Bridgwater and Taunton Canal

The Bridgwater and Taunton Canal is a canal in the south west of England between Bridgwater and Taunton, linking with the River Parrett and the River Tone. It was originally intended that the canal should extend across the south western peninsula of England to Exeter, however with the spread of the railways such plans became uneconomic and the canal was never joined to the main national network of canals.

History

Prior to the building of the canal, navigation between the towns of Bridgwater and Taunton was possible by using the River Parrett and the River Tone. The Tone had been improved by its Conservators, who had obtained acts of Parliament in 1699 and 1707, which had allowed them to straighten and dredge the river and parts of the Parrett, and to build locks and half-locks to manage the water levels. The initial work was completed by 1717, although further improvements including more locks continued to be made until the early 19th century.Tony Haskell, (1994), "By Waterway to Taunton", Somerset Books, ISBN 0-86183-260-4, Chap. 1]

Precursors

From 1768, there were a number of grand schemes proposed, with the aim of linking the Bristol Channel to the English Channel, thereby avoiding the need to navigate by sea around Cornwall and Devon. James Brindley was the first to survey a route, which would have run from the Bristol Channel to Exeter, following the course of the River Tone for part of its route. In 1769, Robert Whitworth looked at a shorter route from Bridgwater Bay to Seaton, following the River Parrett and the River Axe. He was asked to reassess the route in the 1790s. William Jessop surveyed a route between Taunton and Exeter in 1794, while another group proposed a canal linking Bristol, Nailsea, Bridgwater and Taunton, which was surveyed by William White. Jessop's assistant, Josiah Easton, suggested a route from Uphill (on the Bristol Channel) to Seaton, again in 1794, and the previous two schemes sought parliamentary approval in 1795, as the Grand Western Canal and the Bristol and Western Canal, respectively. Only the first was authorised, but the economic downturn caused by the Napoleonic Wars meant that construction did not begin immediately.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 2]

John Rennie surveyed the line for a ship canal from the mouth of the River Parrett to Seaton in 1810, which was designed for ships of 120 tons, but it was felt that the economic situation would not support the projected expenditure of over £1 million. He then considered a more modest proposal, based on the original Bristol and Western plans, and the scheme, now renamed the Bristol and Taunton Canal, was authorised by an act of parliament dated 14 May 1811. The company had powers to raise £420,000 in shares and an additional £150,000 if required, [http://www.jim-shead.com/waterways/sdoc.php?wpage=PNRC0099#PNRC093 Joseph Priestley, (1831), "Historical Account of the Navigable Rivers, Canals, and Railways, of Great Britain"] ] but economic concerns meant that the project did not start immediately. Powers for the Bristol to Bridgwater section lapsed in 1815, but work finally commenced in 1822, to be halted by an injunction because the authorised route was not being followed. A further act, of 17 June 1824, authorised the revised route, and changed the name of the project to the Bridgwater and Taunton Canal Company. The predicted costs for the construction of the shorter canal were £34,145, as opposed to £429,990 for the longer scheme. Three further schemes were proposed before the idea of a Channel-to-Channel link was abandoned. James Green proposed a tub-boat canal in 1822, capable of handling 5-ton boats, which would have used inclines instead of locks, and would have cost £120,000. Thomas Telford revived the idea of a ship canal in 1824, which would have taken over the line of the Bridgwater and Taunton Canal – enabling 200-ton boats to reach the south coast – at a cost of £1.75 million. This was authorised in 1825, but no further action occurred. Finally, a barge canal between Bridgwater and Beer, costing £600,000 was proposed in 1828, but enthusiasm for large canal schemes was waning, and the advent of iron-hulled steamships meant that the risks of navigation around the south-west peninsula were reduced.

Construction

Construction of the canal began in 1822, with James Hollinsworth as the engineer and John Easton as the senior surveyor. The Bristol and Taunton scheme had incorporated a high-level crossing of the River Parrett, but the shortened canal would now join the Parrett at Huntworth, where a basin was to be constructed. This change of route resulted in the Reverend Robert Gray obtaining an injunction, and work on the lower half of the canal stopped until the new route could be properly authorised by the 1824 Act. By this time, the estimated cost had risen to £60,000. Below Durston, the canal cut through clay, but from there to Taunton the bed had to be puddled with clay, as the underlying ground was shale.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 3]

