Military transition team

A Military Transition Team, or Transition Team, is a 10-15 soldier team that and trains local forces. The term has been used in the context of the "War on Terror" to design groups training in particular the Iraqi Security Forces, Afghan Army and other Afghan security forces.

Mission

The primary mission of transition teams is to advise the security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan in the areas of intelligence, communications, fire support, logistics, operations and infantry tactics. The aim is to make the ISF and ANA capable of conducting independent counterinsurgency operations, tactically, operationally, and logistically. When executing military operations with their Iraqi or Afghan partners, transition teams call for U.S. close air support, indirect fire, and medical evacuation, whenever necessary.^[1] They also perform the critical role of liaising between the foreign unit and nearby U.S. units to ensure that each unit is aware of and can assist the other in their operations. Transition teams also monitor and report on the capabilities of the fledgling security force. They work with their Iraqi and Afghan counterparts to enhance the understanding of the rule of law and fundamental human rights.^[2]

In Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, the transition teams are a central part of the strategy to train and equip national security forces. One of the primary missions of U.S. military in Iraq is the training of competent Iraqi security forces. By the end of 2006, transition teams assisted in the training and equipping of approximately 326,000 Iraqi security services. That figure includes 138,000 members of the Iraqi Army and 188,000 Iraqi police and national police forces.^[3]

Types of Transition Teams

Iraq

Military Transition Teams, MiTTs

The preponderance of transition teams are known as Military Transition Teams, MiTTs. These teams are responsible for training and advising the Iraqi Army (IA).[3]

Federal Police Transition Teams, FPTTs

In 2005, in order to provide similar mentorship to Iraq’s other security forces, the Multinational Corps-Iraq (MNC-I) began to embed transition teams with the Ministry of the Interior’s paramilitary Iraqi Federal Police (FP) and regular Iraqi Police Service (IPS). Formerly known as Special Police Training Teams, SPTTs, these national police teams - called Federal Police Transition Teams, FPTTs - are nearly identical to those supporting the Iraqi Army. Unlike MiTTs, however, these teams are traditionally augmented with a contracted U.S. civilian police officer called a Law Enforcement Professional, LEP. The LEP provides expertise in civilian law enforcement functions to the teams.

Police Transition Teams, PTTs

Police Transition Teams, PTTs provide a similar function for the Iraqi Police. These teams vary greatly in size based on area of responsibility and level of threat. They may include military police units and contracted civilian personnel. The Team leader is normally a Staff Sergeant teamed with enablers. The Enablers are usually one interpreter, and an IPA (usually a civilian police officer). The prerequisite for the IPA is 5 years of sworn state service, and the interpreter is usually a local national. These teams travel to the local police stations working with the Station Commanders. These teams assist with logistics, training, and maintaining supplies on hand. The Team leader acts as both an Advisor, and a Liaison. The Team leader does not run the station he simply provides advice.

Border Transition Teams, BTTs

BTTs are transition teams embedded (COP Shocker) with the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior's Directorate of Border Enforcement (DBE) forces at the brigade and battalion levels. These teams assist the DBE in patrolling and controlling illicit border crossings on Iraq's international borders. Specifically, these teams focus on assisting the DBE in preventing infiltration of insurgent, terrorist, and criminal elements into Iraq. Because of the relative remoteness of these assignments, BTTs traditionally include maintenance and communications personnel not found on other TTs.

Port of Entry Transition Teams, PoETTs

PoETTs are transition teams embedded (COP Shocker) with the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior's Port of Entry Directorate (POED) forces at the major ports of entry around the borders of Iraq. These teams assist the POED in controlling the illegal shipments and smuggling of goods and individuals on Iraq's international borders. Specifically, these teams focus on assisting the POED in preventing infiltration of insurgent, terrorist, and criminal elements into Iraq through the border as well as assisting the POED in monitor the . Like the BTT's, the relative remoteness of these assignments enable the PoETTs to include maintenance and communications personnel to their staff.

