- Battle of Poitiers (1356)
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Poitiers
Hundred Years' War
September 19, 1356
place=Near Maupertuis, south of
result=Decisive English Victory
Kingdom of England
Duchy of Gascony
combatant2=Kingdom of France
Edward, the Black Prince
Jean III de Grailly, captal de Buch
John II of FrancePOW
4,000 foot soldiers
cite book | first=Bryan | last=Perrett | title=The Battle Book | publisher=Arms and Armour Press | location=London, England | year=1992 | id=ISBN 1-85409-328-2 p. 237.]
17,000 foot soldiers
casualties2=2,500 killed or wounded
100 + knights:"This article covers the battle during the
Hundred Years' War. For the battle fought by Charles Martelagainst Muslimforces in 732, see Battle of Tours."
The Battle of Poitiers was fought between the Kingdoms of England and France on
September 19, 1356near Poitiers, resulting in the second of the three great English victories of the Hundred Years' War: Crécy, Poitiers, and Agincourt.
August 8, 1356, Edward, the Black Princebegan a great "chevauchée" (raid) north from the English base in Aquitaine, in an effort to relieve allied garrisons in central France, as well as to raid and ravage the countryside. His sortie met little resistance, his Anglo-Gascon forces burning numerous towns to the ground and living off the land, until they reached the Loire Riverat Tours. His army was unable to take the castle nor could they burn the town, due to a heavy downpour. His delay there allowed John II, King of France, to attempt to catch Edward's army and eliminate it. The King, who had been confronting Henry of Grosmontin Normandy, arranged the bulk of his army at Chartresto the north of the besieged Tours, dismissing around 15,000–20,000 of his low-grade infantryto increase the speed of his forces.
Upon receiving reports of the French army on the move, Edward decided a retreat was in order. He marched south pursued in earnest by John. The French caught up to the English a few miles southwest of
Poitiers. A veteran of the battle of Crécy, at which he had fought when he was only sixteen years old, the Black Prince decided on the same tactical scheme employed at that earlier battle. He positioned his troops in a strongly defensive position, in a plain surrounded by natural obstacles, such as a creek on the left and a wood on the back. The luggage wagons, with a great amount of plunder, remained along the old Roman road, the main route from Poitiers to Bordeaux, to give protection to his weak right side. All his men dismounted and were organized in two, or perhaps three units, with the English and Welsh longbowmen placed in a V-formation on both flanks. [ [http://www.myarmoury.com/feature_battle_crecy.html The Battle of Crécy, by Jonathon Blair, referencing "Armies of Crecy and Poitiers (Men-At-Arms Series, No 111)", by Christopher Rothero] ] The Black Prince kept a small cavalryunit, commanded by Jean de Grailly, the Captal de Buch, hidden in the woods at the rear.
The attacking French forces were divided in four parts. At the front were around 300 elite
knights, commanded by general Clermont and accompanied by German mercenarypikemen. The purpose of this group was to charge the English archers and eliminate the threat they posed. These were followed by three groups of infantry (dismounted cavalry) commanded by the Dauphin (later Charles V of France), the Duke of Orléansand King John.
At the beginning of the battle, the English simulated flight on their left wing. This provoked a hasty charge by the French knights against the archers. However, the English were expecting this and quickly attacked the enemy, especially the horses, with a shower of arrows. Belgian chronicler
Jean Froissartwrites that the French armour was invulnerable to the English arrows, that the arrowheads either skidded off the armour or shattered on impact. English history of the battle disputes this, as some claim that the narrow bodkin pointarrows they used have been proven capable of penetrating most plate armourof that time period. While tests have been done to support this with fixed pieces of flat metal, armor was curved and moving men make very poor anvils—so the point is debatable. Given the following actions of the English archers—it seems likely Froissart was correct. The armour on the horses was weaker on the sides and back, so the English archers moved to the sides of the cavalry and shot the horses in the flanks. This was a popular method of stopping a cavalry charge, as a falling horse often destroyed the cohesion of the enemy's line. The results were devastating.
This attack was followed by the Dauphin's infantry, who engaged in heavy fighting, but withdrew to regroup. The next wave of infantry under Orléans, seeing that the Dauphin's men were not attacking, turned back and panicked. This stranded the forces led by the King himself. This was a formidable fighting force, and the English archers were out of arrows: the archers joined the infantry in the fight and some of both groups mounted horses to form an improvised cavalry. Combat was hard, but the Black Prince still had a mobile reserve hidden in the woods, which were able to circle around and attack the French in the flank and rear. The French were fearful of encirclement and attempted to flee. King John was captured with his immediate entourage.
The result was a decisive French defeat, not only in military terms, but also economically: France would be asked to pay a
ransomequivalent to twice the country's yearly income to have the king returned. John, who was accorded royal privileges whilst being a prisoner, was permitted to return to France to try to raise the required funds. He subsequently handed himself back to the English, claiming to be unable to pay the ransom, and died a few months later. In many ways, Poitiers was a repeat of the battle of Crécyshowing once again that tacticsand strategycan overcome a disadvantage in numbers. As the Black Prince wrote shortly afterward in a letter to the people of London:
Notes and references
*Belloc, Hilaire (1913). [http://www.archive.org/details/poitiers00belluoft "Poitiers"] , London: H. Rees. via
*cite book | first=David | last=Green | title=The Battle of Poitiers 1356 | publisher= | location= | year=2004 | id=ISBN 0-7524-2557-9
*cite book | first=David | last=Nicolle | title=Poitiers 1356: The Capture of a King | publisher=Osprey Publishing | location= | year=2004 | id=ISBN 1-84176-516-3
*cite book | first=Barbara | last=Tuchman | title=A Distant Mirror | publisher= | location= | year=1978 | id=ISBN 0-345-34957-1
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/froissart1.html "On The Hundred Years War", a primary source written by Jean Froissart]
* [http://www.myarmoury.com/feature_battle_poitiers.html Great Battles: The Battle of Poitiers] (myArmoury.com article)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.