- Caprimulgiformes
Taxobox
name = Caprimulgiformes
image_width = 250px
image_caption =Large-tailed Nightjar , "Caprimulgus macrurus "
regnum =Animal ia
phylum =Chordata
classis =Aves
infraclassis =Neognathae
unranked_ordo =Cypselomorphae
ordo = Caprimulgiformes
ordo_authority = Ridgway,1881
subdivision_ranks = Families
subdivision =see textThe Caprimulgiformes is an order of
bird s that includes a number ofbird s with global distribution (exceptAntarctica ). They are generally insectivorous and nocturnal. The order gets its name from the Latin for "goat-sucker", an old name based on an erroneous view of theEuropean Nightjar 's feeding habits.ystematics
The classification of the various birds that make up the order has long been controversial and difficult, particularly in the case of the nightjars. All things considered, the nightjar order would probably best be limited to potoos, nightjars, and eared-nightjars, all other lineages being elevated to order level, and the
owlet-nightjar s being altogether distant:* Family Steatornithidae (
Oilbird ) - probably distinct order N.N. ("Steatornithiformes" [Apparently not a valid taxon (yet), and thus it must not be written without quotation marks.] )
* Family Podargidae (frogmouth s, 12 species in 2 genera) - probably distinct order Podargiformes* Family
Nyctibiidae (Potoos, about 5 species in 1 genus)
* FamilyCaprimulgidae
** SubfamilyChordeilinae (New World nighthawks)
** SubfamilyCaprimulginae (typical nightjars)
* FamilyEurostopodidae (eared-nightjars)Traditionally, they were regarded, on morphological grounds, as being midway between the
owl s (Strigiformes) and theswift s. Like the owls, they are nocturnal hunters with a highly developed sense of sight, and like the swifts they are excellent flyers with small, weak legs. At one time or another, they have been allied with owls, swifts,kingfisher s,hoopoe s,mousebird s,hornbill s,roller s,bee-eater s,woodpecker s,trogon s andhummingbirds .Based on analysis of sequence data - notably β-
fibrinogen intron 7 -, Fain & Houde (2004) considered the families of the Caprimulgiformes to be members of the proposed cladeMetaves , which also includes thehoatzin ,tropicbirds ,sandgrouse ,pigeons ,kagu ,sunbittern ,mesites ,flamingos ,grebes andswifts andhummingbirds . This clade was also found by the expanded study of Ericson "et al." (2006), but support was extremely weak.While only the latter study recovered monophyly of the
Cypselomorphae (see below) within Metaves, the former was based on only a single locus and could not resolve their relationships according to standard criteria of statistical confidence. No morphologicalsynapomorphies have been found that uniquely unite Metaves (or Caprimulgiformes for that matter), but numerous unlinked nuclear genes independently support their monophyly either in majority or whole. Ericson "et al." (2006) concluded that if valid, the "Metaves" must originate quite some time before thePaleogene , and they reconciled this with the fossil record.While the relationships of cypselomorphs are a subject of ongoing debate, the
phylogeny of the individual lineages is better resolved. Much of the remaining uncertainty regards minor details.Initial
mtDNA cytochrome "b" sequence analysis (Mariaux & Braun 1996) agreed with earlier morphological (Cracraft 1981) andDNA-DNA hybridization (Sibley & Ahlquist 1990) studies insofar as that the oilbird and the frogmouths seemed rather distinct. The other lineages appeared to form aclade , but this is now known to have been caused by methodological limitiations.The Aegothelidae (
owlet-nightjar s) with about a dozen living species in one genus are apparently closer to theApodiformes (Mayr 2002); these and the Caprimulgiformes are closely related, being grouped together asCypselomorphae . The oilbird and the frogmouths seem quite distinct among the remaining Caprimulgiformes, but their exact placement cannot be resolved based on osteological data alone (Mary 2002).Even the study of Ericson "et al." could not properly resolve the oilbird's and frogmouths' relationships beyond the fact that they are quite certainly well distinct. It robustly supported, however, the idea that the owlet-nightjars should be considered closer to Caprimulgiformes, unlike the methodologically weaker studies of Mariaux & Braun (1996) and Fain & Houde (2004).
Alternatively, Mayr's phylogenetic taxon Cypselomorphae might be placed at order rank and substitute the two present orders Caprimulgiformes and Apodiformes. Such a group would be fairly uninformative as regards its evolutionary history, as it has to include some very
plesiomorph ic and some extremely derived lineages (such as hummingbirds) to achieve monophyly.Evolution
The
fossil record of caprimulgiform birds (in the loose sense) is rather scant. Nonetheless, it supports the emerging consensus phylogeny well. The genus "Paraprefica ", probably from theEarly Eocene (though this is somewhat uncertain) , seems to be a basal form that at times has been allied with the oilbird and the potoos, but cannot be assigned to either with certainty. In the consensus scenario, it would represent a record of the initial divergence of the three lineages.This nicely agrees with fossils suggesting that the basal divergence of the owlet-nightjar and apodiform branch also occurred during that time. In addition, "
Eocypselus ", aLate Paleocene or EarlyEocene genus of north-central Europe, cannot be assigned to any one cypselomorph lineage with certainty but appears to be some ancestral form.These
Paleogene birds strongly suggest that the two main extant lineages of cypselomorphs separated about 60-55 mya (Selandian -Thanetian ), and that some time around theLutetian -Bartonian boundary, some 40 mya, the common ancestors of Nyctibiidae, Caprimulgidae and Eurostopodidae diverged from those of oilbird and frogmouths.References
* (1981): Toward a phylogenetic classification of the recent birds of the world (Class Aves). "Auk" 98(4): 681–714. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v098n04/p0681-p0714.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2006): Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. "Biol. Lett." 2(4): 543-547. DOI|10.1098/rsbl.2006.0523 [http://biology-web.nmsu.edu/houde/Ericson_et_al_2006.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2004): Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. "Evolution" 58(11): 2558-2573. DOI|10.1554/04-235 [http://biology-web.nmsu.edu/houde/Parallel_radiations.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2002): Osteological evidence for paraphyly of the avian order Caprimulgiformes (nightjars and allies). "Journal für Ornithologie" 143(1): 82–97. DOI|10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.01030.x [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1439-0361.2002.01030.x HTML abstract]
* (1996): A Molecular Phylogenetic Survey of the Nightjars and Allies (Caprimulgiformes) with Special Emphasis on the Potoos (Nyctibiidae). "Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution" 6(2): 228–244. doi|10.1006/mpev.1996.0073 (HTML abstract)
* (1990): "Phylogeny and classification of birds". Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Footnotes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.