Other TTs

The U.S. military also embeds a small number of specialty transition teams in low-density administrative, logistics, base security, and transportation units.

Afghanistan

Embedded Training Teams, ETTs

In Afghanistan, transition teams are commonly referred to as Embedded Training Teams, ETTs, however to synchronize the naming conventions between Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Army sometimes refers to ETTs as MiTTs. Like the military transition teams headed for Iraq, the Afghanistan Embedded Transition Teams are tasked with the mission of mentoring members of the Afghanistan security Forces - usually the Afghan National Army (ANA).^[2]
The ETTs and OMLTs mentor the ANA in leadership, staff, and support functions, planning, assessing, supporting, and execution of operations and training doctrine, tactics, techniques, and procedures. In addition to training and mentoring the ANA the ETTs and OMLTs provide the ANA access to combat enablers such as close air support/fires, medical evacuation, and quick reaction All of these countries come together to train and mentor Afghanistan's all volunteer Army. According to the CJTFP Public Affairs Office, Coalition Forces have assisted in training and equipping nearly 35,000 Afghanistan National Army (ANA) Soldiers.^[4]

Operational Mentor Liaison Teams, OMLT

OMLTs are the international (non-U.S.) equivalent of ETTs deployed under the NATO International Security Assistance Force ("ISAF"). They are fielded by other Coalition/Partner countries in Afghanistan to assist in the training of the ANA. The following coalition partners provide OMLTs: France, Germany, Spain, Romania, United Kingdom, Australia, Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Slovenia, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia and Macedonia.^[4][5]

Latvia also provides OMLT, as well as Portugal.

Transition Team Structure

Iraq Transition Team Structure

Transition team soldiers are generally mid- to senior level officer and non-commissioned officers, with the ranks from Staff Sergeant to Colonel. This ensures that the team is sufficient experienced tactically to properly mentor and train their foreign counterparts. Teams are formed from all components and branches of the U.S. military, including the Active Army, Army Reserve, Army National Guard, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Air Force. The usual size of most Iraqi TTs is 10-16 soldiers. However, the number of members in a team can range from as few as three to as many as 45. Many teams are supplemented in theater with security or other support.^[6] Each team is also provided with 1-6 local interpreters to assist in communicating with their Iraqi counterparts. Although the overwhelming majority of transition teams are provided by the U.S. military, Coalition partners in Iraq have fielded teams in support of the U.S. effort to train the ISF.

Once in Iraq, transition teams are assigned administratively to the Iraq Assistance Group (IAG); however, once embedded with their unit in Iraq, U.S. transition teams fall under the operational control of the local U.S. ground forces commander.

Afghanistan Transition Team Structure

Like the military transition teams headed for Iraq, the Afghanistan Embedded Transition Teams are tasked with the mission of mentoring members of the Afghanistan Security Forces. Although the rank and experience base for ETTs is similar to MiTTs, ETTs are usually substantially larger and bring more specialized skills to help train their counterparts. Since approximately mid-2006, the preponderance of ETTs have come from the U.S. Army National Guard.^[4]

Their headquarters in Afghanistan is Combined Joint Task Force Phoenix (CJTFP).^[4][6]

Transition Team Training (Iraq)

Since June 1, 2006, the U.S. Army's 1st Infantry Division, based at Fort Riley, Kansas, is responsible for training all transition teams for service in Iraq and Afghanistan. Previously, transition teams had been trained at several U.S. Army installations, most notably Fort Carson, Colorado; Camp Atterbury, Indiana; Fort Hood, Texas; and Camp Shelby, Mississippi. However, in early 2006, the U.S. Army decided to consolidate all training at Fort Riley in order to standardize and improve training for that critical mission.

In August 2009, the 162nd Infantry Brigade, based at Fort Polk, Louisiana, will be responsible for providing tough, realistic, combined arms and services joint training for Foreign Security Forces-Transition Teams in a mid-to high-intensity environment. Teams will participate in a 60-day rotation for United States Army Personnel with classes operating on a six-day a week schedule. United States Air Force and United States Navy teams will endure a 45-day rotation with a six-day a week schedule.

