- Erie Gauge War
The Erie Gauge War (sometimes called the Erie Railroad War) was a conflict between the citizens of
Erie, Pennsylvania , and two railroad companies over the standardization of therail gauge between Erie and theNew York border. It started on December 7, 1853, and ended on February 1, 1854.Background
In 1849, the
Erie and North East Railroad started laying track east from Erie to the New York–Pennsylvania border at a gauge of RailGauge|6|lk=on.cite book |last=Wellejus |first=Edward |title=Erie: Chronicle of a Great Lakes City |isbn=0897810074 |publisher=Windsor Publications |location=Woodland Hills, CA |year=1980] At the same time, theFranklin Canal Company was laying track west from Erie to theOhio –Pennsylvania border and theBuffalo and State Line Railroad was laying track from Buffalo to the New York border, both were at a gauge of RailGauge|ohio (Ohio gauge). On November 23, 1852, the first train left Erie heading toAshtabula, Ohio , and on January 19, 1852, the first train from New York state arrived in Erie.cite book |last=Reed |first=John Elmer |title=History of Erie County |publisher=Historical Publishing Company|location=Topeka, KS |year=1925 |oclc=2566729] A passenger traveling from Buffalo to Cleveland would be forced to change trains at the Pennsylvania border because of the different gauges.cite book |last=Rhodes |first=James Ford |authorlink=James Ford Rhodes |title=History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 |year=1900 |publisher=Harper & Brothers |location=New York] Twentymile s (32 km) down the road in Erie, the passenger would again have to change trains. The process of having to constantly change trains would result in lengthy delays, often causing passengers to miss connecting trains and be forced to stay in Erie.The citizens of Erie enjoyed being an "enforced stopping place" as they made big profits from the transferring of freight from one train to another and from passengers′ having to buy food at Erie's restaurants or
street vendor s (leading the conflict to sometimes be referred to as the "Peanut War"cite journal |last=Kent |first=Donald H. |date=October 1948 | journal=Pennsylvania History |title=The Erie War of the Gauges|accessdate=2008-04-24 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |volume=15 |issue=4 |format=PDF |location=Philadelphia |url=http://dpubs.libraries.psu.edu/DPubS?service=Repository&version=1.0&verb=Disseminate&view=body&content-type=pdf_1&handle=psu.ph/1143574160] as Erie's peanut sellers would be the hardest hit by the lack of passengers). The owners of the Buffalo and State Line Railroad were able to acquire two-thirds of the Erie and North East'sstock and on November 16, 1853, made the decision to re-lay the RailGauge|6 track between Erie and the New York border as Ohio gauge but, four months early, to try to prevent the change, Erie'scity council had enacted ordinances barring the railroads from crossing the city's streets. On November 26, 1853, the council was reconvened whenrailroad tie s were found being laid in the preparation for the gauge change. The council passed an ordinance to allow the mayor to call out the city's police to take down any of the railroad bridges that crossed the city's streets "in order to preserve the present railroad gauge".Conflict
On December 7, 1853, after swearing in 150 "special police constables", Mayor Alfred King led the police to the railroad bridge crossing State and French streets and, where engineers had marked the edges of the streets on the bridges, had sections of the bridges cut out. That evening, convert|7|mi|km away in town of Harborcreek, its citizens decided to pass its own ordinances and then preceded to tear up tracks along the highway. Three days later, tracks of the new gauge were completed up to the
city limits and that night the people of Harbor Creek tore out the tracks again, knocked down a bridge, and even ploughed up alevel crossing . Aninjunction was obtained by the railroad from theUnited States Circuit Court in Pittsburgh and aUnited States Marshal was dispatched to Harborcreek. Upon arriving in Harborcreek, the marshal served it to one of the officials of Harborcreek and pointed out theseal of the United States . The official promptly threw it on the ground and stomped it with his heel and declaring the heelmark "the seal of Harborcreek."The most serious incident occurred on December 27, 1853, when a train of railroad officials and workers was stopped outside of Harborcreek by a crowd of people ripping up the tracks. An official shot at one the men in the crowd and the crowd, who believed the man to be dead, but was only knocked unconscious, chased the official back on to his train. After two or three members of the crowd forced their way on to the train, the train reversed and "headed at full speed for the state line". Once across the border, the train stopped, and
stowaway s from Harborcreek were sent back over border into Pennsylvania.Reactions
Pennsylvania Governor William Bigler sympathized with Erie saying:Although the governor and state of Pennsylvania agreed with Erie's objectives, people in other states criticized Pennsylvania for its "selfishness". The
United States Representative from Ohio,Edward Wade , suggested that Pennsylvania's nickname be changed to the "Shylock State" because it "demanded a 'pound of flesh' from all who passed its borders". ["Congressional Globe", House of Representatives, 33rd Congress, 1st Session, [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=033/llcg033.db&recNum=231 230] .]On December 26, 1853,
Horace Greeley , editor of the "New York Tribune ", had to travel through Erie on his way toChicago and had to travel from Harborcreek to Erie in an opensleigh "through a cutting storm of wind, snow, and sleet". Greeley had hoped to be able to give a lecture inAdrian, Michigan , that same day "but that could not now be, for the Kingdom of Erie forbade it".Resolution
In January 1854, with the repeal of the
Missouri Compromise by theKansas-Nebraska Act , the Erie Gauge War stopped attracting attention.On January 28, the
Pennsylvania General Assembly passed legislation maintaining "the break at Erie" and repealing the charter for the Franklin Canal Company. Governor Bigler appointed future governorWilliam F. Packer to state superintendent and personally took control of the Franklin Canal Company on February 1. With Bigler in Erie, the tracks and bridges of the Erie and North East were replaced without any difficulty.See also
*
Break-of-gauge References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.