less than a mile to the south of the first downed helicopter. The task force faced overwhelming Somali mobs that overran the crash sites, causing a dire situation. A Somali mob overran the second site and, despite a heroic defense, killed everyone except the pilot, whom they took prisoner. Two defenders of this crash site, Master Sergeant Gary Gordon and Sergeant First Class Randall Shughart, were posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor. About this time, the mission’s quick reaction force (QRF) also tried to reach the second crash site. This force too was pinned by Somali fire and required the fire support of two AH-6 helicopters before it could break contact and make its way back to the base.The assault and security elements moved on foot towards the first crash area, passing through heavy fire, and occupied buildings south and southwest of the downed helicopter. They fought to establish defensive positions so not to be pinned down by very heavy enemy fire, while treating their wounded, and worked to free the pilot’s body from the downed helicopter. With the detainees loaded on trucks, the ground convoy force attempted to reach the first crash site. Unable to find it amongst the narrow, winding alleyways, the convoy came under devastating small arms and RPG fire. The convoy had to return to base after suffering numerous casualties, and sustaining substantial damage to the their vehicles.Reinforcements, consisting of elements from the QRF, 10th Mountain Division soldiers, Rangers, SEALs, Pakistan Army tanks and Malaysian armored personnel carriers, finally arrived at 1:55 A.M. on October 4. The combined force worked until dawn to free the pilot’s body, receiving RPG and small arms fire throughout the night.All the casualties were loaded onto the armored personnel carriers, and the remainder of the force was left behind and had no choice but to move out on foot. AH-6 gunships raked the streets with fire to support the movement. The main force of the convoy arrived at the Pakistani Stadium-compound for the QRF-at 6:30 A.M..

Thus concluding one of the bloodiest and fiercest urban firefights since the Vietnam War. Task Force Ranger experienced a total of 17 killed in action and 106 wounded. Various estimates placed Somali casualties above 1,000. Although Task Force Rangers few missions were successes, the overall outcome of Operation Gothic Serpent was deemed a failure because of the Task Force's failure to complete their mission statement, capturing Mohamed Farrah Aidid. Most U.S. forces pulled out of Somalia by March 1994. The withdrawal from Somalia, was completed on March 1995.Even though Operation Gothic Serpent failed, USSOCOM still made significant contributions to operations in Somalia. SOF performed reconnaissance and surveillance missions, assisted with humanitarian relief, protected American forces and conducted riverine patrols. Additionally, they ensured the safe landing of the Marines and safeguarded the arrival of merchant ships carrying food.cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = USSOCOM Command History
work =
publisher =
date =
url = http://www.socom.mil/Docs/Command_History_26Feb07webversion.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-08
]

Current Role

United States Special Operations Command has played a pivotal role in toppling the former Taliban government in Afghanistan and combating the insurgency since capturing Saddam Hussein in Iraq. [cite news
last = D. Kozaryn
first = Linda
coauthors =
title = U.S. Special Operations Forces Change "Face of War"
work = American Forces Press Service
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = December 14, 2001
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
] USSOCOM is now developing plans to have an expanded and more complex role in the global campaign against terrorism. [cite news |first =Eric Schmitt |last = Thom Shanker |title = The Reach of Ware: Military; Special Warriors Have Growing Ranks and Growing Pains in Taking Key Antiterror Role |work = The New York Times |date= August 2, 2004 |accessdate = 2008-03-11 ]

Afghanistan

[
Operation Anaconda.] During the War in Afghanistan U.S. Special operators have been engaged in furious battles. One such battle happened during Operation Anaconda the mission to squeeze life out of a Taliban and Al-Qaeda stronghold dug deep into the Shah-i-Kot mountains of eastern Afghanistan. The operation was seen as one of the heaviest and bloodiest fights in the War in Afghanistan. [Citation
last = =

first =
author-link =
last2 =
first2 =
author2-link =
title = Operation Anaconda
newspaper = Time
pages =
year =
date =
url = http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020318/popup/
] The battle on an Afghan mountaintop called Takur Ghar featured Special Operations forces from three of the 4 services. Navy SEALs, Army Rangers and pilots and Air Force Combat Controllers and Pararescuemen fought against entrenched Al-Qaeda fighters atop a convert|10000|ft|m|sing=on mountain. According to an executive summary, the battle of Takur Ghar was the most intense firefight American special operators have been involved in since 18 U.S. Army Rangers were killed in Mogadishu, Somalia, in 1993. [cite news
last = Garamone
first = Jim
coauthors =
title = The Battle of Takur Ghar
work = American Forces Press Service
pages =
language =
publisher =
date =
url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44020
accessdate =
] [cite conference
first = DoD
last =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Executive Summary of the Battle of Takur Ghar
booktitle =
pages =
publisher =
date =
location =
url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May2002/d20020524takurghar.pdf
doi =
id =
accessdate = |format=PDF
] [cite book
last = MacPherson
first = Malcolm
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Roberts Ridge: A Story of Courage and Sacrifice on Takur Ghar Mountain, Afghanistan
publisher = Dell
year = 2006
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0553586807
] During Operation Red Wing on June 28, 2005, four Navy SEALs, pinned down in a firefight, radioed for help. A Chinook helicopter, carrying 16 service members, responded but was shot down. All members of the rescue team and three of four Seals on the ground died. It was the worst loss of life in Afghanistan since the invasion in 2001.The Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell alone survived. [cite news
last = Blumenfield
first = Laura
coauthors =
title = The Sole Survivor
work = Washington Post
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = June 11, 2007
url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/10/AR2007061001492.html
accessdate =
] [cite book
last = Luttrell
first = Marcus
authorlink =
coauthors = Patrick Robinson
title = Lone Survivor: The Eyewitness Account of Operation Redwing and the Lost Heroes of SEAL Team 10
publisher = Little, Brown and Company
year = 2007
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0316067598
]

