History of the Khitans

Infobox Former Country
native_name = 契丹 / 遼
conventional_long_name = Khitan / Liao
common_name = Khitan, Liao Dynasty, Kara-Khitan Khanate |
continent = moved from Category:Asia to East Asia
region = East Asia
country = China, Mongolia
era1 = 1
era2 = 2
status =
status_text =
empire = Liao Dynasty
government_type = Monarchy|
event_start = split from Kumo Xi
year_start = 388
event_end = final defeat in a coup
year_end = 1211|
year_exile_start = 1125
year_exile_end = 1211|
event1 =
date_event1 =
event2 = set up the Liao dynasty
date_event2 = 907
event3 = defeated, some absorbed, some exiled
date_event3 = 1125
event4 =
date_event4 = |
event_pre =
date_pre =
event_post =
date_post = |
p1 = Xianbei
p2 = Kumo Xi
s1 = Jin Dynasty (1115–1234)|Dynasty Jin
s2 = Naimans|




flag_type = |


symbol =
symbol_type = |

---

image_map_caption = Location of Khitan-Liao (1025)|
capital = Shangjing
(918-1120)
capital_exile =
latd= |latm= |latNS= |longd= |longm= |longEW= |
national_motto =
national_anthem =
common_languages = Khitan language
religion = ?
currency = |
leader2 =
leader3 =
year_leader2 =
year_leader3 =
title_leader = King, Chief, Emperor
stat_year1 = peak
stat_area1 =
stat_pop1 = 9000000
stat_year2 =
stat_area2 =
stat_pop2 =
stat_year3 =
stat_area3 =
stat_pop3 =
stat_year4 =
stat_area4 =
stat_pop4 =
stat_year5 =
stat_area5 =
stat_pop5 =
footnotes = 1. Other Khitan Dynasties include Northern Liao and Western Liao.
2. The Liao Dynasty had a different name, "Khitan", which was used in 916-947, 983-1066.The Khitan (or "Khitai", zh-cp|c=契丹|p=Qìdān) were a nomadic people, located in Mongolia, and modern Manchuria (Northeast China) from the 4th century, dominating much of it by the 10th century under the Liao Dynasty, and eventually collapsing by 1125 (or 1211).

From Xianbei origins, they were part of the Kumo Xi tribe until 388, when the Kumo Xi-Khitan tribal grouping was roundly defeated by the newly established Northern Wei, allowing the Khitan to resume their own tribe and entity, and beginning the Khitan written history.Xu Elina-Qian, 258]

From the 5th to the 8th centuries, they were dominated by the steppe power to their West (Turks, then the Uyghurs, during the 8th and 9th centuries) and the Chinese to their south (Northern dynasties or Tang, respectively during the 5th and 6th, and 7th to 10th centuries), and in some cases under Korean domination (from the East, mainly Gogureyo), according to the balance of power at any given time. Under this triple domination and oppression, the Khitan started to show growing power and independence. This rise was, compared to other cases, slow. Slow because it was frequently crushed by its neighbouring powers, each using the Khitan warriors when needed, but each ready to crush them when the Khitan rose too much and became powerful, close to becoming an independent fourth regional power. The 696-697 Li-Shun Rebellion is really instructive on this "2 adults and 1 teenager" game : the Khitan were encouraged by the Turks to take all the risks and revolt against the Tang, which they successfully accomplished, before being attacked at their rear by the Turks, to the great advantage of the newly-reborn Turkish empire (2d, 682-745).Xu Elina-Qian, p.241 and p.237]

Enjoying the departure of Uyghur people for West, and the collapse of the Tang Dynasty in early 10th, they established the Liao Dynasty in 907. The Liao Dynasty proved to be a significant power north of the Chinese plain, continuously moving south and West, gaining control over former Chinese and Turk-Uyghur's territories. They eventually fell to the Jin Dynasty of the Jurchen in 1125, who submit and absorb Khitans to their military benefit.