The first teams began training on June 1, 2006. The 1st Brigade, 1st Infantry Division took over command and control of the TT mission in October 2006. The brigade is responsible for the formation and training of the TT teams. This training operation is centered on Fort Riley's Camp Funston, where thousands of U.S. soldiers once trained before shipping off to World War I. The Marine Corps trains their teams at Camp Pendleton, California.

In 2009, the 342nd Military Police Company out of Ohio, became one of the most historical company's taking place in the PTT process. These soldiers were present while the Al Alam district in Tikrit, Iraq was successfully handed over to the Iraqi Police. Their hard work and effort is just one of many in the success of OIF.

The United States Marine Corps approach toward training consists of 2 components. The first is conducted a home station locations at either Camp Pendleton, CA or Camp LeJeune, NC. The second component is 3–6 weeks at 29 Palms Marine Corps Base, CA referred to as Enhanced Mojave Viper (EMV). While at EMV, Marines conduct scenario, immersion, and tactical training in their final phase to training before deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan.

Pre-deployment Training Plan (Afghanistan TTs)

On November 13, 2006, Fort Riley received their first Afghanistan TT teams.

Transition teams bound for Afghanistan receive similar training, but with a focus on Afghan culture and environment. Like the Iraq transition teams, ETTs receive language in Dari and Pashtu, instead of Arabic. Following ETT training at Fort Riley or 29 Palms, teams will then deploy to Afghanistan to receive training from CJTFP.

The Future of Transition Teams

As of December 2006, more than 5000 U.S. military personnel were assigned to transition teams in Iraq. This number, however, is expected to increase as MNC-I expands the size of the Iraqi Security Forces. In its 2006 report, the Iraq Study Group (ISG) recommended the following:

“… United States should significantly increase the number of U.S. military personnel, including combat troops, embedded in and supporting Iraqi Army units. As these actions proceed, we could begin to move combat forces out of Iraq. The primary mission of U.S. forces in Iraq should evolve to one of supporting the Iraqi army, which would take over primary responsibility for combat operations.” (Iraq Study Group Report, 2006, pg 48)^[3]

Furthermore, the ISG also concluded that

“the number of embedded personnel … should be large enough to accelerate the development of a real combat capability in Iraqi Army units. Such a mission could involve 10,000 to 20,000 American troops instead of the 3,000 to 4,000 now in this role.” (Iraq Study Group Report, 2006, pg 49)^[3]

In general, the U.S. military reports that it has been satisfied with the results of the transition team strategy in the Iraq war. It is believed that if the U.S. Military can transition from fighting the insurgents to advising national security forces, U.S. casualty rates may come down. The handover of battlespace to Iraqi Security Forces is an often cited benchmark of progress in the Iraq war. In the National Strategy for Victory in Iraq, victory is defined as "An Iraq that is in the lead defeating terrorists and insurgents and is providing its own security."^[8]

Quotes

• "The men of 3rd Battalion, 3rd Brigade, 6th Division Iraqi Army are dedicated soldiers and are enthusiastic about the opportunities of the New Iraqi Army. They are very optimistic about the new government in Iraq to be able to unite all the people of Iraq. They look forward for the Iraqi government to make improvements in the area of quality of life issues for their families such as water work projects, improvement of daily electricity to their homes and further improvements of the infrastructure of their nation so that they may be focused and go after the insurgents that are disrupting the daily lives of their people. I have learned from their culture and values that they hold dear to their heart such as their family, tribe, honor and country." - Comments by MiTT advisor Captain James Van Thach. [4]

• "It is my belief that we and our Iraqi brothers will be successful in maintaining a secure Iraq that will be free from the terrorist attacks by the insurgency if we continue to learn from each other with open hearts and minds. The opportunity is there and it will be met at all cost even if the cost is by the sacrifice of my own life for Iraq to support an Iraqi government and military that represents the people of this nation regardless of their race, religion or creed and for the future generations for the people of the Republic of Iraq." - Comments by MiTT advisor Captain James Van Thach.[5]