Iraq

At the launch of the Iraq War dozens of 12-member Special Forces teams infiltrated southern and western Iraq to hunt for Scud missiles and pinpoint bombing targets. Scores of Navy SEALs seized oil terminals and pumping stations on the southern coast. [cite news
last = Dao
first = James
coauthors =
title = The Commandos; Navy Seals Easily Seize 2 Oil Sites
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = March 22, 2003
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-20
] Air Force combat controllers flew combat missions in AC-130 gunships and established austere desert airstrips to begin the flow of soldiers and supplies deep into Iraq. It was a far cry from the Persian Gulf war of 1991, where Special Operations forces were kept largely on the sidelines. But it would not be a replay of Afghanistan, where Army Special Forces and Navy SEALs led the fighting. After their star turn in Afghanistan, many special operators were disappointed to play a supporting role in Iraq. Many special operators felt restricted by cautious commanders.cite news
first = James
last = Dao
title = Aftereffects: Special Operations Forces; War Plan Drew U.S. Commandos From Shadows
work = The New York Times
date= April 28, 2003
accessdate = 2008-03-11
] From that point, USSOCOM has since killed or captured hundreds of insurgents and Al-Qaeda terrorists. It has conducted several foreign internal defense missions successfully training the Iraqi security forces. [cite news |first = John |last = Kruzel |title = Navy SEALs share war stories from Anbar province |work = American Forces Press Service |date= May 26, 2007 |accessdate = 2008-03-11 ] [cite news |first = Michael |last = R. Gordon |title = After The War: The Allies; In Major Assault, U.S. Forces Strike Hussein Loyalists |work = New York Times |date= June 13, 2003 |accessdate = 2008-03-11 ]

Pakistan

U.S. Special Operations forces have recently began training Pakistan's elite Special Service Group. [cite news
last = Perlez
first = Jane
coauthors =
title = Joint Chiefs Chairman and Musharraf Discuss Terror Threat
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = February 10, 2008
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
] Suspicions persist that the Pakistani intelligence service, a Taliban patron before U.S. forces overthrew the Islamist government in Kabul in 2001, continues to protect the Taliban's exiled leadership and to facilitate its resurgent operations across the border into Afghanistan. [cite news
last = DeYoung
first = Karen
coauthors =
title = In U.S., Much Interest in Pakistani Election but Few Options
work = Washington Post
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = February 18, 2008
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
] Currently, C.I.A. operatives and Special Operations forces have limited authority to conduct counter-terrorism missions in Pakistan based on specific intelligence about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri or other members of their terrorist organization, Al-Qaeda, hiding in or near the tribal areas. In August 2008, United States Army Special Forces soldiers conducted a raid inside Pakistan. This was the first known combat operation conducted by U.S. soldiers in Pakistan. [cite news
last = David E. Sanger
first = Steven Lee Myers
coauthors = Eric Schmitt
title = U.S. Considers New Covert Push Within Pakistan
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = January 6, 2008
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
]

ubordinated Commands

Air Force

Air Force Special Operations Command was established May 22, 1990, with headquarters at Hurlburt Field, Florida. AFSOC is one of nine major Air Force commands, and the Air Force component of U.S. Special Operations Command, a unified command located at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. It does not contain any numbered air forces and holds operational and administrative oversight of subordinate special operations wings and groups in the Regular Air Force, Air Force Reserve Command and the Air National Guard.

AFSOC provides Air Force special operations forces for worldwide deployment and assignment to regional unified commands. The command's SOF are composed of highly trained, rapidly deployable Airmen, conducting global special operations missions ranging from precision application of firepower, to infiltration, exfiltration, resupply and refueling of SOF operational elements. [cite news
last = Steven Lee Meyers
first = Thom Shanker
coauthors =
title = A Nation Challenged: The Offensive; Special Operations Gunship Being Used Against Taliban
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = October 16, 2001
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
] AFSOC's unique capabilities include airborne radio and television broadcast for psychological operations, as well as aviation foreign internal defense instructors to provide other governments military expertise for their internal development.

