Soft power

Soft power is a term used in international relations theory to describe the ability of a political body, such as a state, to indirectly influence the behavior or interests of other political bodies through cultural or ideological means. The term was first coined by Harvard University professor Joseph Nye, who remains its most prominent proponent, in a 1990 book, "Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power". He further developed the concept in his 2004 book, "Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics". Its usefulness as a descriptive theory has been challenged often, but soft power is still being used as a term that distinguishes the subtle effects of culture, values, and ideas on others' behavior from more direct coercive measures called hard power such as military action or economic incentives.

Definition

The basic concept of power is the ability to influence others to get them to do what you want. There are three major ways to do that: one is to threaten them with sticks; the second is to pay them with carrots; the third is to attract them or co-opt them, so that they want what you want. If you can get others to be attracted to want what you want, it costs you much less in carrots and sticks. [http://www.cceia.org/resources/transcripts/4466.html]

Soft power, then, represents the third way of getting the outcomes you want. Soft power is contrasted with hard power, which has historically been the predominant realist measure of national power, through quantitative metrics such as population size, concrete military assets, or a nation's gross domestic product. But having such resources does not always produce the desired outcomes as the United States discovered in the Vietnam War. The resources from which soft power behavior is derived are culture (when it is attractive to others), values (when there is no hypocrisy in their application) and foreign policies (when they are seen as legitimate in the eyes of others). Unless these conditions are present, culture and ideas do not necessarily produce the attraction that is essential for soft power behavior. The extent of attraction can be measured by public opinion polls, by elite interviews, and case studies. Nye argues that soft power is more than influence, since influence can also rest on the hard power of threats or payments. And soft power is more than just persuasion or the ability to move people by argument, though that is an important part of it. It is also the ability to attract, and attraction often leads to acquiescence.

If I am persuaded to go along with your purposes without any explicit threat or exchange taking place — in short, if my behavior is determined by an observable but intangible attraction — soft power is at work. Soft power uses a different type of currency — not force, not money — to engender cooperation. It uses an attraction to shared values, and the justness and duty of contributing to the achievement of those values. [http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=4290&t=globalization]

The success of soft power heavily depends on the actor’s reputation within the international community, as well as the flow of information between actors. Thus, soft power is often associated with the rise of globalization and neoliberal international relations theory. Popular culture and media is regularly identified as a source of soft power, as is the spread of a national language, or a particular set of normative structures; a nation with a large amount of soft power and the good will that engenders it inspire others to acculturate, avoiding the need for expensive hard power expenditures.

References

* [http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=4290&t=globalization The Benefits of Soft Power]
* [http://www.wordspy.com/words/softpower.asp Power]
* [http://www.softpolitics.com Soft Politics]

External links

* [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/magazine/04obama-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&hp&oref=slogin Barack Obama & the use of soft power]
* [http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/drg/ Global Power Barometer]

Further reading

* Keohane, Robert and Joseph Nye. "Power, Interdependence and the Information Age" from "Conflict After the Cold War"
* Fan, Y. (2008) "Soft power: the power of attraction or confusion”, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4:2, available at http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1594
* Jentleson, Bruce. "Principles: The Coming of a Democratic Century?" from "American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st Century"
* Nye, Joseph. [http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1240/propaganda_isnt_the_way.html Propaganda Isn't the Way: Soft Power]
* Nye, Joseph, [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=sFNfYvNtw5AC&dq=soft+power+nye&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=7pSYj989Op&sig=xDjc4tq_HZnu5ZTL5UW8G6BvIzE&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics]
* Joshua Kurlantzick, "Charm Offensive: How China's Soft Power is Transforming the World" (Yale University Press, 2007). Analysis of China's use of soft power to gain influence in the world's political arena.
* John McCormick "The European Superpower" (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006). Argues that the European Union has used soft power effectively to emerge as an alternative and as a competitor to the heavy reliance of the US on hard power.
* Matthew Fraser, "Weapons of Mass Distraction: Soft Power and American Empire" (St. Martin's Press, 2005). Analysis is focused on the pop culture aspect of soft power, such as movies, television, pop music, Disneyland, and American fast-food brands including Coca-Cola and McDonald's.