The canal was to be about convert|12|mi|km long. It included a convert|700|yd|m|adj=on embankment which was convert|40|ft|m high at Lyng, two short cuttings, 11 brick-built bridges to carry roads over the canal, and more than 12 timber swing bridges, built to provide accomodation crossings for farms which had been cut in two by the line of the canal. The lock at Firepool (Taunton) had a set of reverse-facing gates, to prevent the canal draining if the level of the River Tone dropped. There were four more locks on the main line, and a lock at the entrance to Huntworth Basin. One final lock connected the basin to the river, and again it had a set of reverse-facing gates, so that the basin could be drained at low tide, and the low level retained for maintenance if required. A system of paddle gearing using metal ball weights at the top and metal cylinder weights at the bottom is unique to the Bridgwater and Taunton Canal. [cite web|url=http://webapp1.somerset.gov.uk/her/details.asp?prn=15949|title=Higer Maunsel Lock No 4 and Higher Maunsel Bridge|work=Somerset Historic Environment Record|publisher=Somerset County Council|accessdate=2008-10-11] Over 50 culverts were built to carry streams and drainage ditches under the canal. The work was completed with no recorded incidents of serious injury or death among the workforce.

By mid-1826, the Canal Company had insufficient funds to complete the work, and a special meeting authorised the taking-out of a mortgage to cover the £15,000 deficit. There was animosity between the Company and the Conservators of the River Tone, with the Company maintaining that they had a right to use the Tone to reach the centre of Taunton, and the Conservators maintaining that they did not. The canal was scheduled to be opened on 1st January 1827, but the opening was delayed until 3rd January, as the connection to the River Tone was not made until 2nd January. The opening celebrations were hampered by snow and bitter cold weather.

Operation

The early years of the new canal were marred by legal disputes with the Conservators of the River Tone. The connection to the Tone at Taunton had been made forcibly, by the Canal Company breaching the bank of the river. In August 1827 they announced that they were taking over the Tone, and evicted William Goodland, the river superintendant, from his cottage. Despite a ruling by the Court of King's Bench that their action was illegal, the Canal Company held on to the river until a High Court judgment in February 1830. The Conservators promptly built a dam, to prevent boats reaching the river and water entering the canal, which they removed after further legal action and an Order of the Chancery Court. Reconciliation finally came in late 1831, when the two parties proposed a new Act of Parliament to authorise the sale of the Tone Navigation to the Canal Company. This was obtained in July 1832, and required the Canal Company to erect a new iron bridge to replace the existing North Town Bridge, which hampered access to the wharfs in Taunton. They also had powers to construct a lock and a short length of canal at French Weir, to connect with the Grand Western Canal, while the Conservators were allowed to conduct an annual inspection of the canal, and to resume their ownership of the river if the canal was not maintained in good order.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 4]

At the Bridgwater end, navigation onto the River Parrett was not easy, and the Corporation of Bridgwater had commissioned a number of surveys to construct a floating harbour. All came to nothing, but in 1836, the Bristol and Exeter Railway Company obtained an act to construct a railway which would pass through Bridgwater, and the Canal Company, in order to protect their trade, sought their own Act to construct a floating harbour to the west of Bridgwater, and to extend the canal to join it. This was obtained on 21 April 1837, and the works were started. The canal work involved a deep cutting from Albert Street to West Street, with a short tunnel at West Street, while the basin covered convert|4|acre and included both a ship lock and a barge lock into the river. The estimated cost of £25,000 escalated to nearly £100,000, most of which was raised by mortgage.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 5]

The new facilities were opened on 25 March 1841, after which the basin and locks at Huntworth were filled in.Charles Hadfield, (1967), "The Canals of South West England", David and Charles, ISBN 0-7153-4176-6] Trade increased from 90,000 tons in 1840, before the harbour opened, to 120,000 tons shortly afterwards. Around 2,400 vessels per year were using the port by 1853. The canal company had hoped that the opening of the Grand Western Canal in 1838 and the Chard Canal in 1842 would increase traffic significantly, but their impact was marginal. Despite commercial success, the interest payments on the mortgage were crippling, and in 1846 the company obtained an act to convert the canal into a railway, although its powers were never used. Trade halved as railway competition increased, and the company was in the hands of Receivers by the early 1850s.

In 1866 the Bristol and Exeter Railway stepped in and bought the canal. [cite web|url=http://webapp1.somerset.gov.uk/her/details.asp?prn=43826|title=Bridgwater and Taunton Canal|work=Somerset Historic Environment Record|publisher=Somerset County Council|accessdate=2008-10-11] The main attraction was the dock, with its large volume of coal traffic, but they purchased both the canal and the dock for £64,000, under the terms of an act of parliament obtained that year. Unlike many such acquisitions, the canal was seen as a useful adjunct to the railway network, and was maintained in good order for several years, with the Conservators of the River Tone continuing their annual imspections, and reporting any defects to the railway company.