The command's core missions include battlefield air operations; agile combat support; aviation foreign internal defense; information operations; precision aerospace fires; psychological operations; specialized air mobility; specialized refueling; and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. [cite web
url=http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/
title= AFSOC
accessdate= 2008-01-11
] [cite news
last = Meyers
first = Steven Lee
coauthors = Thom Shanker
title = A Nation Challenged: Air War; Pilots Told to Fire at Will in Some Zones
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = October 17, 2001
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
]

Units

*The 1st Special Operations Wing (1 SOW) is located at Hurlburt Field, Florida. Its mission focus is unconventional warfare: counter-terrorism, combat search and rescue, personnel recovery, psychological operations, aviation assistance to developing nations, "deep battlefield" resupply, interdiction and close air support. The wing's core missions include aerospace surface interface, agile combat support, combat aviation advisory operations, information operations, personnel recovery/recovery operations, precision aerospace fires, psychological operations dissemination, specialized aerospace mobility and specialized aerial refueling. [cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = 1st SOW Fact Sheet
work = AFSOC
publisher =
date =
url = http://www2.hurlburt.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3485
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-01-20
] Among its aircraft is the MC-130 Combat Talon, a low-flying transport/rescue plane that can evade radar detection and slip into enemy territory at a convert|200|ft|m|sing=on altitude for infiltration/exfiltraion missions, even in zero visibility, dropping off or recovering men or supplies with pinpoint accuracy. It also operates the AC-130 Spooky and Spectre gunships that provide highly accurate airborne gunfire for close air support of conventional and special operations forces on the ground.

*The 27th Special Operations Wing (27 SOW) is located at Cannon AFB, New Mexico. Its primary mission includes infiltration, exfiltration and re-supply of special operations forces; air refueling of special operations rotary wing and tiltrotor aircraft; and precision fire support. These capabilities support a variety of special operations missions including direct action, unconventional warfare, special reconnaissance, counter-terrorism, personnel recovery, psychological operations and information operations. [cite press release
title = N.M. Delegation Welcomes 27th Special Ops. Wing to Cannon
publisher =
date = August 29, 2007
url = http://bingaman.senate.gov/news/record.cfm?id=281393
accessdate = 2008-03-21
]

*The 919th Special Operations Wing (919 SOW) is an Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) unit, operationally gained by AFSOC, and located at Eglin AFB Auxiliary Field #3/Duke Field, Florida. The 919 SOW flies and maintains the MC-130E Combat Talon I and MC-130P Combat Shadow special operations aircraft designed for covert operations.

*The 193d Special Operations Wing (193 SOW) is an Air National Guard (ANG) unit, operationally gained by AFSOC, and located at Harrisburg International Airport/Air National Guard Station (former Olmstead Air Force Base), Pennsylvania. Under Title 32 USC, the 193 SOW performs state missions for the Governor of Pennsylvania as part of the Pennsylvania Air National Guard. Under Title 10 USC, the 193 SOW is part of the Air Reserve Component (ARC) of the United States Air Force. Its primary wartime and contingency operations mission as an AFSOC-gained unit is psychological operations (PSYOP). The 193 SOW is unique in that it is the only unit in the U.S. Air Force to fly and maintain the Lockheed EC-130J Commando Solo aircraft.

*The 352nd Special Operations Group (352 SOG) at RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom serves as the core to United States European Command's standing Joint Special Operations Air Component headquarters. The squadron provides support for three flying squadrons, one special tactics squadron and one maintenance squadron for exercise, logistics, and war planning; aircrew training; communications; aerial delivery; medical; intelligence; security and force protection; weather; information technologies and transformation support and current operations. [cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = 352nd Fact Sheet
work = AFSOC
publisher =
date =
url = http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=224
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-01-21
]

*The 353rd Special Operations Group (353 SOG) is the focal point for all U.S. Air Force special operations activities throughout the United States Pacific Command (USPACOM) theater. Headquartered at Kadena AB, Okinawa, Japan, the group is prepared to conduct a variety of high- priority, low-visibility missions. Its mission is air support of joint and allied special operations forces in the Pacific. It maintains a worldwide mobility commitment, participates in Pacific theater exercises as directed and supports humanitarian and relief operations. [cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = 353rd SOG Fact Sheet
work = AFSOC
publisher =
date =
url = http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=225
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-01-21
]

*The 720th Special Tactics Group (720 STG) organizes, trains and equips Special forces worldwide to integrate, synchronize, and/or control the elements of air and space power in the area of operations. It also provides long-range operational and logistics planning, and deploys command and control elements during special tactics force employment or deployment. The 720th STG is also the functional manager for AFSOC's two overseas STS': the 320th under the command of the 353rd Special Operations Group, Kadena Air Base, Japan, and the 321st under the command of the 352nd Special Operations Group at RAF Mildenhall, England. [cite web
url=http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=223
title= 720th STG Fact Sheet
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

*The United States Air Force Special Operations School (USAFSOS) at Hurlburt Field, Florida is a primary support unit of the Air Force Special Operations Command. The USAFSOS prepares special operations Airmen to successfully plan, organize, and execute global special operations by providing indoctrination and education for AFSOC, other USSOCOM components, and joint/interagency/ coalition partners. [cite web
url=http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=186
title=USAFOS Fact Sheet
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

