- Tiris al-Gharbiyya
Tiris al-Gharbiyya (Arabic for "Western Tiris") was the
Mauritania n name for the area ofWestern Sahara under its control between 1975 and 1979.Background
Mauritania annexed the southern third of the former Spanish
colony ofSpanish Sahara in 1975 after theMadrid Accords , withMorocco taking the northern two-thirds (Saguia el-Hamra and the northern half ofRío de Oro ) as itsSouthern Provinces . Both countries claimed historical rights over the area, while theUnited Nations demanded that the indigenous population (Sahrawi s) had aright to self-determination , and should be allowed to decide through areferendum whether the territory should join either of the neighbouring states, or be established as an independent country.The latter was the preferred option of the
Polisario Front , a Sahrawi organization which turned its guerrilla forces against both countries, having until then fought Spain. Its attacks against Mauritania proved highly effective. Polisario strikes against theiron mines atZouerate , as well as the costs of the war effort, soon brought the country to the brink of economic collapse, and produced increasing tensions in the army and government apparatus.In 1978, the one-party government of
Moktar Ould Daddah was severely compromised by the failing war effort, and fell to a coup by disgruntled army officers. Mauritania then disengaged from the conflict, surrendering its claims to any part of Western Sahara, and pulling out its troops. The areas occupied by Mauritania were entered by Morocco, which has sinced claimed ownership over the entire territory, despite continued opposition by Polisario, and its main backer,Algeria . Mauritanianpresident Mohamed Khouna Ould Haidalla in 1984 proceeded to recognize the Polisario-backedSahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) as the legitimate sovereign of the area. After his toppling in yet another militarycoup d'etat later the same year, this position was increasingly downplayed - though never explicitly overturned - in order to appease Morocco.Borders and characteristics
Tiris al-Gharbiyya was the lower half of
Río de Oro , the southern province of the formerSpanish Sahara , comprising 88,000 km² (33,977 sq mi). [Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations: Africa, Fifth Edition, Worldmark Press, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,1976.] It consisted mostly of barren desert terrain, scarcely populated except by some thousands of Sahrawinomad s, many of whom had fled towards the AlgerianTindouf Province in 1975. A few minor settlements dotted thecoast , and the largest of these, Villa Cisneros (Dakhla), was made the provincecapital .While some reports indicate the territory may hold important quantities of
mineral resources such asiron - and there is speculation, but no proof of, off-shore oil - the war prevented any serious exploration efforts. It remains mostly unexplored and unexploited to this day. The exception is the rich Atlanticfishing waters. They were never put to use by Mauritania, but have since been fished by Morocco and foreign ships under Moroccan licenses.The name "
Tiris " refers to adesert plain of the Sahara. Mauritania's northernmost province (in its internationally recognized territory) is similarly calledTiris Zemmour , where "Zemmour " refers to amountain range in central Western Sahara.The Ould Daddah government's claims to the territory was based in the strong cultural and tribal ties between the Moorish inhabitants of Mauritania, and the . The government argued they were all part of the same people, and also put forth the notion of pre-colonial sovereigny by certain Mauritanian
emirate s (tribal fiefdoms) over some of these tribes. Before of theInternational Court of Justice (ICJ), Mauritania claimed in 1975 that the entireSpanish Sahara had historically constituted part of "Bilad Chinguetti ", which it argued had been an undeclared tribal and religious community. But it also recognized that there had never been a Mauritanian state to claim the territory, since Mauritania itself was a modern-day creation of French colonialism. The court recognized the importance of these cultural links, but announced that they had not constituted sovereignty over the territory or its inhabitants before colonialism, and could not by themselves justify sovereignty today. Instead, it recommended a standard self-determination process where Sahrawis were given the choice of merger with Mauritania and/or Morocco, or independence. [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/isasummary751016.htm]Present Mauritanian position
In later years, the Mauritanian government has maintained a policy of strict neutrality between Polisario and Morocco, while retaining its recognition of the SADR. Minor parts of the Mauritanian
political opposition will occasionally express interest in the area, although direct advocacy for retaking it is very rare. Other groups support either Polisario or Morocco. The official position of most parties is to support any final outcome acceptable to both remaining sides of the conflict, and that has also been the government's position since the late 1980s, even if it has varied in tune with relations with Morocco.The territory is now effectively divided between Moroccan and Polisario forces along the length of the
Moroccan Wall , and with acease-fire in effect pending the outcome of theUnited Nations decolonization process.ee also
*Free Zone (Parts of Western Sahara under SADR/Polisario control)
*History of Western Sahara
*History of Mauritania
*Regions of Mauritania
*Southern Provinces (Parts of Western Sahara under Moroccan control)References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.