Following the fall of the Liao Dynasty, many moved further west and established the state of Kara Khitai. Their name survived in the Russian word for China (Китай, "Kitay"), as well as the archaic English (Cathay), Portuguese ("Catai"), and Spanish ("Catay") appellations of the country. They has been classified by Chinese historians as one of the Eastern proto-Mongolic ethnic groups Donghu (zh-stp|s=东胡族|t=東胡族|p=Dōnghú zú).Fact|date=February 2007

Origins

:"To expand soonTo expand this section, please use Xu Elina-Qian, p.83-102]

References to the Khitan in Chinese sources date back to the fourth century. Ancestors of the Khitan were the Yuwen clan of the Xianbei, an ethnic group situated in the area covered by the modern Liaoning province. Fact|date=February 2007 After their regime was conquered by the Murong clan, the remnants scattered in the modern-day Inner Mongolia and mixed there with the original Mongolic population.

Pre-Dynastic Khitans (388–907)

They had been identified as a distinct ethnic group since paying tribute to the Northern Wei Dynasty in the mid-6th century. Fact|date=February 2007

During the time of the Tang Dynasty in China, the Khitan people oscillated between vassality to Tang or to Turks, according to the moment balance of power, or under the Uyghurs when they replaced the Turks as the main steppe power. However, once the Uyghurs left their home in the Mongolian Plateau in 842, enough of a power vacuum was create that gave the Khitan the opportunity to make their rise. The Khitan invaded the areas vacated by the Uyghurs, bringing them under their control.

Khitan's Military activities from 388 to 618

:"To expand soonTo expand this section, please use Xu Elina-Qian, p.155-172] Recorded notable Khitans' raids on Chinese Empire occurred several times as early as the seventh century. In 605, moving and raiding south, they were crushed by a Sui General leading 20,000 Turkish cavalry [CIHofC, p.111] .

Military activities on the 1st half of Tang (618–735)

Under Tang Taizong (r. 626-649), Khitans became vassals of Tang.

;The Li-Sun Rebellion (696-697)Despite some occasional clashes, Khitans remained Chinese vassals until these 690s.Xu Elina-Qian, p.241-243] According to the « Loose rein policy », the Khitan area of this time was under control of Tang by the Governor-general of Yingzhou, Zhao Wenhui, assisted by local Khitans' chieftains, namely the Khitan chieftain and regional governor of Songmo, Li Jinzhong, and his brother-in-law, the Khitan chieftain and prefect of Guicheng Sun Wanrong.

Opposition raise according to Zhao Wenhui behaviour, who firstly looked at local chieftains as servant and humiliated them on many occasions, provoking an associated resentment, and secondly because of the 696s famine occurred in this Khitan area. The Loose rein policy ask to the unsuccessful Tang Governor-general to pay relief, what Zhao Wenhui failed to do, worsening the situation (by not finding solution and not providing relief), and launching the Khitan rebellion (696, fifth month).

Li Jinzhong lead the rebellion, and according to Khitan abilities at war, Yingzhou was soon captured, allowing him to declare himself "Wushang Kehan" (無上可汗: paramount khaghan). Sun Wanrong assisted him as general, successfully leading tens of thousands of troops southward.

The first major response of Tang came in the form of a twenty-eight generals force, promptly defeated by Khitans in the Xiashi Gorge battle (near modern Lulong County of Hebei Province, 696, eighth month). Tang were astonished by the announcement of the defeat, and Empress Wu Zetian quickly issued decrees to launch a new offensive and encourage participations, but the battlefield staid a place of Khitan's victories until Li Jinzhong died of disease. But this Khitans awakening displease to Turks and their Newly reborn Empire too (682-745), with Ashina Mochuo khaghan asking to Tang to be allow to allied himself to Chinese efforts in exchange of an imperial marriage for his daughter, to be son of empress Wu (diplomatic adoption), the return of Turks in Chinese territories (Hexi), and the return of Khitans as Turkish vassals.

The second major Chinese offensive came on the tenth month of 696, Tang attacking from south while Türks did from north, enjoying the recent death of Li Jingzhong.Khitans were in a dangerous situation, suffering heavy lost, but Sun Wanrong took the lead and restored good order and motivation in Khitan's troops. They continuously stormed into Jizhou and Yingzhou, shaking the whole region of Hebei (current north of Huanghe). This opposition was inconclusive.
Also, the powerful Wang Xiaojie assisted by Su Honghui and some others Chinese generals lead a third 170,000 troops strong army to the area of the Xiashi Gorge, but were also crushed by Khitan, who mastered in battlefield and ambuscades. Wang Xiaojie was killed while Su Honghui fled, Khitan were allowed to capture the following frontier garrison of Youzhou, south of Yingzhou.

