- Sydney Accord
The Sydney Accord is an international mutual recognition agreement for qualifications in the fields of
engineering technology .Definition and background
The Sydney Accord is an agreement between the bodies responsible for
accredit ing engineering technologist qualification programs in each of the signatory countries. It recognizes the substantialequivalency of programs accredited by those bodies, and recommends that graduates of accredited programs in any of the signatory countries be recognized by the other countries as having met the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering technologist. The Sydney Accord was signed in 2001.cope
The Sydney Accord covers engineering technologist qualifications.
The scope of the Sydney Accord only covers the "academic" requirement for an engineering technologist qualification. Engineering technologist titles do not transfer directly between signatory countries, that don't have reciprocating agreements, because the signatory countries reserve the right to scrutinize foreign titles and compare them to their own licensing criteria. However, this does not mean the titles are not respected by employers within those signatory countries.
The engineering technologist may be hired within a country by an employer where a formal license is not required. For example, an Incorporated Engineer can be hired within the United States because the respect of the title is deemed valuable to employers. The "industrial exemption" clause negates formal engineering registration within the United States for those who meet the criteria.
Foreign titles may be utilized as a foundation for recognition of professional licensing. The titles can be supplemented with additional experience and/or training to meet the local definition of formal registration. This serves to underline that a foreign technologist covered under the accord does not arrive in a fellow signatory country without merit. The Sydney Accord is therefore not a hollow agreement without advantages.
Accord enhancements
The
Canadian Council of Technicians and Technologists (CCTT) and the United Kingdom'sInstitution of Incorporated Engineers (IIE) signed a reciprocating agreement of recognition for engineering technologist. Therefore, the Incorporated Engineering title does transfer easily between the sponsored countries of this reciprocating agreement. In 2006, the IIE merged with theInstitute of Electrical Engineers (IEE) to form theInstitute of Engineering and Technology (IET). It is assumed that the agreement is still valid because the academic criteria of the Incorporated Engineer did not alter with the merger.The CCTT also signed a
reciprocating agreement with theNational Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies (NICET). NICET is a United States organization sponsored by theNational Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). The formal recognition of the CCTT as a common link between NICET and the IET has not been realized. However, thedaisy chain of acknowledgements hints at the similarity between the UK and USA programs.ignatory countries
The signatory countries/territories of the Sydney Accord are
*Australia
*Canada
*Republic of Ireland
*Hong Kong
*New Zealand
*South Africa
*United Kingdom
*United States (June 2007)Canada
Canada has signed the Sydney Accord with the title of "Applied Science" and "Engineering Technologist".
The Canadian signatory body is the
Canadian Council of Technicians and Technologists (CCTT). This is different from the Canadian signatory of theWashington Accord , theCanadian Council of Professional Engineers (CCPE).In the case of all other Sydney Accord members, the same organisation has signed both the Sydney Accord and the Washington Accord.
Hong Kong
Hong Kong originally signed the Sydney Accord with the title of "Science Technologist" and later abbreviated the title to "Technologist".
United States
The
United States applied for recognition with the Sydney Accord in 2007. The ABET/TAC accreditation was admitted as a provisional member of this accord. Despite this achievement the United States still has significant confusion in defining a unified technologist registration for professionals. Part of the reason for this is that the engineering technology profession is not well defined as a separate profession (distinct from professional engineering) in the United States. This is because the NSPE has opposed legal registration of technologist by the United States government through a licensing program. The loss of government oversight has led to competing ideologies from societies with different perspectives on what represents the qualities of a technologist.U.S. confusion
Some legitimate societies and organizations that have established technology programs do not have clear representation in the accord. The
Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), and theSociety of Broadcast Engineers (SBE) are two organizations that have engineering technology certifications that are respected and recognized but operate independently from the accord. In addition to these societies there are legitimate accreditations that are unacknowledged. They are theDistance Education and Training Council (DETC), theNational Association of Industrial Technology (NAIT), theAccrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges of Technology (ACCSCT), or other non-ABET/TAC institutions that are exclusively regionally accredited. It is unclear if these organizations or societies will eventually be represented by a formal avenue of recognition in the Sydney Accord.Registrations
The United Kingdom is the international representative of the accord and they offer a registration program for individuals from any country. United States' students may apply for a peer review by the
Engineering Council UK if they belong to one of the organizations or societies that are not explicitly mentioned as a member of the accord. Individuals that graduate from a regionally-accredited technology program are likely to receive acceptance through professional engineering registration as an Incorporated Engineer. U.S. professional registration is a state concern. While the profession of engineering technologist is not specifically recognised, many states provide engineering technologists with a pathway towards "Professional Engineer (PE)" licensing that bypasses national engineering requirements. This is opposed by the national regulatory and representative bodies for professional engineers, the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). Notably, the Washington Accord does not apply to American PEs who have obtained this status through a technologist route.ee also
*
Washington Accord
*Dublin Accord
*Certified Engineering Technologist External links
CCTT. (2006). National and International Mobility.
Retrieved on Aug 29, 2006 from
* http://www.cctt.ca/template.asp?id=66BCF9F972D1468B9286F72D20549DE1
* [http://www.engc.org.uk/International/International_Agreements/Sydney_Accord.aspx ECUK - Sydney Accord]NSPE (2006) NSPE Issue Brief: Engineering Technology, Publication #4049
Retrieved on Sept 4, 2006 from
* https://www.nspe.org/govrel/gr2-4049.aspDead link|date=May 2008ABET (2007) Community Matters: ABET to Host International Engineering Meetings
Retrieved on March 3rd, 2007 from
* http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Newsletters/07-02-CM.pdf
* http://www.ieagreements.com/Sydney/default.cfm
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.