Mobile v. Bolden

Mobile v. Bolden
Mobile v. Bolden
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 19, 1979
Reargued October 29, 1979
Decided April 22, 1980
Full case name City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Bolden, et al.'
Citations 446 U.S. 55 (more)
100 S. Ct. 1490; 64 L. Ed. 2d 47; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 121
Prior history Judgment for plaintiffs, 423 F. Supp. 384; affirmed 571 F.2d 238, probable jurisdiction noted, 439 U.S. 815
Holding
Facially neutral electoral districting is constitutional, even if the at-large elections dilute the voting strength of black citizens.
Court membership
Case opinions
Plurality Stewart, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist
Concurrence Blackmun
Concurrence Stevens
Dissent Brennan
Dissent White
Dissent Marshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. XIV, XV; 79 Stat. 437, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973

Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that electoral districts must be drawn without racially discriminatory intent to warrant constitutional protection. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment, but it did not as readily distinguish between effect and intent as it would in Mobile.

Contents

Facts

The city of Mobile, Alabama governs itself by a City Commission that exercises all legislative, executive and administrative power. The three members of the Commission are elected from the city at-large, instead of from three separate single-member districts. Since each Commissioner is elected from the entire city, it is more difficult for a geographically concentrated constituency, such as blacks, to elect someone sympathetic to their interests. A class-action suit was filed on behalf of all the city's black residents against the city itself and all three Commissioners. Their complaint alleged that the city's electoral system violated the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, among other laws. The District Court found for the city's black residents and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Issue

The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether this at-large system violated Amendments Fourteen or Fifteen or the Voting Rights Act.

Result

The court ruled 6-3 for the city of Mobile. In his plurality opinion, Stewart concluded that the relevant language of the Voting Rights Act paralleled that of the Fifteenth Amendment. Stewart dismissed both the Fifteenth and Fourteenth Amendment claims, deciding that both Amendments required proof of racially-motivated intent. Stevens applied a slightly different standard in his concurring opinion but came to the same result about the Constitutionality of Mobile's system.

Analysis

The case somewhat limited the court's previous holding in Gomillion.

See also

References

  1. ^ 446 U.S. 55 (Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com)

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Mobile, Alabama — Mobile   City   From top: Pincus Building, Old City Hall and Southern Market, Fort Condé, Barton Academy, Cathedral Basilica of the Immaculate Co …   Wikipedia

  • History of Mobile, Alabama — The history of Mobile, Alabama differs significantly from the other British colonies, because Mobile began as the first capital of colonial French Louisiana (part of New France). Mobile remained a colony for France until 1763, when Britain took… …   Wikipedia

  • Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder — Supreme Court of the United States Argued April …   Wikipedia

  • Gomillion v. Lightfoot — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Gomillion v. Lightfoot ArgueDateA=October 18 ArgueDateB=19 ArgueYear=1960 DecideDate=November 14 DecideYear=1960 FullName=Gomillion et al. v. Lightfoot, Mayor of Tuskegee, et al. USVol=364 USPage=339 Citation=364 U.S. 339; 81 …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 446 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 446 of the United States Reports :* Curtiss Wright Corp. v. General Elec. Co. , ussc|446|1|1980 * Carlson v. Green , ussc|446|14|1980 * Mobile v. Bolden , ussc|446|55|1980 *… …   Wikipedia

  • Memphis Police Department — Abbreviation MPD Patch of the Memphis Police Department …   Wikipedia

  • International Space Station — ISS redirects here. For other uses, see ISS (disambiguation). International Space Station …   Wikipedia

  • Space Shuttle Atlantis — Atlantis OV 104 Atlantis launching STS 122 mission to dock with the International Space Station OV designation OV 104 Country United States …   Wikipedia

  • NASA Astronaut Group 9 — was announced on May 29, 1980. There were 9 Pilots, 11 Mission Specialists, and 2 International Mission Specialists. Contents 1 Pilots 2 Mission Specialists 3 International Mission Specialists 4 …   Wikipedia

  • Negro league baseball — Part of the History of baseball in the United States series. Part of the Baseball series on History of baseball • Origins of baseball • Early years • First league • Knickerbocker Rules • Massachus …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”