- Cairo Conference
The Cairo Conference (codenamed "SEXTANT") of
November 22 - 26 November 1943, held inCairo ,Egypt , addressed the Allied position againstJapan duringWorld War II and made decisions about postwarAsia . The meeting was attended by President Franklin Roosevelt of theUnited States , Prime MinisterWinston Churchill of theUnited Kingdom , and GeneralissimoChiang Kai-shek of theRepublic of China .Stalin of theSoviet Union had refused to attend the conference on the grounds that since Chiang Kai-Shek was attending, it would cause untimely provocation betweenRussia andJapan .Stalin did meet two days later with Roosevelt and Churchill in
Tehran ,Iran for theTehran Conference .The "
Cairo Declaration " was signed on 27 November 1943,cite news
url=http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/etc/c03.html
publisher=Japan National Diet Library
title=Text of Cairo Declaration in the Japanese National Diet Library
date=November 27, 1943] and released in an "Cairo Communiqué" through radio on 1 December 1943,
cite news
url=http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/01/002_46shoshi.html
publisher=Japan National Diet Library
title=Cairo Communiqué received by the radio operators in USA
date=December 1, 1943] stating the Allies' intentions to continue deploying military force until Japan's unconditional surrender. The three main clauses of the "
Cairo Declaration " are that "Japan be stripped of all the islands in the Pacific which she has seized or occupied since the beginning of theFirst World War in 1914", "all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such asManchuria , Formosa, and thePescadores , shall be restored to theRepublic of China ", and that "in due courseKorea shall become free and independent".Modern Day Implications for Taiwan
The legitimacy of the "
Cairo Declaration " has been challenged byTaiwan independence supporters in recent years. Some supporters of Taiwan independence claim that it is merely a trivial press release, holding no legal meaning. On the other hand, supporters ofChinese reunification argue that the Cairo Declaration is a legitimate historical document, given the fact that it was cited by clause eight of thePotsdam Declaration and referred to by theJapanese Instrument of Surrender . The dispute centers upon whether the Japanese Instrument of Surrender transferred Taiwan's sovereignty to China, as opposed to being a provisional "modus vivendi " that has been supplanted. "SeeLegal status of Taiwan for further information."References
External links
* [http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/FRUS.FRUS1943CairoTehran United States Department of State Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers, The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943]
ee also
*
Imperialism in Asia
*Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945)
*Atlantic Charter (1941)
*Tehran Conference (1943)
*Dumbarton Oaks Conference (1944)
*Potsdam Declaration (1945)
*Japanese Instrument of Surrender (1945)
*List of World War II conferences
*Treaty of San Francisco (1951)
*Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Japan and the People's Republic of China (1978)
*"Alternative meanings:International Conference on Population and Development " (1994), "Cairo Anti-war Conference " (2002, 2003, 2005)
*Cairo Anti-war Conference : For the contemporary Cairo Conference against U.S. hegemony and war on Iraq and in solidarity with Palestine
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.