Decline

The canal was increasingly affected by water supply problems. The main source of water was the River Tone, although this was not fed into the canal at Firepool, in order to ensure that the mills on the upper section could function. Instead it was pumped out of the river at Creech, by the Charlton Pumping Station, [cite web|url=http://webapp1.somerset.gov.uk/her/details.asp?prn=43831|title=Canal pumping house, SW of Charlton, Durston|work=Somerset Historic Environment Record|publisher=Somerset County Council|accessdate=2008-10-11] where the river and canal were only convert|300|yd|m apart. Large volumes of water were discharged from the canal every fortnight, when the Bridgwater Dock was scoured, in order to free it from silt, while the Railway Company was extracting water to supply the station and steam engine sheds at Taunton. During the summer months there was often not enough water to go round.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 8]

The canal gradually became clogged with weed, and the railway took much of the trade. Between 1870 and 1874, income dropped from £2,500 to £1,700. Three years later, the Bristol and Exeter Railway merged with the Great Western Railway. The new owners were remote, and were more interested in the water supply for Taunton station and for the Bridgwater Dock, with the result that the canal deteriorated further. The Conservators continued their annual inspections, but had little hope of any improvements being made.

The opening by the Great Western Railway of the Severn Tunnel in 1886 brought further decline, for the imports of coal and slate from South Wales to Bridgwater Dock and the canal could now be moved more directly. The provision in 1902 of water troughs on the railway near Creech, to enable non-stop trains to pick up water, required another 100,000 gallons a day, which was extracted from the Tone. The remaining traffic moved to the railway, the last commercial boats used the canal, from Bridgwater dock to a wharf in North Town, Taunton, in 1907, [cite web|url=http://www.somerset-waterways.org/somerset-waterways-water.html|title=Bridgwater & Taunton Canal |work=Somerset Waterways|publisher=Somerset Waterways Development Trust|accessdate=2008-10-11] and the canal was effectively closed.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 9]

Closure

After the First World War the canal remained in a state of limbo, with minimal maintenance by the railway company and was the haunt of fishermen and walkers. The Conservators continued their annual inspections, and the infrastructure remained in remarkably good order, compared to many other closed canals. The section near Creech St Michael was even used for swimming lessons for the local school children in the 1930s. Part of the Taunton Stop Line, a defensive line which followed the course of canals and railway embankements from the mouth of the Parrett to Seaton on the south coast, ran along the canal in Second World War. All permanent bridges were mined with Demolition Chambers. [cite web|url=http://www.pillboxes-somerset.com/other_defences.htm|title=Other Defences|work=Somerset Pillboxes|accessdate=2008-10-11] Hamp Bridge was prepared as a demolition with 4 small charge chambers under the east side of the arch containing a total of 30lbs of Ammonal. [cite web|url=http://webapp1.somerset.gov.uk/her/details.asp?prn=22892|title=Hamp bridge, Bridgwater|work=Somerset Historic Environment Record|publisher=Somerset County Council|accessdate=2008-10-11] Anti tank obstacles were placed at bridge sites or locks to hinder bridging operations. [cite web|url=http://webapp1.somerset.gov.uk/her/details.asp?prn=12596|title=Second World War anti-tank obstacles, Coxhill Bridge, S of North Newton|work=Somerset Historic Environment Record|publisher=Somerset County Council|accessdate=2008-10-11] All of the swing bridges were removed, but were then replaced with fixed timber bridges at towpath level. Only essential maintenance was carried out, to ensure a water supply for fire fighting and to prevent flooding.

Control of the canal passed into public ownership with the 1947 Transport Act. Despite concerted efforts, the Conservators could not make any progress with the removal of the fixed low-level bridges, which prevented maintenance from being carried out. The Inland Waterways Association started to take an active interest in the restoration of the canal from 1952, but this was resisted by the British Transport Commission, who padlocked the lock gates to prevent them being used. Despite this, a team of seven men was employed to maintain the infrastructure through this period.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 10] The maintenance of the channel enabled the canal to become one of the first to be used for the commercial transport of water, which was pumped from the canal to Durleigh Reservoir from 1962 onwards. [ [http://www.somerset4u.com/BridgwaterTaunton/somerset4u_BandT_Roots.htm Peter Hardcastle, "Bridgwater and Taunton Canal - the roots", Somerset4u] ]

The Canal was absorbed by the British Waterways Board in 1962. The Conservators carried out an annual inspection in 1965, the first since 1947, but had to use a motor coach for most of the journey, as the locks were unusable. With the passing of the 1968 Transport Act, the canal was classified as a 'remainder waterway' - little more that a drainage channel. Only essential maintenance to keep it safe was to be carried out. Soon afterwards, part of the cutting wall between West Street and Albert Street collapsed, and although the bed of the canal was cleared to ensure water could reach the dock, the towpath remained blocked for another nine years. Bridgwater Docks, which had been used by a small amount of coastal shipping were finally closed in 1971, the connection at the docks was stopped up, and the British Waterways Board were granted permission to cease maintaining the canal for navigation.

