R. v. Boucher

SCCInfoBox
case-name=R. v. Boucher
full-case-name=
heard-date=
decided-date=December 18, 1950
citations= [1951] S.C.R. 265
docket=
history=
ruling=
ratio=
SCC=1950-1951
Majority=Kerwin J. (pp. 277-283)
Concurrence=Rand J. (pp. 283-292)
Concurrence2=Kellock J. (pp. 292-305)
Concurrence3=Estey J. (pp. 305-315)
Concurrence4=Locke J. (pp. 315-331)
Dissent=Rinfret C.J.
Dissent2=Taschereau J. (pp. 283-284)
Dissent3=Cartwright J. (pp. 331-345)
JoinDissent3=Fauteux J.
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied=

"R. v. Boucher" [1951] S.C.R. 265 is a famous Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court overturned a conviction for seditious libel on the grounds that criticizing the government was a valid form of protest.

Background

Aimé Boucher was a farmer in Beauce, Québec, and a practicing Jehovah's Witness. In 1951, he was arrested while distributing pamphlets entitled "Québec's Burning Hate for God and Christ and Freedom Is the Shame of all Canada" that criticized the Québec government suppression of the Witnesses and the courts for doing nothing to prevent. Boucher was charged for seditious libel - for endeavouring to promote public disorder - under section 133(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

At trial, the jury found Boucher guilty, which was upheld on appeal.

Opinion of the Court

In a 5 to 4 decision, the Court held that mere published of critical statements, without any intention to incite violence against the government, could not be seditious libel.

External links

* Full text available at [http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1950/1951rcs0-265/1951rcs0-265.html lexum] and [http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1950/1950canlii2/1950canlii2.html canLII]