- Algebraic curve
In

algebraic geometry , an**algebraic curve**is analgebraic variety of dimension one. The theory of thesecurve s in general was quite fully developed in the nineteenth century, after many particular examples had been considered, starting withcircle s and otherconic section s.**Plane algebraic curves**An algebraic curve defined over a field "F" may be considered as the locus of points in "F"

^{"n"}determined by at least "n"−1 independent polynomial functions in "n" variables with coefficients in "F", "g"_{"i"}("x"_{1}, …, "x"_{"n"}), where the curve is defined by setting each "g"_{"i"}= 0.Using the

resultant , we can eliminate all but two of the variables and reducethe curve to a birationally equivalent plane curve, "f"("x","y") = 0, still with coefficients in "F", but usually of higher degree, and often possessing additional singularities. For example, eliminating "z" between the two equations "x"^{2}+"y"^{2}−"z"^{2}= 0 and "x"+2"y"+3"z"−1 = 0, which defines an intersection of a cone and a plane in three dimensions, we obtain theconic section 8"x"^{2}+5"y"^{2}−4"xy"+2"x"+4"y"−1 = 0, which in this case is an ellipse. If we eliminate "z" between 4"x"^{2}+"y"^{2}−"z"^{2}= 1 and "z" = "x"^{2}, we obtain "y"^{2}= "x"^{4}−4"x"^{2}+1, which is the equation of ahyperelliptic curve .**Projective curves**It is often desirable to consider that curves are a locus of points in

projective space . In the set of equations "g"_{"i"}= 0, we can replace each "x"_{"k"}with "x"_{"k"}/"x"_{0}, and multiply by "x"_{0}^{"n"}, where "n" is the degree of "g"_{"i"}. In this way we obtain homogeneous polynomial functions, which define the corresponding curve in projective space. For a plane algebraic curvewe have a single equation "f"("x","y","z") = 0, where "f" is homogeneous; for example, theFermat curve "x"^{"n"}+"y"^{"n"+"z""n" = 0 is a projective curve.}**Algebraic function fields**The study of algebraic curves can be reduced to the study of irreducible algebraic curves. Up to birational equivalence, these are categorically equivalent to

algebraic function field s. An algebraic function field is a field of algebraic functions in one variable "K" defined over a given field "F". This means there exists an element "x" of "K" which is transcendental over "F", and such that "K" is a finite algebraic extension of "F"("x"), which is the field of rational functions in the indeterminate "x" over "F".For example, consider the field

**C**of complex numbers, over which we may define the field**C**("x") of rational functions in**C**. If"y"^{2}= "x"^{3}−"x"−1, then the field**C**("x","y") is an elliptic function field. The element "x" is not uniquely determined; the field can also be regarded, for instance, as an extension of**C**("y").The algebraic curve corresponding to the function field is simply the set of points ("x","y") in**C**^{2}satisfying "y"^{2}= "x"^{3}−"x"−1.If the field "F" is not

algebraically closed , the point of view of function fields is a little more general than that of considering the locus of points, since we include, for instance, "curves" with no points on them. If the base field "F" is the field**R**of real numbers, then "x"^{2}+"y"^{2}= −1 defines an algebraic extension field of**R**("x"), but the corresponding curve considered as a locus has no points in**R**. However, it does have points defined over the algebraic closure**C**of**R**.**Complex curves and real surfaces**A complex projective algebraic curve resides in n-dimensional complex projective space

**CP**^{"n"}. This has complex dimension "n", but topological dimension, as a realmanifold , 2"n", and is compact, connected, and orientable. An algebraic curve likewise has topological dimension two; in other words, it is a surface. A nonsingular complex projective algebraic curve will then be a smooth orientable surface as a real manifold, embedded in a compact real manifold of dimension 2"n" which is**CP**^{"n"}regarded as a real manifold. The topological genus of this surface, that is the number of handles or donut holes, is the genus of the curve. By considering the complex analytic structure induced on this compact surface we are led to the theory of compactRiemann surfaces .**Compact Riemann surfaces**A Riemann surface is a connected complex analytic manifold of one complex dimension, which makes it a connected real manifold of two dimensions. It is

compact if it is compact as a topological space.There is a triple equivalence of categories between the category of smooth projective algebraic curves over the complex numbers, the category of compact

