Gender-specific job title

A gender-specific job title is a name of a job that also specifies or implies the gender of the person performing that job, such as "stewardess". A gender-neutral job title does not specify or imply gender, such as "firefighter".

See also gender-neutral language.

Debate

There is extensive debate as to whether gender-specific job titles are appropriate in a professional setting. This debate reflects the debate over gender-neutral language in general. The side for gender-neutral job titles usually makes an ideological argument, that gender-specific job titles at some level promote sexism in the workplace. The side for the more traditional, gender-specific terms usually makes a practical argument, that replacing the historical terms everywhere they appear (in documents, etc.) would be difficult and expensive, or that it is unnecessary. However, there are many (in particular feminists) who would claim that this argument is really a backlash against the argument for gender-neutral language.

There is much difficulty in resolving this debate, as in the case of gender-neutral language in general; however there is at least one difference. Whereas in the general case, there is often no appropriate singular gender-neutral replacement (e.g. the third person singular pronoun "he") (although the use of singular they is increasingly common), there are gender-neutral versions of nearly all job titles.

Generally accepted writing conventions

Proponents of gender-neutral job titles believe they should be used, especially when referring to hypothetical persons. For example, "firefighter" instead of "fireman"; "mail carrier", "letter carrier", or "post worker" rather than "mailman"; "flight attendant" instead of "steward" or "stewardess"; "bartender" instead of "barman" or "barmaid". In the rare case where no useful gender-neutral alternative is available, they believe both genders should be used.

Proponents of gender-neutral language advocate the use of a neuter form when where appropriate. For example, a company may seek to fill a vacancy and hire a new "chairperson". Since a gendered individual doesn't currently hold the position, its title reverts to a neuter form. Once that position is filled, advocates believe gender can be attached to the title as appropriate (chair"man" or chair"woman").

Sometimes this formulation can lead to hyper-correcting gender-specific usage, in which women become "chairpersons" but men remain "chairmen". Some women opt to use the word "chairman" in preference to "chairwoman", subject to the style "Madam" or "Mister" prefixing the title, which they perceive to be gender-neutral by itself. Particularly in academia, the word Chair is often used to describe the person occupying the chair.

Proponents believe that job titles that add a suffix to make it feminine should be avoided. For example, "usher", not "usherette"; "comedian", not "comedienne". Some of these are almost entirely obsolete now, such as sculptress, poetess, and aviatrix. If gender is relevant, they believe that the words "woman" or "female" should be used instead of "lady" ("my grandmother was the first female doctor in the province"), except if the masculine is "lord" (as in "landlady").

Terms such as "male nurse," "male model," or "female judge" are often used when the gender is irrelevant. Many advisors on non-sexist usage therefore deprecate them, saying that the statement of exception indicates that a worker of that gender is somehow an ersatz member of that profession. (Woody Allen jokes that his sister was the first woman to be a male nurse in New York.)

pecial cases of gender-neutral/specific job titles

*In the case of "waiter" and "waitress", the status quo seems to be to use those as gender-specific titles, with gender-neutral terms such as "server" (or sometimes "waitron" or "waitstaff") rarely used in practice when dealing with an individual outside North America.
*Increasing numbers of women are calling themselves "actors" rather than "actresses", especially in the live theatre. The Screen Actors Guild annually gives out awards for "Best Male Actor" and "Best Female Actor".
*The gender-neutral "fisher" has been used for "fisherman"; however, in Canada, Australia, Britain, Ireland and elsewhere many women who catch fish have inveighed harshly against this, demanding to be called "fishermen", which they argued was the correct gender-neutral term to describe their career choice. Similarly, many female horseriders have expressed a preference to be described as "horsemen".
*Military ranks which contain the suffix "man" almost universally remain unchanged when applied to female soldiers. For example, a female soldier serving in a Guards regiment is still called Guardsman Smith.
*A "midwife" can be of either gender, the term coming from an Old English term meaning "with the woman."Fact|date=July 2008

These guidelines are by no means a complete standard, as there is still much disagreement on proper usage. Many associations and governments publish handbooks of job titles featuring official recommendations for gender-neutral language.

Languages other than English

When words have a grammatical gender associated with them, in many languages, there is an absolute requirement for morphological changes to maintain sentence agreement. That is, there is a non-political content to the word changes, or inflection. Nevertheless, in the socialist-egalitarian (if tightly controlled) atmosphere of the German Democratic Republic gender-identification word endings were often dropped. [ [http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=120621159894102 Review of: Mary Fulbrook. The People's State: East German Society from Hitler to Honecker. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005. 352 pp., ISBN 978-0-300-10884-2.] ]

ee also

* Epicene
* Gender role
* Gender-specific pronoun
* Gender-neutral language

References

External links

* [http://www.univ.trieste.it/~didactas/pub/unipd/pres%20Evora.doc Gender-Unmarked and Gender-Marked Job Title Usage] (DOC file)