*The 18th Flight Test Squadron evaluates aircraft, equipment and tactics in realistic battlespace environments to provide decision makers accurate, timely and complete assessments of mission capability. [cite web
url=http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=219
title=18th FTS Fact Sheet
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

Army

On December 1, 1989 the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) activated as the 16th major Army command. These special operations forces have been America's spearhead for unconventional warfare more than 40 years. USASOC commands such units as the well known Special Forces (SF) and Rangers, and such relatively unknown units as the Psychological Operations Group (PSYOP) and Civil Affairs Brigade (CA). These are one of the USSOCOM's main weapons for waging unconventional warfare and counter-insurgency. The significance of these units is emphasized as conventional conflicts are becoming less prevalent as insurgent and guerrilla warfare increases. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/sofinfo/story.html
title=USASOC overview
accessdate=2008-01-08
] [cite news
last = Schmitt
first = Eric
coauthors = Michael R. Gordon
title = A Nation Challenged: The Military: Top Air Chief Sent
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = September 21, 2001
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
]

Units

* The 75th Ranger Regiment is the premier light-infantry unit of the United States Army and is headquartered at Fort Benning, Georgia. The 75th Ranger Regiment’s mission is to plan and conduct special missions in support of U.S. policy and objectives. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/75thrr/75th_home.htm
title= 75th Ranger Regiment website
accessdate=2008-02-12
] The Rangers are a flexible and rapid-deployable force. Each battalion can deploy anywhere in the world with 18 hours notice. The Army places much importance on the 75th Ranger Regiment and its training; it possess the capabilities to conduct conventional and most special operations missions. Rangers are capable of infiltrating by land, sea, or air and direct action operations such as conducting raids or assaulting buildings or airfields. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/75thrr/75thrrfs.html
title= 75th Ranger Regiment website
accessdate=2008-02-12
]

*United States Army Special Forces (SF) aka Green Berets perform several doctrinal missions: unconventional warfare, foreign internal defense, special reconnaissance, direct Action, counter-terrorism and counter-proliferation. These missions make Special Forces unique in the U.S. military, because they are employed throughout the three stages of the operational continuum: peacetime, conflict and war.cite book
last = Couch
first = Dick
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Chosen Soldier: The Making of a Special Forces Warrior
publisher = Three Rivers Press
month = March | year = 2007
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0307339394
] Foreign Internal Defense operations, SF’s main peacetime mission, are designed to help friendly developing nations by working with their military and police forces to improve their technical skills, understanding of human rights issues, and to help with humanitarian and civic action projects. Special Forces unconventional warfare capabilities provide a viable military option for a variety of operational taskings that are inappropriate or infeasible for conventional forces. Special Forces are the U.S. military’s premier unconventional warfare force. [cite news
last = Shanker
first = Thom
coauthors =
title = A Nation Challenged: Battlefield; Conduct of War Is Redefined By Success of Special Forces
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = January 21, 2002
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-20
]

Foreign internal defense and unconventional warfare missions are the bread and butter of Special Forces soldiers. For this reason SF candidates are trained extensively in weapons, engineering, communications and medicine. SF soldiers are taught to be warriors first and teachers second because they must be able to train their team and be able to train their allies during a FID or UW mission.cite news
last = Schmitt
first = Eric
coauthors = Thom Shanker
title = U.S. Plan Widens Role in Training Pakistani Forces in Qaeda Battle
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = March 2, 2008
url =
accessdate = 2008-04-28
] Often SF units are required to perform additional, or collateral, activities outside their primary missions. These collateral activities are coalition warfare/support, combat search and rescue, security assistance, peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, humanitarian de-mining and counter-drug operations. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/SF/mission.htm
title=USASF mission
accessdate=2008-01-08
]

*The 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Night Stalkers) headquartered at Fort Campbell, Kentucky provides aviation support to Army special operations forces. The Regiment consists of MH-6 and AH-6 light helicopters, MH-60 helicopters and MH-47 heavy assault helicopters. The capabilities of the 160th SOAR (A) have been evolving since the early 1980s. Its focus on night operations resulting in the nickname, the "Night Stalkers." [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/160soar/soar_home.htm
title= Night Stalkers fact sheet
accessdate=2008-01-08
] The primary mission of the Night Stalkers is to conduct overt or covert infiltration, exfiltration, and resupply of special operations forces across a wide range of environmental conditions. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/160soar/Blkhawk.html
title=160th SOAR,MH-60 Black Hawk Helicopter Fact Sheet
accessdate=2008-02-12
]

