- Minuscule 1
New Testament manuscript infobox
form=Minuscule
number="'1"
caption=
name=
sign=
text=New Testament (except Rev)
script= Greek
date= 12th century
found=
now at=University of Basel
cite=
size= 18.5 by 11.5 cm
type= Caesarean,Byzantine text-type
cat= III, V
hand=
note=Minuscule 1 (Gregory-Aland); Soden δ 254; formerly it was designated by 1eap (to distinguish it from minuscule 1rK, which previously used number 1). It is a Greek minuscule
manuscript of theNew Testament , on 297 parchment leaves (18.5 by 11.5 cm), usually dated paleographically to the 12th century. Written in one column per page, 38 lines per page, [K. Aland, M. Welte, B. Köster, K. Junack, "Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments", Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York 1994, p. 47. ] with a beautiful miniatures which were stolen before 1560.Description
The codex contains all the
New Testament except ofBook of Revelation in order:Gospel s,Acts of the Apostles ,General epistles , andPauline epistles (Hebrews is the last book in Paul). It was written on parchment continuously and without separation in "elegant and minute" minuscule. Ammonian sections presented, but theEusebian Canons absent. It contains a scholion questioning the authenticity of . The Pericope Adultera is placed after John 21:25.The codex is located now in
University of Basel (A. N. IV, 2) inBasel .The Greek text of the
Gospels is a representative of theCaesarean text-type . Aland placed it in Category III. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text od this codex is a representative of theByzantine text-type . Aland placed it in Category V. [Kurt Aland, Barbara Aland, "The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism", transl. Erroll F. Rhodes, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1995, p. 129. ] It belongs to theFamily 1 together with manuscripts 118, 131, and 209. [Bruce M. Metzger, B.D. Ehrman, "The Text Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration", Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 86-87. ]History of the codex
This codex was borrowed by Reuchlin and used by
Desiderius Erasmus in the first edition of his Novum Testamentum (1519). In result some of its readings came toTextus Receptus . Erasmus used this codex very little, because its text was different from other manuscripts with which he was acquainted. Oecolampadius and Gerbelius insisted to Erasmus for using more readings from this codex in third edition, but according to Erasmus the text of this codex was altered from the Latin manuscripts. [ S. P. Tregelles, "An Introduction to the Critical study and Knowledge of the Holy Scriptures", London 1856, p. 208. ] Wettstein was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and patristic quotations. [J.J. Wettstein, "Prolegomena ad Novi Testamenti Graeci", 1730, p. 57. ] In 1751 he changed his high opinion ("Novum Testamentum Græcum"). Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with some errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Tregelles, and Roth collated its again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. Dean Burgon noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined byKirsopp Lake in 1902. [Kirsopp Lake, "Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies", Texts and Studies, volume vii, Cambridge, 1902, collates 1 with 118, 131, and 209. ] It was named "the Lake Group", orFamily 1 .According to Hort its text preceded the
byzantine text-type .See also
*
List of New Testament minuscules
*Novum Instrumentum omne
*Textual criticism References
Further reagings
* K. Lake, "Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies", Text and Studies VII 3, Cambridge 1902.
* F.H. A. Scrivener, "A plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament", Cambridge 1894.External links
* [http://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/Manuscripts1-500.html#m1 At the Encyclopedia of Textual Criticism]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.