Riemann surface s, and the category of complex algebraic function fields, so that in studying these subjects we are in a sense studying the same thing. This allows complex analytic methods to be used in algebraic geometry, and algebraic-geometric methods in complex analysis, and field-theoretic methods to be used in both, which is characteristic of a much wider class of problems than simply curves and Riemann surfaces.**ingularities**Using the intrinsic concept of

tangent space , points "P" on an algebraic curve "C" are classified as "smooth" or "non-singular", or else "singular". Given "n"−1 homogeneous polynomial functions in "n"+1 variables, we may find theJacobian matrix as the ("n"−1)×("n"+1) matrixof partial derivatives. If the rank of this matrix at a point "P" on the curve has the maximal value of "n"−1, then the point is a smooth point. In particular, if the curve is a plane projective algebraic curve, defined by a single homogeneous polynomial equation "f"("x","y","z") = 0, then the singular points are precisely the points "P" where the rank of the 1×("n"+1) matrix is zero, that is, where:$frac\{\; partial\; f\; \}\{\; partial\; x\; \}(P)=frac\{\; partial\; f\; \}\{\; partial\; y\; \}(P)=frac\{\; partial\; f\; \}\{\; partial\; z\; \}(P)=0.$Since "f" is a polynomial, this definition is purely algebraic and makes no assumption about the nature of the field "F", which in particular need not be the real or complex numbers. It should of course be recalled that (0,0,0) is not a point of the curve and hence not a singular point.

The singularities of a curve are not birational invariants. However, locating and classifying the singularities of a curve is one way of computing the genus, which is a birational invariant. For this to work, we should consider the curve projectively and require "F" to be algebraically closed, so that all the singularities which belong to the curve are considered.

**Classification of singularities**Singular points include multiple points where the curve crosses over itself, and also various types of "cusp", for example that shown by the curve with equation "x"

^{3}= "y"^{2}at (0,0).A curve "C" has at most a finite number of singular points. If it has none, it can be called "smooth" or "non-singular". For this definition to be correct, we must use an

algebraically closed field and a curve "C" inprojective space (i.e., "complete" in the sense of algebraic geometry). If, for example, we simply look at a curve in the real affine plane there might be singular "P" modulo the stalk, or alternatively as the sum of "m"("m"−1)/2, where "m" is the multiplicity, over all infinitely near singular points "Q" lying over the singular point "P". Intuitively, a singular point with delta invariant δ concentrates δ ordinary double points at "P".The

Milnor number μ of the singularity is the degree of the mapping grad "f"("x","y")/|grad "f"("x","y")| on the small sphere of radius ε, in the sense of the topologicaldegree of a continuous mapping , where grad "f" is the (complex) gradient vector field of "f". It is related to δ and "r" by theMilnor-Jung formula ,:$mu\; =\; 2delta\; -\; r\; +\; 1$Another singularity invariant of note is the multiplicity "m", defined as the maximum integer such that the derivatives of "f" to all orders up to "m" vanish.Computing the delta invariants of all of the singularities allows the genus "g" of the curve to be determined; if "d" is the degree, then

:$g\; =\; frac\{1\}\{2\}(d-1)(d-2)\; -\; sum\_P\; delta\_P,$

where the sum is taken over all singular points "P" of the complex projective plane curve.

Singularities may be classified by the triple ["m", δ, "r"] , where "m" is the multiplicity, δ is the delta-invariant, and "r" is the branching number. In these terms, an "ordinary cusp" is a point with invariants [2,1,1] and an "ordinary double point" is a point with invariants [2,1,2] . An ordinary n-multiple point may be defined as one having invariants ["n", "n"("n"−1)/2, "n"] .

**Examples of curves****Rational curves**A rational curve, also called a unicursal curve, is any curve which is birationally equivalent to a line, which we may take to be a projective line and identify with the field of rational functions in one indeterminate "F"("x"). If "F" is algebraically closed, this is equivalent to a curve of genus zero; however thefield

**R**("x","y") with "x"^{2}+"y"^{2}= −1 is a field of genus zero which is not a rational function field.Concretely, a rational curve of dimension "n" over "F" can be parameterized (except for isolated exceptional points) by means of "n" rational functions defined in terms of a single parameter "t"; by clearing denominators we can turn this into"n"+1 polynomial functions in projective space. An example would be the

rational normal curve .Any

conic section defined over "F" with a rational point in "F" is a rational curve. It can be parameterized by drawing a line with slope "t" through the rational point, and intersection with the plane quadratic curve; this gives a polynomial with "F"-rational coefficients and one "F"-rational root, hence the other root is "F"-rational (i.e., belongs to "F") also.For example, consider the ellipse "x"