*4th Psychological Operations Group (Airborne) Soldiers use persuasion to influence perceptions and encourage desired behavior. The cornerstone of PSYOP is truth, credibly presented to convince a foreign audience to cease resistance or take actions favorable to friendly forces. [cite web
url=http://www.bragg.army.mil/psyop/psyopintro.htm
title= PSYOP Recruiting website
accessdate=2008-02-12
] [cite press release
title = Army Civil Affairs, Psychological Operations Soldiers Deploy in Support of Tsunami Relief Efforts
publisher = Department Of Defense
date = January 7, 2005
url = http://www.defenselink.mil/home/articles/2005-01/a010705tj1.html
accessdate = 2008-03-14
] 4th PSYOP Gp supports national objectives at the tactical, operational and strategic levels of operations. Strategic psychological operations advance broad or long-term objectives; global in nature, they may be directed toward large audiences or at key communicators. Operational psychological operations are conducted on a smaller scale. 4th PSYOP Gp is employed by theater commanders to target groups within the theater of operations. 4th PSYOP Gp purpose can range from gaining support for U.S. operations to preparing the battlefield for combat. Tactical psychological operations are more limited, used by commanders to secure immediate and near-term goals. In this environment, these force-enhancing activities serve as a means to lower the morale and efficiency of enemy forces. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/psyop/psyop_default.htm
title=PSYOP fact sheet
accessdate=2008-02-12
]

*95th Civil Affairs Brigade (Airborne) specialists identify critical requirements needed by local citizens in war or disaster situations. They also locate civilian resources to support military operations, help minimize civilian interference with operations, support national assistance activities, plan and execute noncombatant evacuation, support counter-drug operations and establish and maintain liaison with civilian aid agencies and other nongovernmental organizations. In support of special operations, these culturally-oriented, linguistically-capable Soldiers may also be tasked to provide functional expertise for foreign internal defense operations, unconventional warfare operations and direct action missions. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/ca/ca_default.htm
title=95th Civil Affairs Fact Sheet
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

*Special Operations Support Command (Airborne) has a difficult mission supporting ARSOF. In their respective fields, signal and support soldiers provide supplies, maintenance, equipment and expertise allowing Special Operation Forces to "shoot, move and communicate" on a continuous basis. Because ARSOF often uses SOF-unique items, soldiers assigned to these units are taught to operate and maintain a vast array of specialized equipment not normally used by their conventional counterparts. SOSCOM also provides the ARSOF with centralized and integrated materiel management of property, equipment maintenance, logistical automation and repair parts and supplies. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/soscom/soscom_default.htm
title=SOSCOM Home Page
accessdate=2008-02-12
]

*John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center (USAJFKSWCS) trains USSOCOM and Army Special Operations Forces through development and evaluation of special operations concepts, doctrines and trainings. [cite web
url=http://www.soc.mil/swcs/swcs_default.htm
title=USAJFKSWCS
accessdate=2008-02-19
]

Navy

[
thumb|United States Naval Special Warfare Command emblem.] The United States Naval Special Warfare Command (SPECWARCOM, NAVSOC, or NSW) was commissioned April 16, 1987, at Naval Amphibious Base Coronado in San Diego, California. As the Naval component to the United States Special Operations Command headquartered in Tampa, Florida. Naval Special Warfare Command provides vision, leadership, doctrinal guidance, resources and oversight to ensure component maritime special operations forces are ready to meet the operational requirements of combatant commanders. [cite web
url=https://www.navsoc.navy.mil/
title= NAVSOC info website
accessdate=2008-01-08
] Today, SEAL Teams, SEAL Delivery Vehicle Teams, and Special Boat Teams comprise the elite combat units of Naval Special Warfare. These teams are organized, trained, and equipped to conduct a variety of missions to include unconventional warfare, direct action, special reconnaissance, foreign internal defense, counter terrorism missions, and support psychological and civil affairs operations. Their highly trained specialists are deployed worldwide in support of National Command Authority objectives, conducting operations with other conventional and unconventional forces.

Units

*United States Navy SEALs have distinguished themselves as an individually reliable, collectively disciplined and highly skilled maritime force. The most important trait that distinguishes Navy SEALs from all other military forces is that SEALs are maritime special forces, as they strike from and return to the sea. SEALs (Sea, Air, Land) take their name from the elements in and from which they operate. Their stealth and clandestine methods of operation allow them to conduct multiple missions against targets that larger forces cannot approach undetected. Because of the dangers inherent in their missions, prospective SEALs go through what is considered by many military experts to be one of the toughest training regimes in the world. [cite web
url=http://199.208.208.41/seal/introduction.aspx
title= Official U.S. Navy SEAL Info Website
accessdate=2008-01-11
] [cite book
last = Couch
first = Dick
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = The Warrior Elite: The Forging of SEAL Class 228
publisher = Crown
month = October | year = 2001
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0609607103
]

*SEAL Delivery Vehicle Teams are SEALs who use the SDV MK VIII and the Advanced SEAL Delivery System (ASDS), submersibles that provides NSW with an unprecedented capability that combines the attributes of clandestine underwater mobility and the combat swimmer. [cite web
url=http://www.navyseals.com/insertion-extraction
title= Navy SEALs insertion/extraction page
accessdate=2008-01-11
] [cite news
last = Tiron
first = Roxana
coauthors =
title = New Mini-Sub Gives SEALs Extra Speed, Range, Payload
work = National Defense Magazine
pages =
language =
publisher =
month = February | year = 2002
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-20
]

*Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC) are trained extensively in craft and weapons tactics, techniques and procedures. Focusing on clandestine infiltration and exfiltration of SEALs and other special operations forces, SWCC provide dedicated, rapid mobility in shallow water areas where larger ships cannot operate. Like SEALs, SWCC must have excellent physical fitness, highly motivated, combat-focused and responsive in high stress situations. [cite web
url=http://www.seal.navy.mil/swcc/introduction.aspx
title=Official U.S. Navy SWCC Info Website
accessdate=2008-01-11
]

Marine Corps

In October 2005, the Secretary of Defense directed the formation of United States Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command the Marine component of U. S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). It was determined that the Marine Corps would initially form a unit of approximately 2500 to serve with USSOCOM. On February 24, 2006, MARSOC activated at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. MARSOC initially consisted of a small staff and the Foreign Military Training Unit (FMTU), which had been formed to conduct Foreign Internal Defense. FMTU is now designated as the Marine Special Operations Advisor Group (MSOAG). [cite news
last = Kenyon
first = Henry
coauthors =
title = Marine Corps Special Operations Command Hits the Beach
work = Signal Magazine
pages =
language =
publisher =
month = May | year = 2006
url = http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/templates/SIGNAL_Article_Template.asp?articleid=1123&zoneid=182
accessdate = 2008-04-10
]

As a service component of USSOCOM, MARSOC is tasked by the Commander USSOCOM to train, organize, equip; deploy task organized, scalable, and responsive U.S. Marine Corps special operations forces worldwide in support of combatant commanders and other agencies. MARSOC has been directed to conduct Foreign Internal Defense, Direct Action and Special Reconnaissance. MARSOC has also been directed to develop a capability in Unconventional Warfare , Counter Terrorism , and Information Operations.MARSOC deployed its first units in August 2006, six months after initial activation. MARSOC will reach full operational capability in October 2008. [cite web
url=http://www.marsoc.usmc.mil/
title=MARSOC
accessdate=2008-01-08
]

Units

*Marine Special Operations Battalions (MSOB) are organized, trained and equipped to deploy for worldwide missions as directed by MARSOC. MSOBs consists of five Marine Special Operations Companies (MSOCs) and is task-organized with personnel uniquely skilled in special equipment support, intelligence and fire-support. [cite web
url=http://www.marsoc.usmc.mil/1stmsob.html
title= MARSOC, MSOB Info website
accessdate=2008-01-21
] [cite news
last = Kennedy
first = Harold
coauthors =
title = Shift to Special Operations Will Not 'Gut' the Marine Corps, General Says
work = National Defense Magazine
pages =
language =
publisher =
month = March | year = 2006
url = http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/issues/2006/march/shift.htm
accessdate = 2008-04-10
]

*Marine Special Operations Advisor Group (MSOAG), formerly the Foreign Military Training Unit train, advise and assist friendly host-nation forces—including naval and maritime military and paramilitary forces—to enable them to support their governments’ internal security and stability, to counter subversion and to reduce the risk of violence from internal and external threats. [cite web
url=http://www.marsoc.usmc.mil/msoag.html
title=MARSOC, MSOAG Info website
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

*The Marine Special Operations Support Group (MSOSG) provides specified support capabilities for worldwide special operations missions as directed by MARSOC. The MSOSG specifically provides combined arms planning and coordination, K-9 support, special operations communications support, combat service support (including logistics) and all-source intelligence fusion capability. The MSOSG can deploy tailored support detachments as directed by MARSOC. [cite web
url=http://www.marsoc.usmc.mil/msosg.html
title=MARSOC, MSOSG Info website
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

*The Marine Special Operations School (MSOS) performs the screening, recruiting, training, assessment and doctrinal development functions for MARSOC. It includes two subordinate Special Missions Training Branches (SMTBs), one on each coast.
**The Special Mission Training Branch—East provide special operations training in tactics, techniques and procedures, and evaluation and certification of MARSOC forces to specified conditions and standards for SOF. The Marines of MSOS are operators with the training, experience and mature judgment to plan, coordinate, instruct and supervise development of SOF special reconnaissance and direct action skills. [cite web
url=http://www.marsoc.usmc.mil/msos.html
title=MARSOC, MSOS Info website
accessdate=2008-01-21
]

Joint Special Operations Command

The Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) is the component that controls the special mission units (SMU) of USSOCOM. These units perform highly classified activities.cite news
last = Emerson
first = Steven
coauthors =
title = Stymied Warriors
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = November 13, 1988
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
] cite news
last = Mazzetti
first = Mark
coauthors =
title = Pentagon Sees Move in Somalia as Blueprint
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = January 13, 2007
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-13
] [cite news
last = Risen
first = James
coauthors =
title = The World: Passing the Laugh Test; Pentagon Planners Give New Meaning to 'Over the Top'
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = September 20, 1998
url =
accessdate = 2008-04-10
]