Restoration

From the late 1960s, there was a growing awareness of the benefits of retaining the canal. The Inland Waterways Association produced a report suggesting that there was a future for the canal, and Somerset County Council produced a second report, suggesting that funds should be made available for maintenance and restoration. The 1968 Countryside Act provided a framework for such action, and a visit in 1971 to see the work being done on the Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal as part of the creation of the Brecon Beacons National Park convinced the Council of the wisdom of such a course of action. By 1974, Higher and Lower Maunsell locks, which are listed buildings [cite web|url=http://webapp1.somerset.gov.uk/her/details.asp?prn=15948|title=Lower Maunsell Lock No 3 and Lower Maunsell Bridge|work=Somerset Historic Environment Record|publisher=Somerset County Council|accessdate=2008-10-11] had been refurbished by the British Waterways Board, with funding from the County Council. Funding for towpath maintenance and weed cutting was also provided.Haskell (1994), Ibid., Chap. 11]

In December 1974, the Council bought Bridgwater Dock from British Railways. The concrete wall across the barge lock was removed, but there was no intention to restore the ship lock. By 1980, the Council had invested over £50,000 in the restoration, which included Kings and Standards locks, and the bottom gates of Newtown lock. Some bridges had been raised, but only to convert|4|ft|m, which allowed canoeing, but prevented bigger boats from using the waterway. Work on the deep cutting between West Street and Albert Street started in September 1978, jointly funded by the County Council and Sedgemoor District Council, using direct labour, while a Manpower Services Commission scheme to dredge the canal from the dock to the cutting and to widen the towpath was funded by the District Council in 1981.

The condition of the swing bridge at Bathpool caused a change in policy. There were objections to the plan to replace it with a fixed bridge with limited headroom, and the planning application was deferred. By 1983, a six-year plan to restore the canal was fully costed, which was adopted by the British Waterways Board, the County Council, Sedgemoor District Council and Taunton Deane Borough Council in the following year. The scheme was supported by the West Country Branch of the Inland Waterways Association, who offered the services of the Waterway Recovery Group, to do some of the work. The swing bridges at Crossways, Boat and Anchor, and Fordgate were rebuilt, and by 1987, convert|4.5|mi|km of canal were available for navigation. After some teething problems, it was decided that many of the rest of the accomodation bridges would be raised to give convert|8|ft|m of headroom, rather than rebuilding them as swing bridges. Restoration of the bridges at the Taunton end continued during the early 1990s, and the canal was finally re-opened in 1994. [Jane Cumberlidge, (1998), "Inland Waterways of Great Britain", 7th Ed., Imray Laurie Norie and Wilson, ISBN 0-85288-355-2]

Boating is encouraged, though the lack of a link at Bridgwater to the River Parrett is restrictive. (The lack of a link is due to the Parrett being a salt water river, whereas the Canal is now fresh water; reopening the canal to the Parrett would be detrimental to wildlife.) The canal forms part of the local flood relief system, in winter taking water from the River Tone at Taunton and discharging into the Parrett at a sluice in the western fringe of Bridgwater. Bridgwater docks, in which the tidal basin, locks, quaysides, bridges and fittings are listed buildings, [cite web|url=http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/Default.aspx?id=373956|title=Bridgwater Dock, Tidal Basin, locks, quaysides, bridges and fittings|work=Images of England|publisher=English Heritage|accessdate=2008-10-05] is now a marina, and the old warehouse, built in 1840-1850 [cite web|url=http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/Default.aspx?id=373958|title=Wares Warehouse|work=Images of England|publisher=English Heritage|accessdate=2008-10-05] has been converted into apartments, with new apartment blocks built nearby. The only commercially active industry located at the docks is Bowering's Animal Feed Mill. The tow path forms part of Sustrans' National Cycle Network route NCR 3 connecting Bath and Cornwall, and attracts numerous travellers.

External links

* [http://www.canals.com/Bridgwater_and_Taunton_Canal.htm Bridgwater and Taunton Canal] at canals.com

References

Further reading

* [http://www.canals.com/Bridgwater_and_Taunton_Canal.htm The Bridgwater and Taunton Canal by John Swayne]
* [http://www.dindorp.co.uk/BridgwaterTaunton/somerset4u_BandT_Route.htm Bridgwater and Taunton Canal - The Route]
* [http://www.waterways.org.uk/Waterways/PrincipalNavigations/BridgwaterandTauntonCanal Bridgwater and Taunton Canal from the Inland Waterways Association]
* [http://www.somerset.gov.uk/media/DE6%5CA0/Final_canal_leaflet_4th_Jan_07.pdf Bridgwater and Taunton Canal leaflet from Somerset County Council]