^{2}+ "xy" + "y"^{2}= 1, where (−1, 0) is a rational point. Drawing a line with slope "t" from (−1,0), "y" = "t"("x"+1), substituting it in the equation of the ellipse, factoring, and solving for "x", we obtain:$x\; =\; frac\{1-t^2\}\{1+t+t^2\}.$We then have that the equation for "y" is:$y=t(x+1)=frac\{t(t+2)\}\{1+t+t^2\}$which defines a rational parameterization of the ellipse and hence shows the ellipse is a rational curve. All points of the ellipse are given, except for(−1,1), which corresponds to "t" = ∞; the entire curve is parameterized therefore by the real projective line.Viewing rational parameterizations with rational coefficients projectively, we can view them as giving number theoretical information about homogeneous equations defined over the integers. For example from the above, we obtain:$X=1-t^2,quad\; Y=t(t+2),quad\; Z=t^2+t+1\; ,!$for which :$X^2+XY+Y^2=Z^2\; ,!$is true for integer "X", "Y" and "Z" if "t" is an integer. Hencewe obtain triangles with integer length sides, such as sides of length 3, 7, and 8, where one of the angles is 60°, from relationships such as 8

^{2}−3·8+3^{2}= 7^{2}.Many of the curves on Wikipedia's

list of curves are rational, and hence have similar rational parameterizations.**Elliptic curves**An

elliptic curve may be defined as any curve of genus one with arational point : a common model is a nonsingularcubic curve , which suffices to model any genus one curve. In this model the distinguished point is commonly taken to be an inflection point at infinity; this amounts to requiring that the curve can be written in Tate-Weierstrass form, which in its projective version is:$y^2z\; +\; a\_1\; xyz\; +\; a\_3\; yz^2\; =\; x^3\; +\; a\_2\; x^2z\; +\; a\_4\; xz^2\; +\; a\_6\; z^3.\; ,!$Elliptic curves carry the structure of anabelian group with the distinguished point as the identity of the group law. In a plane cubic model three points sum to zero in the group if and only if they arecollinear . For an elliptic curve defined over the complex numbers the group is isomorphic to the additive group of the complex plane modulo theperiod lattice of the correspondingelliptic function s.**Curves of genus greater than one**Curves of genus greater than one differ markedly from both rational and elliptic curves. Such curves defined over the rational numbers, by

Faltings' theorem , can have only a finite number of rational points, and they may be viewed as having ahyperbolic geometry structure. Examples are thehyperelliptic curve s, the Klein quartic curve, and theFermat curve "x"^{"n"}+"y"^{"n"}= "z"^{"n"}when "n" is greater than three.**See also**

*Acnode

*Bézout's theorem

*Birational geometry

*Conic section

*Cubic plane curve

*Crunode

*Curve

*Elliptic curve

*Faltings' theorem

*Fractional ideal

*Function field of an algebraic variety

*Function field (scheme theory)

*Genus (mathematics)

*Hilbert's sixteenth problem

*Hyperelliptic curve

*Jacobian variety

*Klein quartic

*List of curves

*Quartic plane curve

*Rational normal curve

*Riemann-Hurwitz formula

*Riemann–Roch theorem

*Riemann surface

*Weber's theorem **References***Egbert Brieskorn and Horst Knörrer, "Plane Algebraic Curves", John Stillwell, trans., Birkhäuser, 1986

*Claude Chevalley, "Introduction to the Theory of Algebraic Functions of One Variable", American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Surveys Number VI, 1951

*Hershel M. Farkas and Irwin Kra, "Riemann Surfaces", Springer, 1980

*Phillip A. Griffiths, "Introduction to Algebraic Curves", Kuniko Weltin, trans., American Mathematical Society, Translation of Mathematical Monographs volume 70, 1985 revision

*Robin Hartshorne, "Algebraic Geometry", Springer, 1977

*Shigeru Iitaka, "Algebraic Geometry: An Introduction to the Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties", Springer, 1982

*John Milnor, "Singular Points of Complex Hypersurfaces", Princeton University Press, 1968

*George Salmon, "Higher Plane Curves", Third Edition, G. E. Stechert & Co., 1934

* Jean-Pierre Serre, "Algebraic Groups and Class Fields", Springer, 1988

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*