Units

*1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (Combat Applications Group (CAG), Delta Force) is the first of the two primary counter-terrorist units of JSOC and SOCOM. Modeled after the British Special Operations force Special Air Service, Delta is arguably one of the best SOF in the world.cite book
last = L. Haney
first = Eric
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Inside Delta Force: The Story of America's Elite Counterterrorist Unit
publisher = Delta
month = August | year = 2005
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0385339364
] This is because of Delta's stringent training and selection process. Delta recruits primarily from the most talented and highly skilled operators in the Army Special Forces and the 75th Ranger Regiment although CAG will take anyone and everyone that can pass their screening.cite book
last = Bowden
first = Mark
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Black Hawk Down: A Story of Modern War
publisher = Signet
year = 2001
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0451203933
] Recruits must pass a rigid selection course before beginning training. Delta has received training from numerous U.S. government agencies and other tier one SOF and has created a curriculum based on this training and techniques that it has developed. Delta Force conducts clandestine and overt special operations all over the world. It has the capability to conduct a myriad of special operations missions but specializes in counter-terrorism and hostage rescue operations.

*Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU) is the second of the two primary counter-terrorist units of JSOC and SOCOM. DEVGRU is the Naval Special Warfare's counter-part to Delta Force. Like Delta DEVGRU recruits the best operators from the best units in its branch, the Navy SEALs. DEVGRU is also capable of performing any type of special operations mission, but trains especially for maritime counter-terrorist operations.

*The Intelligence Support Activity (ISA ,The Activity) is the support branch of JSOC and USSOCOM. Its primary missions are to provide Human Intelligence (HUMINT) and Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) mainly for Delta and DEVGRU's operations. [cite book
last = Smith
first = Michael
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Killer Elite: The Inside Story of America's Most Secret Special Operations Team
publisher = St. Martin's Press
year = 2007
location = New York, New York
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0312362722
] Before the establishing of the Strategic Support Branch in 2001, the ISA needed the permission of the CIA to conducts its operations which sometimes caused it to be less effective in its support of JSOC's primary units. [cite news
last = Gellman
first = Barton
coauthors =
title = Secret Unit Expands Rumsfeld's Domain
work = Washington Post
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = January 23, 2005
url =
accessdate = 2008-04-17
] cite news
last = Gerth
first = Jeff
coauthors = Philip Taubman
title = U.S. MILITARY CREATES SECRET UNITS FOR USE IN SENSITIVE TASKS ABROAD
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = June 8, 1984
url =
accessdate = 2008-05-08
]

*The 24th Special Tactics Squadron (24th STS) is the AFSOC component of JSOC. The 24th STS operates similarly to the 720th Special Tactics Group. The 24th STS usually operates with Delta and DEVGRU because of the convenience of 24th STS ability to synchronize and control the different elements of air power and enhance air operations deep in enemy territory.

Portions of JSOC units have made up the constantly changing special operations task force, operating in the U.S. Central Command area of operations. The Task Force 11, Task Force 121, Task Force 6-26 and Task Force 145 are creations of the Pentagon's post-Sept. 11 campaign against terrorism, and it quickly became the model for how the military would gain intelligence and battle insurgents in the future. Originally known as Task Force 121, it was formed in the summer of 2003, when the military merged two existing Special Operations units, one hunting Osama bin Laden in and around Afghanistan, and the other tracking Sadaam Hussein in Iraq. [cite news
last = Schmitt
first = Eric
coauthors =
title = In Secret Unit's 'Black Room,' a Grim Portrait of U.S. Abuse
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = March 19, 2006
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-08
] [cite news
last = E. Sanger
first = David
coauthors =
title = New U.S. Effort Steps Up Hunt For bin Laden
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = February 29, 2004
url =
accessdate = 2008-03-08
]

List of USSOCOM commanders

Further information

References

*cite web
last = Andrew Kelley
first = Stephen
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Better Lucky Than Good: Operation Earnest Will as Gunboat Diplomacy
work =
publisher = Naval Postgraduate School
month = June | year = 2007
url = http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/kelley07.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-05-12

*cite book
last = Briscoe
first = Charles
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Weapon of Choice: ARSOF in Afghanistan
publisher = Combat Studies Institute Press
year = 2001
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn =

*cite book
last = Couch
first = Dick
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Chosen Soldier: The Making of a Special Forces Warrior
publisher = Three Rivers Press
month = March | year = 2007
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0307339394

*cite book
last = Couch
first = Dick
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Down Range: Navy SEALs in the War on Terrorism
publisher = Three Rivers Press
year = 2006
location = New York, New York
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 1400081017

*cite book
last = Lee Wise
first = Harold
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Inside the Danger Zone: The U.S. Military in the Persian Gulf, 1987-1988
publisher = US Naval Institute Press
month = May | year = 2007
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 1591149703

*cite book
last = Pushies
first = Fred
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = U.S. Air Force Special Ops
publisher = MBI Publishing Company
year = 2007
location = Osceola, Wisconsin
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0-7603-0733-4