In a fourth campaign (fifth month, 697), Empress Wu sent Lou Shide and Shatuo Zhongyi leading a 200,000 troop strong army northward to stop Sun Wanrong who was advancing southward. Despite previous victories on battlefields, Turks refused the proposed Khitan-Turk alliance a launch a massive attack on Xincheng, while the helpful (Kumo) Xi betrayed Khitan to support China. Khitan populations were now facing devastating Turkish plunders on north, while successful Khitan army was now facing Chinese 200,000 troops plus Xi troops on south. In such critical situation, cohesion in Khitan headquarters collapsed, ending by the assassination of Sun Wanrong by one of his own subordinates. The Khitan troops, without clear leader and in such critical situation collapsed too, while the remaining Khitan, together with Xi, gave allegiance to Turks, as formerly planned between Mochou khaghan and empress Wu Zetian in early 696, while a new chieftain was proclaim : Li Shihuo (697-717, [李] 失活).

Consequently, Khitan, together with Xi and both under Turkish leadership, remained time by time aggressive toward Chinese, with the Tang launching several punitive campaigns against them from 700 to 714.

;The Li-Sun rebellion and the TurksTurks played a major role in crushing this rebellion, on military actions and on strategic role as well (attacking on the rear!). It is to understand the Turkish situation. Turks were submit to China in 630, crushing their first Turkish Empire. In 679, enjoying Chinese internal political turmoil, they revolted. They were bloodily defeated by Tang troops in 681 in a Pyrrhic victory, also, the remnant Eastern Turks reunited under Ashina Guduolu (d. 691), who was able to proclaimed the reborn of the Turkish empire (682-745), without Tang's reaction.Xu Elina-Qian, p.243-245]
At his death, his brother Mochuo replaced him, and engaged Turks in an aggressive policy of "plunder to strengthen" as the best way to revitalize his Empire. Turks plundered all their neighbour, Khitan and Chinese as well, but encouraged Khitans to rebel against Tang rule. But almost as soon as Khitan rebelled and were successful, Turks proposed China an alliance. Actually, Turks, in war against China, were just asking for a diversion on east, allowing them to be more free on their front. When Khitans unexpectedly appeared to be so successful, they both were surprised and afraid, seeing a new power born on their East, but also, seeing Khitan fighting hard against Chinese, seen the perfect occasion to take advantage of both busied Khitan and crying Tang. By attacking Khitan on their rear, they provided a "inestimable" help to Tang, while working for themselves too by crushing eastern raising power.

Even more, while the fourth Chinese campaign was still not launch and despite previous propositions of alliance, Turks attacked Chinese territories to show clearly their strong (third month, 697). Also, along with the final victory, they eventually got back the Turkish population held in six Chinese northern border prefectures since 670-674, the submission of both Khitan and Xi, plus large amount of seed-grain, silk, farming implements, iron, noble titles for Mochou khaghan (General, Khaghan, noble's rank) and the asked imperial marriage.

;The Ketuyu rebellion (720-734) In the 710's, the Khitan military chief Ketuyu (可突于) was so valiant and beloved by Khitan's commoners that the Khitan King Suogu (李娑固 Li Suogu, r. 718-720) became both jealous and in fear. Accordingly, he plotted to assassinate Ketuyu. As often the case, the plot was disclosed, and Ketuyu's troops attacked the King, who fled to Yingzhou to get Chinese support.Xu Elina-Qian, p.245-248]
Xu Qinzhan (許欽? [Xu Elina-Qian, p.293a] ), the Chinese Governor-General of Yingzhou immediately called for a punitive military campaign, ordering General Xue Tai, assisted by 500 valiant soldier [XTS 43. 1119 and 37. 930. Xu Elena-Qian also talk about « a tens of thousand strong army was being mobilized from Guanzhong to reinforce this operation » (37. 930.). But did them were on the battlefield when Li Dapu (Xi King) and Li Suogu (Khitan dethroned King) were killed ?] , Xi troops, and Suogu troops to walk northward. The Chinese-loyalist army was crushed, both Suogu (Khitan King) and Li Dapu (Xi King) were killed, while Xue Tai was kindly captured (and not executed) by Ketuyu, in hope to resume good relations with Chineses, sending an envoy to humbly apologize, while he enthroned Suogu's cousin Yuyu (李鬱于, 720-722/724).

