Delegative Democracy

Delegative Democracy

Delegate Democracy is a form of democratic control whereby voting power is vested in delegates, rather than representatives. This term is a generic description of either already existing or proposed popular control apparatuses.

Contents

The delegative form

The prototypical delegative democracy has been aptly summarized by Bryan Ford in his paper, Delegative Democracy, as containing the following principles:

  • 1. Choice of Role: Each member can choose to take either a passive role as an individual or an active role as a delegate, differentiating this from representative forms in which only specified representatives are allowed. Delegates have further choices as to how active they are and in what areas.
  • 2. Low Barrier to Participation: The difficulty and cost of becoming a delegate is small, and in particular does not require campaigning or winning a competitive election.
  • 3. Delegated Authority: Delegates exercise power in organizational processes on behalf of themselves and those individuals who select them as their delegate. Different delegates, therefore, can exercise varying levels of decision power.
  • 4. Privacy of the Individual: To avoid social pressures or coercion, all votes made by individuals are private, both from other individuals and from delegates.
  • 5. Accountability of the delegates: To ensure the accountability of delegates to their voters and to the community at large, all formal deliberative decisions made by delegates are public.
  • 6. Specialization by Re-Delegation: Delegates can not only act directly on behalf of individuals as generalists, but through re-delegation they can also act on behalf of each other as specialists.

Variations on this general model most certainly exist, and this outline is only mentioned here for orientation within a general model. For example, in the "Joy of Revolution" delegates are left open to being specialized at the time of each individual's delegation of authority. Additionally, general principles of fluidity can often be applied to the concept such that individuals can revise their "vote" at any time by modifying their registered delegation (sometimes called "proxy") with the governing organization. (see also Single Transferable Vote.)

Contrasted with Representative Democracy

Crucial to the understanding of delegate democracy is the theory's view of the meaning of "representative democracy." Representative democracy is seen as a form of governance whereby a single winner is determined for a predefined jurisdiction, with a change of delegation only occurring after the preset term length (or in some instances by a forced recall election if popular support warrants it). The possibility usually exists within representation that the "recalled" candidate can win the subsequent electoral challenge.

This is contrasted with most forms of governance referred to as "delegative." Delegates may not, but usually do, have specific limits on their "term" as delegates, nor do they represent specific jurisdictions. Some key differences include:

  • 1. Optionality of term lengths.
  • 2. Possibility for direct participation.
  • 3. The delegate's power is decided in some measure by the voluntary association of members rather than an electoral victory in a predefined jurisdiction. (See also: Single Transferable Vote.)
  • 4. Delegates remain re-callable at any time and in any proportion.
  • 5. Often, the voters have the authority to refuse observance of a policy by way of popular referendum overriding delegate decisions or through nonobservance from the concerned members. This is not usually the case in representative democracy.
  • 6. Possibility exists for differentiation between delegates in terms of what form of voting the member has delegated to them. (For example: "you are my delegate on matters of national security and farm subsidies.")[1]

Contrasted with Direct Democracy

Direct democracy is a form of popular control where all collective decisions are made by way of the direct votes of constituents. Two key differences include:

  • 1. Optionality of direct involvement. Delegative democracy can be called a "voluntary direct democracy" in that you can be included in decisions (and are usually expected to be, by default) however you can "opt out" by way of abstaining or delegating your voting to someone else if you lack the time and/or interest to vote on the delegated matter.
  • 2. Reviewable decisions. Though not a perceived advantage, decisions are capable of (in a number of ways, dependent on the exact policies of the organization) being reviewed by the constituents. This is contrasted with direct democracy where decisions can only be changed (since the constituents will already have decided one way on matters.) This difference, though, is mostly overhead on the delegative model.

Outside of these two main differences, delegative models are seen as essentially a form of direct democracy. So much so that some have taken to calling the system a "direct democracy with delegable proxies" (though that name is less common.)

Notable examples of Delegate Democracy

  • The internal policies of the Paris Commune are seen as the real-world precursor to the more formalized notions of modern delegative democracy.
  • Early soviets[2], before a Bolshevik majority was reached. Delegative democracy was gradually eroded in favor of more representational forms of governance.
  • Industrial Workers of the World trade federation. Its general assembly consists of delegates elected to carry out deliberations and construct referendums. All members can proxy their votes and have full access to meetings. The assembly currently has no power to make and enforce decisions on its own. These changes are accomplished by way of referendum, though policy changes have been proposed.
  • Mondragon Corporation General assembly is supreme authority in the corporation and it consists of all the workers.

External links

References

  1. ^ http://www.bopsecrets.org/PS/joyrev1.htm#Representative%20democracy%20versus%20delegate%20democracy Retrieved: April 12th 2009
  2. ^ "The word Soviet which, in Russian, means precisely council, was pronounced for the first time with this specific meaning. In short, this first council represented something like a permanent social assembly of workers." The Unknown Revolution By Voline

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Outline of democracy — The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to democracy: Democracy – form of government in which all people have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.[1] Ideally, this includes equal (and more or less… …   Wikipedia

  • Illiberal democracy — Part of the Politics series Democracy History · Va …   Wikipedia

  • Defective democracy — Defective democracies are democracies with certain defects. The concept was proposed by the political scientists Wolfgang Merkel, Hans Jürgen Puhle and Aurel Croissant at the beginning of the 21st century to subtilize the usual distinction of… …   Wikipedia

  • Peronismus — Juan Perón, Begründer und Führungsfigur der peronistischen Bewegung (Aufnahme von 1947) Der Peronismus bezeichnet eine politische und gesellschaftliche Bewegung in Argentinien, die seit den 1940er Jahren besteht. Benannt ist sie nach ihrem… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Peronist — Juan Perón, Begründer und Führungsfigur der peronistischen Bewegung (Aufnahme von 1947) Der Peronismus bezeichnet eine politische und gesellschaftliche Bewegung in Argentinien, die seit den 1940er Jahren besteht. Benannt ist sie nach ihrem… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Defekte Demokratie — Als defekte Demokratie werden in der vergleichenden Demokratietheorie politische Systeme bezeichnet, die zwar bereits als demokratisch angesehen werden, gegenüber entwickelten liberalen und rechtsstaatlichen Demokratien aber verschiedene Defekte… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Guillermo O'Donnell — Guillermo O’Donnell (* 1936 in Argentinien) ist ein argentinischer Politikwissenschaftler und Helen Kellogg Professor of Government and International Studies an der University of Notre Dame. Zu seinen wichtigsten theoretischen Beiträgen in der… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Guillermo O’Donnell — (* 1936 in Argentinien) ist ein argentinischer Politikwissenschaftler und Helen Kellogg Professor of Government and International Studies an der University of Notre Dame. Zu seinen wichtigsten theoretischen Beiträgen in der Politikwissenschaft… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Bibliography — INTRODUCTION The number of books dedicated to the late Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and its successor state, the Russian Federation, is virtually incalculable. This surfeit is due to a number of factors: Russia’s geographic size and …   Historical Dictionary of the Russian Federation

  • Aurel S. Croissant — Aurel Croissant (* 1969 in Germany) is Professor of Political Science at the Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences of the University of Heidelberg. Education Croissant received his Dr. Phil. in Political Science from the University of Mainz… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”