• "Our MiTT was 100% embedded within 1/3/1. We trained, ate, slept, laughed and shared all of the same hardships with the Iraqis. During combat operations in the Diyala Province, we were able to instruct the Iraqis and develop them while in kinetic operations. This created an environment where the best leaders rose to the top and the others were marginalized and taken out of leadership billets. It also created the strongest of bonds: when the Iraqis witnessed Marines fighting along side them, it truly inspired them. With all the investment in their development, we were still challenged by corruption and the occasional identification of insurgents in their ranks." - Comments by MiTT leader Major Chuck McGregor, USMC.

References

Notes

1. ^ Fort Riley Official Transition Team Website
2. ^ ^{a b} Major General Carter F. Ham (Commander, 1st Infantry Division)[1].
3. ^ ^{a b c} Iraq Study Group Report, 2007
4. ^ ^{a b c d} Combined Joint Task Force Phoenix Website (Official DoD website)
5. ^ http://www.nato.int/isaf/topics/factsheets/omlt-factsheet.pdf
6. ^ ^{a b} Major General Carter F. Ham (Commander, 1st Infantry Division)
7. ^ Combined Joint Task Force Phoenix Website - Coalition (Official DoD website)[2]
8. ^ National Strategy for Victory in Iraq, 30 November 2005

Links (General)

• Two Years in Iraq (James Van Thach) and Honored as a General
• Army News Service: "Top Iraqi General Visits Fort Riley, Sees Transition Team Training"
• Army Times: "Military Transition Team training shifts to Riley"
• U.S. Army, 1st Infantry Division and Fort Riley. "Transition Team (Official U.S. Army website)". http://www.riley.army.mil/units/trainingteam.aspx. Retrieved 2007-11-08. 
• Transition Teams AKO Page (sign-on required)
• NATO OMLT fact sheet

Links (Iraq TTs)

• Blog: From the Front Lines

• Barrows, Gary (2007-04-27). "NPTTs Making a Difference in Iraq". U.S. Army. http://www.army.mil/-news/2007/04/27/2891-national-police-transition-teams-making-a-difference-in-iraq/. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 

• Hirsh, Michael; Kevin Peraino And Sarah Childress (2006-12-18). "The Perils of Partnership: Inside the Pentagon's New Iraq Strategy". Newsweek. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16126921/site/newsweek/. Retrieved 2007-12-01. 

• Vu, Tom (2006-10-01). "Up Close: Listening to the Captain". BN Magazine Online. http://bnmagazine.com/article_detail.php?art_id=286. Retrieved 2007-12-01. 

• Jaffe, Greg (2006-06-18). "A Camp Divided; Wisdom of LTC Payne: Pain". Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB115041127402681735-lMyQjAxMDE2NTEwODQxMTgxWj.html. Retrieved 2007-12-01. 

• Johnson, Karl (2006-02-03). "Iraqi Soldiers Learn From Military Transition Teams". U.S. Army (363rd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment). http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/feb2006/a020306wm1.html. Retrieved 2007-12-01. 

• Kemplin, Kristen (2006-02-15). "Police Transition Teams Help Iraqi Police Take Back Streets". U.S. Army (363rd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment). http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=178&Itemid=42. Retrieved 2007-12-01. 

• "Transition Teams Key to Success in Iraq". U.S. DoD. http://newsblaze.com/story/20061210115606tsop.nb/newsblaze/IRAQ0001/Iraq.html. Retrieved 2007-12-01. 

• U.S. National Security Council (2005-11-30). "National Strategy for Victory in Iraq" (PDF). The White House. pp. 38. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/iraq/iraq_strategy_nov2005.html. Retrieved 31 October 2007. 

Links (Afghanistan TTs)

• U.S. Department of Defense, Combined Joint Task Force Phoenix. "Combined Joint Task Force Phoenix Website (Official DoD website)". http://www.taskforcephoenix.com. Retrieved 2007-12-01.