Indeed, peaceful relations were restored, and when Ketuyu made a second coup to face new king Tuyu suspicions, Tang court peacefully confirmed the newly enthronized king Shaogu (李邵固 Li Shaogu, 725-730), displaying the respective Tang's will of appeasement.

In 730, Ketuyu went to present tributes to Chang'an and was then mistreated by the chancellor Li Yuanhong. Back to Khitan territories, Ketuyu assassinated the pro-Tang Shaogu (fifth month, 730) and switched the allegiance of his subjects and of the Xi tribes from Tang to Türks, sending a clear message to Tang. Ketuyu then attacked Pinglu (part of Yingzhou ) where a preventive Tang's army was stationed.
The Chang'an officials were panicked by the vision of a new Khitan rebellion. They ordered Prince of Zhong Jun -as commander in chief- assisted by 18 generals to go north with warriors recruited from as far as Guannei, Hedong, Henan and Hebei to crush this Khitan-Xi rebellion. In 732 (third month) Khitan-Xi troops were defeat by the Prince of Xin'an, Ketuyu had to fled away while Li Shi Suogao, the Xi king, betrayed to submit back to Tang with his 5,000 subjects [Note: what is this ? it was just 5,000 Xi at this time ?] , getting by the way the titles of the Prince of Guiyi (allegiance and righteousness) and prefect of Guiyi Zhou, with the Xi allowed to settle in Youzhou, under Chinese protection.

A second major campaign came in 733 (fourth month), Guo Yingjie being ordered to lead 10,000 troops assisted by Xi warriors to crush Khitan. But Ketuyu came first with Turkish support, putting Chinese-Xi troops in difficulty, thus, Xi fled to save themselves. As predictable, Guo Yingjie and his men, alone to face Khitan-Turkish troops, lost with heavy causalities: Guo along most of his men being killed on the battlefield. While one year later the Khitan were defeated by Zhang Shougui, regional commander of Youzhou (second month, 734).

Ketuyu, seeing Khitan forces exhausted by repetitive Tang campaigns, pretended to surrender (twelfth month, 734) and was eventually was murdered together with his puppet King, Qulie (李屈列 Li Qulie 730-734), by his subordinate Li Guozhe (李過折). Li Guozhe being soon himself assassinate in favor of a Ketuyu's clan restoration.

;Origines of the Ketuyu RebellionWhile traditional scholars explain this Ketuyu Rebellion as a typical barbarian reaction, modern historians are more cautious. Both the Chinese Liao expert Shu Fen and the Japanese Matsui Hitoshi are incline to think that Chinese lenient policy encouraged Ketuyu's arrogance.
On contrary, Xu Elian-Qian support that the Chinese interferences in Khitan internal changes caused the aggressive Ketuyu's reactions. That true for the conflict of 720 and the aggressive Chinese ingerence tentative. But this opinion don't explain the 725's Chinese appeasement policy, Chinese letting Ketuyu kill the Khitan king and enthrone a new one. Actually, when Ketuyu was "personally" mistreated in Chang'an (730), this resentment lead him to choice the huge of consequences "diplomatic opposition" by turning his submission to Turk. This turn was predictably understand by Chang'an as a first magnitude treason which can't be tolerate, leading to the following 5 years of war to submit them back. Shu and Matsui don't see this Chinese reaction as an aggressive interference, but as a predictable interference, caused by Ketuyu arrogant turn face to the recent lenient policy.

Xu explain that Khitans were in a turning point, the Dahe family being collapsing as an after-shock of the Li-Sun Rebellion, while the Yaonian family was raising by organizing a new confederation (web of alliances). Accordingly, this period was rich in turmoils. The opposition may have came from the respective perceived definition of the « Loose rein » agreement. In time of weakness of the central power, like in the 680's, this Loose rein policy means large independence for submitted population, who choice their own chief, etc. In time of strong central power —as under Tang Xuanzong reign (712-756)— the central Chinese power is incline to impose his pro-Chinese choices, including in choice of Kings and major chiefs, despite the previous Loose rein agreement. Also, in prosperous revitalizing time such Xuanzong's reign and face to the 720's coup, Tang official immediately sent an army to support the dethroned pro-Tang king, clearly interfering in Khitan internal affairs.

Also, the 730-734 war seems to have been the consequences of both Chinese revitalized foreign policy, Khitan internal turmoil and associated oppression on Ketuyu, and following miscalculations from Ketuyu.

