- Island restoration
The ecological restoration of islands, or island restoration, is the application of the principles of
ecological restoration toisland s and island groups. Islands, due to their isolation, are home to many of the world's endemic species, as well as important breeding grounds forseabird s and somemarine mammal s. Their ecosystems are also very vulnerable to human disturbance and particularly tointroduced species , due to their small size. Island groups such asNew Zealand andHawaii have undergone substantialextinction s and losses of habitat. Since the 1950s several organisations and government agencies around the world have worked to restore islands to their original states; New Zealand has used them to hold natural populations of species that would otherwise be unable to survive in the wild. The principal components of island restoration are the removal of introduced species and the reintroduction of native species.Islands, endemism and extinction
Isolated islands have always been known to have greater levels of endemism; since the 1970s the theory of
Island biogeography , formulated byRobert MacArthur andE.O. Wilson this is understood to be because isolation limits immigration of new species to the island, allowing new species to evolve. For example, 71% of New Zealand's bird species (prior to human arrival) were endemic. Island species, as well as displaying greater levels of endemism, have characteristics that make them particularly vulnerable to human disturbance.Many island species evolved on small islands, or even restricted habitats on small islands. Small populations are vulnerable to even modest hunting, and restricted habitats are vulnerable to loss or modification. More importantly, island species are often ecologically naive, that is they have not evolved, or have lost appropriate behavioural responses to
predator s. This often resulted in flightlessness, or unusual levels of tameness. This made many species susceptible to hunting (it is thought, for example, thatmoa s were hunted to extinction in a few short generations) and to predation by introduced species. Some, such as theDodo , are thought to have become extinct because of the pressure of both humans and introduced animals. One estimate of birds in thePacific islands puts the extinctions at 2000 species. Between 40 to 50% of the bird species of New Zealand went extinct since 200 AD.Island restoration
The field of island restoration is usually credited with having been started in New Zealand in the 1960s, but other smaller projects, such as the restoration of
Nonsuch Island inBermuda (which began in 1962) have been going on for almost as long. Nevertheless, the program undertaken by the Department of Conservation (DOC) is one of the largest in the world. It began onCuvier Island , where ecologists removed stock,goat s,feral cats and finally, in 1993,Pacific Rat s. The success of the project resulted in similar projects around New Zealand. The advantages to the DOC were considerable; in addition to protecting species endemic to smaller islands, like theMagenta Petrel , islands near the mainland, once restored, could act as habitat for species of birds that were unable to survive on the mainland. Species like theTakahe , where the remaining wild population was at considerable risk from feral cats and dogs, could be moved to these islands to safeguard the species.Eradication of introduced species
One important aspect of island restoration is the removal of
invasive species . Since these species are most often the reason that native fauna and flora is threatened, their removal is essential to the restoration project. Islands are particularly suitable for restoration as once cleared of an introduced species they can be kept cleared of these species by virtue of being an island. Species removal is intensive and expensive, and methods used must be carefully chosen as to not create too much impact on non-target species. Feral cats, goats and three species of rats are among the most damaging species introduced to islands (Moors & Atkinson 1984). The differences in size, lifestyle and behaviour preclude the use of the same techniques for all of them, but with many species a range of techniques needs to be used in order to ensure success. Larger animals, such as goats and pigs, can effectively be hunted; in the case ofRound Island , inMauritius , all the goats were eliminated by a single marksman. On larger islands ecologists use aJudas goat , where a radio collared goat is released into the wild. This goat is then followed and groups it joins are removed. To remove cats a combination of techniques is needed, both hunting, trapping and poisoning. Cats are more difficult to hunt than goats and pigs, requiring the use of experienced hunters and night hunting.Trapping is ineffective for rats, given their sheer numbers, and the only method that works is
poison ing, which can be delivered into the field by broadcasting (by hand or from the air) or by the maintenance of bait stations. This method has been employed around the world, in theFalkland Islands , in the tropical Pacific, and off New Zealand, where over 40 islands have been cleared. This method is not without problems, especially if the rats share the island with other, native species of rodent that might take the bait as well, as has happened onAnacapa Island in the Channel Islands. In the Pacific poison intended for rats was taken by landcrab s instead; the crabs were not affected by the poison but frustrated attempts to clear the rats.The removal of invasive
weed s is, in most cases, more difficult than removing animal species. One such eradication was that ofsandbur , "Cencrus echinatus", an introducedgrass onLaysan . The grass, introduced to Laysan around 1961, had taken over 30% of the island by 1991, displaced the nativebunchgrass , and reduced the breeding habitat of two endemic threatened species, theLaysan Duck andLaysan Finch , as well as those of severalseabird s. The removal took ten years, with controlled spraying for the first year, then individual removal of plants, then, when few plants were being found, sifting of the sands around plants to remove seeds. The cost of the eradication was $150,000/year.Restoration of former habitat
In many cases the removal of introduced species is sufficient to allow a return to a pre-disturbance state, but generally active management, often in the form of replanting native flora and reintroduction of expirated fauna is needed to achieve restoration goals. Planting of native species helps to replenish species that were either grazed or out competed. Species of animal can be translocated either from existing populations, or from captive bred populations. These reintroductions need to be carefully managed, particularly in the case of
endangered species , where the potential benefits need to be weighed against the possibility of failure. Not all translocations succeed, and it may be necessary to help the reintroduced animals along with supplementary feeding or other kinds of management.One other important aspect of restoration is prevention, that is, keeping invasive species from returning to a cleared island. This can be achieved by restricting access to the island in question (reducing possible instances of invasion) to more stringent quarantine methods. For example, in order to prevent invasive weeds from returning to Laysan people working on the island must bring entirely new clothes to the island, which must be frozen prior to arrival.
