Cross v. United States (1871)

Cross v. United States (1871)
Cross v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 31, 1872
Decided November 11, 1872
Full case name Alexander Cross v. United States
Citations 81 U.S. 479 (more)
20 L. Ed. 721; 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1013; 14 Wall. 479
Prior history Appeal from the Court of Claims
Questions presented
What is the proper construction of 13 Stat. 591 of July 2d, 1864?
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Davis, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
13 Stat. 591

Cross v. United States, 81 U.S. 479 (1871), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the principle of res judicata did not apply to Congressional reference cases. This was because Congress' intent in referring the case to the Court of Claims was to waive the defense of time bar for the entire controversy and that such intent could not be interpreted narrowly to prevent full recovery.

Contents

Background

In 1851, Daniel Saffarans leased a warehouse in San Francisco to the United States government for ten years. As part of the construction of the warehouse, Alexander Cross, purchased the property and the lease contract with the government. After occupying the warehouse for three years, the Secretary of the Treasury terminated the lease, citing the informal nature of the assignment of the contract by Saffarans to Cross.[1] In 1856, Cross sued the United States in the Court of Claims for the delinquent installment payments, however the government prevailed by showing that the informal nature of the assignment of the lease was defective and therefore insufficient for Cross to maintain a claim. The decision of the court was sent to Congress, which in 1864 passed 13 Stat. 591. This law permitted Cross to re-file his claim against the government and waived the defense of improper assignment as a bar to recovery.

Cross refiled the suit and prevailed against the government. However, he had only sued for three of the additional years of rents, so two years after prevailing against the government, he filed a new suit for the remaining $69,515 of the claim. The government cited that the waiver of defense by Congress was only effective for the first refiling and that as the amount was known to him at that time, he should be prevented from filing the additional suit.[2] This bar is commonly known as res judicata in that it prevents the plaintiff from refiling on a claim if he could have brought the claim in an earlier suit.

Opinion of the Court

In its decision, the Court stated that Congress' intent in passing the 1864 Act was to permit him to recover for the entire controversy. As there was no limiting language in the act that would prohibit him from refiling, the Court would not read the statute to permit only partial recovery. Therefore, the Court reversed the dismissal by the Court of Claims and remanded the case to them with instructions to enter a judgment for the remaining $69,515.[2]

Subsequent developments

This opinion established the principle that Congressional statutes providing remedial action should be construed liberally toward the aim of Congress' intent in passing the statute.[3] It also articulated the principle that if an installment payment was not overdue at the time a suit was commenced, it was not time barred from being brought in a later suit.[4][5] However, while such statutes are construed liberally, in Hartiens v. U.S., the Court of Claims narrowed the meaning of Cross, by limiting its action of re-reference to looking at false or fraudulent information from the first trial and not re-hearing the entire controversy.[6] Further, in the later Paul v. U.S. matter, the court confirmed that the principles of res judicata and stare decisis do not apply in Congressional reference cases.[7]

References

  1. ^ Cross v. United States, 81 U.S. 479, 481, 1871 WL 14753, 2 (1871)
  2. ^ a b Cross v. United States, 81 U.S. 479, 484, 1871 WL 14753, 4 (1871)
  3. ^ Hubbell v. U.S., 15 Ct.Cl. 546 (1879).
  4. ^ Goodwin v. Cabot Amusement Co., 149 A. 574, 579, 129 Me. 36 (1930)
  5. ^ Luce v. Minard, 88 A. 728, 728, 87 Vt. 177 (1913).
  6. ^ Hartiens v. U.S., 42 Ct.Cl. 42, 1906 WL 888 (1906).
  7. ^ Paul v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 236, 266 (1990).

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Cross v. United States — may refer to: Cross v. United States (1871) A case involving Congressional reference of a government contract dispute. Cross v. United States (1916) A case regarding remuneration for clerks of the court for the copying and docketing of… …   Wikipedia

  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, country in N. America. This article is arranged according to the following outline: introduction Colonial Era, 1654–1776 Early National Period, 1776–1820 German Jewish Period, 1820–1880 East European Jewish Period,… …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • United States District Court for the District of New Jersey — (D.N.J.) Map …   Wikipedia

  • United States Code — A few volumes of Title 11 (Bankruptcy) of the United States Code Annotated (U.S.C.A.) at a law library. The Code of Laws of the United States of America[1] (variously abbreviated to Code of Laws of the United States, United States Code, U.S. Code …   Wikipedia

  • United States — a republic in the N Western Hemisphere comprising 48 conterminous states, the District of Columbia, and Alaska in North America, and Hawaii in the N Pacific. 267,954,767; conterminous United States, 3,022,387 sq. mi. (7,827,982 sq. km); with… …   Universalium

  • United States Marine Band — This article is about the Marine Corps band. For the geographical unit, see Marine band (geology). United States Marine Band …   Wikipedia

  • United States Marine Corps — Corps des Marines des États Unis Emblème de l USMC Période 10 novembre 1775 Présent Pays …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Article One of the United States Constitution — United States of America This article is part of the series: United States Constitution Original text of the Constitution Preamble Articles of the Constitution I  …   Wikipedia

  • 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment (United States) — 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment coat of arms Active 1846–present Country U …   Wikipedia

  • Reconstruction Era of the United States — In the history of the United States, the term Reconstruction Era has two senses: the first covers the entire nation in the period 1865–1877 following the Civil War; the second one, used in this article, covers the transformation of the Southern… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”