- Patent pool
In
patent law , a patent pool is aconsortium of at least twocompanies agreeing to cross-license patents relating to a particulartechnology . The creation of a patent pool can save patentees and licensees time and money, and, in case of blocking patents, it may also be the only reasonable method for making the invention available to the public. [ "The pooling of the patents, licensing all patents in the pool collectively, and sharing royalties is not necessarily an antitrust violation. In a case involving blocking patents such an arrangement is the only reasonable method for making the invention available to the public." - International Mfg. Co. v. Landon, 336 F.2d 723, 729 (9th Cir. 1964) ]Competition law issues are usually important when a large consortium is formed. Patent pooling has recently become a hotly debated field.One of the first patent pools was formed in
1856 , by manufacturers Grover, Baker, Singer, Wheeler, and Wilson, all accusing the others ofpatent infringement . They met inAlbany, New York to pursue their suits. Orlando B. Potter, a lawyer and president of the Grover and Baker Company, proposed that, rather than sue their profits out of existence, they pool their patents ("See also: Isaac Singer/I. M. Singer & Co").As in that example many industries could not function without patent pools since the coordination costs (risk, negotiation, etc.) would otherwise be too high. Patent pools are only one example of cases where members of an otherwise competitive industry join in common cause to create some resource that is to their collective benefit. For example the insurance industry pools claims data to collectively reduce risk; the catalog sales industry pools sales data to better model their customes; the auto industry collaborates to standardize components; and in the software industry we see open source collaboration. All these are examples of pooling to reduce risk and lower coordination costs. Or|date=September 2007
In a more modern example in
August 2005 , a patent pool was formed by about 20 companies active in the Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) domain [http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1798/1/1/] [http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS8390642236.html] . The RFID Consortium picked Via Licensing to administer its patent pool in September 2006 [http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/2636/1/1/] .Patent pools do not eliminate risk, they only temper it. Patent holders (including other patent pools) outside the pool can still create cost and risk for the industry. While it is rare for a patent pool to indemnify licensees the pool does help to assure a common interest will emerge should one member beaccused of infringement by a third party. Flaws in the design of the pool's governance can create the risk that one member can break the common cause of the group. Examples of well-known such cases include the
MPEG-2 ,MPEG-4 Part 2 and H.264 video coding standards, and theDVD6C pool.References
Further reading
* [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/patentpool.pdf United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Patent Pools: A Solution to the Problem of Access in Biotechnology Patents?"] ,
December 5 ,2000 (PDF file)See also
*
Essential patent
*Open Invention Network
*Patent portfolio
*Patent thicket
*Sherman Antitrust Act
* 501(c)(6) — i.e. industry specific nonprofits
*Patent holding company
*Cross-licensing
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
