Paulette Caveat

Paulette Caveat

In 1973, a group of Dene chiefs filed a caveat at the land titles office in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories to gain a legal interest in 400,000 square miles of land in northern Canada. The chiefs wanted to claim the land by virtue of their aboriginal rights, and prevent further development until ownership had been settled.

It came to be known as the Paulette Caveat, named after François Paulette, who was chief of the Fort Smith Chipewyan at the time, and one of the chiefs who initiated the caveat.

If the caveat was allowed, all development in the area could be halted until land claims were settled. The land office referred the caveat to the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and Justice William Morrow, the only sitting judge of that court at the time.

Morrow held a six-week hearing process in several communities in the Northwest Territories, some only accessible by plane. He wanted to find out if aboriginal people had understood that they were signing over their land to the government, when they signed Treaty 8 and Treaty 11, several decades earlier.

Morrow listened to testimony from elderly people in the communities who witnessed the signing of land treaties decades earlier. Morrow even held his court at the bedside of elderly people unable to make it to the makeshift courtrooms.

Many witnesses testified that the people who signed the treaties were under the impression that they were committing to a peace and friendship deal with the Canadian government and the white man.

Morrow found that the Dene did not understand the treaties to have relinquished their traditional rights to the land. He ruled that the chiefs had sufficiently established a case for claiming aboriginal rights so as to warrant the filing of a caveat.

The finding was appealed by the federal government and later overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada, but only on a point of law. The higher court didn't question Morrow's definition of aboriginal rights.

The ruling prompted the need to clarify land rights in the resource-rich land in northern Canada. It was the precursor to further negotiations between the Dene and the federal government to establish and clarify land rights, talks that are still going on in the present day.

External links

* [http://library.usask.ca/native/cnlc/vol09/307.html Morrow's 59-page ruling]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Caveat — Caveat, the third person singular present subjunctive of the Latin cavere , means warning (or more literally, let him beware ); it can be shorthand for Latin phrases such as: * Caveat lector , let the reader beware * Caveat emptor , let the buyer …   Wikipedia

  • Paulette (name) — Infobox Given Name Revised name = Paulette imagesize= caption= pronunciation= po LET gender =Female meaning = small or humble region = origin =Roman related names = Pauline, Paulina, Paul footnotes = Paulette ( po LET ) is the French feminine… …   Wikipedia

  • Métis people (Canada) — This article is about Indigenous Canadians of mixed race. For other uses, see Metis (disambiguation). See also: Métis people (United States) The title of this article contains the character é. Where it is unavailable or not desired, the name may… …   Wikipedia

  • Aboriginal peoples in Canada — Native Canadian redirects here. For Canadian born people in general, see Canadians. Aboriginal peoples in Canada …   Wikipedia

  • First Nations — This article is about the indigenous peoples of Canada. For other indigenous peoples, see Indigenous peoples by geographic regions. First Nations …   Wikipedia

  • Corbiere v. Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs) — Supreme Court of Canada Hearing: October 13, 1998 Judgment: May 20, 1999 …   Wikipedia

  • Delgamuukw v. British Columbia — Supreme Court of Canada Hearing: June 16, 17, 1997 Judgment: December 11, 1997 …   Wikipedia

  • Numbered Treaties — Aboriginal peoples in Canada …   Wikipedia

  • Native Women's Association of Canada v. Canada — Supreme Court of Canada Argued March 4, 1994 Decided October 27, 1994 Full case name: Her Majesty The Queen v. Native Women s Association of Canada, Gail Stacey Moore and Sharon McIvor …   Wikipedia

  • Mitchell v. M.N.R. — Aboriginal peoples in Canada …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”