*cite book
last = R. Pirnie
first = Bruce
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Assessing Requirements for Peacekeeping, Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief
publisher = RAND Corporation
month = August | year = 1998
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0833025945

*cite book
last = Smith
first = Michael
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Killer Elite: The Inside Story of America's Most Secret Special Operations Team
publisher = St. Martin's Press
year = 2007
location = New York, New York
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0312362722

*cite book
last = Sweetman
first = Jack
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Great American Naval Battles
publisher = Naval Institute Press
month = March | year = 1999
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 1557507945

*cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = USSOCOM Posture Statement
work =
publisher = USSOCOM
year = 2007
url = http://www.socom.mil/Docs/USSOCOM_Posture_Statement_2007.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-12
;Web
*USDOD. [http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/ U.S. DOD Dictionary of Military Terms] . United States of America: "U.S. Department of Defense". June 5, 2003.
*USDOD. [http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/ U.S. DOD Dictionary of Military Terms: Joint Acronyms and Abbreviations] . United States of America: "U.S. Department of Defense". June 5, 2003.

*cite news
last = Talmadge
first = Eric
coauthors =
title = New US Submarines Trade Nukes for SEALs
work = Associated Press
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = February 27, 2008
url = http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Feb27/0,4670,StealthatSea,00.html
accessdate =

*cite news
last = Eric Schmitt
first = Michael R. Gordon
coauthors =
title = Leak on Cross-Border Chases From Iraq
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = February 4, 2008
url =http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/washington/04rules.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=Army+Rangers&st=nyt&oref=slogin
accessdate =

*cite news
last = von Zielbauer
first = Paul
coauthors =
title = Criminal Charges Are Expected Against Marines, Official Says
work = New York Times
pages =
language =
publisher =
date = April 27, 2007
url = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/27/world/asia/27abuse.html?scp=1&sq=MARSOC&st=nyt
accessdate =

*cite news
last = Graham
first = Bradley
coauthors =
title = Elite Marine Unit to Help Fight Terrorism
work = Washington Post
pages =
language =
publisher =
year = 2006
url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/01/AR2005110102069.html
accessdate =
;Bibliography
*cite book
last = David Tucker
first = Christopher J. Lamb
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = United States Special Operations Forces
publisher = Columbia University Press
year = 2007
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0231131909

*cite book
last = Luttrell
first = Marcus
authorlink =
coauthors = Patrick Robinson
title = Lone Survivor: The Eyewitness Account of Operation Redwing and the Lost Heroes of SEAL Team 10
publisher = Little, Brown and Company
month = June | year = 2007
location =
pages =
url =
doi =
id =
isbn = 0316067598

External links

* [http://news.soc.mil/releases/News%20Archive/2008/October/081002-03.html USASOC News Service]
* [http://www.socom.mil U.S. Special Operations Command]
* [http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/ Air Force Special Operations Command]
* [http://www.soc.mil/ U.S. Army Special Operations Command]
* [https://www.navsoc.navy.mil/ U.S. Naval Special Warfare Command]
* [http://www.marsoc.usmc.mil/ U.S. Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command]
* [http://www.defenselink.mil/ Department of Defense]

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • United States Special Operations Command — USSOCOM SOCOM Emblem des US Special Operations Command …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Command — Emblème du SOCOM copié sur celui du Office of Strategic Services Période 16 avril 1987 Pays États Unis …   Wikipédia en Français

  • United States Special Operations Command South — SOCSOUTH Emblem des SOCSOUTH Aufstellung 4. Augus …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Command Central — The United States Special Operations Command Central [ [http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/Joint%20Special%20Operations%20Component.aspx?PageView=Shared CENTCOM COMPONENT SOCCENT] ] (USSOCCENT or SOCCENT) is a subordinate… …   Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Command Europe — U.S. Special Operations Command Europe Pays  États Unis Allégeance United States Special Operations Command Type Subordinate Unified Command Fait pa …   Wikipédia en Français

  • United States Special Operations Command Africa — SOCAFRICA Abzeichen Ärmelabzeichen (Shoulder Sleeve Insignia) …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Command Central — Abzeichen des SOCCENT Das United States Special Operations Command Central (SOCCENT) ist ein teilstreitkräfteübergreifendes Verbundkommando (Sub Unified Combatant Command) zur Führung der Special Operations Forces (Sondereinsatzkräfte), das dem… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Command Europe — Ärmelabzeichen des SOCEUR Das Special Operations Command Europe (SOCEUR) ist ein Verbundkommando, dass die Special Operations Forces (Sondereinsatzkräfte) des US European Command (EUCOM) in sich vereint und führt. Das Hauptquartier des SOCEUR… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Command Pacific — Wappen des Special Operations Command Pacific Das Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC) ist ein Verbundkommando (Sub Unified Combatant Command), dass die Special Operations Forces (Sondereinsatzkräfte) des US Pacific Command (PACOM) in sich …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Special Operations Forces — are active and reserve Component forces of U.S. Military Services designated by the United States Secretary of Defense and specifically trained to conduct operations in an area under enemy or unfriendly control or politically sensitive… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”