Performance rights organisation

Performance rights organisation

Performance rights organizations (PROs) provide intermediary functions, particularly royalty collection, between copyright holders and parties who wish to use copyrighted works "publicly" such as shopping and dining venues. Legal consumer purchase of works, such as buying CDs from a music store, confer "private" performance rights. PROs usually only collect royalties when use of a work is incidental to an organization's purpose. Royalties for works essential to an organization's purpose, such as theaters and radio, are usually negotiated directly with the rights holder.

In some countries PROs are called copyright collectives or copyright collecting agencies. A copyright collective is more general than a PRO as it is not limited to performances and includes reproduction rights organizations (RRO's). RROs represent works distributed via mediums such as CD, audiocassette, or computer file rather than use of works in public settings.


The first performing rights society was established in France in 1851. In the United Kingdom, the Copyright Act 1842 was the first to protect musical compositions with the Performing Right Society, founded in 1914 encompassing live performances. The rights for recorded or broadcast performance are administered by the Mechanical Copyright Protection Society, founded in 1924. Italy introduced a performing rights society in 1882 and Germany in 1915. In the United States, The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) was founded in 1914; SESAC in 1930 and Broadcast Music, Inc (BMI) in 1944.


Other than their primary purpose as an intermediary between rights holders and customers, PROs are highly active in legal arenas. PROs take alleged rights violators to court, or in the U.S., to the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, or CARP, of the Library of Congress. PROs lobby on behalf of rights holders, especially in discussions of legal royalty rates.

As a side benefit of tracking public performance of works for royalty collection, PROs publish statistics of publicly performed works.

The licensing services provided by a PRO arguably provide advantage to customers, who can simultaneously license all works the PRO represents.


PROs have been criticized for charging non-profit organizations for their use of copyrighted music in situations where the non-profit organization was not earning money from the use. ASCAP, for example, was eventually forced in the face of public opinion to abandon its attempts to charge the Girl Scouts of the USA for singing campfire songs . ASCAP's and SESAC's policy of charging non-commercial educational (NCE) radio stations for playing copyrighted music has also been criticised, especially by college radio stations across the U.S., which rely entirely on student and listener support for funding and have difficulty affording the extra fees.

PROs are often criticized for stretching the definition of "public performance." Until relatively recently in the U.S., playing copyrighted music in restaurants did not involve legal issues if the media was legally purchased. PROs now demand royalties for such use.

By discouraging performances in limited public arenas, again using the restaurant example, critics say PROs eliminate the free publicity such performances provide for a work thereby depressing media sales. Incidentally, lower media sales conflicts with RROs but disputes between the two parties are not known to occur since each type of organization represents the interests of the same parties, rights holders, and are forced to work in common interest.

Rights owners - especially independents and newcomers not represented by large publishing companies - criticize the PROs for what they deem to be "mystical" formulas for deciding who gets what share of the total licensing revenue received.

Rights holders criticize PROs for slow or non-existent payments and excessive membership dues or service fees.


"See also


*CCLI - Christian Copyright Licensing International -


*APRA (Australia & New Zealand) -


*RAO (Russia) -
*Buma/Stemra (Netherlands) -
*GEMA (Germany) -
*PRS (U.K.) -
*Sabam (Belgium) -
*Sacem (France)
*SGAE Spain
*SIAE (Italy) -
*STIM (Sweden)
* Asteras Collective Rights Management (Cyprus) -
*ZAiKS (Poland) -


*JASRAC (Japan) -

*COMPASS (Singapore ) -

North America

United States

*ASCAP (U.S.) -
*BMI (U.S.) -
*SESAC (U.S.) -
*SoundExchange (U.S.) -


*SOCAN (Canada) -
**"formerly PROCAN and CAPAC"
*CMRRA (Canada) -
*SPACQ (Québec) -

outh America

*SADAIC (Argentina)
*ECAD - (Brazil)

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development — (OECD) …   Wikipedia

  • Human rights in the United Kingdom — The United Kingdom has a long and established tradition of avowed respect for its subjects human rights. At the same time, the UK, like many nations, has also had a history of both de jure and de facto racial and ethnic religious discrimination,… …   Wikipedia

  • Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions — The Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) is a Geneva based international non governmental human rights organisation founded in 1994 by Scott Leckie as a foundation in the Netherlands (Stichting COHRE). COHRE maintains registered offices …   Wikipedia

  • Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network — The Euro Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN) is a network of 82 human rights organisations, institutions and individuals based in 30 countries in the Euro Mediterranean region. Established in 1997 in response to the Barcelona Declaration… …   Wikipedia

  • Human rights — Rights Theoretical distinctions Natural and legal rights Claim rights and liberty rights Negative and positive rights Individual an …   Wikipedia

  • Collective rights management — is the licensing of copyright and related rights by organizations acting on behalf of rights owners. Collective management organisations, such as collecting societies, typically represent groups of copyright and related rights owners, such as… …   Wikipedia

  • LGBT rights in Zambia — are governed by the penal code of Zambia. Homosexuality is illegal in Zambia [cite web url = and living overseas/travel advice by country/sub saharan africa/zambia title = Zambia accessdate = 2008 08 04… …   Wikipedia

  • Rabbis for Human Rights — (Logo) Rabbis for Human Rights ist eine 1988 gegründete israelische Organisation, die sich selbst als „Stimme des Gewissens“ in Israel beschreibt. [1] Zu ihren Mitgliedern zählen Reformjuden, orthodoxe Juden, konservative Juden und Studenten.… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights — Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights …   Wikipedia

  • Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India — The Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties are sections of the Constitution of India that prescribe the fundamental obligations of the Statefn|° to its citizens and the duties of the citizens to the State …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”