Miller-El v. Dretke

Miller-El v. Dretke
Miller-El v. Dretke
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 6, 2004
Decided June 13, 2005
Full case name Miller-El v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Divisions
Citations 545 U.S. 231 (more)
125 S. Ct. 2317; 162 L. Ed. 2d 196; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 4658; 73 U.S.L.W. 4479; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 376
Holding
The prosecution in the capital trial of Miller-El violated the Fourteenth Amendment as interpreted in Batson v. Kentucky when it racially discriminated against black potential jurors, and Miller-El is entitled to habeas corpus relief.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Souter, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence Breyer
Dissent Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia

Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by prosecutors of peremptory challenges and of the Texas procedure appropriately termed the "jury shuffle."

Contents

Factual background

Thomas Miller-El was charged with capital murder committed in the course of a robbery. After voir dire, Miller-El moved to strike the entire jury because the prosecution had used its peremptory challenges to strike ten of the eleven African-Americans who were eligible to serve on the jury. This motion was denied, and Miller-El was subsequently found guilty and sentenced to death.

Decision

In 1986, the US Supreme Court ruled in Batson v. Kentucky that a prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges may not be used to exclude jurors on the basis of race. Miller-El appealed based on the Batson criteria and asked that his conviction be overturned. In June 2005, the US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn Miller-El's death sentence, finding his jury selection process had been tainted by racial bias.

The Court had held in Batson that a defendant could rely on "all relevant circumstances" in making out a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination. Miller-El clarified that "all relevant circumstances" included evidence outside "the four corners of the case."[1] Specifically, the Court allowed statistical analysis of the venire,[2] side-by-side comparison of struck and empaneled jurors,[3] disparate questioning,[4] and evidence of historical discrimination.[5]

Impact

The Court extended the holding of Miller-El in Snyder v. Louisiana .

See also

References

  1. ^ Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, 240 (2005).
  2. ^ Id. at 240-41.
  3. ^ Id. at 241.
  4. ^ Id. at 255.
  5. ^ Id. at 263.

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Batson v. Kentucky — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants=Batson v. Kentucky ArgueDate=December 12 ArgueYear=1985 DecideDate=April 30 DecideYear=1986 FullName=Batson v. Kentucky USVol=476 USPage=79 Citation=476 U.S. 79; 106 S. Ct. 1712; 90 L. Ed. 2d 69; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 150; …   Wikipedia

  • 2004 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States — The table below lists the opinions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of the United States during the 2004 Term, which lasted from October 4, 2004, until October 3, 2005. The table illustrates what opinions were filed by each justice… …   Wikipedia

  • Law, Crime, and Law Enforcement — ▪ 2006 Introduction Trials of former heads of state, U.S. Supreme Court rulings on eminent domain and the death penalty, and high profile cases against former executives of large corporations were leading legal and criminal issues in 2005.… …   Universalium

  • Citation signal — Introductory signals are used in legal citations to present authorities and show how the authorities relate to propositions in textual statements. A legal writer uses an introductory signal to tell readers how her citation to legal authority… …   Wikipedia

  • Peremptory challenge — usually refers to a right in jury selection for the defense and prosecution to reject a certain number of potential jurors who appear to have an unfavorable bias without having to give any reason. Other potential jurors may be challenged for… …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 545 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 545 of the United States Reports :* Gonzales v. Raich , ussc|545|1|2005 * Alaska v. United States , ussc|545|75|2005 * Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. ,… …   Wikipedia

  • Todesstrafe in den USA — Das Bestehen der Todesstrafe in den Vereinigten Staaten ist eine der national wie international kontroversesten Themen des Rechtssystems der Vereinigten Staaten. Ihre Vollstreckung obliegt ebenso wie ihre Verhängung in den allermeisten Fällen den …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Todesstrafe in den Vereinigten Staaten — Das Bestehen der Todesstrafe in den Vereinigten Staaten ist eines der national wie international kontroversesten Themen des Rechtssystems der Vereinigten Staaten. Ihre Vollstreckung obliegt ebenso wie ihre Verhängung in den allermeisten Fällen… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Liste des arrêts de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, volume 545 — Ceci est une liste des arrêts de la Cour suprême des États Unis du volume 545 de l’United States Reports: Sommaire 1 Liste 2 Voir aussi 3 Source 4 Liens externes …   Wikipédia en Français

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”