Opposition to island restoration
Prior to the initial efforts to remove rats from New Zealand's offshore islands there was a great deal of skepticism as to the feasibility of island restoration amongst ecologists and conservation workers. However as the techniques have improved and larger islands have been restored, most of the initial criticisms from within the field have been dropped, in particular as the costs of eradication are often much lower than continuous pest control. Outside of the field of conservation there has been some opposition from other interested groups, particularly from the
animal rights movement, which contends that the welfare of the pests in question is not adequately addressed in island restoration plans. Because a broad spectrum of pest removal techniques needs to be used, including leg traps, animal rights campaigners accuse ecologists of cruelty, and indifference to non-targeted species that also take bait or are trapped, and suggest that more humane methods such as capture and sterilization be used instead (something those working in island restoration contend would be too expensive). Some also defend the rights of the introduced species to exist as well. Others, including scientists affiliated with the animal rights movement, accept that when the choice is between the future of a species and a population of pests, the future of a species must take priority (with the caveat that the extermination is conducted as humanely as possible). Opposition to island restoration has not led to the abandonment of many projects but has delayed several, particularly through court action. Groups sometimes adopt different approaches; opponents ofhedgehog removal in theOuter Hebrides offered bounties for live hedgehogs removed from the islands and relocated in their natural habitat. Invasive plants can also generate strong feelings. The removal of "Eucalyptus " trees from Angel Island inSan Francisco Bay faced considerable opposition.Island restoration projects
Island restoration has been attempted in many countries since the 1960s, and has met with varying degrees of success. The following examples highlight some of the factors that influence projects.
Aleutian Islands
The
Aleutian Islands , prior to the 1700s, lacked any terrestrial predators, but from the mid 1700sArctic Fox es were introduced to act as a source for thefur trade , a practice that continued into the early 20th century. This introduction decimated the birds of the chain, particularlyseabird s like theWhiskered Auklet . The reduction in seabirds, in turn, had effects on theecology of the islands, as many of the plants were dependent on the guano from nesting birds acting as a fertilizer. In the early 1950s managers of the Aleutian Islands Reservation became aware of the damage, and an eradication program began. Since then over 80 islands have been cleared of non-native foxes (only six islands remain) and bird populations have rebounded. Whiskered Auklets, which numbered 25,000 in 1974, had increased to 116,000 in 2003.Campbell Island
Campbell Island is a sub
Antarctic island 700 km south of New Zealand that became infested with rats in the 1800s. Several endemic birds, including theCampbell Island Teal andCampbell Island Snipe , only survived on small rocky islets just off the island, and the populations were perilously low. Several teals were taken into captivity forex-situ conservation , but once they had bred in captivity there was no-where else to return them to until the island was cleared of rats. The DOC's plan to remove rats from the island was one of the most ambitious attempted, as the island was so remote, the rat populations had the highest density of rats anywhere in the world, the weather treacherous and, at 113 km², it was the largest island at that point where eradication had been attempted. The poison had to be dropped in the winter, to minimize disturbance to nesting seabirds and reduce the chance ofbird strike for the pilots. After several experiments, the eradication began in 2001. In 2003 trackers with dogs were unable to find any rats. Soon after the island was cleared it was possible to return the teals to the island. Snipe have self-reintroduced to the island and have begun breeding.References
* Atkinson, I A E, (1988). "Presidential address: Opportunities for Ecological Restoration". New Zealand Journal of Ecology 11: 1-12 [http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/NZJEcol11_1.pdf]
* Flint, E. & Rehkemper, G. (2002) "Control and eradication of the introduced grass, "Cenchrus echinatus", at Laysan Island, Central Pacific Ocean". Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species (proceedings of the international conference on eradication of island invasives) (Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 27. Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M.N., eds) [http://www.issg.org/database/species/reference_files/TURTID/Flint.pdf] .
*Kettmann, M. (April 29 2003 ) "Death for Life on Anacapa island", The Santa Barbara Independent
* Moors, P.J.; Atkinson, I.A.E. (1984). "Predation on seabirds by introduced animals, and factors affecting its severity.". In "Status and Conservation of the World's Seabirds". Cambridge: ICBP. ISBN 0-946888-03-5.
* Nogales, Manuel "et al" (2004). "A review of feral cat eradication on islands". "Conservation Biology". 18 (2), 310-319. [http://www.issg.org/database/species/reference_files/felcat/Nogales%20et%20al.%202004.pdf]
*Williams, J.C., Byrd G.V.& Konyukhov, N.B. (2003) "Whiskered Auklets "Aethia pygmaea", foxes, humans and how to right a wrong." "Marine Ornithology" 31: 175-180 [http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/31_2/31_2_175-180.pdf]
* Wingate, D.B. (1985) "The restoration of Nonsuch Island as a living museum of Bermuda's precolonial terrestrial biome." In "Conservation of Island Birds". ICBP Technical Publication. ISBN 0-946888-04-3External links
* [http://www.islandconservation.org Island Conservation]
* [http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=33748 New Zealand Department of Conservation Ecological Restoration]
* [http://www.hear.org/articles/turningthetide/ IUCN Proceedings of the International Conference on Eradication of Island Invasives]
* [http://www.channelislandsrestoration.com/ Channel Islands Restoration]
* [http://currents.ucsc.edu/04-05/03-28/foxes.asp UC Santa Cruz: Impact of Foxes in Alaska]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4724821.stm BBC News: New Zealand's pest eradication on islands]
* [http://www.snh.org.uk/scottish/wisles/uist.asp UK SNH Uist Wader Project: impact of hedgehogs on wading bird breeding success]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.