Harassed by An Lushan (750s)

;Rise of An Lushan and Chinese-on-Khitan hostilitiesBy the 730s, Regional commander already add large autonomy of initiative to face neighbouring threats, accordingly, boundary wars and rebellions are understand by many scholars as the full responsibility of local general commanders.

In 736 (third month), Zhang Shougui, the general commander of Youzhou sent his protected, the smart An Lushan (an officer of the Pinglu Army 平盧軍, based in modern Chaoyang, he was said to know 6 languages out of Chinese), to attack Khitan and Xi rebels, but An Lushan made a too-much audacious attack with cost him almost all his troops. He escape usual execution for such disobedience cases in part because of Zhang affection for him, and in part thanks to Emperor Xuanzong who -overviewing death penalty cases- believed that his audacious and mid-barbarian character should not be pay by death."Zizhi Tongjian", vol. 214.] .

Back to Youzhou, he soon became the "Bingmashi" (兵馬使) "of Pinglu Army" (741, seventh month), cultivating carefully relationships with other officials and generals to earn praises, and bribing Imperial messengers to advantageously include him in their reports. As the consequence of this systematic bride, he was promote "commandant at Yingzhou" (Ying prefecture) and "Jiedushi" ("military governor") of the Pinglu army [The Pinglu Army under his leadership being promote to be a military circuit, is Bingmashi rank was upgraded to Jiedushi rank (military governor).] in 742 to face and defeat northern threat (Khitans, Xi, Bohai, and Heishui Mohe)."Zizhi Tongjian", vol. 215] and military governor of Fanyang Circuit (范陽, headquartered in modern Beijing) in 744, plundering Khitan and Xi villages to display his military abilities. This continuous harassment of Khitan is understand by some scholars as volunteer provocation to up the Khitan aggressiveness and threat, in the aim to get more troops from Chang'an for his future rebellion, and as the reason of the 745's Khitan-Xi rebellion.

As commander of the northeastern frontier (744–755), An Lushan organised military operations against the Khitan-Xi nomads. His motivation was to curry favour with the Tang court, and probably also to obtain more troops for his subsequent campaigns to defeat what he saw as the enormous threat presented by the northeastern "babarians", amongst whom the Khitan were the most significant. He may also have been motivated by thoughts of preparing for his future rebellion (755–763).

;745s Khitan rebellionIn 745 (third month), several Tang's princess were married to Khitan's leaders in sign of appeassment. But for some reason [what?] , Khitans soon (745, ninth month) turned into an open rebellion against Tang, killing the princess and starting military operations. Huge previous pressures from An Lushan combine with Chang'an court praise for him may have display to Khitan a impasse visions against which they eventually revolted.Khitans were quickly defeated by An Lushan's toops by a dual of punitive expeditions and traps. Sources reports that Banquets for peace declaration were set up by An Lushan and offered to Khitan and Xi, whom, happy to get both peace and free provisions rushed to the buffet and drunk heavely these food and wine poisoned by some narcotics. An Lushan then led his warriors to kill all of them, who were sleeping on the ground or drunk enough to be easy to kill, and the Chiefs' heads were send to Tang court for displaying. Sources says that each of such Banquet ended by the death of thousand warriors, but this claims stay difficult to believe : can Khitan be that naive to let An Lushan kill thousands of them -several times- in the same kind of "free food traps" ? The difficulty is that Chinese sources seems also biased against An Lushan, depicting him by this story as a trerrible untrustable enemy. The final result stay : Khitan's 745 rebellion was hardly crushed.

