1973 Ohio State vs. Michigan football game

The Vote for the Roses
Ohio State Buckeyes Michigan Wolverines (9-0) (10-0) 10 10 Head coach:  Woody Hayes Head coach:  Bo Schembechler AP Coaches 1 1 AP Coaches 4 4 1 2 3 4 Total Ohio State 0 10 0 0 10 Michigan 0 0 3 7 10
Date	November 24, 1973
Stadium	Michigan Stadium
Location	Ann Arbor, Michigan

The 1973 edition to the Michigan-Ohio State Rivalry, was one of the most controversial games in NCAA history. In this game, both teams were undefeated, with Ohio State ranked 1st, and Michigan ranked 4th. A conference championship, Rose Bowl appearance, and possible national championship was on the line in this monumental game. A then NCAA record crowd of 105,233 watched the game at Michigan Stadium.

With heavy rain, the game was mostly fought on ground. The two teams combined for 90 yards passing in a defensive battle. Ohio State failed to make a single first-down in the first quarter, but took an early 3-0 lead in the second quarter, with a 31 yard field goal by Blair Conway. Gil Chapman, Michigan's punt returner returned OSU's ensuing kick-off all the way to the OSU 27 yard line. A significant clipping penalty was called on Michigan which subsequently gave Michigan bad field position. With the way the game had gone, field position proved to be a huge advantage.

After a series of punts, Ohio State got the ball on their own 45 yard line. Back-to-back Heisman Trophy winner Archie Griffin rushed for 41 yards on 5 carries, to get to 100 yards rushing, and OSU to the 5 yard line. Fullback Pete Johnson busted his way through the defense for a touchdown just before the half to extend OSU's lead to 10-0.

Michigan made defensive half-time adjustments in an attempt to crawl back into the game. The Wolverines outgained the Buckeyes 209-91 in total yardage in the 2nd half. Michigan took the 2nd half kick-off and marched all the way to the OSU 30 yard line. However, quarterback Dennis Franklin's pass was intercepted in the end zone ruining a great drive. Midway through the third quarter, OSU faced a 4th and 2 on the Michigan 34 yard line, and decided to go for it. Their failed fourth down conversion gave Michigan new life, and lots of momentum. It is still looked down on today, as a controversial coaching call.

Michigan engineered an 11 play drive, using the rushing ability of fullback Ed Shuttlesworth. The Wolverines kicked a field goal to get on the board, and make the score 10-3. Midway through the fourth quarter, Michigan's defense held, and the offense was able to start the tying drive with great field position. Dennis Franklin threw a 35 yard post-out pattern to tight end Paul Seal to get inside the red zone. Three consecutive Michigan offensive plays failed to get them a first down, and they were now faced with a 4th and inches on the 10 yard line.

Ohio State loaded the box with 9 defensive players, and focused on stopping Shuttlesworth, who had burned them the entire game. Franklin faked the inside hand-off to Shuttlesworth, and then slipped through the tackles running 10 yards for a touchdown, to tie the score at 10-10. Michigan got the ball back with a minute to go in the game, for the game-winning drive, but had to start at their own 10 yard line. After a couple of completions, Michigan made it into OSU territory.

Franklin tried to throw the game-winning touchdown pass to Shuttlesworth, but was injured, breaking his collar bone. Two plays later, Michigan kicker Mike Lantry attempted a 58 yard field goal, but it missed the left goal-post by two inches. Ohio State took over, but their back-up quarterback threw an interception that was returned to the OSU 33. Michigan moved the ball to the OSU 28, before settling for a field goal. For the second consecutive try, the field goal missed, and the game ended in a 10-10 tie.

Aftermath

Michigan's coaches and players felt that although the game was a tie, that they were the better team and deserved to go to the Rose Bowl. Even Ohio State coach Woody Hayes admitted that his team wouldn't go to the Rose Bowl. There was lots of debate on who would play in the Rose Bowl. Michigan's strong second half, and Franklin's injury were factors in debating who would represent the conference in the "granddaddy of them all".

Ohio State had gone to the Rose Bowl the year before. The Big Ten at the time had a longstanding policy stating that only the conference champion would go to a bowl, the Rose Bowl. The Big Ten also had a "no-repeat" rule until 1971, and had it still been in effect, Michigan would have gone to the Rose Bowl automatically, even if it had lost to Ohio State. With the latter rule abolished, the decision as to who would represent the conference would be left up to a telephone vote by the Big Ten's athletic directors. According to Michigan coach Bo Schembechler's 1989 autobiography, the Big Ten was nervous because the conference had lost the previous four Rose Bowls, and Franklin's injury may have been a deciding factor.^[1]

On the day after the game, following a conference call, it was announced that Ohio State would play in the Rose Bowl instead of Michigan. Schembechler was furious at the call, referring to it as "an embarrassment to the Big Ten Conference" and claiming "petty jealousies" were involved.^[2] Schembechler went on to demand changes to the Big Ten's policies regarding post-season play. Schembechler was particularly bitter because his 1973 team did not lose a game and was not rewarded with a bowl assignment, and remained angry at the vote until his death in 2006. Schembechler also claimed the Franklin injury was just an excuse, since Ohio State's strength was a running game and not a passing attack.^[3]

It was rumored that Michigan State University voted for Ohio State in retaliation for Michigan's "no" vote in 1949 against admitting Michigan State to the Big Ten. This charge was never substantiated. For months afterward, Ohio State newspapers would be flooded with letters from angry Wolverine fans, and threats of lawsuits.

It is unknown whether then Big Ten commissioner Wayne Duke had influenced the vote in Ohio State's favor or not. Schembechler said he had spoken with Illinois coach Bob Blackman, who said his athletic director, Cecil Coleman, would vote in favor of Michigan. Yet following the vote, it was revealed that Coleman had voted for the Buckeyes.^[4] Even if the vote were tied at 5-all, Michigan would have been awarded the berth.

Wayne Duke vehemently denies that he influenced the vote in any way, saying the athletic directors followed the procedure in place and that he was merely the messenger. Ohio State ended up winning the Rose Bowl over USC.

Among the changes that were made in the Big Ten Conference were the abolishment of the archaic "Rose Bowl or No Bowl" rule. This would allow conference teams other than the champion to accept invitations to other bowls. Michigan would be the first team to receive such an invite, to the Orange Bowl following the 1975 season. Another change, which also took effect in 1975, was the dropping of the athletic directors' vote in the event of a tie for the championship. The new rule stated the team which had gone the longest without appearing in the Rose Bowl would go to Pasadena. Schembechler had pushed for that reform, claiming that the athletic directors were not qualified to decide which team would better represent the conference in the Rose Bowl.^[5]

The tie denied Ohio State the national championship. Alabama vaulted the Buckeyes into the top spot in both polls, and the Crimson Tide finished the regular season 11-0 to earn the number one ranking in the UPI coaches poll, which did not conduct a post-bowl poll at that time. Notre Dame ended up as AP national champions by defeating Alabama 24-23 in the Sugar Bowl, leaving the Buckeyes second in both wire-service surveys.

To this day, the aftermath of the 1973 Michigan-Ohio State contest remains one of the biggest controversies in college football history.

References

1. ^ Schembechler, Glenn and Mitch Albom. Bo. Random House Value Publishing. 1989. ISBN#05170-74338
2. ^ Pennington, John. The Ten-Year War: Ten Classic Games Between Bo and Woody. p. 113. Ulyssian Publications. ISBN#19305-80789 2005.
3. ^ Pennington. p. 114.
4. ^ Pennington. p. 116
5. ^ Pennington. p. 116.