;751–752s wars to 755s An Shi rebellionIn 751–752, following An Lushan's provocations a harassments, the Khitans moved south to attack the Chinese Tang Empire. Accordingly, Khitan were soon subject to a Chinese campaign (751, eighth month) : An Lushan assisted by 2,000 Xi guides leading 60,000 Chinese troops into Khitan's territories. But when the fights seriously started, Xi suddenly turned their support to Khitan, the Khitan-Xi army then quickly squeeze on hampered-by-rains Tang armies and killed almost all soldiers while An Lushan escapaded to Shizhou with just twenty cavalrymen. The defending general Su Dingfang, a Tang's general was eventually able to stop Khitan pursuit troops, which retreated : they had their battlefield victory, not the wished An Lushan's head. So they laid a siege on the city, and only Shi Siming (one An Lushan's general) was able to end this event. One of his generals was killed in action, and, after retreating, he blamed and executed two other for the defeat. In 752, to punish this audaces and insult, a 200,000 strong army including both Chinese and bararian infantry and cavalry went northward to meet Khitan. But while he An Lushan requested that the ethnically Tujue general Li Xianzhong (李獻忠) accompany him, Li, feared An and, when compelled to, rebelled, thus putting a halt to An's campaign. After three years (755, month fourth), An announced his victory, about which historical reccords are not really clear. By this time, An Lushan was already engage into a opposition to the Yang clan locate in Chang'an, this turned his system of alliances. Put into an impasse, he rose into rebellion and had to walk southward to conquest quickly the unprotected hearth of the Tang territories. In this movement, he then looked for assisatance from northern nomades : Tujue, Uighurs, Khitan, Xi, Shiwei. All, in some extend, assisted his troops and his rebellion. Khitan principaly by his previously-took-prisonniers' warriors. But the Khitan, exhausted, take a little part in these campaigns.

;Background reasons of these oppositionsThe continuous agitation of Khitans on the northeast of the Empire, maintant by An Lushan actions, provided An Lushan more and more support troops from Chang'an for his own power and ambitions, growing to 160,000–200,000 men. This was allow by several factors:
* An Lushan seemed to be a clever military official especially skilled to set up good relationships with his superiors, whatever by systematic brides (as say sources) or by his possible real abilities ;
* An Lushan was skilled to both : up Khitan's aggressivity, enlarge the threat in his rapports, and trap/crush them, getting large praises
* the time (740s) was an apogee of prosperity, the tresor was full, the Chinese Empire was at a maximum of extension, Xuanzong and Chang'an officials sur-estimated their own power and displayed growing mark of lazy behaviour and management : waste of financial ressources, lack of troops in the Central area ;
* in Chang'an, the high chancellor Li Linfu, facing to the rise of the Yang clan in Chang'an, wanted both to resist the Khitans' pressure and counterbalance the growing influence of the Yang clan in Chang'an affairs.

Accordingly, An Lushan power strengthened with associated pressions on Khitan.

The turn point came when An became worry about the post Xuanzong-Li Linfu (An Lushan add get their favor, but to the cost of relations with other officials). Noticing that the heart of the empire was without defenses, An considered to plan a rebellion. He selected some 8,000 soldiers among the surrendered Khitan, Xi, and Tongluo (同羅) tribesmen, organizing them into an elite corps known as the "Yeluohe" (曵落河, "the brave") and a dozen of able generals."Zizhi Tongjian", vol. 216.]

When Li Linfu died and Yang Guozhong —a Yang clan member— replaced him as high chancellor, An Lushan rose in rebellion with his composed armies, and attacked the central power, with some Khitan, Xi, and Turkish supporters. Then only leaving Khitan.

2nd half of the Tang dynasty (763–907)

;Middle of Tang's dynastyKhitans were concentrating themselves on their own development and were relatively peaceful.

;Uighurs domination and Khitans stateWhen Turks where overthrow by Uighurs in 745, the war-lover power ot the Turks was replaced by a the commerce-lover Uighurs. Also, the control that Uighurs had on Khitans where of a different kind. Uighurs where focusing on economic exchanges, were the protector of the diplomatic stability, and leave large political and internal freedoms to their vassals. Khitans used this to keep a peaceful environment, helping to strenghened all their demographic, economic and structural force.

For their demography, the main point was the choice to avoid foreign conflicts. The new Steppes lords were relatively peaceful, while the Tang dynasty was later immensely weaken by the An-Shi rebelion (755-763), providing a new intra-China situation with a weak center and with provinces generals turn on the pacification and strengthening of their respective provinces. In this context, Khitans and their close-relatives the Xi had opposite strategies. Kumo Xi keeped a relatively agressive foreign policy slowly exhausting their forces. Khitans choice to stay a calm self-defensive power, enjoying most of the Manchurian plain, and working to improve their daily situation. While previous centuries successive Turko-Chinese provocations (or recall to obeisance) and following wars had forbidden to Khitan any notable grow, this VIII century situation eventually allowed one. This demographic grow will strongly support the other qualitative changes.

Pre-Dynastic Khitan's allegiances and reasons

* pre-388 : Kumo Xi, themselves submitted to Turks, Part of the Kumo Xi-Khitan tribal complex Xu Elina-Qian, p.264]
* 388-?: Later (383-409) & Northern Yan (409-436), 388's Kumo Xi defeat face to Northern Wei
* 479-? : Northern Wei, to avoid Rouran-Goguryean invasion
* 560's(?)-? : some tribes submit to Goguryeo, to avoid Northern Qi and Eastern Turk threat (heavy 553's defeat face to N. Qi + new threat by Turks) ;
* "To complete"
* 648-696Xu Elina-Qian, p.247] : Tang Dynasty, because of recent Tang expansion, and following Turkish collapse ;
* 696-697 : independent (Li-Sun Rebellion) and in war on all sides, encouraged by Tujue and cause by Chinese official mistreatment a famine ;
* 697-72X : Tang Dynasty+ Tujue, since the 697's defeat ;
* 730-734 : Turks, Ketuyu Rebellion cause by Tang interventionism and Tang's Chancellor mistreatment ;
* 734-? : Tang Dynasty, because of recent defeat.
* "To complete"

Liao Dynasty, The Golden Age (907–1125)

The Liao Dynasty was founded in 907 when Abaoji, posthumously known as Emperor Taizu was named the leader of the Khitan nation. Even though the Great Liao Dynasty was not declared until the 947, it is generally said to have begun with the elevation of Abaoji.

Though Abaoji died in 926, the dynasty would last nearly two more centuries. Five cities were designated as capitals during that dynasty. In addition to the supreme capital in the heartland of Khitan territory, there were four regional capitals. One of which was Beijing, which became a capital for the first time in its history, though it was not the principle capital of the dynasty, but rather was designated as the southern capital after the Khitan acquired the contentious Sixteen Prefectures in 935.

Abaoji introduced a number of innovations, some more successful than others. He divided the empire into two parts, one of which was governed based on nomadic models while the sedentary population was government largely in accordance with Chinese techniques.

Less successful was the attempted introduction of primogeniture in succession to the throne. Although he designed his eldest son to be heir, he did not succeed Abaoji.

Abaoji was "afraid that their use of Chinese advisers and administrative techniques would blur their own ethnic identity, the Khitan made a conscious effort to retain their own tribal rites, food, and clothing and refused to use the Chinese language, devising a writing system for their own language instead." [ 2006 Encyclopaedia Britannica. ] The first of these two scripts was created in 920. The second, based on alphabetic principles, was created five years later.

Post Liao Dynasty history

The Khitans were absorbed by Jurchens, and widely use in the following years of war to conquest the north of Song territories. In the other hand, a number of the nobility of the Liao Dynasty escaped the area westwards towards Western Regions, establishing the short-lived Kara-Khitan or Western Liao dynasty, they were in turn absorbed by the local Turkic and Iranic populations and left no influence of themselves. As the Khitan language is still almost completely illegible, it is difficult to create a detailed history of their movements.

Other interesting issues

;Writing systemsKhitans invented the Khitan script. For the purpose of keep their distinct identity from Han Chinese's culture. It had both a « small script », alphabetic, and « large script » inspired on Chinese characters. Similar the Jurchen script, it was not widely used by Khipan people except for official purpose because it was so complicated.

;A policy according to history's teaching The Khitan are also said to have learned from history. On the one hand, they observed the fearsome effect that steppe cavalry had on the Chinese, through their use by the Uyghurs, Shatuo Turks, Kyrgyz, and later themselves. On the other, they also noted the effect that the adoption of Chinese writing and other tools of administration had on their cultural integrity.

;Modern days descendantThere is no clear evidence of there being any descendant ethnic groups of the Khitan in modern-day Northeast China, but some recent genetic studies and family geneology researches have substantiated the hypothesis that the Daur ethnic group of Inner Mongolia are direct descendants of the ancient Khitan. [ cite web
last= Li
first= Jinhui
url= http://china.org.cn/english/2001/Aug/16896.htm
title= DNA Match Solves Ancient Mystery
publisher= china.org.cn
date= 08/02/2001 ] In addition, the Yunnan Han Chinese clans of A, Mang, Jiang, plus dozens other clans who self-identified as Yelu descents and were called Ben People by other Yuannan ethnic groups are descendants of the Khitan. [ [http://web.archive.org/web/20040906072640/http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/twain/1279/royalhouse/Khitan/khitanlegend.htm 契丹傳說源流 --《施甸長官司族譜》Legend of Khitan] (Chinese Traditional Big5 code page) via Internet Archive] Furthermore, the Liu clan in a few dozen villages with the name Yelu Zhuang also proclam as descendants of the Yelu clan of Khitan. During Liao period, ethinc Khitan were divided into two clans, Yelu and Xiao. Yelu was later sinicized into Liu.

Historical atlas

ee also

;Sub-studies
* Pre-Dynastic Khitan (388-907), before the Liao empire (include in this article)
* Liao Dynasty (907-1125), the Khitan Empire.
* Kara-Khitan Khanate (1125-1211), the kingdom set up by escaped Khitans

;Ethnic and states context
* Origines : Donghu → Xiongnu → Xianbei → Kumo Xi → Khitan
* Steppes (west) : Rouran (4th to 6th), Turkish Empire (5th to 8th) and Uyghur Empire (8th and 9th centuries), Kumo Xi
* China (south) : Northern dynasties (5 and 6th, especially Northern Wei), Tang (7 to 10th c.), Song Dynasty
* From East : Goguryeo, Jurchen, Goryeo (Goryeo-Khitan Wars)
* From North : Rouran, Didouyu, MoheSee also Ethnic groups in Chinese history

;Major Khitan characters
* Li Jinzhong (d. 696) and Sun Wanrong (d. 697)
* Ketuyu (d. 734)
* Abaoji (Taizu)See also List of the Khitan rulers

;Other
*Buraq Hajib
*Eagle hunting
*Khitan script

References

Sources

;Pre-dynastic Khitan
* MATSUI, Hitoshi 松井等 (Japan). "Qidan boxing shi 契丹勃興史 (History of the rise of the Khitan)". Mamden chiri-rekishi kenkyu hokoku 1 (1915).
Translated into Chinese by Liu, Fengzhu 劉鳳翥. In Minzu Shi Yiwen Ji 民族史譯文集 (A Collection of Translated Papers on Ethnic Histories) 10 (1981). Repr. in: Sun, Jinji et al. 1988 (vol. 1), pp. 93-141
* Chen, Shu 陳述. Qidan Shi Lunzheng Gao 契丹史論證稿 (A Study on the History of the Khitan). Beijing: Zhongyang Yanjiu Yuan Shixue Yanjiu Suo 中央研究院史學研究所, 1948.
* Chen, Shu 陳述. Qidan Shehui Jingji Shi Gao 契丹社會經濟史稿 (A Study on the Khitan's Social Economical History). Shanghai: Sanlian Chuban She 三聯出版社, 1963.
* Feng, Jiasheng 1933.

;Liao Dynasty
* Shu, Fen (舒焚), Liaoshi Gao 遼史稿 (An History of the Liao). Wuhan: Hubei Renmin Chuban She 湖北人民出版社, 1984
* WITTFOGEL, Karl & FENG, Chia-sheng. History of Chinese Society: Liao (907-1125). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1949.

;Post-Dynastic / Qara Khitai
* Biran, Michal. "The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History: Between China and the Islamic World", ISBN 0521842263

;Useful official dynastic histories
* Wei Shu 魏史 (Dynastic History of the Northern Wei Dynasty): Wei, Shou 魏收 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1973.
* Xin Wudai Shi (XWDS) 新五代史 (New Dynastic History of the Five Dynasties): Ouyang, Xiu 歐陽修 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1974.
* Sui Shu (SS) 隋書 (Dynastic History of the Sui Dynasty): Wei Zheng 魏徵 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1973.
* Jiu Tangshu (JTS) 舊唐書 (Old Dynastic History of Tang Dynasty): Liu, Xu 劉昫 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1975.
* Xin Tangshu (XTS) 新唐書 (New Dynastic History of the Tang Dynasty): Ouyang, Xiu 歐陽修 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1975
* Liao Shi (LS) 遼史 (Dynastic History of the Khitan Liao Dynasty): Tuotuo 脱脱 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1974
* Song Shi 宋史 (History of Song): Tuotuo 脫脫 et al. eds. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1974
* Zizhi Tongjian (ZZTJ) 資治通鑒 (Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government): Sima, Guang 司馬光 ed. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局, 1956

;Other
*
*
* [http://209.85.175.104/search?q=cache:5ibfZ9mYuSsJ:www.republicanchina.org/khitan.htm+History+Khitans&hl=fr&ct=clnk&cd=12&gl=fr Khitans]
* [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=khitans Khitans] on scholar.google.com